Explore the vast range of titles available.

Systemic vasculitis is a group of rare diseases that share an essential characteristic: inflammation of blood vessel walls. This injury occurs during the disease course, but specific features vary for each entity. In this paper, we will address relevant aspects of the newest monogenic mutation vasculitis, such as deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA2) and VEXAS syndrome (UBA1), and other relevant vasculitis, such as Cogan syndrome and Susac syndrome that may share some similarities with them.

BackgroundThe immune response and safety using different COVID-19 vaccine platforms in patients with immune mediated rheumatic diseases is still uncertain. The objective of this study is to compare the immunogenicity and safety after two doses of BNT162b2, CoronaVac and ChadOx-1 in SLE patients.MethodsProspective study including SLE patients who received a primary schedule to COVID-19 vaccination between May and August 2021. Immunogenicity, events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization (ESAVI) and disease activity were assessed at baseline and after each vaccine dose.Results121 SLE patients were included in the cohort, 88 in the immunogenicity analysis and 118 in the safety analysis. The groups were homogenous concerning sex, age, and comorbidities. Seropositivity after two doses of vaccines was similar between CoronaVac (68%), ChadOx1 (80,6%) and BNT162b2 (88%) (p=0.231). However, CoronaVac and ChadOx-1 presented lower titers in comparison with BNT162b2. Regarding ESAVI, the most frequent reported following first and second vaccine doses were, respectively: injection site pain (65.2%/41.1%), headache (50.9%/29.9%) and arthralgia (37.5%/22.5%). Fever and myalgia were more related to ChAdOx1 than CoronaVac (23.3 vs. 5.0%; p=0.025). There was no difference in MEX-SLEDAI between vaccine platforms. No serious ESAVI were reported.ConclusionAfter two doses, the three COVID-19 vaccine platforms induced a significant increase in antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2. Patients who received BNT162b2 exhibited a higher serological response compared to the other vaccines. All three vaccine platforms demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious ESAVI or worsening of disease activity.Clinical trial NumberThe study was registered in The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) in 04/14/2021 with code RBR-108fyykd.

Background: To prospectively evaluate the safety and clinical impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Subanalysis of the Brazilian multicenter observational study “Safety, Effectiveness and Duration of Immunity after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (SAFER)”, which included SLE patients vaccinated with CoronaVac, ChAdOx1, or BNT162b2. Patients with HIV infection, pregnant women, or those with immunosuppression not related to SLE were excluded. Safety data related to adverse events and underlying disease activity were assessed. Additionally, COVID-19 cases were monitored throughout the follow-up period. Results: The study included 373 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with a mean age of 36 years, the majority being women (89.8%). The most common adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were injection site reactions and headache, observed both after the first and subsequent doses. The ChAdOx-1 vaccine was associated with a higher frequency of adverse events compared to CoronaVac. At baseline, 38.3% of patients were in remission, 32.8% had low disease activity, and 28.9% had moderate to high activity. Following CoronaVac vaccination, there was an increase in remission rates (from 34.6% to 51.1%) and a significant reduction in moderate to high activity (from 37.6% to 15.0%) after the first dose, with this reduction partially maintained after the second dose. In contrast, patients vaccinated with ChAdOx-1 showed an increase in moderate to high activity (from 14.5% to 38.2% after the first dose), a trend that persisted after the second dose. No statistically significant changes in disease activity were observed among those who received BNT162b2. During follow-up, 44 cases of COVID-19 were reported, all mild, with no deaths or need for intensive care unit admission. Conclusions: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated a favorable safety profile in patients with SLE, with a low frequency of serious adverse events. While analysis of disease activity revealed variations across vaccine platforms, most notably an increased proportion of moderate to high disease activity among those receiving ChAdOx-1 compared with CoronaVac and BNT162b2, the overall occurrence of COVID-19 during follow-up was limited to mild cases, with no severe outcomes. These findings highlight that, despite potential risks of disease exacerbation, the clear protection against severe COVID-19 supports vaccination as a beneficial strategy for this immunocompromised population.

