Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurrent CC patients at our institution who would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to identify metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated at UFHealth between 2006 and 2016. Chart review was performed to determine if the patient met bevacizumab eligibility criteria. Results: In total, 79 patients with metastatic/recurrent CC were identified; 85.5% would have been ineligible to receive bevacizumab, and 14.5% would have been eligible. The most common reason for exclusion was active bleeding (68.4%); 94% of which was vaginal. In all, 27.6% would be excluded due to poor renal function, and 23.7% due to poor performance status (PS). Conclusions: Despite improved survival, only 14.5% of metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated over a 10-year period would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Most patients would have been excluded due to active bleeding, most commonly vaginal bleeding, a common complication from their disease. Identifying novel therapies for metastatic/recurrent CC patients with improved safety profiles that would allow for their use in this challenging population is critical.

Subcutaneous emphysema is a known complication of carbon dioxide insufflation, an essential component of laparoscopy. The literature contains reports of hypercarbia, pneumothorax, or pneumomediastinum. However, isolated lower extremity subcutaneous emphysema remains a seldom-reported complication. We report a case of unilateral lower extremity subcutaneous emphysema following robotic-assisted hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooophorectomy, staging, and anterior/posterior colporrhaphy for carcinosarcoma and vaginal prolapse. On postoperative day 1, the patient developed tender crepitus and bruising of her right ankle. Radiography confirmed presence of subcutaneous air. Vital signs and laboratory findings were unremarkable. Her symptoms spontaneously improved over time, and she was discharged in good condition on day 2. In stable patients with postoperative extremity swelling or pain with crepitus on exam, the diagnosis of iatrogenic subcutaneous emphysema must be considered.

Our aim was to assess the clinical utility of postoperative hemoglobin testing following hysterectomy. We carried out a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent robotic surgery at an academic center during a 44-month study period. Data included demographics and perioperative outcomes. The mean postoperative decrease in hemoglobin level was evaluated using numerical and categorical variables. A total of 201 women were included. A total of 45 (22.4%) developed symptoms suggestive of hemodynamic compromise. When compared to asymptomatic patients, these patients were no different in operative time, estimated blood loss, pre- or post-operative hemoglobin levels, or the change in hemoglobin levels. Symptomatic patients did receive less fluid intraoperatively (1.2 vs. 1.5 l; p<0.0001). Perioperative outcomes were not associated with a greater postoperative decrease in hemoglobin (Hb). Postoperative anemia was associated with preoperative anemia (0% vs. 45%; p<0.0001). Patients with postoperative anemia were also more likely to be re-admitted within 30 days after surgery (7% vs. 23%; p=0.025). Of the three patients who received blood transfusions postoperatively, all three had preoperative Hb<9.5 g/dl, compared to 2.5% of those who were not transfused (p<0.0001). Using Institutional charges and Medicare reimbursement rates for blood hemoglobin testing, savings were estimated to be $3,629 and $1,236, respectively, during the study period. Postoperative Hb testing may be safely avoided unless starting Hb is less <10 g/dl. Clinical practice change can reduce healthcare costs without hindering patient care.

To analyze the impact of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer on overall survival among age >65. We examined women who underwent hysterectomy from 2010 to 2015 from the U.S. National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). We evaluated the impact of surgical approach on survival. Of 243,601 endometrial cancer cases, 42,458 met the inclusion criteria. Laparoscopic approach was associated with improved survival by 14% (HR=0.86; 95%CI=0.80-0.92; p<0.001) and robotic approach was associated with improved survival by 12% (HR=0.88; 95%CI=0.83-0.93; p<0.0001), compared to the open approach. Similarly, the weighted adjusted 5-year overall survival was 73.1% (95%CI=72%-74.2%), 76.4% (95%CI=75.1-77.7%), and 75.5% (95%CI=74.7-76.4%) for open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches, respectively (p<0.001). Minimally invasive surgery improved overall survival in women over 65 years with endometrial cancer.

