Explore the vast range of titles available.

In patients with acute ischemic stroke, endovascular therapy (intraarterial t-PA, mechanical clot disruption or retrieval, or a combination of these) did not achieve superior clinical outcomes as compared with intravenous t-PA. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but more than half the treated patients do not recover completely or die. 1 Alternative treatments, such as endovascular treatment, have been used for many years. As compared with endovascular treatment, intravenous thrombolysis is associated with a lower probability of recanalization 2 – 9 (46% of cases with intravenous t-PA vs. >80% with endovascular treatment 10 – 15 ). Nevertheless, the two approaches have not been directly compared, recanalization is not invariably associated with a favorable clinical outcome, 16 and it is not known whether clinical outcomes are superior with endovascular therapy . . .

PurposeThe Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a routine first-line treatment option for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Pipeline Shield) is an updated version of the PED which has been modified to include a surface phosphorylcholine biocompatible polymer. Its early technical success and safety have been reported previously. Here, we assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Shield for the treatment of IAs.Materials and methodsThe Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (PFLEX) study was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study for the treatment of unruptured IAs using the Pipeline Shield. The primary endpoint was a major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurologic death at 1-year post-procedure. Angiographic outcomes were also assessed by an independent radiology laboratory at 6 months and 1 year.ResultsFifty patients (mean age, 53 years; 82% female) with 50 unruptured IAs were treated. Mean aneurysm diameter was 8.82±6.15 mm. Of the target aneurysms, 38/50 (76%) were small (<10 mm), 11/50 (22%) were large (≥10 and<25 mm), and 1/50 (2%) was giant (≥25 mm). Forty-seven (94%) were located in the internal carotid artery and three (6%) in the vertebral artery. At 1-year post-procedure, no major strokes or neurologic deaths were reported, and complete occlusion was achieved in 27/33 (81.8%). There were no instances of aneurysm recurrence or retreatment.ConclusionsOur 1-year follow-up concerning angiographic and safety outcomes corroborate previous evidence that the Pipeline Shield is a safe and effective treatment for IAs.Trial registration number NCT02390037

This Polish multicenter study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Flow Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) in treating selected unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The FRED Poland Study was an observational, multicenter, prospective study conducted in 8 Polish investigational sites. Imaging results were independently assessed by a Corelab and adverse events were adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee (CEC). Clinical results up to 24 months and anatomical results at 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment were reported. A total of 86 patients with 89 target aneurysms were enrolled between January 2016 and September 2017. Most aneurysms were located on the anterior circulation (93.2%, 83/89 aneurysms) with the majority (64.0%, 57/89) being small (< 10 mm) in size. Treatment was successfully performed in 86 out of 89 cases (96.6%). The permanent neurological morbidity rate was 3.6%, and the neurological mortality rate was 2.4%. Imaging follow-up at 6 months showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm in 64.9% of cases, increasing to 79.5% at 12 months and 85.5% at 24 months. This study offers a comprehensive overview of the flow diversion treatment approach, demonstrating that the FRED device is effective and safe for use in intracranial aneurysm treatment. These results align with existing literature, reaffirming the device reliability and suitability for clinical use.