BackgroundPatients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are at increased risk for infections due to both disease-related immune dysregulation and immunosuppressive therapy. Despite the benefits of vaccination, immunization rates in this population remain suboptimal, often due to concerns about safety, efficacy, and their potential for inducing disease flare. Regional-specific guidelines are necessary to address the particular epidemiological issues and aspects of the healthcare systems, especially in countries like Brazil.ObjectiveTo provide updated, evidence-based, and nationally relevant recommendations on vaccination in adult patients with IMRD in Brazil, focusing on immunogenicity, safety and disease activity outcomes.MethodsA multidisciplinary task force from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies addressing eleven clinical questions related to vaccine safety and efficacy in IMRD. Studies were selected using predefined PICO criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using JBI tools, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE approach. Statements were developed and submitted to a Delphi-based voting process; consensus was achieved if ≥80% of the panelists voted “agree” or “strongly agree” for all the statements.ResultsEleven recommendations were developed based on a systematic review of the literature, with meta-analyses conducted when appropriate. Inactivated vaccines demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with low flare rates and no significant increase in disease activity, even under immunosuppression. Live attenuated vaccines, including yellow fever, were considered safe when administered according to timing protocols. Immunogenicity may be reduced in patients receiving methotrexate, mycophenolate, corticosteroids, rituximab, and JAK inhibitors, although this does not appear to compromise clinical protection in most cases. Temporary treatment interruption was associated with improved immunogenicity in selected contexts, but without consistent evidence of clinical benefit and with potential risks related to disease control. Specific guidance was provided for influenza and hepatitis B vaccination, as well as for prioritizing vaccination before initiating immunosuppression whenever feasible. Statements also addressed the approach to revaccination and post-vaccination serologic testing. Despite the overall very low to moderate certainty of evidence, most recommendations reached strong consensus (≥80% agreement). Shared decision-making and individualized strategies were emphasized across all scenarios.ConclusionThese recommendations offer tailored guidance for improving vaccination strategies in IMRD patients in Brazil. Given the heterogeneity of evidence, clinical decisions should be individualized, considering disease activity, treatment regimen, vaccine availability, and patient preferences. Shared decision-making is essential in all scenarios to enhance vaccine uptake and align preventive care with patient-centered management.

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease”, is a Brazilian multicentric prospective observational phase IV study in the real-life. Data were analyzed after 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines: adenoviral vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Astrazeneca), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac Biotech). IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike (IgG-S) receptor-binding domain level were quantified at baseline (T1) and 28 days after the first (T2), 2nd (T3) and 3rd (T4) doses by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant-assay, Abbott-Laboratories). Results: 721 patients with IMID were included in the analysis. The median titers of IgG-S (BAU/mL) increased progressively over the times: at baseline was 6.26 (5.41–7.24), T2: 73.01 (61.53–86.62), T3: 200.0 (174.36–229.41) and T4: 904.92 (800.49–1022.97). The multivariate linear regression showed that greater IgG-S titers were associated with pre-exposure to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and BNT162b2 booster vaccine (p < 0.001). Rituximab and immunosuppressant drugs were independent factors for low titers (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: All platforms were safe and induced an increase in IgG-S antibodies. COVID-19 pre-exposure and BNT162b2 booster regimens were predictors of higher humoral immune responses, which is relevant in immunosuppressed populations. Immunosuppressants (mainly rituximab) predicted the lowest antibodies.

Breakthrough COVID-19 (occurring in fully vaccinated people) has been described. Data on its characteristics among immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) patients are scarce. This study describes breakthrough COVID-19 occurring in IMRD patients participating in the SAFER-study, a Brazilian multicentric cohort evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with autoimmune diseases. A descriptive analysis of the population and a binary logistic regression model were performed to evaluate the predictors of COVID-19-related hospitalization. A p-value < 0.05 was significant. The included 160 patients were predominantly females (83.1%), with a mean (SD) age of 40.23 (13.19) years. The patients received two (19%), three (70%), or four (11%) vaccine doses. The initial two-dose series was mainly with ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) (58%) or BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm-Beijing) (34%). The first booster (n = 150) was with BNT162b2 (BioNtech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer) (63%) or ChAdOx1 (29%). The second booster (n = 112) was with BNT162b2 (40%) or ChAdOx1 (26%). The COVID-19 hospitalization rate was 17.5%. IMRD moderate/high activity (OR: 5.84; CI: 1.9–18.5; p = 0.002) and treatment with corticosteroids (OR: 2.94; CI: 1.02–8.49; p = 0.0043) were associated with higher odds of hospitalization, while increasing the number of vaccine doses was protective (OR: 0.37; CI: 0.15–0.9; p = 0.032). These findings, along with previous reassuring results about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, argue in favor of booster vaccination in IMRD patients.