Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
3 result(s) for "Blyden, Susan"
Sort by:
Culturally Tailored Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Programs in Black African and Caribbean Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (HEAL-D): Protocol for a Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
People of Black African and Black Caribbean ethnicity experience higher rates and poorer outcomes of type 2 diabetes (T2D) than people of White European ethnicity; these inequalities are compounded by poor healthcare access. Cultural tailoring of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) programs has the potential to improve healthcare engagement and clinical outcomes for ethnic minority groups. Healthy Eating & Active Lifestyles for Diabetes (HEAL-D) is a co-designed, culturally tailored group-based DSMES program for adults of Black African and Black Caribbean ethnicity. This trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of the HEAL-D intervention, compared to standard DSMES programs, in Black African and Black Caribbean adults living with T2D. A 24-month, multicenter, pragmatic, open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group, individually randomized group treatment trial will be conducted, with primary end point (glycated hemoglobin [HbA ]) assessment at 12 months. Black African and Black Caribbean adults with T2D (n=300), recruited from 3 to 5 centers in the United Kingdom (including London, West Midlands, and Greater Manchester), will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to HEAL-D (intervention) or a standard DSMES program (control). HbA , blood lipids, anthropometric outcomes, blood pressure, physical activity, and patient-reported outcome measures relating to psychological well-being and self-management support, lifestyle behaviors, and health economics will be collected at baseline and follow-up visits (6, 12, and 24 months). Cost-effectiveness will be assessed through a cost-utility analysis conducted from a health and social care perspective. A mixed methods process evaluation will provide a formative evaluation of delivery, intervention fidelity, and implementation of HEAL-D, and an embedded study within a project will assess the impact of multiple long-term conditions on uptake of, and engagement with HEAL-D, and the impact of HEAL-D on multiple long-term conditions. The trial received Research Authority and Research Ethics Council approval on April 22, 2024. Funding began in August 2023. Site \"green light\" was received on August 15, 2024, for London; November 29, 2024, for Manchester; and January 31, 2025, for the West Midlands. Recruitment commenced in August 2024 and is due to run for 11 months. As of March 26, 2025, a total of 76 participants have consented. Last patient, last visit is expected in June 2027; primary data analysis is expected to begin in July 2027. Final results are anticipated to be available in September 2027, and publication is expected by the end of 2027. The HEAL-D trial will address whether a culturally tailored DSMES program, provided in-person or via videoconferencing, is clinically and cost-effective compared to standard DSMES at improving diabetes management in Black African and Black Caribbean adults. If effective, this would provide an evidence-based model of equitable DSMES services and improve the implementation of healthcare programs for ethnic minority groups. ISRCTN 1434448; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14344948. DERR1-10.2196/71861.
Validity Theory (Vt) and Modern Test Theory (Mtt) in Assessment Measurement and Design
Background: Healthcare education use assessment results (test scores) to make inferences about students' knowledge and ability. The NMP curriculum, therefore, assumes a standard of proficiency achievement in successive student cohorts. Therefore, these assessments are high-stakes and must be valid as they may have implications for patients' safety. Aims: This study aimed to apply Kane's (2006) validity theory to evidence whether the assessments capture the proficiency it purports to assess and modern test theory to measure the appropriateness of the score interpretation. Method: Theory-Driven Thematic Analysis (TDTA) was used to code and content analyse the reflections; Ryle (1949), Mezirow (1981), Benner (2001) and Bloom's (1956) theories instructed the content validity, quality and evidenced mastery of the NMP subject and theory domains. The Structured Clinical Examination (SCE) criterion was analysed using the Rasch one-parameter logistic model (1-PL) to measure relationships between the test item criteria, the student ability and test-items parameters capacity to discriminate among students with varying ability. Results: Representation of Ryle's, Mezirow's, Benner's, and Bloom's theories in the reflections were at the lower levels of achievement. The SCEs, criterion analyses showed the test item favoured students with limited ability, indicating an easy test; overall, suggesting the assessments' validity is compromised. Conclusion: Applying validity and measurement theory to assessed work could elucidate the meaning of assessment scores and ensure that assessments are appropriate to the examinees' level of ability.
Virus genomes reveal the factors that spread and sustained the West African Ebola epidemic
The 2013-2016 epidemic of Ebola virus disease in West Africa was of unprecedented magnitude, duration and impact. Extensive collaborative sequencing projects have produced a large collection of over 1600 Ebola virus genomes, representing over 5% of known cases, unmatched for any single human epidemic. In this comprehensive analysis of this entire dataset, we reconstruct in detail the history of migration, proliferation and decline of Ebola virus throughout the region. We test the association of geography, climate, administrative boundaries, demography and culture with viral movement among 56 administrative regions. Our results show that during the outbreak viral lineages moved according to a classic 'gravity' model, with more intense migration between larger and more proximate population centers. Notably, we find that despite a strong attenuation of international dispersal after border closures, localized cross-border transmission beforehand had already set the seeds for an international epidemic, rendering these measures relatively ineffective in curbing the epidemic. We use this empirical evidence to address why the epidemic did not spread into neighboring countries, showing that although these regions were susceptible to developing significant outbreaks, they were also at lower risk of viral introductions. Finally, viral genome sequence data uniquely reveals this large epidemic to be a heterogeneous and spatially dissociated collection of transmission clusters of varying size, duration and connectivity. These insights will help inform approaches to intervention in such epidemics in the future.