Explore the vast range of titles available.

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures is performed using a multi-parametric algorithm. Left atrial (LA) strain was recently found to accurately classify the degree of diastolic dysfunction. We hypothesized that LA strain could be used as a stand-alone marker and sought to identify and test a cutoff, which would accurately detect elevated LV pressures. We studied 76 patients with a spectrum of LV function who underwent same-day echocardiogram and invasive left-heart catheterization. Speckle tracking was used to measure peak LA strain. The protocol involved a retrospective derivation group (N = 26) and an independent prospective validation cohort (N = 50) to derive and then test a peak LA strain cutoff which would identify pre-A-wave LV diastolic pressure > 15 mmHg. The guidelines-based assessment of filling pressures and peak LA strain were compared side-by-side against invasive hemodynamic data. In the derivation cohort, receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed area under curve of 0.76 and a peak LA strain cutoff < 20% was identified as optimal to detect elevated filling pressure. In the validation cohort, peak LA strain demonstrated better agreement with the invasive reference (81%) than the guidelines algorithm (72%). The improvement in classification using LA strain compared to the guidelines was more pronounced in subjects with normal LV function (91% versus 81%). In summary, the use of a peak LA strain to estimate elevated LV filling pressures is more accurate than the current guidelines. Incorporation of LA strain into the non-invasive assessment of LV diastolic function may improve the detection of elevated filling pressures.

The postdischarge rehospitalization and death rates are high in patients with acute heart failure (HF) syndromes despite optimization of standard therapy for chronic HF. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no systematic analysis of the causes of death and rehospitalization in this patient population. This was a prespecified analysis of adjudicated cause-specific all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization in the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study with Tolvaptan (EVEREST) trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients hospitalized with worsening HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% comparing tolvaptan, an oral vasopressin receptor antagonist to placebo, in addition to standard care. Of the 4,133 randomized, there were 5,239 rehospitalizations and 1,080 deaths during a median of 9.9 months. Of all deaths, 41.0% were due to HF, 26.0% due to sudden cardiac death (SCD), 2.6% due to acute myocardial infarction (MI), 2.2% due to stroke, and 13.2% due to non-CV causes. Of all hospitalizations, 39.2% were non-CV, whereas 46.3% were for HF, and a minority of hospitalizations was due to stroke, MI, arrhythmia, or other CV causes. Despite close follow-up and evidence-based therapy within a clinical trial, rehospitalization and death remain high. Although most deaths were from HF, one quarter of patients had SCD. In addition, there were almost as many non-CV hospitalizations as HF hospitalizations. Knowledge of the causes of death and rehospitalization may be essential for proper management and early initiation of therapy.

An 84-year-old man presented with weakness and shortness of breath. Electrocardiographic results aroused concern about an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Imaging of the chest 1 month earlier had revealed a large mass invading the left ventricle.

Istaroxime is a novel intravenous agent with inotropic and lusitropic properties related to inhibition of the Na+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase and stimulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium adenosine triphosphatase activity. We analyzed data from HORIZON-HF, a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the short-term effects of istaroxime in patients hospitalized with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35% to test the hypothesis that istaroxime improves diastolic stiffness in acute heart failure syndrome. One hundred twenty patients were randomized 3:1 (istaroxime/placebo) to a continuous 6-hour infusion of 1 of 3 doses of istaroxime or placebo. All patients underwent pulmonary artery catheterization and comprehensive 2-dimensional/Doppler and tissue Doppler echocardiography at baseline and at the end of the 6-hour infusion. We quantified diastolic stiffness using pressure-volume analysis and tissue Doppler imaging of the lateral mitral annulus (E'). Baseline characteristics were similar among all groups, with mean age 55 +/- 11 years, 88% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 27% +/- 7%, systolic blood pressure (SBP) 116 +/- 13 mm Hg, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 25 +/- 5 mm Hg. Istaroxime administration resulted in an increase in E' velocities, whereas there was a decrease in E' in the placebo group (P = .048 between groups). On pressure-volume analysis, istaroxime decreased end-diastolic elastance (P = .0001). On multivariate analysis, increasing doses of istaroxime increased E' velocity (P = .043) and E-wave deceleration time (P = .001), and decreased E/E' ratio (P = .047), after controlling for age, sex, baseline ejection fraction, change in PCWP, and change in SBP. Istaroxime decreases PCWP, increases SBP, and decreases diastolic stiffness in patients with acute heart failure syndrome.

