Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes with previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly those with previous stenting, are at high risk of ischaemic events. These patients are generally treated with aspirin. In this trial, we aimed to investigate if these patients would benefit from treatment with aspirin plus ticagrelor. The Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in diabEtes Mellitus patients Intervention Study (THEMIS) was a phase 3 randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, done in 1315 sites in 42 countries. Patients were eligible if 50 years or older, with type 2 diabetes, receiving anti-hyperglycaemic drugs for at least 6 months, with stable coronary artery disease, and one of three other mutually non-exclusive criteria: a history of previous PCI or of coronary artery bypass grafting, or documentation of angiographic stenosis of 50% or more in at least one coronary artery. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either ticagrelor or placebo, by use of an interactive voice-response or web-response system. The THEMIS-PCI trial comprised a prespecified subgroup of patients with previous PCI. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (measured in the intention-to-treat population). Between Feb 17, 2014, and May 24, 2016, 11 154 patients (58% of the overall THEMIS trial) with a history of previous PCI were enrolled in the THEMIS-PCI trial. Median follow-up was 3·3 years (IQR 2·8–3·8). In the previous PCI group, fewer patients receiving ticagrelor had a primary efficacy outcome event than in the placebo group (404 [7·3%] of 5558 vs 480 [8·6%] of 5596; HR 0·85 [95% CI 0·74–0·97], p=0·013). The same effect was not observed in patients without PCI (p=0·76, pinteraction=0·16). The proportion of patients with cardiovascular death was similar in both treatment groups (174 [3·1%] with ticagrelor vs 183 (3·3%) with placebo; HR 0·96 [95% CI 0·78–1·18], p=0·68), as well as all-cause death (282 [5·1%] vs 323 [5·8%]; 0·88 [0·75–1·03], p=0·11). TIMI major bleeding occurred in 111 (2·0%) of 5536 patients receiving ticagrelor and 62 (1·1%) of 5564 patients receiving placebo (HR 2·03 [95% CI 1·48–2·76], p<0·0001), and fatal bleeding in 6 (0·1%) of 5536 patients with ticagrelor and 6 (0·1%) of 5564 with placebo (1·13 [0·36–3·50], p=0·83). Intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 33 (0·6%) and 31 (0·6%) patients (1·21 [0·74–1·97], p=0·45). Ticagrelor improved net clinical benefit: 519/5558 (9·3%) versus 617/5596 (11·0%), HR=0·85, 95% CI 0·75–0·95, p=0·005, in contrast to patients without PCI where it did not, pinteraction=0·012. Benefit was present irrespective of time from most recent PCI. In patients with diabetes, stable coronary artery disease, and previous PCI, ticagrelor added to aspirin reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, although with increased major bleeding. In that large, easily identified population, ticagrelor provided a favourable net clinical benefit (more than in patients without history of PCI). This effect shows that long-term therapy with ticagrelor in addition to aspirin should be considered in patients with diabetes and a history of PCI who have tolerated antiplatelet therapy, have high ischaemic risk, and low bleeding risk. AstraZeneca.

Vericiguat is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation for heart failure in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following a recent worsening event. The aim of the VICTOR trial was to assess the effect of vericiguat in patients with HFrEF without recent heart failure worsening. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, conducted at 482 sites across 36 countries, patients aged 18 years or older with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40%) without heart failure hospitalisation within 6 months or outpatient intravenous diuretic use within 3 months before randomisation were randomly assigned (1:1) using an intervention randomisation system with interactive response technology to oral vericiguat (target 10 mg dose) or matching placebo. The primary composite endpoint was time to cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation. Efficacy endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug (safety population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05093933, and is complete. Between Nov 2, 2021, and Dec 21, 2023, 10 921 patients were screened and 6105 were randomly assigned: 3053 to vericiguat and 3052 to placebo. The median age was 68·0 years (IQR 61·0–75·0), 1440 (23·6%) patients were women, 4665 (76·4%) were men, 3934 (64·4%) were White, and 2899 (47·5%) had no previous hospitalisation for heart failure. During a median follow-up of 18·5 months (IQR 13·6–24·7), primary outcome events occurred in 549 (18·0%) patients in the vericiguat group and 584 (19·1%) patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·83–1·04]; p=0·22). As prespecified in the protocol, because the primary endpoint was not statistically significant, all analyses of secondary and exploratory endpoints are considered nominal. Cardiovascular death occurred in 292 (9·6%) patients in the vericiguat group and 346 (11·3%) patients in the placebo group (HR 0·83 [95% CI 0·71–0·97]). Hospitalisation for heart failure occurred in 348 (11·4%) patients in the vericiguat group and in 362 (11·9%) patients in the placebo group (HR 0·95 [95% CI 0·82–1·10]). Serious adverse events occurred in 717 (23·5%) of 3049 patients in the vericiguat group and 751 (24·6%) of 3049 patients in the placebo group. The most common adverse event was symptomatic hypotension (345 [11·3%] patients in the vericiguat group and 281 [9·2%] in the placebo group). All-cause death occurred in 377 (12·3%) patients in the vericiguat group and 440 (14·4%) patients in the placebo group (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·74–0·97]). Among patients with HFrEF and no recent worsening, vericiguat did not reduce the risk of a composite endpoint of time to cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation. Fewer cardiovascular deaths were observed in the vericiguat group than in the placebo group. Merck Sharp & Dohme (a subsidiary of Merck) and Bayer.

Following completion of the VICTORIA trial, vericiguat was approved for the treatment of worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and received a class IIb recommendation in European and North American guidelines. The subsequent VICTOR trial evaluated the use of vericiguat in patients with HFrEF and no recent worsening. We aimed to assess the effect of vericiguat on clinical endpoints through pooled analyses of patient-level data from the VICTORIA and VICTOR trials. This prespecified, pooled individual participant-level analysis was conducted on data from two trials: VICTORIA, which was active from Sept 25, 2016, to Sept 2, 2019 in 42 countries, and VICTOR, which was active from Nov 2, 2021, to Feb 5, 2025 in 36 countries. The VICTORIA trial enrolled adult (aged ≥18 years) participants with HFrEF with recent worsening (defined as either hospitalisation for heart failure within the previous 6 months or outpatient use of intravenous diuretics within the previous 3 months) and increased NT-proBNP concentrations; the VICTOR trial had similar eligibility criteria but participants had no recent worsening of heart failure. Participants in both trials received contemporary background guideline-directed heart failure therapy as appropriate. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure (also assessed individually). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD420251065636. Data from 11 155 patients (5050 in the VICTORIA trial and 6105 in the VICTOR trial) were included in the pooled analysis. The primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure occurred in 1446 (25·9%) of 5579 patients in the vericiguat group and 1556 (27·9%) of 5576 patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·91 [95% CI 0·85–0·98]; p=0·0088), with similar reductions in its individual components of cardiovascular death (0·89 [0·80–0·98]; p=0·020) and hospitalisation for heart failure (0·92 [0·84–1·00]; p=0·043) as first events. Vericiguat reduced the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with HFrEF across a broad range of clinical severity, including those receiving contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy. Vericiguat might be suitable as an additional treatment option for selected patients with HFrEF. Merck Sharp & Dohme (a subsidiary of Merck) and Bayer.