Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Resistance to osimertinib in advanced EGFR- mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes a significant challenge for clinicians either in terms of molecular diagnosis and subsequent therapeutic implications. Methods This is a prospective single-centre study with the primary objective of characterising resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in advanced EGFR- mutated NSCLC patients treated both in first- and in second-line. Next-Generation Sequencing analysis was conducted on paired tissue biopsies and plasma samples. A concordance analysis between tissue and plasma was performed. Results Sixty-five advanced EGFR -mutated NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib in first- ( n  = 56) or in second-line ( n  = 9) were included. We managed to perform tissue and liquid biopsies in 65.5% and 89.7% of patients who experienced osimertinib progression, respectively. Acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 80% of 25 patients with post-progression samples, with MET amplification ( n  = 8), EGFR C797S ( n  = 3), and SCLC transformation ( n  = 2) the most frequently identified. The mean concordance rates between tissue and plasma for the EGFR activating mutation and for the molecular resistance mechanisms were 87.5% and 22.7%, respectively. Conclusions Resistance to osimertinib demonstrated to be highly heterogeneous, with MET amplification the main mechanism. Plasma genotyping is a relevant complementary tool which might integrate tissue analysis for the study of resistance mechanisms.

To assess the role of Notch activation in predicting bevacizumab efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC). Notch activation was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on 65 CRC enrolled within randomized clinical trials assessing first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and on 21 CRC treated with chemotherapy alone. Strong Notch (IHC 3+) activation was negatively associated with response (18 vs 62% in low Notch cases [IHC 0, 1, 2+]; p = 0.016), progression-free survival (4.9 vs 12.1 months; p = 0.002) and overall survival (19.3 vs 30.4 months; p = 0.039). No correlation was found between Notch activation and clinical outcome in CRC treated with chemotherapy alone. A potential role of Notch activation in the antitumor activity of bevacizumab could be hypothesized.

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for markers on X chromosome are associated with malignancy in endocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas. The aim of this work is to investigate low-grade, well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas (WDEC) vs high-grade, poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas (PDEC) of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract for common deletion regions on X chromosome. We performed a comparative allelotyping analysis with 24 highly polymorphic markers for the X chromosome in 12 WDECs and 5 PDECs. Overall, the LOH frequency in all informative loci investigated was 59% in primary and 61% in metastasis, with a significantly higher rate in PDECs than in WDECs (p<0.015 for primary and p<0.00005 for metastasis). In both WDECs and PDECs, the small Xq25 region as defined by DXS8059, DXS8098, and DXS8009 markers showed higher LOH rate as compared to the rest of the chromosome markers (p<0.04). In addition, LOH was very frequently elevated also in DXS294 and in DXS102 loci mapping the chromosomal region Xq26. In no instances differences were found between primary tumors and metastases. Methylation analysis revealed that Xq25 loss preferentially occurred on the inactive X chromosome, a feature in agreement with findings from other human cancers suggesting escape of tumor suppressor genes to X chromosome inactivation at this region. Overall, our data indicate that the two chromosomal regions, Xq25 and Xq26, may participate to the malignant progression of GEP endocrine carcinomas.

The research here presented aims at characterizing the thermal behaviour of a PCM-based latent heat storage enhanced with graphene oxide. The heat storage tank is composed of two PVC coaxial cylinders and a smooth stainless-steel helical heat exchanger installed inside the smaller one. The heat exchanger is immersed in PCM, a commercial paraffin with a melting temperature of around 28°C. The melting and solidification of the PCM were forced through hot or cold water flowing in the heat exchanger. The purpose is to explore the melting and solidification process by monitoring the temperature in the PCM with multiple thermocouples placed at different heights and different radial distances from the centre of the heat exchanger. Initially, the system was studied with pure paraffin. Then, two different mass percentages (i.e., 1.5% and 3%) of graphene oxide were added, whose high thermal conductivity had to counterbalance the paraffin low thermal conductivity and thus enhance the overall performance of the system. These three configurations were then compared to a reference scenario, consisting of the inner cylinder filled with pure water. The use of graphene oxide has increased the heat flux by up to 24% during heating and up to 31% during cooling compared to the pure PCM.

Background/Aims: National Plans for Rare Diseases (RDs) are the common denominator of current public health policy concerns on RDs across the EU. With the aim of a better distribution of the available resources, they conjugate the European objective that aims at ensuring that patients with RDs have access to high-quality care - including diagnostics, treatment and rehabilitation - with the national priorities of selecting specific measures for adoption and implementation. Methods: The European Project for Rare Diseases National Plans Development (EUROPLAN, www.europlanproject.eu) is cofunded by the EU Commission (DG-SANCO) and is coordinated by the Italian National Center for Rare Diseases of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS). The EUROPLAN goal is to promote the implementation of National Plans or Strategies to tackle RDs and share relevant experiences within countries, linking national efforts, through a common strategy at a European level. In order to fulfill these objectives, EUROPLAN involved health authorities, clinicians, scientists, the European Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), and many other patient groups as associated and collaborating partners from several European countries. Results: The project was launched in 2008 and foresaw 2 implementation phases: phase 1 (2008-2011) to build the consensus definition of operational tools (recommendations and indicators), and the ongoing phase 2 (2012-2015), mainly aimed at capacity building with the proactive involvement of multilevel stakeholders. EUROPLAN is facilitating and accelerating the implementation of National Plans in almost all EU and several non-EU Countries. Conclusions: EUROPLAN is a European and an international process more than a project, and it could be defined as a ‘litmus test' demonstrating how the collaboration between institutions and patients' associations can accelerate the process of awareness and development of policies and actions.