•Severe AS is characterized by chronic pressure overload and impairment in left ventricular remodeling.•Loop-diuretic therapy prior to TAVI is a marker of higher-risk patients with more medical co-morbidities and echocardiographic evidence of advanced left ventricular remodeling.•Loop-diuretic therapy was associated with a trend towards 1-year mortality on propensity-matched analysis. The use of LDT may signify significant hemodynamic changes and left ventricular remodeling in severe aortic stenosis (AS). Therefore, we sought to determine whether loop diuretic therapy (LDT) is associated with adverse outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe symptomatic AS. Subjects undergoing TAVI at a single institution from June 2008 to December 2017 were analyzed. LDT doses were normalized to oral furosemide daily equivalents. All outcomes were adjudicated using VARC2 criteria. Descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression, and propensity score matching were used. Of the 804 subjects studied, 48.3% were on pre-TAVI LDT with a mean dose of 51.1 mg furosemide dose-equivalents. Subjects on LDT were higher risk, frail patients with more co-morbidities including chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease requiring prior bypass grafting, peripheral arterial disease, atrial fibrillation or flutter, and diabetes with more severe heart failure symptoms. Those on LDT also had worse left ventricular systolic function, lower transvalvular gradients, and markers of adverse left ventricular remodeling, including increased left ventricular mass index and higher rates of concentric and eccentric hypertrophy. On propensity-score matching, death within one year post-TAVI was borderline significantly higher in the pre-LDT as compared with no-LDT group (16.9% vs 10.4 %, p = 0.068). In conclusion, use of pre-TAVI LDT for severe symptomatic AS is associated with a trend towards worse 1-year mortality and is a marker of high-risk, frail individuals with advanced left ventricular remodeling.

Aims The TOPCAT trial showed no benefit for spironolactone in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Post‐hoc, spironolactone helped participants from the Americas, but not Eastern Europe. Determining which patients with HFpEF could respond like TOPCAT's responders should help guide their care. We aimed to develop a TOPCAT Trial Score (TS) as a composite metric to identify such patients. Methods and results From the TOPCAT individual‐level data, we calculated a TS of age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, creatinine, potassium, glucose, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left atrial volume for each participant as a weighted distance in multidimensional space from the theoretical perfectly average Americas participant. Logistic regression was used to measure TS and spironolactone as predictors of TOPCAT's primary outcome. The relationship between TS and the H2FPEF score was also determined in TOPCAT and a registry cohort of real‐world patients in the U.S. with HFpEF. A bimodal distribution of TS separated American (n = 1766) and Eastern European (n = 1,677) participants. Those with lower TS showed no significant response to spironolactone. Spironolactone's benefit rose with rising TS [βinteraction = ‐0.28 (P < 0.01)]. Significantly more American participants had benefit from spironolactone based on higher TS (> 1.14), in addition to higher likelihood of HFpEF based on higher H2FPEF scores (≥3). The cohort of real‐world patients with HFpEF had even higher TS than American TOPCAT participants. Conclusions Patients with HFpEF can be quantified by the TS to capture the likelihood of benefit from spironolactone.

