Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The LINX ® magnetic sphincter augmentation system (MSA) is a surgical technique with short-term evidence demonstrating efficacy in the treatment of medically refractory or chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Currently, the Nissen fundoplication is the gold-standard surgical treatment for GERD. We are the first to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis comparing MSA to the Nissen fundoplication. Methods A comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) using search terms “Gastroesophageal reflux or heartburn” and “LINX or endoluminal or magnetic” and “fundoplication or Nissen” was completed. All randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparison study and case series with greater than 5 patients were included. Five hundred and forty-seven titles were identified through primary search, and 197 titles or abstracts were screened after removing duplicates. Meta-analysis was performed on postoperative quality of life outcomes, procedural efficacy and patient procedural satisfaction. Results Three primary studies identified a total of 688 patients, of whom 273 and 415 underwent Nissen fundoplication and MSA, respectively. MSA was statistically superior to LNF in preserving patient’s ability to belch (95.2 vs 65.9%, p  < 0.00001) and ability to emesis (93.5 vs 49.5%, p  < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between MSA and LNF in gas/bloating (26.7 vs 53.4%, p  = 0.06), postoperative dysphagia (33.9 vs 47.1%, p  = 0.43) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) elimination (81.4 vs 81.5%, p  = 0.68). Conclusion Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to be an effective treatment for GERD with short-term outcomes comparable to the more technically challenging and time-consuming Nissen fundoplication. Long-term comparative outcome data past 1 year are needed in order to further understand the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation.

Purpose We sought to characterize the prevalence and subsequent impact of pre- and post-operative COVID-19 diagnosis on bariatric surgery outcomes. COVID-19 has transformed surgical delivery, yet little is known regarding its implications for bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods The Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was evaluated with three cohorts described: those diagnosed with COVID-19 pre-operatively (PRE), post-operatively (POST), and those without a peri-operative COVID-19 (NO) diagnosis. Pre-operative COVID-19 was defined as COVID-19 within 14 days prior to the primary procedure while post-operative COVID-19 infection was defined as COVID-19 within 30 days after the primary procedure. Results A total of 176,738 patients were identified, of which 174,122 (98.5%) had no perioperative COVID-19, 1364 (0.8%) had pre-operative COVID-19, and 1252 (0.7%) had post-operative COVID-19. Patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-operatively were younger than other groups (43.0 ± 11.6 years NO vs 43.1 ± 11.6 years PRE vs 41.5 ± 10.7 years POST; p  < 0.001). Pre-operative COVID-19 was not associated with serious complications or mortality after adjusting for comorbidities. Post-operative COVID-19, however, was among the greatest independent predictors of serious complications (OR 3.5; 95% CI 2.8–4.2; p  < 0.0001) and mortality (OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.8–14.1; p  = 0.002). Conclusions Pre-operative COVID-19 within 14 days of surgery was not significantly associated with either serious complications or mortality. This work provides evidence that a more liberal strategy which employs early surgery after COVID-19 infection is safe as we aim to reduce the current bariatric surgery case backlog. Graphical Abstract

