Explore the vast range of titles available.

Developing drugs that target KRAS , the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer, has not been successful despite much concerted efforts dedicated towards it in the last thirty years. Considering the key role this driver oncogene plays, the pharmacological drugging of KRAS remains a key challenge for cancer research. In this review, we highlight the emerging experimental strategies for blocking KRAS function and signaling and its direct targeting. We also report on the results in this field of research produced by our group.

Heterozygous germline mutations in BRCA2 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Contrary to non-cancerous cells, where BRCA2 deletion causes cell cycle arrest or cell death, tumors carrying BRCA2 inactivation continue to proliferate. Here we set out to investigate adaptation to loss of BRCA2 focusing on genome-wide transcriptome alterations. Human cells in which BRCA2 expression is inhibited for 4 or 28 days are subjected to RNA-seq analyses revealing a biphasic response to BRCA2 abrogation. The early, acute response consists of downregulation of genes involved in cell cycle progression, DNA replication and repair and is associated with cell cycle arrest in G1. Surprisingly, the late, chronic response consists predominantly of upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). Activation of the cGAS-STING-STAT pathway detected in these cells further substantiates the concept that BRCA2 abrogation triggers cell-intrinsic immune signaling. Importantly, we find that treatment with PARP inhibitors stimulates the interferon response in cells and tumors lacking BRCA2. BRCA2 plays important roles in cell physiology by promoting DNA replication and DNA double-strand breaks repair. Here the authors, reveal the impact of BRCA2 depletion on the cell transcriptional program with activation of the innate immune response that is potentiated by PARP inhibitor treatments.

G-quadruplexes (G4s) are guanine-rich non-canonical secondary structures of nucleic acids that were identified in vitro almost half a century ago. Starting from the early 1980s, these structures were also observed in eukaryotic cells, first at the telomeric level and later in regulatory regions of cancer-related genes, in regulatory RNAs and within specific cell compartments such as lysosomes, mitochondria, and ribosomes. Because of the involvement of these structures in a large number of biological processes and in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including cancer, the interest in G4 targeting has exponentially increased in the last few years, and a great number of novel G4 ligands have been developed. Notably, G4 ligands represent a large family of heterogeneous molecules that can exert their functions by recognizing, binding, and stabilizing G4 structures in multiple ways. Regarding anti-cancer activity, the efficacy of G4 ligands was originally attributed to the capability of these molecules to inhibit the activity of telomerase, an enzyme that elongates telomeres and promotes endless replication in cancer cells. Thereafter, novel mechanisms through which G4 ligands exert their antitumoral activities have been defined, including the induction of DNA damage, control of gene expression, and regulation of metabolic pathways, among others. Here, we provided a perspective on the structure and function of G4 ligands with particular emphasis on their potential role as antitumoral agents. In particular, we critically examined the problems associated with the clinical translation of these molecules, trying to highlight the main aspects that should be taken into account during the phases of drug design and development. Indeed, taking advantage of the successes and failures, and the more recent technological progresses in the field, it would be possible to hypothesize the development of these molecules in the future that would represent a valid option for those cancers still missing effective therapies.

Telomeres, the nucleoprotein structures that cap the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, play important and multiple roles in tumorigenesis. Functional telomeres need the establishment of a protective chromatin structure based on the interplay between the specific complex named shelterin and a tight nucleosomal organization. Telomere shortening in duplicating somatic cells leads eventually to the destabilization of the telomere capping structure and to the activation of a DNA damage response (DDR) signaling. The final outcome of this process is cell replicative senescence, which constitute a protective barrier against unlimited proliferation. Cells that can bypass senescence checkpoint continue to divide until a second replicative checkpoint, crisis, characterized by chromosome fusions and rearrangements leading to massive cell death by apoptosis. During crisis telomere dysfunctions can either inhibit cell replication or favor tumorigenesis by the accumulation of chromosomal rearrangements and neoplastic mutations. The acquirement of a telomere maintenance mechanism allows fixing the aberrant phenotype, and gives the neoplastic cell unlimited replicative potential, one of the main hallmarks of cancer. Despite the crucial role that telomeres play in cancer development, little is known about the epigenetic alterations of telomeric chromatin that affect telomere protection and are associated with tumorigenesis. Here we discuss the current knowledge on the role of telomeric chromatin in neoplastic transformation, with a particular focus on H3.3 mutations in alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) cancers and sirtuin deacetylases dysfunctions.

