Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction The microsatellite-instable gastric cancer subtype, because of its supposed high antigenic potential, is a promising candidate for immunotherapy. We analyzed if the presence of a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system is associated with other markers of immune response and their relationship with outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients. Methods We analyzed the relationship between clinical outcome and MMR status, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), lymphocytosis, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in metastatic gastric cancer patients treated with a chemotherapy doublet in the first-line setting. Other stratification factors were sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy, metastatic sites, and histotype. Results One hundred three patients were eligible for analysis. Defective MMR was found in 15 patients (14 %), TILs were found in 18 patients (17 %), lymphocytosis was found in 24 patients (23 %), and high NLR was found in 75 patients (72 %). Significant correlations were found between defective MMR and TIL positivity ( p  = 0.0004), between defective MMR and lymphocytosis ( p  = 0.0062), between defective MMR and low NLR ( p  = 0.000069), and between TIL positivity and lymphocytosis ( p  = 0.000147). All factors had a statistically significant impact on overall survival, although on multivariate analysis only defective MMR ( p  = 0.0001) and TIL positivity ( p  = 0.0192) maintained their independent prognostic role. Similar results were observed for progression-free survival, with defective MMR ( p  = 0.0001) and TIL positivity ( p  = 0.0195) maintaining their prognostic role on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Our analysis confirms the favorable prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer patients with a defective MMR system and suggests that expression of TILs might also be linked to better outcome. Because of the correlation between defective MMR status and measures of immune system activity, this group of patients would be the best candidates for novel immunotherapy-based therapies.

Background: Validated predictors of sensitivity or resistance to Bevacizumab (Bev) are not available, and Inflammatory Indexes (IIs) has been reported to be useful prognostic factors in various malignant solid tumours, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Objectives: To explore the prognostic value of IIs in mCRC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus Bev. Design: One hundred and eighty-two patients diagnosed with mCRC and treated with first line chemotherapy plus Bev were considered for this prospective non-pharmacological study. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, aspartate transaminase (AST) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) tests were carried out at baseline and before each treatment cycle, according to clinical practice. Methods: Pre-treatment Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII), Colon Inflammatory Index (CII) and Aspartate aminotransferase-Lymphocyte Ratio Index (ALRI) were evaluated to assess a correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In the overall population, PFS and OS were lower in patients with high SII (HR 1.64, p = 0.006 and HR 1.75, p = 0.004, respectively) and high ALRI (HR 2.13, p = 0.001 and HR 1.76, p = 0.02, respectively), but no difference was detected according to CII value. The multivariate analysis confirmed both SII and ALRI as independent prognostic factors for PFS (HR 1.64 and 2.82, respectively) and OS (HR 1.65 and 2.12, respectively). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate and confirm that IIs, and in particular SII and ALRI, are easy to measure prognostic markers for patient candidates to first line chemotherapy plus Bev for mCRC. Plain language summary Inflammatory Indexes can predict the efficacy of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer Bevacizumab (Bev) is a humanized monoclonal antibody with antiangiogenic activity, used in combination with chemotherapy as a standard first line treatment for many metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Validated predictors of sensitivity or resistance to Bevacizumab are not available, although several studies have investigated this issue in recent years. In this study, we investigated whether some selected baseline inflammatory indexes levels, namely Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII) and Aspartate aminotransferase-Lymphocyte Ratio Index (ALRI) could predict the survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. We enrolled 182 patients diagnosed with mCRC and treated with first line chemotherapy plus Bev. For each patient we tested blood neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, aspartate transaminase (AST) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) before each treatment cycle, according to clinical practice. We calculated the SII value as platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, and ALRI as AST/lymphocyte count. We found that patients with high SII and high ALRI values had lower survival as compared to those with low values. These parameters represent reproducible, inexpensive and easy to measure biomarkers to be used in both clinical practice and clinical trials, for patient selection. Visual Abstract

