Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the classification of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) according to ANCA type (anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) or anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibodies) predicts treatment response.MethodsTreatment responses were assessed among patients enrolled in the Rituximab in ANCA-associated Vasculitis trial according to both AAV diagnosis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA)/microscopic polyangiitis (MPA)) and ANCA type (PR3-AAV/MPO-AAV). Complete remission (CR) was defined as disease activity score of 0 and successful completion of the prednisone taper.ResultsPR3-AAV patients treated with rituximab (RTX) achieved CR at 6 months more frequently than did those randomised to cyclophosphamide (CYC)/azathioprine (AZA) (65% vs 48%; p=0.04). The OR for CR at 6 months among PR3-AAV patients treated with RTX as opposed to CYC/AZA was 2.11 (95% CI 1.04 to 4.30) in analyses adjusted for age, sex and new-onset versus relapsing disease at baseline. PR3-AAV patients with relapsing disease achieved CR more often following RTX treatment at 6 months (OR 3.57; 95% CI 1.43 to 8.93), 12 months (OR 4.32; 95% CI 1.53 to 12.15) and 18 months (OR 3.06; 95% CI 1.05 to 8.97). No association between treatment and CR was observed in the MPO-AAV patient subset or in groups divided according to AAV diagnosis.ConclusionsPatients with PR3-AAV respond better to RTX than to CYC/AZA. An ANCA type-based classification may guide immunosuppression in AAV.Trial registration numberNCT00104299; post-results.

ObjectivesTo develop a Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) to assess glucocorticoid (GC)-related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies.MethodsNineteen experts on GC use and outcome measures from 11 subspecialties participated. Ten experts were from the USA; nine from Canada, Europe or Australia. Group consensus methods and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) were used. A Composite GTI and Specific List comprise the overall GTI. The Composite GTI reflects toxicity likely to change during a clinical trial. The Composite GTI toxicities occur commonly, vary with GC exposure, and are weighted and scored. Relative weights for items in the Composite GTI were derived by group consensus and MCDA. The Specific List is designed to capture GC toxicity not included in the Composite GTI. The Composite GTI was evaluated by application to paper cases by the investigators and an external group of 17 subspecialists.ResultsThirty-one toxicity items were included in the Composite GTI and 23 in the Specific List. Composite GTI evaluation showed high inter-rater agreement (investigators κ 0.88, external raters κ 0.90). To assess the degree to which the Composite GTI corresponds to expert clinical judgement, participants ranked 15 cases by clinical judgement in order of highest to lowest GC toxicity. Expert rankings were then compared with case ranking by the Composite GTI, yielding excellent agreement (investigators weighted κ 0.87, external raters weighted κ 0.77).ConclusionsWe describe the development and initial evaluation of a comprehensive instrument for the assessment of GC toxicity.

This study of ANCA-associated vasculitis compared a single course of rituximab with conventional immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine and showed similar results for the primary outcome of complete remission by 6 months, maintained through 18 months. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (previously termed Wegener's granulomatosis) and microscopic polyangiitis are called antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitides because they are frequently accompanied by autoantibodies against proteinase 3 or myeloperoxidase. 1 , 2 For nearly four decades, cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have been the standard therapy for the induction of remission. However, the primary results of the Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) trial 3 and results from a European trial 4 showed that rituximab was as effective as cyclophosphamide for the induction of remission in patients with severe disease. Moreover, the rituximab-based regimen was superior in patients who had relapsing disease at 6 months. 3 Rituximab has . . .

