Explore the vast range of titles available.

HER3, a member of the EGFR family of receptor tyrosine kinases coded by the ERBB3 gene, plays an important role in cancer, despite its lack of intrinsic kinase activity. As with genes coding for potential heterodimeric partners of HER3, EGFR, and HER2, oncogenic mutations of ERBB3 have been explored by several studies. In this review, we discuss the evidence presenting ERBB3 somatic mutations as potential tumoral drivers. We then show that ERBB3 mutations are not uncommon in many cancer types. Finally, we present the recent results of several studies evaluating different therapeutic approaches for treating patients with oncogenic ERBB3 mutations.

The prognostic role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been clearly demonstrated in many types of cancer. However, their roles in diagnostic and treatment strategies remain to be defined. In this review, we present an overview of the current clinical validity of CTCs in nonmetastatic and metastatic cancer, and the main studies or concepts investigating the clinical utility of CTCs. In particular, we focus on breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancer. Two major topics concerning the clinical utility of CTC are discussed: treatment based on CTC count or CTC variations, and treatment based on the molecular characteristics of CTCs. Although some of these studies are inconclusive, many are still ongoing, and their results could help to define the role of CTCs in the management of cancers. A summary of published or ongoing phase II‐III trials is also presented. This review article discusses the clinical utility of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in various settings of screening and treatment of non‐metastatic and metastatic tumors. Two major aspects are considered, namely i) treatment based on CTC count or CTC variations, and ii) treatment based on the molecular characteristics of CTCs. A summary of published or ongoing phase II‐III trials with CTCs is also presented.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are rare tumor cells and have been investigated as diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers in many types of cancer. Although CTCs are not currently used in clinical practice, CTC studies have accumulated a high level of clinical validity, especially in breast, lung, prostate and colorectal cancers. In this review, we present an overview of the current clinical validity of CTCs in metastatic and non-metastatic disease, and the main concepts and studies investigating the clinical utility of CTCs. In particular, this review will focus on breast, lung, colorectal and prostate cancer. Three major topics concerning the clinical utility of CTC are discussed--(1) treatment based on CTCs used as liquid biopsy, (2) treatment based on CTC count or CTC variations, and (3) treatment based on CTC biomarker expression. A summary of published or ongoing phase II and III trials is also presented.

Background CirCe01 trial aimed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumour cell (CTC)-based monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients beyond the third line of chemotherapy (LC). Methods CirCe01 was a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial (NCT01349842) that included patients with MBC after two systemic LC. Patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL (CellSearch®) were randomised between the CTC-driven and the standard arm. In the CTC arm, changes in CTC count were assessed at the first cycle of each LC; patients in whom CTC levels predicted early tumour progression had to switch to a subsequent LC. Results Greater than or equal to 5 CTC/7.5 mL were observed in N  = 101/204 patients. In the CTC arm ( N  = 51), 43 (83%) and 18 (44%) patients completed CTC monitoring in the third and fourth lines, respectively, and 18 (42%) and 11 (61%) of these patients, respectively, had no CTC response. Thirteen (72%) and 5 (46%) of these patients underwent early switch to the next LC. Overall survival was not different between the two arms (hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = [0.6;1.4], p  = 0.8). In subgroup analyses, patients with no CTC response who switched chemotherapy experienced longer survival than patients who did not. Conclusions Due to the limited accrual and compliance, this trial failed to demonstrate the clinical utility of CTC monitoring. Clinical Trial Registration NCT, NCT01349842, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01349842 , registered 9 May 2011.

