Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have substantially improved clinical outcomes in multiple cancer types and are increasingly being used in early disease settings and in combinations of different immunotherapies. However, ICIs can also cause severe or fatal immune-related adverse-events (irAEs). We aimed to identify and characterise cardiovascular irAEs that are significantly associated with ICIs. In this observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study, we used VigiBase, WHO's global database of individual case safety reports, to compare cardiovascular adverse event reporting in patients who received ICIs (ICI subgroup) with this reporting in the full database. This study included all cardiovascular irAEs classified by group queries according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, between inception on Nov 14, 1967, and Jan 2, 2018. We evaluated the association between ICIs and cardiovascular adverse events using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC). IC is an indicator value for disproportionate Bayesian reporting that compares observed and expected values to find associations between drugs and adverse events. IC025 is the lower end of the IC 95% credibility interval, and an IC025 value of more than zero is deemed significant. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03387540. We identified 31 321 adverse events reported in patients who received ICIs and 16 343 451 adverse events reported in patients treated with any drugs (full database) in VigiBase. Compared with the full database, ICI treatment was associated with higher reporting of myocarditis (5515 reports for the full database vs 122 for ICIs, ROR 11·21 [95% CI 9·36–13·43]; IC025 3·20), pericardial diseases (12 800 vs 95, 3·80 [3·08–4·62]; IC025 1·63), and vasculitis (33 289 vs 82, 1·56 [1·25–1·94]; IC025 0·03), including temporal arteritis (696 vs 18, 12·99 [8·12–20·77]; IC025 2·59) and polymyalgia rheumatica (1709 vs 16, 5·13 [3·13–8·40]; IC025 1·33). Pericardial diseases were reported more often in patients with lung cancer (49 [56%] of 87 patients), whereas myocarditis (42 [41%] of 103 patients) and vasculitis (42 [60%] of 70 patients) were more commonly reported in patients with melanoma (χ2 test for overall subgroup comparison, p<0·0001). Vision was impaired in five (28%) of 18 patients with temporal arteritis. Cardiovascular irAEs were severe in the majority of cases (>80%), with death occurring in 61 (50%) of 122 myocarditis cases, 20 (21%) of 95 pericardial disease cases, and five (6%) of 82 vasculitis cases (χ2 test for overall comparison between pericardial diseases, myocarditis, and vasculitis, p<0·0001). Treatment with ICIs can lead to severe and disabling inflammatory cardiovascular irAEs soon after commencement of therapy. In addition to life-threatening myocarditis, these toxicities include pericardial diseases and temporal arteritis with a risk of blindness. These events should be considered in patient care and in combination clinical trial designs (ie, combinations of different immunotherapies as well as immunotherapies and chemotherapy). The Cancer Institut Thématique Multi-Organisme of the French National Alliance for Life and Health Sciences (AVIESAN) Plan Cancer 2014–2019; US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; the James C. Bradford Jr. Melanoma Fund; and the Melanoma Research Foundation.

The magnitude of effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on specific cardiovascular and renal outcomes and whether heterogeneity is based on key baseline characteristics remains undefined. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2i in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched PubMed and Embase for trials published up to Sept 24, 2018. Data search and extraction were completed with a standardised data form and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Efficacy outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death), the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure, and progression of renal disease. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled across trials, and efficacy outcomes were stratified by baseline presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and degree of renal function. We included data from three identified trials and 34 322 patients (60·2% with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), with 3342 major adverse cardiovascular events, 2028 cardiovascular deaths or hospitalisation sfor heart failure events, and 766 renal composite outcomes. SGLT2i reduced major adverse cardiovascular events by 11% (HR 0·89 [95% CI 0·83–0·96], p=0·0014), with benefit only seen in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (0·86 [0·80–0·93]) and not in those without (1·00 [0·87–1·16], p for interaction=0·0501). SGLT2i reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure by 23% (0·77 [0·71–0·84], p<0·0001), with a similar benefit in patients with and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and with and without a history of heart failure. SGLT2i reduced the risk of progression of renal disease by 45% (0·55 [0·48–0·64], p<0·0001), with a similar benefit in those with and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The magnitude of benefit of SGLT2i varied with baseline renal function, with greater reductions in hospitalisations for heart failure (p for interaction=0·0073) and lesser reductions in progression of renal disease (p for interaction=0·0258) in patients with more severe kidney disease at baseline. SGLT2i have moderate benefits on atherosclerotic major adverse cardiovascular events that seem confined to patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, they have robust benefits on reducing hospitalisation for heart failure and progression of renal disease regardless of existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or a history of heart failure. None.