Background Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains an incurable disease with a poor prognosis. Recently, the global phase 3 SUNLIGHT study demonstrated that adding bevacizumab to trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in refractory disease significantly improves overall survival (OS). As a result, this combination is set to become the new standard of care for refractory mCRC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including Pembrolizumab, have shown excellent results in mCRC patients with mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) mCRC. Additionally, recent trials evaluating both concomitant and sequential chemoimmunotherapy in mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) and microsatellite-stable (MSS) mCRC have yielded promising outcomes. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, though historically limited in effectiveness, show potential when combined with ICIs. Preliminary studies suggest they enhance chemotherapy response while maintaining favorable safety profiles. These evidences support the exploration of immunotherapy and FTD/TPI plus Bevacizumab in pMMR/MSS mCRC patients. Methods This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the clinical and immunological activity of an innovative approach combining induction immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab plus DC vaccine) followed by maintenance chemotherapy (FTD/TPI plus Bevacizumab) in patients with refractory MSS/pMMR mCRC. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and overall survival (OS). Discussion This study explores a novel sequential immunochemotherapy approach combining a DC-based vaccine with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and standard chemotherapy in patients with refractory pMMR/MSS mCRC. By integrating cellular immunotherapy without omitting the current standard of care (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab), the trial aims to enhance treatment efficacy in a setting traditionally resistant to immunological strategies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only ongoing trial investigating this therapeutic combination in this specific patient population. Trial registration This study, acronym CombiCoR-Vax, has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov registry with identifier NCT06522919, on July 9, 2024.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated to dismal prognosis despite the use of palliative chemotherapy, partly due to the lack of knowledge of biological processes underlying disease progression. Exosomes have been identified as biomarkers sources in different cancer types. Aim of the study was to analyse the contents of circulating exosomes in patients with pancreatic cancer who received palliative chemotherapy. Patients were submitted to blood sample collection before chemotherapy (T0) and after 3 months (T3). We quantified by an ELISA-based technique specific proteins of cancer-derived exosomes (CD44,CD44v6,EpCAM,CD9,CD81,Tspan8,Integrin α6,Integrin β4,CD24,CXCR4). We correlated the baseline levels of these factors and changes between T3 and T0 and survival outcomes. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier method. Correlation was assessed by log-rank test and level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. Multivariate analysis was performed by logistic regression analysis. Nineteen patients were enrolled. EpCAM T0 levels and increased EpCAM levels from T0 to T3 were those mostly associated with differences in survival. Patients having higher EpCAM had median progression free survival (PFS) of 3.18vs7.31 months (HR:2.82,95%CI:1.03-7.73,p = 0.01). Overall survival (OS) was shorter for patients having higher EpCAM (5.83vs16.45 months,HR:6.16,95%CI:1.93-19.58,p = 0.0001) and also response rates (RR) were worse (20%vs87%,p = 0.015). EpCAM increase during treatment was associated with better median PFS (2.88vs7.31 months,HR:0.24,95%CI:0.04-1.22,p = 0.003). OS was also better (8.75vs11.04 months, HR:0.77,95%CI:0.21-2.73,p = 0.66) and RR were 60%vs20% (p = 0.28). Among clinical factors that might determine changes on PFS and OS, only ECOG PS was associated to significantly worse PFS and OS (p = 0.0137and<0.001 respectively).Multivariate analysis confirmed EpCAM T0 levels and EpCAM T0/T3 changes as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Pancreatic cancer patients exosomes express EpCAM, whose levels change during treatment. This represents a useful prognostic factor and also suggests that future treatment modalities who target EpCAM should be tested in pancreatic cancer patients selected by exosome EpCAM expression.