Background Cancer patients have been reported to be at higher risk of COVID-19 complications and deaths. We report the characteristics and outcome of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during breast cancer treatment at Institut Curie hospitals (ICH, Paris area, France). Methods An IRB-approved prospective registry was set up at ICH on March 13, 2020, for all breast cancer patients with COVID-19 symptoms or radiologic signs. Registered data included patient history, tumor characteristics and treatments, COVID-19 symptoms, radiological features, and outcome. Data extraction was done on April 25, 2020. COVID-19 patients were defined as those with either a positive RNA test or typical, newly appeared lung CT scan abnormalities. Results Among 15,600 patients actively treated for early or metastatic breast cancer during the last 4 months at ICH, 76 patients with suspected COVID-19 infection were included in the registry and followed. Fifty-nine of these patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 based on viral RNA testing ( N  = 41) or typical radiologic signs: 37/59 (63%) COVID-19 patients were treated for metastatic breast cancer, and 13/59 (22%) of them were taking corticosteroids daily. Common clinical features mostly consisted of fever and/or cough, while ground-glass opacities were the most common radiologic sign at diagnosis. We found no association between prior radiation therapy fields or extent of radiation therapy sequelae and extent of COVID-19 lung lesions. Twenty-eight of these 59 patients (47%) were hospitalized, and 6 (10%) were transferred to an intensive care unit. At the time of analysis, 45/59 (76%) patients were recovering or had been cured, 10/59 (17%) were still followed, and 4/59 (7%) had died from COVID-19. All 4 patients who died had significant non-cancer comorbidities. In univariate analysis, hypertension and age (> 70) were the two factors associated with a higher risk of intensive care unit admission and/or death. Conclusions This prospective registry analysis suggests that the COVID-19 mortality rate in breast cancer patients depends more on comorbidities than prior radiation therapy or current anti-cancer treatment. Special attention must be paid to comorbidities when estimating the risk of severe COVID-19 in breast cancer patients.

Background Following the PALOMA-3 study results, the combination of palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, with fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, has become a standard therapy in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib has been shown to increase the progression-free survival (PFS) overall but no predictive biomarker of palbociclib efficacy has been validated so far. We thus evaluated whether early changes of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels are associated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant efficiency. Methods ER+ HER2− MBC patients were included in a prospective observational cohort before treatment initiation. Tumor response was assessed by radiological evaluation (RECIST v1.1) every 3 months. Plasma samples were collected before treatment (baseline), at day 15 (D15), at day 30 (D30), and at disease progression. We searched for somatic mutations from archived tumor tissues by targeted deep sequencing. For patients with somatic mutations identified, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was tracked using digital droplet PCR. Ratios of ctDNA levels ([D15/baseline] and [D30/baseline]) were then correlated with prospectively registered patient characteristics and outcomes. Results Twenty-five of the 61 patients enrolled had a somatic mutation testable in plasma ( N PIK3CA  = 21, N TP53  = 2, N AKT1  = 2). At baseline, 84% of patients had detectable ctDNA levels but ctDNA levels had no prognostic impact on PFS ( p = 0.10 ). Among those patients, ctDNA was still detected in 82% at D15 and 68% at D30. ctDNA clearance observed at day 30 was associated with longer PFS (HR = 7.2, 95% CI = 1.5–32.6, p  = 0.004). On the contrary, a [D30/baseline] ctDNA ratio > 1 was associated with a shorter PFS (HR = 5.1, 95% CI = 1.4–18.3, p = 0.02 ) and all 5 patients with increased ctDNA levels at D30 showed disease progression after 3 months under palbociclib-fulvestrant. Finally, at the time of radiological tumor progression, ctDNA was detected in all patients tested. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that the efficiency of palbociclib and fulvestrant can be monitored by serial analyses of ctDNA before radiological evaluation and that early ctDNA variation is a prognostic factor of PFS.

Activating mutations in the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene confer resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AI), and may be targeted by selective estrogen receptor downregulators. We designed a multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which combines a drop-off assay, targeting the clustered hotspot mutations found in exon 8, with an unconventional assay interrogating the E380Q mutation in exon 5. We assessed its sensitivity in vitro using synthetic oligonucleotides, harboring E380Q, L536R, Y537C, Y537N, Y537S, or D538G mutations. Further validation was performed on plasma samples from a prospective study and compared with next generation sequencing (NGS) data. The multiplex ESR1-ddPCR showed a high sensitivity with a limit of detection ranging from 0.07 to 0.19% in mutant allele frequency. The screening of plasma samples from patients with AI-resistant metastatic breast cancer identified ESR1 mutations in 29% of them, all mutations being confirmed by NGS. In addition, this test identifies patients harboring polyclonal alterations. Furthermore, the monitoring of circulating tumor DNA using this technique during treatment follow-up predicts the clinical benefit of palbociclib–fulvestrant. The multiplex ESR1-ddPCR detects, in a single reaction, the most frequent ESR1 activating mutations with good sensitivity. This method allows real-time liquid biopsy for ESR1 mutation monitoring in large cohorts of patients.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are particularly rare in non-metastatic breast cancer, and the clinical validity of CTC detection in that clinical setting was initially not well recognized. A cytological CTC detection device (CellSearch) fulfilling the CLIA requirements for analytical validity was subsequently developed and, in 2008, we reported the first study (REMAGUS02) showing that distant metastasis-free survival was shorter in early breast cancer patients with one or more CTCs. In the past 10 years, other clinical studies and meta-analyses have established CTC detection as a level-of-evidence 1 prognostic biomarker for local relapses, distant relapses, and overall survival. This review summarizes available data on CTC detection and the promises of this proliferation- and subtype-independent metastasis-associated biomarker in early breast cancer patients.

