Explore the vast range of titles available.

A considerable body of previous research on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has helped characterize the regional specificity of various cognitive functions, such as cognitive control and decision making. Here we provide definitive findings on this topic, using a neuropsychological approach that takes advantage of a unique dataset accrued over several decades. We applied voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping in 344 individuals with focal lesions (165 involving the PFC) who had been tested on a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tasks. Two distinct functional-anatomical networks were revealed within the PFC: one associated with cognitive control (response inhibition, conflict monitoring, and switching), which included the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex and a second associated with value-based decision-making, which included the orbitofrontal, ventromedial, and frontopolar cortex. Furthermore, cognitive control tasks shared a common performance factor related to set shifting that was linked to the rostral anterior cingulate cortex. By contrast, regions in the ventral PFC were required for decision-making. These findings provide detailed causal evidence for a remarkable functional-anatomical specificity in the human PFC.

The coronavirus disease pandemic has brought a new urgency for the development and deployment of web-based applications which complement, and offer alternatives to, traditional one-on-one consultations and pencil-and-paper (PaP) based assessments that currently dominate clinical research. We have recently developed a web-based application that can be used for the self-administered collection of patient demographics, self-rated health, depression and anxiety, and cognition as part of a single platform. In this study we report the findings from a study with 155 cognitively healthy older adults who received established PaP versions, as well as our novel computerized measures of self-rated health, depression and anxiety, and cognition. Moderate to high correlations were observed between PaP and web- based measures of self-rated health ( r = 0.77), depression and anxiety ( r = 0.72), and preclinical Alzheimer’s disease cognitive composite (PACC) ( r = .61). Test-retest correlations were variable with high correlations for a measure of processing speed and a measure of delayed episodic memory. Taken together, these data support the feasibility and validity of utilization of this novel web-based platform as a new alternative for collecting patient demographics and the assessment of self-rated health, depression and anxiety, and cognition in the elderly.

Independence in everyday functioning has been associated with successful aging and declines in functioning may be indicative of pathological cognitive decline. Social determinants of health, like economic status and access to health care, a]lso play a role in everyday functioning. Understanding these factors are of particular importance for older Black adults who have had long-standing disparate access to care, education, and treatments. The current study aimed to evaluate social determinants of health, more specifically social engagement, as moderators of the association between cognition and everyday functioning. A sample of 930 older Black adults from Rush University: The Memory and Aging Project, African American Clinical Core, and Minority Adult Research Study were used. Participants completed a battery of neuropsychological testing as well as questionnaires about their everyday functioning and social behaviors. Hierarchical linear regressions were utilized to determine to what extent social factors moderated the relationship between cognition and everyday functioning. Late life social activity reduced the effect of global cognition on everyday functioning and was independently associated with everyday functioning. Social network size was associated with increased impairment. Results from the current study provide novel information regarding the role of social interaction on cognition in an older Black adult sample. Future interventions may benefit from an emphasis on increasing social engagement.

Executive functions (EF) encompass a variety of higher-order capacities such as judgment, planning, decision-making, response monitoring, insight, and self-regulation. Measuring such abilities quantitatively and establishing their neural correlates has proven to be challenging. Here, using a lesion-deficit approach, we report the neural correlates of a variety of EF tests that were developed under the auspices of the NINDS-supported EXAMINER project (Kramer, 2011; www.examiner.ucsf.edu). We administered a diverse set of EF tasks that tap three general domains—cognitive, social/emotional, and insight—to 37 patients with focal lesions to the frontal lobes, and 25 patients with lesions outside the frontal lobes. Using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM), we found that damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) was predominately associated with deficits in social/emotional aspects of EF, while damage to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and anterior cingulate was predominately associated with deficits in cognitive aspects of EF. Evidence for an important role of some non-frontal regions (e.g., the temporal poles) in some aspects of EF was also found. The results provide further evidence for the neural basis of EF, and extend previous findings of the dissociation between the roles of the ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal sectors in organizing, implementing, and monitoring goal-directed behavior. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–12)