Transradial (TR) cardiac catheterization is effective and offers lower rates of vascular complications and bleeding compared with transfemoral cardiac catheterization. We sought to describe the safety and feasibility of TR cardiac catheterization in liver transplant candidates (LTCs). We retrospectively reviewed 1,071 consecutive cases of TR cardiac catheterization in 1,045 patients from May 2008 to December 2011 at a single institution. The primary end point was radial approach failure. Ten percent of TR cases (n = 107) were performed in LTCs and 90% (n = 964) were performed in non-LTCs. The LTC group had lower rates of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular risk factors. The LTC group had a significantly lower platelet count (75,000 vs 237,000/mm3, p <0.01), higher international normalized ratio (1.7 vs 1.1, p <0.01), and lower mean arterial pressure (78 vs 89 mm Hg, p <0.01). The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 21 in LTCs. Percutaneous coronary interventions were performed in 4% of LTCs and 15% of non-LTCs (p <0.01). The radial approach failure rate was 10% in LTCs and 7% in non-LTCs (p = 0.15). In conclusion, radial approach failure was similar between the LTC and non-LTC groups. Despite significant differences in platelet count and international normalized ratio, there was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the groups, suggesting that TR cardiac catheterization is safe and effective in LTCs.

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of inhospital and post-discharge worsening renal function (WRF) on prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Severe chronic kidney disease and inhospital WRF are both associated with poor outcomes after TAVR. There are no data available on post-discharge WRF and outcomes. This was a single-center study evaluating all TAVR from June 1, 2008, to June 31, 2014. WRF was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dl. Inhospital WRF was measured from day 0 until discharge or day 7 if the hospitalization was >7 days. Post-discharge WRF was measured at 30 days after discharge. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were used. In a series of 208 patients who underwent TAVR, 204 with complete renal function data were used in the inhospital analysis and 168 who returned for the 30-day follow-up were used in the post-discharge analysis. Inhospital WRF was seen in 28%, whereas post-discharge WRF in 12%. Inhospital and post-discharge WRF were associated with lower rates of survival; however, after multivariate analysis, only post-discharge WRF remained a predictor of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.18, p = 0.030 for every 1 mg/dl increase in serum creatinine). In conclusion, the rate of inhospital WRF is higher than the rate of post-discharge WRF after TAVR, and post-discharge WRF is more predictive of mortality than inhospital WRF.

Acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) are associated with the rapid onset of heart failure (HF) signs and symptoms. Hospitalizations for AHFS continue to rise and are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Several pharmacological agents are currently approved for the treatment of AHFS, but their use is associated with an increase in short-term mortality. There is a need for new agents that can be given in the acute setting with increased efficacy and safety. Istaroxime is a unique agent with both inotropic and lusitropic properties which is currently being studied for the treatment of AHFS. Istaroxime inhibits the sodium–potassium adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) and stimulates the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase isoform 2 (SERCA-2) thereby improving contractility and diastolic relaxation. Early data from human studies reveal that istaroxime decreases pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and possibly improves diastolic function without causing a significant change in heart rate (HR), blood pressure, ischemic or arrhythmic events. Most commonly reported side effects were related to gastrointestinal intolerance and were dose related. In conclusion, istaroxime is a novel agent being investigated for the treatment of AHFS whose mechanism of action and cellular targets make it a promising therapy. Further studies with longer infusion times in patients with hypotension are required to confirm its efficacy and safety.

Heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with increased readmission rates. This study evaluated the effects of eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocking agent, on the duration of subsequent hospitalizations for HF in the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS). The EPHESUS study included 6,632 patients post-AMI with LVEF ≤40% and clinical HF or diabetes, receiving standard therapy, randomized to either eplerenone 25 mg, titrated to 50 mg daily, or placebo, with a mean follow-up of 16 months. Analyses of the length of stay and total number of days of HF hospitalizations per patient were conducted on a subgroup of 828 patients with subsequent HF hospitalizations, overall and across 5 distinct geographic regions. Eplerenone was associated with a 1.6-day reduction in the mean length of HF hospitalization (9.2 vs 10.8 days with placebo; P = .019) and 3.6-day reduction in the total days spent in the hospital for HF (13.3 vs 16.9 days with placebo; P = .0006). These benefits were observed in all geographic regions. In patients post-AMI with reduced LVEF and HF or diabetes, eplerenone added to standard therapy reduced the mean length and total days of HF hospitalizations compared to placebo in all regions. Given the high cost of hospital care for HF, these findings may translate into an economic benefit to health care worldwide.