Background: Regorafenib is a recognised treatment for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The phase II ReDOS trial indicated that a stepwise dose escalation approach could enhance tolerability and persistence while maintaining efficacy. The ReTrITA study, a significant multicentre real-world cohort in Italy, served as the foundation for this sub-analysis concentrating solely on patients treated with regorafenib. Methods: This retrospective analysis encompassed 713 patients treated at 17 Italian centres from 2012 to 2023. Patients were categorised into two groups: ReDOS-like escalation (n = 313) and fixed dosing (no-ReDOS) (n = 400). The endpoints assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox models, accompanied by exploratory subgroup analyses. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was comparable between the escalation and fixed dosing groups, recorded at 7.4 months and 6.7 months, respectively (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85–1.18, p = 0.93). Progression-free survival (PFS) demonstrated a significant improvement with escalation, recording 3.1 months compared to 3.9 months (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65–0.89, p = 0.0007). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a consistent progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients aged ≥70 years (HR 0.71, p = 0.015), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0–1 (HR 0.76, p = 0.022), RAS wild-type tumours (HR 0.69, p = 0.026), and rectal primaries (HR 0.72, p = 0.043). The disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) were comparable, at 23.2% versus 25.3% and 2.0% compared 2.6%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, the fixed dose group’s duration of response (DoR) was numerically longer (15.4 months) than that of the variable dosing group (8.9 months). A lower percentage of patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events with escalation (35.4% compared to 39.5%, p = 0.0042). Conclusions: This sub-analysis of the ReTrITA cohort demonstrates that regorafenib dose escalation is achievable in real-world settings, resulting in notable improvements in progression-free survival and enhanced tolerability, while not adversely affecting overall survival. These results support and improve the findings of the ReDOS study, showing that dosage escalation is possible and helpful in a diverse, unselected group of people, which is what is performed in routine oncology treatment. The findings are consistent with both randomised and observational studies, endorsing individualised dosing as a practical strategy in refractory mCRC.

Background: Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are approved treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in refractory cases. However, the optimal sequencing of these agents is unknown. The ReTrITA study planned to assess the real-world efficacy of R and T, administered either sequentially or as monotherapy, in a large Italian multicentre population. Methods: This retrospective observational analysis comprised 1156 mCRC patients treated between 2012 and 2023 at 17 Italian cancer centres. Patients were divided into four groups: sequential T/R (n = 261), sequential R/T (n = 155), R monotherapy (n = 313), and T monotherapy (n = 427). The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary goals being disease control rate, objective response rate, and treatment-related toxicity. Results: The monotherapy cohorts showed no significant difference in OS (R: 5.0 months; T: 5.9 months; p = 0.8371) or PFS (R: 3.2 months; T: 3.3 months; p = 0.6531). Compared to T/R, the sequential R/T group had significantly better outcomes: median OS was 16.6 vs. 12.6 months (HR = 0.67; p = 0.0004), and median PFS was 11.5 vs. 8.5 months (HR = 0.60; p < 0.0001). The survival advantage of R/T was consistent across clinical subgroups. The toxicity profiles were comparable with known safety data, with a lower prevalence of neutropenia reported in the R/T sequence. Conclusions: ReTrITA confirms the efficacy of R and T as monotherapies and provides compelling real-world evidence that the R/T sequence improves survival in refractory mCRC. These findings support a regorafenib-first approach in patients who are eligible, and they emphasise the need for future research into combination strategies and comparisons with newer drugs such as fruquintinib.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women (7%) and the sixth in men (5%) in Italy, with a life expectancy of around 5% at 5 years. From 2010, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) developed national guidelines for several cancers. In this report, we report a summary of clinical recommendations of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of PDAC, which may guide physicians in their current practice. A panel of AIOM experts in upper gastrointestinal cancer malignancies discussed the available scientific evidence supporting the clinical recommendations.