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial compared rituximab with cyclophosphamide for remission induction in ANCA−associated vasculitis. Rituximab therapy was not inferior to daily cyclophosphamide treatment for remission induction in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis and may be superior in relapsing disease. Rituximab therapy was not inferior to daily cyclophosphamide treatment for remission induction in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis and may be superior in relapsing disease. Wegener's granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis are classified as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)−associated vasculitides because most patients with generalized disease have antibodies against proteinase 3 or myeloperoxidase. 1 , 2 The ANCA-associated vasculitides affect small-to-medium-size blood vessels, with a predilection for the respiratory tract and kidneys. 3 – 6 Cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have been the standard therapy for remission induction for nearly four decades. 7 , 8 This regimen transformed the usual treatment outcome of severe ANCA-associated vasculitis from death to a strong likelihood of disease control and temporary remission. 3 – 5 , 9 _ 11 However, not all patients have a remission with this combination of drugs, and those . . .

Despite the growing availability of smoking cessation apps, low engagement and cessation rates have remained a significant challenge. To address this issue, we used a user-centered design to iteratively develop a mobile app (MO) to provide comprehensive, tailored, and evidence-based content to support smokers in their quitting journey. This study examined the acceptability, use, and preliminary efficacy of the MO app for smoking cessation. Specifically, we sought to understand smokers' preferred features, engagement, and satisfaction with MO; identify concerns in using the app and ways to improve the app; and evaluate its smoking cessation outcomes. Through 3 cohorts, we recruited 10, 12, and 85 adult smokers who attempted to quit smoking to pilot-test the MO app between December 2019 and July 2022. Participants were instructed to complete a baseline survey, interact with the app for 6 weeks, and fill in a postsurvey at week 6. Participants in cohort 3 completed an additional postsurvey at week 12. Participants' app use was tracked and analyzed. The primary outcome measures were participants' 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 and 12 weeks. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the MO app across all 3 cohorts, rating it between 4.40 and 4.76 on a scale of 5 for acceptability. Users engaged with app activities for an average of 89 to 159 times over 35 days. The most liked features of the app included \"quit plan,\" \"tracking,\" \"reminders and notifications,\" \"MOtalks,\" and \"motivational quotes.\" The 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate of the modified intention to treat population in cohort 3 was 58% at 6 weeks and 52% at 12 weeks. Those who interacted more frequently with app features and engaged with more diverse activities were more likely to maintain abstinence at weeks 6 and 12. For each additional time logged into the app, the odds of staying abstinent at week 12 increased by 5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08). Participants who earned >5000 points during app use also had higher odds of quitting at both 6 weeks (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.25-7.75) and 12 weeks (OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.83-11.76), compared with those who earned <5000 points. Our study demonstrated that MO is a feasible mobile phone app with high acceptability and usability and can effectively deliver smoking cessation support to individuals who want to quit. Implications for developing and evaluating mobile phone apps for smoking cessation are discussed.

Although rates of tobacco use in California have declined overall, adults in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV), particularly Hispanic or Latinos (\"Latinos\"), have disproportionately high rates of tobacco use, tobacco-related illness, and mortality. Residents of the SJV also have limited access to cessation support services and need accessible, nonclinical alternatives. Given high smartphone use rates among Latinos and residents of rural communities, digital health tools may present an accessible approach to expand cessation support. This study explored tobacco use behaviors, cessation experiences, and views about digital cessation tools for tobacco cessation among SJV residents. The secondary objective was to assess the appeal, usability, and necessary adaptations of 2 existing digital smoking cessation tools-a smoking cessation app and a social media-based cessation intervention. Through an SJV-based academic-community partnership, we recruited 29 predominantly Latino adults who reported current smoking. We conducted 4 focus group discussions to explore tobacco use and cessation experiences and preferences for smoking cessation tools: 1 in-person in English, 1 online in English, and 2 online in Spanish. Subsequently, 9 participants from the focus group discussions completed individual, in-depth interviews where they viewed videos describing 2 digital smoking cessation tools-a cessation app and a social media cessation intervention-to assess their appeal and usability. Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify themes. Overall, 82.1% (23/28) had made a quit attempt in the past year, and most intended to quit smoking in the next 6 months, with 11.1% (3/27) never expecting to quit. Most participants were motivated to quit despite experiencing barriers, and they emphasized the need for culturally tailored digital cessation tools to help overcome the barriers to quitting smoking. They preferred interventions that integrated culturally relevant content reflecting lived experiences, featured language-concordant communications, and provided social supports, such as chat rooms for peer connection. Participants reported polyuse of tobacco with other substances, including cannabis, which may need to be addressed when delivering smoking cessation interventions. While participants appreciated the app's private interface and comprehensive curriculum, they preferred the social media-based program for its engaging design, despite privacy concerns. Preferences for specific interventions varied by age and digital literacy. Participants also expressed preference for material rewards to incentivize the use of digital health tools to quit smoking. This sample of predominantly Latino adults from the SJV expressed favorable interest in digital cessation support, yet existing tools require adaptation to improve cultural relevance, accessibility, usability, and privacy concerns. Participants emphasized language-concordant services, representation from people with lived experience, and community-building features. While digital interventions were well received, privacy concerns and digital literacy barriers must be addressed to enhance engagement.