IntroductionIt is important to appropriately risk stratify bariatric surgery patients, as these patients often have obesity-related comorbidities which can increase postoperative complication risk but also benefit the most from bariatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate the utility of risk stratification using ASA class for bariatric surgery patients and assessed predictive factors of postoperative complications.MethodsThe 2020 MBSAQIP database was analyzed, and an ASA-deemed high-risk cohort (class IV) and normal-risk (ASA class II and III) cohort were compared. Univariate analysis was performed to characterize differences between cohorts and to compare complication rates. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with increased odds of postoperative complications.ResultsWe evaluated 138 612 patients with 5380 (3.9%) considered high-risk and 133 232 (96.1%) normal-risk. High-risk patients were more likely to be older (46.2 ± 12.0vs.43.4 ± 11.9, p < 0.001), male (30.9%vs.18.4%, p < 0.001), have higher BMI (51.4 ± 10.2vs.44.9 ± 7.4, p < 0.001), and have more comorbidities. High-risk patients were more likely to have increased 30-day serious complications (4.5%vs.2.8%, p < 0.001) and death (0.2%vs.0.1%, p = 0.001) but not anastomotic leak (0.2%vs.0.2%, p = 0.983). Multivariate models showed ASA class IV patients were at higher odds for any serious complication by 30 days (aOR 1.36, 95%CI 1.18–1.56, p < 0.001) but not for death (aOR 1.04, 95%CI 0.49–2.21, p = 0.921). The factor independently associated with the highest odds of complication in both models was functional status preoperatively (partially dependent aOR 2.06, 95%CI 1.56–2.72, p < 0.001; fully dependent aOR 3.19, 95%CI 1.10–9.28, p = 0.033 for any serious complication; partially dependent aOR 5.08, 95%CI 2.16–12.00, p < 0.001 for death).ConclusionsWhile elevated ASA class correlates with increased serious complications, pre-operative functional status appears to have a much greater contribution to odds of serious complications and mortality. These findings question the utility of using ASA to risk stratify patients peri-operatively and provides evidence for using a simpler and more practical functional status approach.

There is a strong relationship between obesity and the development of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Respectively, bariatric surgery is often touted as the most effective option for treating obesity and its comorbidities, including OSA. Nevertheless, there remains paucity of data in the literature of the comparison of all the specific types of bariatric surgery themselves. In an effort to answer this question, a systematic review was performed, to determine, of the available bariatric procedures [Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, or biliopancreatic diversion (BPD)], which procedures were the most efficacious in the treatment of OSA. A total of 69 studies with 13,900 patients were included. All the procedures achieved profound effects on OSA, as over 75 % of patients saw at least an improvement in their sleep apnea. BPD was the most successful procedure in improving or resolving OSA, with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding being the least. In conclusion, bariatric surgery is a definitive treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, regardless of the specific type.

Background Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of early postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery are poorly understood. Our study characterizes 30-day follow-up after bariatric surgery prior to COVID-19 (years 2015–2019) and during the pandemic of COVID-19 (year 2020) and evaluates general predictive factors of short-term follow-up. Methods Data was extracted from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry from 2015 to 2020. Cohorts were divided into pre-pandemic and pandemic years and patients with and without 30-day follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify general factors independently predictive of 30-day follow-up. The primary aim was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on short-term 30-day follow-up adherence. A secondary outcome was to characterize general short-term postoperative 30-day follow-up associated with elective bariatric surgery and identify independent predictors of 30-day follow-up among bariatric surgery patients using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 834,646 patients were identified. Follow-up rates significantly increased in the COVID era in 2020 ( p  < 0.0001). Patients who achieved 30-day follow-up were older and had an increased burden of medical comorbidities, including non-insulin and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, as well as increased BMI compared to patients lacking follow-up. The cohort with successful 30-day follow-up was more likely to receive gastric bypass and had increased rates of metabolic comorbidities. After adjusting for comorbidities, the greatest independent predictors of follow-up were the 2020 COVID-19 era year, Asian race, black race, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Conclusions After adjusting for comorbidities, the 2020 COVID-19 era year was one of the greatest predictors of follow-up after bariatric surgery. Postoperative follow-up rates after elective bariatric surgery are excellent at > 95% and increased during the 2020 COVID-19 era year. Several independent predictors of follow-up were identified which may help in development of strategies aimed to mitigate lack of postoperative follow-up. Graphical Abstract