Introduction Pancreatic cancer arising in the context of BRCA predisposition may benefit from poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We analyzed real‐world data on the impact of olaparib on survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients harboring germline BRCA mutations in Italy, where olaparib is not reimbursed for this indication. Methods Clinico/pathological data of pancreatic cancer patients with documented BRCA1‐2 germline pathogenic variants who had received first‐line chemotherapy for metastatic disease were collected from 23 Italian oncology departments and the impact of olaparib exposure on overall survival (OS) was analyzed. Results Of 114, 53 BRCA‐mutant pancreatic cancer patients had received olaparib for metastatic disease. OS was significantly longer in patients who were exposed to olaparib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.568, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.351–0.918, log‐rank p = 0.02) in any setting/line of treatment; similar results were obtained for patients who received olaparib as maintenance treatment (in any line of treatment), patients who had stage IV disease at diagnosis, and patients who did not experience progressive disease as their best response to first‐line chemotherapy. Exposure to olaparib in the first‐line maintenance setting after platinum‐based chemotherapy, however, did not significantly impact survival. At multivariate analysis, CA19.9 levels at diagnosis and response to first‐line chemotherapy were independently prognostic; however, when response to chemotherapy was excluded, any exposure to olaparib was a significant independent predictor of longer OS, together with CA19.9 levels. Conclusion The real‐world data presented here support the use of olaparib for metastatic disease in germline BRCA‐mutant pancreatic cancer patients, as it may significantly prolong survival. In a real‐world population of Italian patients with advanced pancreatic cancer carrying germline BRCA pathogenic variants, exposure to olaparib resulted in significantly longer overall survival. However, the prognostic impact of olaparib exposure was not evident in the first‐line maintenance setting, after platinum‐based chemotherapy.

In many tumor types serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels is an indirect marker of tumor hypoxia, neo-angiogenesis and worse prognosis. However data about hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking in the clinical setting of patients undergoing transarterial-chemoembolization (TACE) in whom hypoxia and neo-angiogenesis may represent a molecular key to treatment failure. Aim of our analysis was to evaluate the role of LDH pre-treatment levels in determining clinical outcome for patients with HCC receiving TACE. One hundred and fourteen patients were available for our analysis. For all patients LDH values were collected within one month before the procedure. We divided our patients into two groups, according to LDH serum concentration registered before TACE (first: LDH≤450 U/l 84 patients; second: LDH>450 U/l 30 patients). Patients were classified according to the variation in LDH serum levels pre- and post-treatment (increased: 62 patients vs. decreased 52 patients). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for all clinical characteristics analyzed (gender, median age, performance status ECOG, staging systems). In patients with LDH values below 450 U/l median time to progression (TTP) was 16.3 months, whereas it was of 10.1 months in patients above the cut-off (p = 0.0085). Accordingly median overall survival (OS) was 22.4 months and 11.7 months (p = 0.0049). In patients with decreased LDH values after treatment median TTP was 12.4 months, and median OS was 22.1 months, whereas TTP was 9.1 months and OS was 9.5 in patients with increased LDH levels (TTP: p = 0.0087; OS: p<0.0001). In our experience, LDH seemed able to predict clinical outcome for HCC patients undergoing TACE. Given the correlation between LDH levels and tumor angiogenesis we can speculate that patients with high LDH pretreatment levels may be optimal candidates for clinical trial exploring a multimodality treatment approach with TACE and anti-VEGF inhibitors in order to improve TTP and OS.

LDH may represent an indirect marker of neo-angiogenesis and worse prognosis in many tumour types. We assessed the correlation between LDH and clinical outcome for biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. Overall, 114 advanced BTC patients treated with first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin were included. Patients were divided into two groups (low vs. high LDH), according to pre-treatment LDH values. Patients were also classified according to pre- and post-treatment variation in LDH serum levels (increased vs. decreased). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.0 and 2.6 months respectively in patients with low and high pre-treatment LDH levels (p = 0.0042, HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37–0.87). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 and 5.6 months (low vs. high LDH) (p = 0.324, HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.54–1.24). DCR was 71% vs. 43% (low vs. high LDH) (p = 0.002). In 38 patients with decreased LDH values after treatment, PFS and OS were respectively 6.2 and 12.1 months, whereas in 76 patients with post-treatment increased LDH levels, PFS and OS were respectively 3.0 and 5.1 months (PFS: p = 0.0009; HR = 0.49; 95% IC: 0.33–0.74; OS: p < 0.0001; HR = 0.42; 95% IC: 0.27–0.63). Our data seem to suggest that LDH serum level may predict clinical outcome in BTC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.