Robotic surgery for gynecologic malignancy is associated with a lower rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than laparotomy. Obese patients represent a particularly high-risk group for VTE, but prior studies tend to focus on patients with a much lower BMI and without extended VTE prophylaxis. Our objective was to examine the role of extended thromboprophylaxis in obese patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of obese patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2 ) who underwent robotic surgery for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. The primary outcome measured was the occurrence of a VTE event within the 30-day postoperative period. The Farrington–Manning score test was used for equivalence analysis with a 5% margin. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications. One hundred thirty-two robotic cases for endometrial cancer met our criteria. One hundred twenty-one (92%) received preoperative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, and 100% used pneumatic compression devices. Ninety-three percent and 90% received preoperative pharmacologic prophylaxis in the extended and no extended group, respectively ( p -value = 0.7). Seventy patients (54%) received 4-week extended prophylaxis. Estimated blood loss was similar in both groups (75 mL vs 60 mL, p -value = 0.6). Perioperative complications and readmissions were similar between the two groups. There were no VTE events during hospital stay. One patient in the group that did not receive extended prophylaxis developed a VTE in the 30-day postoperative period (1.6%), versus 0% in the group that did receive extended prophylaxis ( p -value = 0.1). The risk of VTE was low. The absence of extended VTE prophylaxis did not significantly increase the risk for VTE in obese patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who underwent robotic-assisted surgery.

The introduction of minimally invasive surgery in other gynecologic cancers has shown benefits with similar oncologic outcomes. However, the biology and complexity of surgery for ovarian cancer may preclude this approach for ovarian cancer patients. Our objective is to assess feasibility to achieve complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer patients via minimally invasive surgery. Our data sources include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biosis, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model with DerSimonian and Laird estimator for the amount of heterogeneity to estimate the pooled outcomes. A funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to test publication bias. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. There were 6 studies (3 prospective, 3 retrospective) that met the criteria for meta-analysis with a total of 3231 patients, 567 were in the minimally invasive group and 2664 in the laparotomy group. Both groups were similar in stage and serous histology. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 74.50% (95% CI 40.41–97.65%) and 53.10% (95% CI 4.88–97.75%) of patients in the minimally invasive and laparotomy groups, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between these 2 pooled proportions ( p  = 0.52). Three studies compared minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in obtaining complete cytoreductive surgery [OR = 0.90 (95% CI 0.70–1.16; p  = 0.43)]. A symmetrical funnel plot indicated no publication bias. The pooled proportion for grade > 2 postoperative complications was not significant among the laparoscopy group [3.11% (95% CI 0.00–10.24%; p  = 0.15)]. Complete cytoreductive surgery appears feasible and safe with minimally invasive surgery in selected advanced ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. However, effective screening strategies have not been established and continue to be elusive. A good screening test must adequately address validity, reliability, yield, cost, acceptance and follow-up services. An ideal screening test for ovarian cancer must have a high sensitivity in order to correctly diagnose all women with the disease and a high specificity to avoid false-positive results. The current screening modalities of bimanual examination, CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasonography together allow us to detect only 30-45% of women with early-stage disease. Recent developments in proteomic and genomic research have identified a number of potential biomarkers. Although panels of tumor markers and proteomic-based technologies may improve the positive predictive value, all markers require validation and interfacing with newly developed diagnostic imaging technologies. While a large amount of information on miRNAs has been promising, much remains to be elucidated. This review will examine the current status of biomarkers and technologies of interest in the effort of early detection of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. However, effective screening strategies have not been established and continue to be elusive. A good screening test must adequately address validity, reliability, yield, cost, acceptance and follow-up services. An ideal screening test for ovarian cancer must have a high sensitivity in order to correctly diagnose all women with the disease and a high specificity to avoid false-positive results. The current screening modalities of bimanual examination, CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasonography together allow us to detect only 30-45% of women with early-stage disease. Recent developments in proteomic and genomic research have identified a number of potential biomarkers. Although panels of tumor markers and proteomic-based technologies may improve the positive predictive value, all markers require validation and interfacing with newly developed diagnostic imaging technologies. While a large amount of information on miRNAs has been promising, much remains to be elucidated. This review will examine the current status of biomarkers and technologies of interest in the effort of early detection of ovarian cancer.