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)-induced glycemic improvement is associated with increases in glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) secreted from ileal L-cells. We analyzed changes in ileal bile acids and ileal microbial composition in diet-induced-obesity rats after RYGB or sham surgery to elucidate the early and late effects on L-cells and glucose homeostasis. In early cohorts, there were no significant changes in L-cell density, GLP-1 or glucose tolerance. In late cohorts, RYGB demonstrated less weight regain, improved glucose tolerance, increased L-cell density, and increased villi height. No difference in the expression of GLP-1 genes was observed. There were lower concentrations of ileal bile acids in the late RYGB cohort. Microbial analysis demonstrated decreased alpha diversity in early RYGB cohorts which normalized in the late group. The early RYGB cohorts had higher abundances of Escherichia–Shigella but lower abundances of Lactobacillus , Adlercreutzia , and Proteus while the late cohorts demonstrated higher abundances of Escherichia–Shigella and lower abundances of Lactobacillus . Shifts in Lactobacillus and Escherichia–Shigella correlated with decreases in multiple conjugated bile acids. In conclusion, RYGB caused a late and substantial increase in L-cell quantity with associated changes in bile acids which correlated to shifts in Escherichia–Shigella and Lactobacillus . This proliferation of L-cells contributed to improved glucose homeostasis.

Obesity is a common disease affecting adults and children. The incidence of obesity in Canada is increasing. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively new and effective procedure for weight loss. Owing to an increase in the number of bariatric surgical procedures, general surgeons should have an understanding of the complications associated with LSG and an approach for dealing with them. Early postoperative complications following LSG that need to be identified urgently include bleeding, staple line leak and development of an abscess. Delayed complications include strictures, nutritional deficiencies and gastresophageal reflux disease. We discuss the principles involved in the management of each complication. L’obésité est une maladie fort répandue, tant chez les adultes que chez les enfants, et son incidence est en hausse au Canada. La gastrectomie longitudinale laparoscopique (GLL) est une intervention relativement nouvelle et efficace pour la perte de poids. Compte tenu de l’augmentation du nombre d’interventions chirurgicales bariatriques, les chirurgiens généralistes doivent se familiariser avec les complications associées à la GLL et avec leur prise en charge. Les complications postopératoires immédiates de la GLL qu’il faut savoir reconnaître sans retard sont l’hémorragie, les fuites le long de la ligne d’agrafes et la formation d’abcès. Parmi les complications plus tardives, mention-nons les sténoses, les carences alimentaires et le reflux gastro-œsophagien. Nous présentons les principes qui sous-tendent la prise en charge de chaque complication.

Obesity is an epidemic that is known to play a role in the development of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Studies have shown that increasing body mass index plays a role in the incompetence of the gastroesophageal junction and that weight loss and lifestyle modifications reduce the symptoms of GERD. As a method of producing effective and sustainable weight loss, bariatric surgery plays a major role in the treatment of obesity. We reviewed the literature on the effects of different types of bariatric surgery on the symptomatic relief of GERD and its complications. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was considered an effective method to alleviate symptoms of GERD, whereas laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy appeared to increase the incidence of the disease. Adjustable gastric banding was seen to initially improve the symptoms of GERD; however, a subset of patients experienced a new onset of GERD symptoms during long-term follow-up. The literature suggests that different surgeries have different impacts on the symptomatology of GERD and that careful assessment may be needed before performing bariatric surgery in patients with GERD.

Within the last decade, several authors have proposed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a potential definitive treatment for morbid obesity. While initially perceived as being a solely restrictive procedure, it is now theorized to have additional hormonal effects (primarily the reduction of circulating levels of plasma ghrelin). However, there is limited supporting evidence for this claim. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature to clarify the effects of LSG on modulation of postoperative ghrelin concentrations. A comprehensive literature search for published or unpublished studies of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and ghrelin written in English prior to February 2013 was performed using Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, and Scopus. Gray literature was also searched through Google. Inclusion criteria for searches were: randomized controlled trials, non-randomized clinical trials, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, or case series. Seven studies were deemed suitable for analysis. The mean patient age was 43 ± 8.8 years and female percentage was 74.4 ± 15.3 %. The mean initial BMI was 46.2 ± 7.8 and mean follow-up time was 9.5 ± 15 months. The mean postoperative BMI was 37.3 ± 5.8 over the same follow-up period. Pooled mean preoperative ghrelin levels were 698.4 ± 312.4 pg/ml and postoperative levels were 414.1 ± 226.3 pg/ml ( P  < 0.0001). Pooled analysis of ghrelin levels at 3, 6, and 12 months showed a significant reduction in circulating levels. Our systematic review shows that LSG has a significant effect on ghrelin levels, leading to considerable reduction in circulation levels following surgery. Further research and standardization is necessary to clearly establish a causative relationship between LSG and reduction of circulating ghrelin levels.