Prédicteurs des connaissances et des comportements d’athlètes-étudiants post-secondaires en ce qui regarde les commotions cérébrales. Objectif: Cette étude vise à explorer les connaissances et les attitudes d’athlètes-étudiants en ce qui regarde le signalement des symptômes liés aux commotions cérébrales mais aussi les prédicteurs démographiques de ces connaissances et de ces attitudes. Elle vise également à déterminer dans quelle mesure des réponses à un sondage ont changé à la suite d’une intervention éducative en ligne. Méthodes: Un total de 108 athlètes-étudiants de première division inscrits dans une université importante du sud des États-Unis ont ainsi répondu à un sondage visant à évaluer, outre leurs attitudes à l’égard du fait de signaler des symptômes consécutifs à une possible commotion cérébrale, leurs connaissances en ce qui regarde la terminologie des commotions cérébrales, les symptômes qui y sont liés ainsi que les trajectoires de rétablissement. Fait à souligner, ces jeunes ont complété le sondage 24 à 48 heures avant leur présentation éducative en ligne et une semaine après l’avoir visionnée. Résultats: Au départ, nos répondants ont correctement identifié 72 % des symptômes de commotion cérébrale inclus dans le sondage. Ils ont aussi identifié correctement 75 % des aspects liés à une trajectoire de rétablissement typique suivant une commotion cérébrale. Un total de 54 % d’attitudes au départ à l’égard du fait de signaler des symptômes a correspondu aux meilleures pratiques sur le plan clinique. Une analyse de variance multivariée (ou « MANOVA » en anglais) a par ailleurs révélé que les athlètes masculins non-caucasiens étaient associés à de plus faibles connaissances de départ au sujet des symptômes des commotions cérébrales. Le fait de posséder de telles connaissances n’a pas été associée à des attitudes spécifiques en ce qui a trait au signalement de symptômes. Des tests de Student d’échantillons appariés ont indiqué que les connaissances portant sur la terminologie des commotions cérébrales se sont améliorées légèrement à la suite des présentations éducatives. Conclusions: Quelques sous-groupes d’athlètes-étudiants du collège ont montré des connaissances relativement plus faibles au sujet des symptômes liés aux commotions cérébrales si on les compare à d’autres. En cela, il se pourrait qu’ils puissent bénéficier d’efforts éducatifs accrus nous permettant de nous assurer qu’ils sont en mesure de reconnaître lorsqu’une commotion éventuelle s’est produite. De plus, considérant que connaissances et attitudes ne sont pas reliées et que l’intervention en ligne a eu un faible impact sur les connaissances mais non sur les attitudes, les efforts à venir devraient envisager des interventions destinées directement à modifier ces mêmes attitudes.

