Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
237
result(s) for
"Blommaert, Jan"
Sort by:
The sociolinguistics of globalization
by
Blommaert, Jan
in
Language and languages Globalization.
,
Languages in contact.
,
Linguistic change.
2010
\"Human language has changed in the age of globalization: no longer tied to stable and resident communities, it moves across the globe, and it changes in the process. The world has become a complex 'web' of villages, towns, neighbourhoods and settlements connected by material and symbolic ties in often unpredictable ways. This phenomenon requires us to revise our understanding of linguistic communication. In The Sociolinguistics of Globalization Jan Blommaert constructs a theory of changing language in a changing society, reconsidering locality, repertoires, competence, history and sociolinguistic inequality\"--Provided by publisher.
Commentary: Mobility, contexts, and the chronotope
2017
Mobility raises specific issues with regard to what we understand by ‘context’, and in this commentary I suggest that Bakhtin's concept of chronotope could be a useful instrument enabling a precise and detailed, mobile, unit of ‘context’. This unit connects specific time-space arrangements with ideological and moral orders, projecting possible and preferred identities. The articles in this issue offer rich material in this direction.
Journal Article
Chronotopes, Scales, and Complexity in the Study of Language in Society
2015
Recent developments in the study of language in society have moved the field increasingly away from linear models toward complex models. The complexity of timespace as an aspect of what is called context is of key importance in this development, and this article engages with two possibly useful concepts in view of this: chronotope and scale. Chronotope can be seen as invokable chunks of history that organize the indexical order of discourse; scale, in turn, can be seen as the scope of communicability of such invocations. Thus, whenever we see chronotopes, we see them mediated by scales. The cultural stuff of chronotopes is conditioned by the sociolinguistic conditions of scale. This nuanced approach to timescale contextualization offers new directions for complexity-oriented research in our fields.
Journal Article
Durkheim and the Internet : sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination
Sociolinguistic evidence is an undervalued resource for social theory, and in this book, Jan Blommaert uses contemporary sociolinguistic insights to develop another sociological imagination. Taking Durkheim as the point of departure, he first demonstrates how the facts of language and social interaction can be used as conclusive refutations of individualistic theories of society such as 'Rational Choice'. Next, he engages with theorizing the post-Durkheimian social world in which we currently live. This new social world operates 'offline' as well as 'online' and is characterized by 'vernacular globalization'. These fundamental changes, announced by theorists such as Castells and Appadurai, require a new set of theoretical and conceptual tools capable of capturing the complexity and dynamics of contemporary societies. Blommaert proposes new theories of social norms, social action, identity, social groups, integration, social structure and power, all of them animated by a deep understanding of language and social interaction. - website publisher.
POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN POST-DIGITAL SOCIETIES
2020
ABSTRACT In his contribution to the Special Issue “Digital and semiotic mechanisms of contemporary populisms”, Jan Blommaert offers a communicability model which accounts for political discourse (and others) in the post-digital era we live. He starts by arguing that the idea of the public (a homogeneous entity) that was very popular in the 20th century sociological imagination of how propaganda worked in “manufacturing consent” can no longer be used to explain the fragmented audiences of our post-digital era. The author illuminates his argument by resorting to the circulation of political tweets/retweets as texts in our algorithmic-oriented world. Such a circulation aims at niched audiences. In the last section, the author argues that discourse analysts need to operate from this communicability model if they are to understand the cruciality of political discourse in our contemporary social lives. RESUMO Em sua contribuição ao dossiê “Mecanismos digitais e semióticos dos populismos contemporâneos”, Jan Blommaert oferece um modelo de comunicabilidade que aborda discursos políticos (e outros) na era pós-digital em que vivemos. Ele começa argumentando que a ideia do público (uma entidade homogênea) - muito popular na imaginação sociológica do século XX - como base para explicar como a propaganda “produzia consenso” não pode mais ser usada para explicar as audiências fragmentadas de nossa era pós-digital. O autor ilumina seu argumento ao se debruçar na circulação de tweets/retweets políticos como textos em nosso mundo orientado algoritmicamente. Tal circulação se direciona a audiências de nicho. Na última seção, o autor argumenta que analistas do discurso precisam operar com tal modelo de comunicabilidade se quiserem compreender o quão crucial o discurso político é em nossas vidas sociais contemporâneas.
Journal Article
Language, Asylum, and the National Order
2009
This paper discusses modernist reactions to postmodern realities. Asylum seekers in Western Europe—people typically inserted into postmodern processes of globalization—are routinely subjected to identification analyses that emphasize the national order. The paper documents the case of a Rwandan refugee in the United Kingdom whose nationality was disputed by the Home Office because of his “abnormal” linguistic repertoire. An analysis of that repertoire, however, supports the applicant's credibility. The theoretical problematic opposes two versions of sociolinguistics: a sociolinguistics of languages, used by the Home Office, and a sociolinguistics of speech and repertoires, used in this paper. The realities of modern reactions to postmodern phenomena must be taken into account as part of the postmodern phenomenology of language in society.
Journal Article
Language Ideological Debates
by
Jan Blommaert
in
Language
,
LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES
,
LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
2010
No detailed description available for \"Language Ideological Debates\".