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a multisystemic vascular dysplasia inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. Approximately 10 % of patients have cerebral vascular malformations, a proportion being cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and fistulae that may lead to potentially devastating consequences in case of rupture. On the other hand, detection and treatment related-risks are not negligible, and immediate. While successful treatment can be undertaken in individual cases, current data do not support the treatment of unruptured AVMs, which also present a low risk of bleeding in HHT patients. Screening for these AVMs is therefore controversial. Structured discussions, distinctions of different cerebrovascular abnormalities commonly grouped into an “AVM” bracket, and clear guidance by neurosurgical and neurointerventional radiology colleagues enabled the European Reference Network for Rare Vascular Disorders (VASCERN-HHT) to develop the following agreed Position Statement on cerebral screening: 1) First, we emphasise that neurological symptoms suggestive of cerebral AVMs in HHT patients should be investigated as in general neurological and emergency care practice. Similarly, if an AVM is found accidentally, management approaches should rely on expert discussions on a case-by-case basis and individual risk-benefit evaluation of all therapeutic possibilities for a specific lesion. 2) The current evidence base does not favour the treatment of unruptured cerebral AVMs, and therefore cannot be used to support widespread screening of asymptomatic HHT patients. 3) Individual situations encompass a wide range of personal, cultural and clinical states. In order to enable informed patient choice, and avoid conflicting advice, particularly arising from non-neurovascular interpretations of the evidence base, we suggest that all HHT patients should have the opportunity to discuss knowingly brain screening issues with their healthcare provider. 4) Any screening discussions in asymptomatic individuals should be preceded by informed pre-test review of the latest evidence regarding preventative and therapeutic efficacies of any interventions. The possibility of harm due to detection of, or intervention on, a vascular malformation that would not have necessarily caused any consequence in later life should be stated explicitly. We consider this nuanced Position Statement provides a helpful, evidence-based framework for informed discussions between healthcare providers and patients in an emotionally charged area.

Background and purposeThe Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has become a routine first-line option for treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We assessed the early safety and technical success of a new version of PED, Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Pipeline Shield), which has the same design and configuration but has been modified to include a surface synthetic biocompatible polymer.Materials and methodsThe Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (PFLEX) study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study for the treatment of unruptured IAs using Pipeline Shield. The primary study endpoints included the occurrence of major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurologic death at 1 year post-procedure. Secondary endpoints included the rate of Pipeline Shield-related or procedure-related serious or non-serious adverse events. Analyses were conducted to evaluate early safety findings in the 30-day post-procedure period as well as technical procedural success outcomes.ResultsFifty patients with 50 unruptured target IAs were enrolled. Mean aneurysm diameter was 8.82±6.15 mm. Thirty-eight aneurysms (76%) were small (<10 mm). Device deployment was technically successful with 98% of devices. Complete wall apposition was achieved immediately post-procedure in 48 cases (96%). No major strokes or neurologic deaths were reported in the 30-day post-procedure period.ConclusionsThe results of this first experience with the new Pipeline Flex corroborate the early safety of the device. Mid-term and long-term follow-up examinations will provide data on safety outcomes at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up periods.Clinical trial registrationNCT02390037.

Background: In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and the safety of flow diverter devices (FDD) in anterior communicating artery (ACoA) region aneurysms, focusing on anatomical factors that could affect the outcome, such as the location of the aneurysm along the ACoA (centered on ACoA or decentered on the A1–A2 junction) and the anatomy of the ACoA region. Methods: Clinical, procedural and follow-up data were analyzed. Aneurysms were classified according to the location along the ACoA (centered or decentered on the A1–A2 junction) and on the basis of the anatomical configuration of the ACoA region. Safety was assessed by recording intraprocedural, periprocedural and delayed complications to determine the morbidity and mortality rates. The functional outcome was evaluated with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) prior to and after the endovascular procedure. To assess the efficacy, midterm and long-term clinical, angiographic and cross-sectional imaging follow-ups were recorded. Subgroup analysis according to the different ACoA regional anatomical configurations and the ACoA aneurysm locations were performed. Results: 33 patients (17 males; 16 females) with ACoA region aneurysms were treated with FDDs. 27 aneurysms were located at the A1–A2 junction (82%) while the remaining six aneurysms were centered on the ACoA. No mortality was recorded. The overall morbidity rate was 6% (2/33 procedures). Major complications occurred in 33% (2/6) of ACoA aneurysms and in the 0% of A1–A2 junction aneurysms. Mid-term and long-term neuroimaging follow-ups showed the occlusion of the aneurysm in 28/33 cases (85%). Complete occlusion rates were 93% in the A1–A2 junction aneurysms and 50% in ACoA aneurysms. Conclusions: The FDD is a safe and effective tool that can be used in the treatment of selected cases of ACoA region aneurysms. The location of the aneurysm along the ACoA and the regional anatomy of the ACoA complex could affect the efficacy and safety.