The telomeric repeat‐binding factor 2 (TRF2) is a telomere‐capping protein that plays a key role in the maintenance of telomere structure and function. It is highly expressed in different cancer types, and it contributes to cancer progression. To date, anti‐cancer strategies to target TRF2 remain a challenge. Here, we developed a miRNA‐based approach to reduce TRF2 expression. By performing a high‐throughput luciferase screening of 54 candidate miRNAs, we identified miR‐182‐3p as a specific and efficient post‐transcriptional regulator of TRF2. Ectopic expression of miR‐182‐3p drastically reduced TRF2 protein levels in a panel of telomerase‐ or alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT)‐positive cancer cell lines. Moreover, miR‐182‐3p induced DNA damage at telomeric and pericentromeric sites, eventually leading to strong apoptosis activation. We also observed that treatment with lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containing miR‐182‐3p impaired tumor growth in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) models, including patient‐derived tumor xenografts (PDTXs), without affecting mouse survival or tissue function. Finally, LNPs‐miR‐182‐3p were able to cross the blood–brain barrier and reduce intracranial tumors representing a possible therapeutic option for metastatic brain lesions. Synopsis A miRNA‐based strategy to inhibit the telomeric protein TRF2 was developed, which led to efficient decrease of triple negative breast cancer growth. miR‐182‐3p was identified as an efficient regulator of TRF2 expression in human cancer through high‐throughput miRNA luciferase screening. TRF2 inhibition by miR‐182‐3p induced DNA damage at telomeric and pericentromeric sites and consequent genomic instability. miR‐182‐3p limited the growth of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) models by activating apoptosis. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containing miR‐182‐3p reduced tumor volume in vivo in various TNBC models, including Olaparib‐resistant patient‐derived tumor xenografts. LNPs‐miR‐182‐3p crossed the blood brain barrier, showing therapeutic potential against brain metastasis. Graphical Abstract A miRNA‐based strategy to inhibit the telomeric protein TRF2 was developed, which led to efficient decrease of triple negative breast cancer growth.

Telomeres are specialized nucleoprotein structures responsible for protecting chromosome ends in order to prevent the loss of genomic information. Telomere maintenance is required for achieving immortality by neoplastic cells. While most cancer cells rely on telomerase re-activation for linear chromosome maintenance and sustained proliferation, a significant population of cancers (10–15%) employs telomerase-independent strategies, collectively referred to as Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT). ALT mechanisms involve different types of homology-directed telomere recombination and synthesis. These processes are facilitated by loss of the ATRX or DAXX chromatin-remodeling factors and by abnormalities of the telomere nucleoprotein architecture. Although the functional consequences of telomerase and ALT up-regulation are similar in that they both prevent overall telomere shortening in tumors, these telomere maintenance mechanisms (TMMs) differ in several aspects which may account for their differential prognostic significance and response to therapy in various tumor types. Therefore, reliable methods for detecting telomerase activity and ALT are likely to become an important pre-requisite for the use of treatments targeting one or other of these mechanisms. However, the question whether ALT presence can confer sensitivity to rationally designed anti-cancer therapies is still open. Here we review the latest discoveries in terms of mechanisms of ALT activation and maintenance in human tumors, methods for ALT identification in cell lines and human tissues and biomarkers validation. Then, original results on sensitivity to rational based pre-clinical and clinical anti-tumor drugs in ALT vs hTERT positive cells will be presented.

The cells with compromised BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) function accumulate stalled replication forks, which leads to replication‐associated DNA damage and genomic instability, a signature of BRCA1/2 ‐mutated tumours. Targeted therapies against BRCA1/2 ‐mutated tumours exploit this vulnerability by introducing additional DNA lesions. Because homologous recombination (HR) repair is abrogated in the absence of BRCA1 or BRCA2, these lesions are specifically lethal to tumour cells, but not to the healthy tissue. Ligands that bind and stabilise G‐quadruplexes (G4s) have recently emerged as a class of compounds that selectively eliminate the cells and tumours lacking BRCA1 or BRCA2. Pyridostatin is a small molecule that binds G4s and is specifically toxic to BRCA1/2‐deficient cells in vitro . However, its in vivo potential has not yet been evaluated. Here, we demonstrate that pyridostatin exhibits a high specific activity against BRCA1/2‐deficient tumours, including patient‐derived xenograft tumours that have acquired PARP inhibitor (PARPi) resistance. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that pyridostatin disrupts replication leading to DNA double‐stranded breaks (DSBs) that can be repaired in the absence of BRCA1/2 by canonical non‐homologous end joining (C‐NHEJ). Consistent with this, chemical inhibitors of DNA‐PKcs, a core component of C‐NHEJ kinase activity, act synergistically with pyridostatin in eliminating BRCA1/2‐deficient cells and tumours. Furthermore, we demonstrate that pyridostatin triggers cGAS/STING‐dependent innate immune responses when BRCA1 or BRCA2 is abrogated. Paclitaxel, a drug routinely used in cancer chemotherapy, potentiates the in vivo toxicity of pyridostatin. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyridostatin is a compound suitable for further therapeutic development, alone or in combination with paclitaxel and DNA‐PKcs inhibitors, for the benefit of cancer patients carrying BRCA1/2 mutations. Synopsis DNA replication and repair defects caused by loss of BRCA1/2 can be exploited therapeutically to specifically target tumours carrying mutations in these genes. Pyridostatin and its combinations with NU‐7441 and/or paclitaxel, specifically eliminate BRCA1/2‐deficient tumours in vivo . Pyridostatin, a G‐quadruplex ligand, inflicts DNA damage and exhibits anti‐tumour activity in the absence of BRCA1/2 in vivo , including against patient‐derived PARPi‐resistant tumours. DNA lesions caused by pyridostatin are repaired by C‐NHEJ. Inhibition of C‐NHEJ with the DNA‐PK inhibitor NU‐7441 sustains unrepaired double‐strand breaks in BRCA1/2‐deficient cells, even after pyridostatin removal. Combination of pyridostatin with NU‐7441 and paclitaxel is associated with long‐lasting anti‐tumour efficacy in the absence of BRCA1/2. Pyridostatin and its combinations are well tolerated in vivo and pave the way for novel targeted anti‐tumour and/or maintenance therapies. Graphical Abstract DNA replication and repair defects caused by loss of BRCA1/2 can be exploited therapeutically to specifically target tumours carrying mutations in these genes. Pyridostatin and its combinations with NU‐7441 and/or paclitaxel, specifically eliminate BRCA1/2‐deficient tumours in vivo .