Objective:Socioeconomic factors, spanning from childhood to mid-adulthood, were examined in an older adult Black cohort to better understand their influence on the ability to complete instrumental activities of daily living. Previous research with socioeconomic factors has primarily focused on cognitive changes rather than everyday functioning. Additionally, research that has been conducted examining functioning has been with predominantly White samples.Participants and Methods:Data on Black participants were obtained from Rush University’s Memory and Aging Project (MAP), Minority Aging Research Study (MARS), and the Latino CORE study (CORE). Participants (n = 1,273) were predominately female (79.9%) and ranged in age from 54 - 97 years (M = 73 years old). Participants were stratified into two groups based on their consensus diagnosis: no cognitive impairment (NCI; 76.1%) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Linear regression analyses were utilized on each group to examine predictors of decreased functioning in instrumental activities of daily living. Predictors included income levels during childhood, at age 40, and current income level. Additionally, sex, education level, and parental education levels were included in the models.Results:Impairment of functioning in instrumental activities of daily living was predicted by the age of the participants at the time of their visit in both NCI and MCI groups (p < 0.001). Current income levels for the NCI participants significantly predicted functioning in IADLs (p < 0.001). This relationship was not present for the MCI group, rather, total family income at age 40 better predicted functioning (p = 0.043).Conclusions:Previous research has found that early and mid-life socioeconomic circumstances have cascading and complex effects on late life cognition. These same associations may be applicable to functioning with instrumental activities of daily living as they are with cognition. In the present study, current income levels were influential on the functioning of participants without cognitive impairment. Although, when examining those with mild cognitive impairment, mid-life economic circumstances were more impactful on everyday functioning. While the economic status of both groups were predictors of functioning, these findings highlight the importance of better understanding socioeconomic factors across the lifespan and all levels of cognition.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) ranks as the 6th leading cause of death in the United States, yet unlike other diseases in this category, there are no disease-modifying medications for AD. Currently there is significant interest in exploring the benefits of pharmacological treatment before the onset of dementia (e.g., in those with mild cognitive impairment); however, recruitment for such studies is challenging. The current study examined interest in pharmacological intervention trials relative to other types of clinical interventions. A total of 67 non-demented older adults enrolled in a longitudinal cognitive aging study completed a questionnaire assessing interest in participating in a variety of hypothetical research study designs. Consistent with past research, results showed that the opportunities for participants to advance science, receive feedback about their current health, and help themselves or others, were associated with increased interest in clinical trial participation. Some factors were not associated with change in interest (e.g., a doctor not recommending participation) while others were associated with decreased interest (e.g., having to come in for multiple visits each week). Relative to other types of interventions, pharmacological intervention trials were associated with the least interest in participation, despite pharmacological interventions being rated as more likely to result in AD treatment. Decreased interest was not predicted by subjective memory concerns, number of current medications, cardiovascular risk, or beliefs about the likely success of pharmacological treatments. These results highlight the challenges faced by researchers investigating pharmacological treatments in non-demented older individuals, and suggest future research could contribute to more effective ways of recruiting participants in AD-related clinical trials.

Objective:The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a well validated and reliable clinical assessment tool that can be used for characterizing cognitive function in older adults. The RBANS has been shown to reliably discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitively healthy (CH) individuals. While the RBANS has traditionally been administered in a face to face setting, administration is also feasible via telehealth. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, cognitive assessments were unexpectedly moved to telehealth formats. Given this, the current study assessed whether differences emerged between face to face and telehealth RBANS scores in both individuals who were CH and had MCI.Participants and Methods:A total of 61 individuals (NCH = 27, NMCI = 34) completed baseline and 1-year follow-up visits in the current study. The sample was predominantly female (N = 43, 70.5%), identified as white (N = 57, 93.4%), and were well educated (MYears = 15.93). Participants completed the RBANS form B at an in-person baseline visit and form C at a one year follow-up visit. Higher RBANS scores indicate overall better cognitive performance. As expected, CH individuals performed better than those with MCI on immediate memory, language, attention, delayed memory, and total score. There were no significant differences found for the visuospatial index. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to assess whether differences in RBANS performance existed based on test administration method.Results:Group differences between testing formats were observed in CH individuals on immediate memory [F(1,37) =9.10, p < .01)], language [F(1, 37)=9.41=p < .01)], and total score [F(1,37)=6.56, p < .05], with higher performance in those who completed the followup session in-person.There were no differences in baseline performance on any RBANS index between those who received an in person versus telehealth format (p’s > .05). No differences were observed in the MCI group. There were no significant differences observed between the CH and MCI group on demographic factors.Conclusions:Results from the current study suggest that CH counterparts experienced a greater degree of difference in scores between testing formats, whereas individuals with MCI did not. The lack of difference in MCI individuals may be due to less room for variability over time for this group given already low scores. These results suggest that while telehealth has been shown to be a viable option for RBANS administration in some samples, further work needs to be conducted regarding the equivalence of in-person vs. telehealth formats. This study is not without limitations. The small MCI group was segmented into in-person and telehealth groups, further reducing power to detect statistically significant results. The sample was also homogenous with highly educated, Caucasian women. Future research should aim to assess a larger, more diverse sample to identify whether RBANS is a reliable measure alone for assessing cognitive change over time via telehealth for MCI.