In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive early breast cancer (EBC) patients, with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus HER2-targeted therapy, the KATHERINE trial demonstrated a 50% reduction in risk of recurrence or death with adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus trastuzumab. A retrospective bicentric cohort study was set to assess the real-world efficacy and safety of T-DM1 as adjuvant therapy in HER2-positve EBC patients treated at Institut Curie Hospitals. N = 102 patients consecutively treated from September 2019 to January 2021 were included. All patients had previously received neoadjuvant trastuzumab (plus pertuzumab in one patient) and chemotherapy, N = 95 (93%) with anthracyclines. Post-neoadjuvant residual cancer burden was RCB I, II and III in N = 28 (27%), 62 (61%) and 11 (11%) patients, respectively, while N = 70 (69%) had an estrogen receptor-positive disease. After a median follow-up of 44 months (range 4.5–54), N = 7 (7%) patients experienced distant tumor recurrence, including central nervous system (CNS) metastases in N = 5 patients, leading to death in N = 2 patients, while no local recurrence was reported. The 4-years disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 92.5% (95%CI=[87;98]), lymph node involvement at diagnosis (cN+) being the only factor associated with a higher risk of relapse (p = 0.025, no event in the node negative group in our population). Dose reductions of T-DM1 were required in N = 34 patients (33%) after a median of 5 cycles, mainly because of peripheral neuropathy (N = 14), increased alanine and/or aspartate aminotransferase level (N = 9), and thrombopenia (N = 6). Adverse event leading to drug discontinuation occurred in N = 23 patients (23%), after a median of 9 cycles, mostly peripheral neuropathy (N = 10) and thrombopenia (N = 9). Grade 3–4 toxicity affected N = 9 patients (9%), with no related death to T-DM1. With a low relapse rate and although more dose reductions and treatment discontinuation were observed in our cohort, our results are consistent with those of the KATHERINE trial. CNS as the most frequent site of relapse points to a potential role for drugs with higher activity against CNS metastases.

Purpose Previous cohort studies have reported plasma TK1 activity (pTKa) as a potential prognostic biomarker in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this prospective study, we report here the prognostic impact of pTKa in ER+/HER2− MBC patients treated with endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitor. Experimental design Patients were included into the prospective, ethics committee-approved ALCINA study (NCT02866149). Eligibility criteria were patients with ER+/HER2− MBC treated at Institut Curie with endocrine therapy and palbociclib. Plasma samples were obtained at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. pTKa was quantified by the DiviTum® assay (Biovica, Sweden). Results From May 2016 to August 2018, 103 patients treated with endocrine therapy and palbociclib were included. Patients had received a median of two prior systemic therapies for MBC (range 0–14). Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range 6–31), with median PFS and OS of 9.6 months (95%CI [7.0–11.3]) and 28 months (95%CI [23–not reached]), respectively. Median baseline pTKa was 292 Du/L (range 20–27,312 Du/L, IQR [89–853]). After adjusting for other prognostic factors, baseline pTKa remained an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (HR = 1.3 95%CI [1.1–1.4], p  = 0.0005) and OS (HR = 1.3 95%CI [1.2–1.6], p  < 0.0001), and 4-week pTKa was associated with OS (HR = 1.6 95%CI [1.3–2], p  < 0.0001). That survival prediction was significantly improved by the addition of baseline pTKa to clinicopathological characteristics. Adding pTKa changes at 4 weeks to baseline pTKa did not further increase survival prediction. Conclusion This study demonstrates the clinical validity of pTKa as a new circulating prognostic marker in ER+/HER2− MBC patients treated with endocrine therapy and palbociclib.