Overall rates of venous thromboembolism, including in-situ pulmonary thrombosis, are approximately three-times higher than historical matched controls of hospitalised populations, whereas rates of arterial thromboembolism, including acute coronary syndromes and stroke, although still elevated, are lower than previously described. 1 Microvascular thrombotic mechanisms have been implicated in progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome and subsequent need for organ support, and autopsy studies have identified unsuspected pulmonary embolism or in-situ pulmonary arterial thrombosis in nearly 60% of patients, suggesting that thrombosis has an important role in mortality. 2,3 Proposed mechanisms for these microvessel thrombotic and intravascular coagulopathic mechanisms and classic macrovessel thromboembolism are complex and include patient-related risk factors seen in medical patients hospitalised with pneumonia and sepsis, as well as more SARS-CoV-2-dependent mechanisms, including endothelial dysfunction, hyperinflammation and cytokine storm, formation of neutrophil-extracellular traps, complement-system activation, hypofibrinolysis, and platelet-derived and coagulation-derived mechanisms of thrombin generation leading to thromboinflammation. 4 Given this tendency for thrombotic complications with COVID-19, several multicentre randomised trials of antithrombotic therapies were launched globally as a logical next step to test whether the addition or escalated dosing of antithrombotic agents would provide further benefit to existing standards of care, and to understand the risk–benefit in terms of bleeding risk. 5 These trials have included anticoagulants with escalated or therapeutic doses being compared with standard prophylactic doses, anti-platelet agents, and fibrinolytic agents, as well as more novel approaches. 6 Trial designs have included adaptive, multiplatform, and Bayesian design frameworks, and the endpoints have included all-cause mortality, or composites including freedom from organ support or other surrogates of disease severity, and finally thrombosis. 5 For the most part, randomised trials to date have not shown benefits of add-on or escalated antithrombotic therapy over usual standard of care. The reason why the HEP-COVID trial 12 yielded a clear result despite its modest size in answering the trial hypothesis was that it used a traditional antithrombotic clinical trial design. 12 HEP-COVID used an agent with established efficacy in thromboembolic disease at an optimal dose (therapeutic low molecular weight heparin), selected a highly enriched population using a validated strategy (elevated D dimers), and used an endpoint that was specific to the mechanism of intervention (a composite of major thromboembolism and mortality). Burger/Phanie/Science Photo Library ACS declares research grants and consulting fees from Janssen Research & Development LLC, Bayer, Portola, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, and the ATLAS group, unrelated to the area of work commented on here.

Peripheral artery disease is a highly morbid type of atherosclerotic vascular disease involving the legs and is estimated to affect over 230 million individuals globally. Few therapies improve functional capacity and health-related quality of life in people with lower limb peripheral artery disease. We aimed to evaluate whether semaglutide improves function as measured by walking ability as well as symptoms, quality of life, and outcomes in people with peripheral artery disease and type 2 diabetes. STRIDE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done at 112 outpatient clinical trial sites in 20 countries in North America, Asia, and Europe. Participants were aged 18 years and older, with type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease with intermittent claudication (Fontaine stage IIa, able to walk >200 m) and an ankle–brachial index of less than or equal to 0·90 or toe–brachial index of less than or equal to 0·70. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive web response system to receive subcutaneous semaglutide 1·0 mg once per week for 52 weeks or placebo. The primary endpoint was the ratio to baseline of the maximum walking distance at week 52 measured on a constant load treadmill in the full analysis set. Safety was evaluated in the safety analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04560998 and is now completed. From Oct 1, 2020, to July 12, 2024, 1363 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 792 were randomly assigned to semaglutide (n=396) or placebo (n=396). 195 (25%) participants were female and 597 (75%) were male. Median age was 68·0 years (IQR 61·0–73·0). The estimated median ratio to baseline in maximum walking distance at week 52 was significantly greater in the semaglutide group than the placebo group (1·21 [IQR 0·95–1·55] vs 1·08 [0·86–1·36]; estimated treatment ratio 1·13 [95% CI 1·06–1·21]; p=0·0004). Six serious adverse events in five (1%) participants in the semaglutide group and nine serious adverse events in six (2%) participants in the placebo group were possibly or probably treatment related, with the most frequent being serious gastrointestinal events (two events reports by two [1%] in the semaglutide group and five events reported by three [1%] in the placebo group). There were no treatment-related deaths. Semaglutide increased walking distance in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and type 2 diabetes. Research implications include the need for future studies to further elucidate mechanisms of benefit and to assess the efficacy and safety in patients with peripheral artery disease who do not have type 2 diabetes. Novo Nordisk.

Patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent revascularization were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) or placebo. All patients received aspirin. The primary outcome of acute limb ischemia, major amputation for vascular causes, MI, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death occurred less frequently with rivaroxaban.

Dapagliflozin is a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor that reduces blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by promoting glycosuria via inhibiting urinary glucose reabsorption. In addition to improving blood glucose control, treatment with dapagliflozin results in glucose-induced osmotic diuresis, weight loss, and blood pressure lowering. Previous trials of SGLT-2 inhibitors showed reductions in cardiovascular (CV) events, including CV death and hospitalization for heart failure, and ischemic events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). DECLARE–TIMI 58 (NCT01730534) is a phase 3b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the CV safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin that has completed randomization of 17,160 patients with T2DM and a history of either established ASCVD (n=6,971) or multiple risk factors for ASCVD (n=10,189). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to dapagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo. The primary safety outcome is the time to the first event of the composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events; MACEs). The co-primary efficacy outcomes are the composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke and the composite of CV death or hospitalization for heart failure. This event-driven trial will continue until at least 1,390 subjects have a MACE outcome, thereby providing >99% power to test for the primary outcome of safety of dapagliflozin measured by rejecting the hypothesis that the upper bound of the CI >1.3 for the primary outcome of MACE, as well as 85% power to detect a 15% relative risk reduction in MACE and an estimated 87% power to detect a 20% reduction in the composite of CV death or hospitalization for heart failure at a 1-sided α level of .0231. The DECLARE–TIMI 58 trial is testing the hypotheses that dapagliflozin is safe (does not increase) and may reduce the occurrence of major CV events. DECLARE–TIMI 58 is the largest study to address this question with an SGLT-2 inhibitor in patients with T2DM and with established CV disease and without CV disease but with multiple risk factors.

In a randomized trial of patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment with dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor that promotes glucosuria, did not result in a higher or lower rate of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke than placebo but did result in a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure.

In this cardiovascular safety trial, lorcaserin facilitated sustained weight loss without a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than that with placebo in a high-risk population of overweight or obese patients.

An acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event is associated with a high risk of recurrent ACS, stroke, and death. To ameliorate the risk of subsequent events, current guidelines for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non–ST-segment elevation ACS recommend long-term management strategies for secondary prevention including risk factor modification and anti-ischemic and antiplatelet therapies. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is a critical component of secondary prevention therapy following ACS. However, despite the importance of DAPT for secondary prevention after ACS, questions remain over the optimal duration of therapy. Clinical evidence is emerging that maintenance DAPT >12 months lowers the risk of recurrent ACS events; however, this benefit must be considered against any potential risks of prolonged DAPT such as bleeding. Several tools for bleeding risk assessment have shown promise; however, their limited accuracy and discriminative power necessitates further development. Assessment of patient ischemic risk should consider the complexity of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure, anatomic burden of coronary artery disease, and additional underlying risk factors. Consequently, identifying patients in whom the risk:benefit ratio favors prolonged DAPT may prove invaluable for clinicians in deciding which patients should continue or stop taking DAPT at 12 months after PCI, or consider P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy as an option. This article reviews the most recent information about the risks and benefits of DAPT continued for >12 months after ACS and provides critical guidance to assist physicians in identifying patients most likely to benefit from a secondary prevention strategy with DAPT.

In a trial involving patients with infrapopliteal artery disease, the use of a drug-eluting resorbable scaffold was superior to angioplasty in reducing reintervention and maintaining patency at 1 year.