Objective:Dementia worry (DW) is anxious rumination about personal risk for dementia. Personal experience with dementia may affect DW, such that individuals with personal experience with dementia may have higher worry about developing dementia themselves. Further, dementia knowledge (DK), including what may increase one’s dementia risk as well as treatment options for dementias, may be influenced by one’s dementia experience. Prior studies have suggested that personal experience alters the relationship of age to DW; no prior studies have examined this for DK. In the present study, we examined whether DW and/or DK were differentially related to age in older adults.Participants and Methods:Adults (≥ 50 years old; N=252) in Ohio and Louisiana completed an online survey. 94 participants reported no personal dementia experiences, and 158 participants endorsed having a biological relative with dementia. The sample ranged in age from 23 to 92 (M=65, SD=9.3), with 96% identifying as White and 76% holding advanced degrees. DW was measured with the Dementia Worry Scale. Dementia knowledge was measured with true or false questions about causes and treatments for dementia.Results:Groups did not differ in age (p=.73), education (p=.50), or perceived SES (p=.28), but did differ in gender (p=.06). The experience group had higher dementia knowledge (p=.02). In those with biological dementia experience, lower age was related to higher dementia worry (r=-.24, p=.003) and greater dementia knowledge (r=-.18, p=.03). However, in those with no experience, age was not related to either dementia worry (r=.04) or to dementia knowledge (r=.16). Dementia worry did not relate to dementia knowledge in either group (no experience r=.03, experience r=.13).Conclusions:Findings suggest that younger individuals who have personal experience with dementia are highly worried about personal risk for dementia, despite having higher knowledge of dementia. Further, these results demonstrate that dementia knowledge is not related to dementia worry in older individuals with or without biological dementia experience. Findings may be important for informing dementia prevention education efforts.

Objective:Previous investigations have demonstrated the clinical utility of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color Word Interference Test (CWIT) as an embedded validity indicator in mixed clinical samples and traumatic brain injury. The present study sought to cross-validate previously identified indicators and cutoffs in a sample of adults referred for psychoeducational testing.Participants and Methods:Archival data from 267 students and community members self-referred for a psychoeducational evaluation at a university clinic in the South were analyzed. Referrals included assessment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, specific learning disorder, autism spectrum disorder, or other disorders (e.g., anxiety, depression). Individuals were administered subtests of the D-KEFS including the CWIT and several standalone and embedded performance validity indicators as part of the evaluation. Criterion measures included The b Test, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, Medical Symptom Validity Test, Dot Counting Test, and Reliable Digit Span. Individuals who failed 0 criterion measures were included in the credible group (n = 164) and individuals failing 2 or more criterion measures were included in the non-credible group (n = 31). Because a subset of the sample were seeking external incentives (e.g., accommodations), individuals who failed only 1 of the criterion measures were excluded (n = 72). Indicators of interest included all test conditions examined separately, the inverted Stroop index (i.e., better performance on the interference trial than the word reading or color naming trials), inhibition and inhibition/switching composite, and sum of all conditions.Results:Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were significant for all four conditions (p < .001) and the inverted stroop index (p = .032). However, only conditions 2, 3 and 4 met minimal acceptable classification accuracy (AUC = .72 - 81). ROC curves with composite indicators were also significant (p < .001), with all three composite indicators meeting minimal acceptable classification accuracy (AUC = .71- .80). At the previously identified cutoff of age corrected scale score of 6 for all four conditions, specificity was high (.88 -.91), with varying sensitivity (.23 - .45). At the previously identified cutoff of .75 for the inverted stroop index, specificity was high (.87) while sensitivity was low (.19). Composite indicators yielded high specificity (.88 - .99) at previously established cutoffs with sensitivity varying from low to moderate (.19 - .48). Increasing the cutoffs (i.e., requiring higher age corrected scale score to pass) for composite indicators increased sensitivity while still maintaining high specificity. For example, increasing the total score cutoff from 18 to 28 resulted in moderate sensitivity (.26 vs .52) with specificity of .91.Conclusions:While a cutoff of 6 resulted in high specificity for most conditions, the sum of all four conditions exhibited the strongest classification accuracy and appears to be the most robust indicator which is consistent with previous research (Eglit et al., 2019). However, a cutoff of 28 as opposed to 18 may be most appropriate for psychoeducational samples. Overall, the results suggest that the D-KEFS CWIT can function as a measure of performance validity in addition to a measure of processing speed/executive functioning.