Early data have shown the potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies to expand the therapeutic landscape in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). While many CAR T-cell therapy learnings can be drawn from the experience of this modality in oncology, key questions remain regarding clinical development considerations unique to lupus. To assess and discuss these issues, the Lupus Accelerating Breakthroughs Consortium, a public–private partnership, convened a multi-partner working group to collect the diverse perspectives of academics/clinicians (including rheumatologists and oncologists), industry representatives (including SLE as well as CAR T-cell clinical development experts), regulators and people living with lupus on this potentially ground-breaking therapy. The working group considered the risk/benefit considerations for eligibility criteria in lupus, early-phase dosing and dose-limiting toxicity challenges, incorporation of comparator arms in late-phase registrational trial design, SLE-specific issues in conditioning therapy and immune monitoring and the limitations of SLE pre-clinical models for studying cell therapies. The key future ‘calls to action’ for the field include the need for well-defined severity/refractoriness-based eligibility criteria, the need for long-term monitoring infrastructure and the need for educational and logistical support for rheumatologists and patients.

Background: Based on a literature search, there are limited data on the economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly in patients with lupus nephritis. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare health care resource utilization and direct medical care costs over a period of 12 months in patients with a history of SLE with or without nephritis. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 claim for an immunosuppressive/disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, antimalarial agent, NSAID/cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, or other SLE-related treatment (eg, opioid and combination analgesic, antianxiety agent, antihyperlipidemic agent, antihypertensive agent, bisphosphonate, vitamin D) dated between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007, were identified using a nationally representative, US commercial insurance claims database. The date of the first dispensation of the treatment represented the index date. Patients were required to have ≥2 claims containing a diagnosis of SLE during a 6-month preindex period through 3 months postindex and to have continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months before and 12 months after the index date. Patients with ≥1 claim containing a diagnosis of nephritis during the preindex period were identified. Health care resource utilization and direct medical care cost data were assessed over a period of 12 months; paid amounts were used as a proxy for costs and were expressed in year-2008 US dollars. Results: A total of 15,590 patients with SLE were identified (13,828 women, 1762 men; mean age, 48 years); 1068 (6.9%) had a history of nephritis. The mean age of patients with SLE without nephritis was significantly greater compared with the group with nephritis (47.9 vs 46.5 years, respectively; P < 0.001), and a greater proportion of this group were women (89.0% vs 84.7%; P < 0.001). Over a period of 12 months, 30.3% of patients with nephritis were hospitalized compared with 13.6% of those without nephritis ( P < 0.001); the mean lengths of hospital stays were 16.52 and 9.69 days ( P < 0.001) in patients with and without nephritis, respectively. Patients with nephritis also underwent more outpatient laboratory tests (mean, 64.42 vs 30.96; P < 0.001) and had a significantly higher mean number of intravenous infusions (mean, 1.7 vs 1.1; P < 0.001), and total 12-month follow-up costs were significantly greater in patients with nephritis compared with those without nephritis (mean, $30,652 vs $12,029; P < 0.001). Costs associated with inpatient and outpatient care were 252% and 146% higher in patients with SLE with nephritis, respectively. Outpatient costs were associated with approximately half of the total costs in patients with or without nephritis; pharmacy costs accounted for 20% of the total costs in patients with SLE and nephritis and 27% of total costs among those without nephritis. Significantly higher costs also were found in patients with nephritis when only SLE-related costs were assessed and after differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities were adjusted through multivariate analyses (all, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The present data analysis found that patients with SLE with nephritis consumed significantly more health care resources, with >2.5-fold the costs, compared with those without nephritis. The majority (84%) of added costs were attributable to inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient services, and 16% were attributable to pharmacy services.