Bariatric surgery has been shown to induce type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission in severely obese patients. After laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), diabetes remission occurs early and independently of weight loss. Previous research has identified preoperative factors for remission, such as duration of diabetes and HbA1c. Understanding factors that predict diabetes remission can help to select patients who will benefit most from bariatric surgery. We retrospectively reviewed all T2DM patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or LRYGB between January 2008 and July 2014. The primary outcome was diabetes remission, defined as the absence of hypoglycemic medications, fasting blood glucose < 7.0 mmol/L and HbA1c < 6.5%. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify predictive factors of diabetes remission. We included 207 patients in this analysis; 84 (40.6%) had LSG and 123 (59.4%) had LRYGB. Half of the patients (49.8%) achieved diabetes remission at 1 year. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that LRYGB had higher odds of diabetes remission than LSG (odds ratio [OR] 6.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.79–15.50, p < 0.001). Shorter duration of diabetes (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–0.99, p = 0.032) and the absence of long-acting insulin (OR 0.0011, 95% CI < 0.000–0.236, p = 0.013) predicted remission. Type of bariatric procedure (LRYGB v. LSG), shorter duration of diabetes and the absence of long-acting insulin were independent predictors of diabetes remission after bariatric surgery. Il a été démontré que la chirurgie bariatrique provoque une rémission du diabète de type 2 chez les patients gravement obèses. Après la dérivation gastrique Roux-en-Y (DGRY) par laparoscopie, la rémission du diabète se produit tôt et indépendamment de la perte de poids. Des recherches antérieures ont identifié des facteurs préopératoires de rémission, notamment la durée du diabète et l'HbA1c. Comprendre les facteurs prédictifs de la rémission du diabète peut aider à sélectionner les patients qui bénéficieront le plus de la chirurgie bariatrique. Nous avons examiné rétrospectivement les dossiers de tous les patients atteints de diabète de type 2 qui ont subi par laparoscopie une gastrectomie en manchon (GM) ou une DGRY entre janvier 2008 et juillet 2014. Le principal résultat a été la rémission du diabète, définie comme l'absence de médicaments hypoglycémiques, la glycémie à jeun < 7,0 mmol/L et l'HbA1c < 6,5 %. Les données ont été soumises à une analyse de régression logistique multiple pour déterminer les facteurs prédictifs de la rémission du diabète. Nous avons inclus 207 patients dans cette analyse; 84 (40,6 %) ont subi une GM et 123 (59,4 %), une DGRY. La moitié des patients (49,8 %) ont obtenu une rémission du diabète à 1 an. L'analyse logistique multiple a montré que la DGRY s'accompagnait de probabilités plus élevées de rémission du diabète que la GM (rapport de cotes [RC] 6,58; intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 %, 2,79–15,50, p < 0,001). La durée plus courte du diabète (RC 0,91; IC de 95 %, 0,83–0,99, p = 0,032) et absence d'insuline à action prolongée (RC 0,0011; IC de 95 % < 0,000–0,236, p = 0,013) étaient prédicteurs de rémission. Le type d'intervention bariatrique (DGRY c. MG), la durée plus courte du diabète et l'absence d'insuline à action prolongée étaient des prédicteurs indépendants de la rémission du diabète après une chirurgie bariatrique.