The transcription factor CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) modulates pleiotropic functions mostly related to gene expression regulation. The role of CTCF in large scale genome organization is also well established. A unifying model to explain relationships among many CTCF-mediated activities involves direct or indirect interactions with numerous protein cofactors recruited to specific binding sites. The co-association of CTCF with other architectural proteins such as cohesin, chromodomain helicases, and BRG1, further supports the interplay between master regulators of mammalian genome folding. Here, we report a comprehensive LC-MS/MS mapping of the components of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex co-associated with CTCF including subunits belonging to the core, signature, and ATPase modules. We further show that the localization patterns of representative SWI/SNF members significantly overlap with CTCF sites on transcriptionally active chromatin regions. Moreover, we provide evidence of a direct binding of the BRK-BRG1 domain to the zinc finger motifs 4–8 of CTCF, thus, suggesting that these domains mediate the interaction of CTCF with the SWI/SNF complex. These findings provide an updated view of the cooperative nature between CTCF and the SWI/SNF ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, an important step for understanding how these architectural proteins collaborate to shape the genome.

The activation of endothelin-A receptor (ETAR) by endothelin-1 (ET-1) has a critical role in ovarian tumorigenesis and progression. To define the molecular mechanism in ET-1-induced tumor invasion and metastasis, we focused on β-arrestins as scaffold and signaling proteins of G protein-coupled receptors. Here, we demonstrate that, in ovarian cancer cells, β-arrestin is recruited to ETAR to form two trimeric complexes: one through the interaction with Src leading to epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) transactivation and β-catenin Tyr phosphorylation, and the second through the physical association with axin, contributing to release and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β and β-catenin stabilization. The engagement of β-arrestin in these two signaling complexes concurs to activate β-catenin signaling pathways. We then demonstrate that silencing of both β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2 inhibits ETAR-driven signaling, causing suppression of Src, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), AKT activation, as well as EGFR transactivation and a complete inhibition of ET-1-induced β-catenin/TCF transcriptional activity and cell invasion. ETAR blockade with the specific ETAR antagonist ZD4054 abrogates the engagement of β-arrestin in the interplay between ETAR and the β-catenin pathway in the invasive program. Finally, ETAR is expressed in 85% of human ovarian cancers and is preferentially co-expressed with β-arrestin-1 in the advanced tumors. In a xenograft model of ovarian metastasis, HEY cancer cells expressing β-arrestin-1 mutant metastasize at a reduced rate, highlighting the importance of this molecule in promoting metastases. ZD4054 treatment significantly inhibits metastases, suggesting that specific ETAR antagonists, by disabling multiple signaling activated by ETAR/β-arrestin, may represent new therapeutic opportunities for ovarian cancer.

The Telomere Repeat-Binding factor 2 (TRF2) contributes to cancer progression by both telomere-dependent and independent mechanisms, including immune escape and angiogenesis. Here, we found that TRF2, through its Basic domain, directly interacts with Emerin forming a complex, including Lamin A/C, Lamin B1, SUN1, and SUN2. Importantly, TRF2 association with the inner nuclear membrane is functional to the proper establishment of cell polarity, finally promoting productive 1D and 3D migration in triple negative breast cancer cells (TNBC). In line with this, a spontaneous model of TNBC metastasis, combined with intravital imaging, allowed us to demonstrate that TRF2 promotes cell migration at the primary tumor site and is required for the early steps of the metastatic cascade. In human breast cancers, aberrantly elevated TRF2 expression positively correlates with cancer progression, metastasis, and poor prognosis, identifying TRF2 as a potential target for novel therapeutic strategies against TNBC.