Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Braz, G.P."
Sort by:
Efficacy and stability performance of traditional versus motion sensor-assisted strategies for FES standing
Standing by means of functional electrical stimulation (FES) after spinal cord injury is a topic widely reported in the neurorehabilitation literature. This practice commonly uses surface stimulation over the quadriceps muscle to evoke knee extension. To date, most FES neuroprostheses still operate without any artificial feedback, meaning that after a fatigue-driven knee buckle event, the stimulation amplitude or pulse width must be increased manually via button presses to re-establish knee-lock. This is often referred to as ‘hand-controlled (HC) operation’. In an attempt to provide a safer, yet clinically practical approach, this study proposed two novel strategies to automate the control of knee extension based on the kinematic feedback of four miniaturised motion sensors. These strategies were compared to the traditional HC strategy on four individuals with complete paraplegia. The standing times observed over multiple trials were in general longer for the automated strategies when compared to HC (0.5–80%). With the automated strategies, three of the subjects tended to need less upper body support over a frame to maintain balance. A stability analysis based on centre of pressure (CoP) measurements also favoured the automated strategies. This analysis also revealed that although FES standing with the assistance of a frame was likely to be safe for the subjects, their stability was still inferior to that of able-bodied individuals. Overall, the unpredictability of knee buckle events could be more effectively controlled by automated FES strategies to re-establish knee-lock when compared to the traditional user-controlled approach, thus demonstrating the safety and clinical efficacy of an automated approach.
The Sitting Height/Height Ratio for Age in Healthy and Short Individuals and Its Potential Role in Selecting Short Children for SHOX Analysis
Aims: To determine the presence of abnormal body proportion, assessed by sitting height/height ratio for age and sex (SH/H SDS) in healthy and short individuals, and to estimate its role in selecting short children for SHOX analysis. Methods: Height, sitting height and weight were evaluated in 1,771 healthy children, 128 children with idiopathic short stature (ISS), 58 individuals with SHOX defects (SHOX-D) and 193 females with Turner syndrome (TS). Results: The frequency of abnormal body proportion, defined as SH/H SDS >2, in ISS children was 16.4% (95% CI 10-22%), which was higher than in controls (1.4%, 95% CI 0.8-1.9%, p < 0.001). The SHOX gene was evaluated in all disproportionate ISS children and defects in this gene were observed in 19%. Among patients with SHOX-D, 88% of children (95% CI 75-100%) and 96% of adults had body disproportion. In contrast, SH/H SDS >2 were less common in children (48%, 95% CI 37-59%) and in adults (28%, 95% CI 20-36%) with TS. Conclusion: Abnormal body proportions were observed in almost all individuals with SHOX-D, 50% of females with TS and 16% of children considered ISS. Defects in SHOX gene were identified in 19% of ISS children with SH/H SDS >2, suggesting that SH/H SDS is a useful tool to select children for undergoing SHOX molecular studies.