BACKGROUNDLittle is known about the autoreactive B cells in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated (ANCA-associated) vasculitis (AAV). We aimed to investigate tolerance checkpoints of circulating antigen-specific proteinase 3-reactive (PR3+) B cells.METHODSMulticolor flow cytometry in combination with bioinformatics and functional in vitro studies were performed on baseline samples of PBMCs from 154 well-characterized participants of the RAVE trial (NCT00104299) with severely active PR3-AAV and myeloperoxidase-AAV (MPO-AAV) and 27 healthy controls (HCs). Clinical data and outcomes from the trial were correlated with PR3+ B cells (total and subsets).RESULTSThe frequency of PR3+ B cells among circulating B cells was higher in participants with PR3-AAV (4.77% median [IQR, 3.98%-6.01%]) than in participants with MPO-AAV (3.16% median [IQR, 2.51%-5.22%]) and participants with AAV compared with HCs (1.67% median [IQR, 1.27%-2.16%], P < 0.001 for all comparisons), implying a defective central tolerance checkpoint in patients with AAV. Only PBMCs from participants with PR3-AAV contained PR3+ B cells capable of secreting PR3-ANCA IgG in vitro, proving they were functionally distinct from those of participants with MPO-AAV and HCs. Unsupervised clustering identified subtle subsets of atypical autoreactive PR3+ memory B cells accumulating through the maturation process in patients with PR3-AAV. PR3+ B cells were enriched in the memory B cell compartment of participants with PR3-AAV and were associated with higher serum CXCL13 levels, suggesting an increased germinal center activity. PR3+ B cells correlated with systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, P < 0.05) and complete remission (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONThis study suggests the presence of defective central antigen-independent and peripheral antigen-dependent checkpoints in patients with PR3-AAV, elucidating the selection process of autoreactive B cells.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00104299.FundingThe Vasculitis Foundation, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH, and the Mayo Foundation for Education and Research.

ObjectiveRandomised trials of type I anti-CD20 antibodies rituximab and ocrelizumab failed to show benefit in proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). We compared obinutuzumab, a humanised type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces potent B-cell depletion, with placebo for the treatment of LN in combination with standard therapies.MethodsPatients with LN receiving mycophenolate and corticosteroids were randomised to obinutuzumab 1000 mg or placebo on day 1 and weeks 2, 24 and 26, and followed through week 104. The primary endpoint was complete renal response (CRR) at week 52. Exploratory analyses through week 104 were conducted. The prespecified alpha level was 0.2.ResultsA total of 125 patients were randomised and received blinded infusions. Achievement of CRR was greater with obinutuzumab at week 52 (primary endpoint, 22 (35%) vs 14 (23%) with placebo; percentage difference, 12% (95% CI −3.4% to 28%), p=0.115) and at week 104 (26 (41%) vs 14 (23%); percentage difference, 19% (95% CI 2.7% to 35%), p=0.026). Improvements in other renal response measures, serologies, estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria were greater with obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab was not associated with increases in serious adverse events, serious infections or deaths. Non-serious infusion-related reactions occurred more frequently with obinutuzumab.ConclusionsImproved renal responses through week 104 were observed in patients with LN who received obinutuzumab plus standard therapies compared with standard therapies alone. Obinutuzumab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified.Trial registration numberNCT02550652.