Background and PurposeEmbolization is the first-line treatment for dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVF). The precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL) embolic agent is a non-adhesive copolymer with specific features and endovascular behavior. This study assessed its safety and efficacy in a prospective real-life cohort.MethodsThe PHIL-dAVF study was a prospective single-arm open-label observational multicenter study conducted between October 2017 and November 2019 in 14 European centers. Patients with a single intracranial dAVF intended for PHIL embolization were included. Previously partially treated or multiple dAVFs were excluded. Additional devices and embolic agents were permitted as complementary techniques or second-line strategies. Primary endpoints were functional outcome changes from baseline and complete cure rate at 3–6 months after the last embolization. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AE) incidence.ResultsA total of 67 patients (77 endovascular procedures; 70.1% men, mean age 61±14 years) were included. Most DAVFs were unruptured (71.6%), located in the transverse/sigmoid sinus (53.7%) and Cognard grade III or IV (56.7%). Sixty patients (89.6%) received one single embolization. Additional devices were used in 31.2% of procedures. Complete angiographic cure rate was 86.9% at the 3–6 month DSA follow-up after the last endovascular treatment. At least one AE was recorded in 37.3% of patients during follow-up, of which 52.9% were related to the procedure. The procedural rates of AE and serious AE were 32.5% and 15.6%, respectively. Five AEs were related to PHIL. Transient functional deterioration occurred in three patients (4.5%), all resolved by the last follow-up.ConclusionThe PHIL-dAVF study provides evidence about the efficacy and safety of PHIL in the treatment of intracranial dAVFs, with outcomes comparable to existing liquid embolic agents reported in the literature.

Intracranial aneurysm development and rupture may be associated to the morphology of the parent vessel. To quantitatively characterize the geometry of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in relation to the location and orientation of lateral aneurysms and to identify recurrent patterns associated with their rupture status. The geometry of 54 ICAs hosting lateral aneurysms was analyzed by means of computational geometry techniques. The ICA was split into individual bends, and the bend hosting the aneurysm was described in terms of curvature, torsion, length, and radius. Aneurysm position and orientation with respect to the parent vessel and specifically the hosting bend were characterized, as well as angles between the portions of the parent artery immediately upstream of and downstream from the aneurysm and the aneurysm ostium. Differences in geometric parameters with respect to rupture status and their performance as classifiers were evaluated. ICA bends hosting ruptured aneurysms were shorter with a smaller radius, lower maximum curvature, and lower proximal torsion compared with those hosting unruptured lesions. Ruptured aneurysms occurred in more distal portions of the ICA, along the outer wall of the vessel, and closer to the curvature peak within the hosting bend than unruptured ones. The proximal portions of ICAs hosting ruptured aneurysms approached the ostium region at a smaller angle. Geometric factors relative to the ICA were associated with the distribution of aneurysms and their rupture status. The present work has potential implications in the quest for hemodynamic factors contributing to the development, progression, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms.

Flow diverters are increasingly used for the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. A rare complication from flow diversion is delayed aneurysm rupture, which can lead to carotid–cavernous fistula (CCF) in the setting of cavernous carotid aneurysms (CCAs). Direct CCFs pose unique management challenges, given the lack of transarterial access to the fistula. We present two cases of direct CCFs following treatment of CCAs with the Pipeline embolization device (PED). Case 1 was a middle-aged patient with a symptomatic 10 mm wide-necked left CCA. Six weeks after PED treatment the patient developed diplopia secondary to direct CCF. Case 2 was a middle-aged patient with a symptomatic 17 mm left CCA treated with PED. One-month follow-up angiography demonstrated a direct CCF. Both patients underwent successful coil embolization of the CCF through a transvenous approach. Direct CCF formation following PED deployment for CCA is a rare complication. Parent vessel sacrifice may be avoided with transvenous occlusion of the fistula.