Explore the vast range of titles available.

Circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging biomarker for many cancers, but the limited sensitivity of current detection methods reduces its utility for diagnosing minimal residual disease. Here we describe phased variant enrichment and detection sequencing (PhasED-seq), a method that uses multiple somatic mutations in individual DNA fragments to improve the sensitivity of ctDNA detection. Leveraging whole-genome sequences from 2,538 tumors, we identify phased variants and their associations with mutational signatures. We show that even without molecular barcodes, the limits of detection of PhasED-seq outperform prior methods, including duplex barcoding, allowing ctDNA detection in the ppm range in participant samples. We profiled 678 specimens from 213 participants with B cell lymphomas, including serial cell-free DNA samples before and during therapy for diffuse large B cell lymphoma. In participants with undetectable ctDNA after two cycles of therapy using a next-generation sequencing-based approach termed cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing, an additional 25% have ctDNA detectable by PhasED-seq and have worse outcomes. Finally, we demonstrate the application of PhasED-seq to solid tumors. The sensitivity of circulating tumor DNA detection is improved by identifying sequences with two or more mutations.

PurposeLymphoma lesion detection and segmentation on whole-body FDG-PET/CT are a challenging task because of the diversity of involved nodes, organs or physiological uptakes. We sought to investigate the performances of a three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically segment total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) in large datasets of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).MethodsThe dataset contained pre-therapy FDG-PET/CT from 733 DLBCL patients of 2 prospective LYmphoma Study Association (LYSA) trials. The first cohort (n = 639) was used for training using a 5-fold cross validation scheme. The second cohort (n = 94) was used for external validation of TMTV predictions. Ground truth masks were manually obtained after a 41% SUVmax adaptive thresholding of lymphoma lesions. A 3D U-net architecture with 2 input channels for PET and CT was trained on patches randomly sampled within PET/CTs with a summed cross entropy and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) loss. Segmentation performance was assessed by the DSC and Jaccard coefficients. Finally, TMTV predictions were validated on the second independent cohort.ResultsMean DSC and Jaccard coefficients (± standard deviation) in the validations set were 0.73 ± 0.20 and 0.68 ± 0.21, respectively. An underestimation of mean TMTV by − 12 mL (2.8%) ± 263 was found in the validation sets of the first cohort (P = 0.27). In the second cohort, an underestimation of mean TMTV by − 116 mL (20.8%) ± 425 was statistically significant (P = 0.01).ConclusionOur CNN is a promising tool for automatic detection and segmentation of lymphoma lesions, despite slight underestimation of TMTV. The fully automatic and open-source features of this CNN will allow to increase both dissemination in routine practice and reproducibility of TMTV assessment in lymphoma patients.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) have both demonstrated impressive clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this study, we analyzed the outcome of 809 patients with R/R DLBCL after two or more previous lines of treatment who had a commercial chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells order for axi-cel or tisa-cel and were registered in the retrospective French DESCAR-T registry study ( NCT04328298 ). After 1:1 propensity score matching ( n  = 418), the best overall response rate/complete response rate (ORR/CRR) was 80%/60% versus 66%/42% for patients treated with axi-cel compared to tisa-cel, respectively ( P  < 0.001 for both ORR and CRR comparisons). After a median follow-up of 11.7 months, the 1-year progression-free survival was 46.6% for axi-cel and 33.2% for tisa-cel (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46–0.79; P  = 0.0003). Overall survival (OS) was also significantly improved after axi-cel infusion compared to after tisa-cel infusion (1-year OS 63.5% versus 48.8%; HR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45–0.88; P  = 0.0072). Similar findings were observed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting statistical approach. Grade 1–2 cytokine release syndrome was significantly more frequent with axi-cel than with tisa-cel, but no significant difference was observed for grade ≥3. Regarding immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), both grade 1–2 and grade ≥3 ICANS were significantly more frequent with axi-cel than with tisa-cel. In conclusion, our matched comparison study supports a higher efficacy and also a higher toxicity of axi-cel compared to tisa-cel in the third or more treatment line for R/R DLBCL. Analysis of outcomes of over 800 patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma, treated with commercially available CAR T cell therapy, supports higher efficacy and also a higher toxicity of axicabtagene ciloleucel compared to tisagenlecleucel as the third or more treatment line for this type of tumor.

Attempts to omit radiotherapy in two previous phase 3 studies involving patients who had an early response after upfront treatment with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) showed that the risk of treatment failure was higher in those who did not receive radiotherapy than in those who did, even though no difference in overall survival was observed between these two groups.4,5 In The Lancet Oncology, Peter Borchmann and colleagues6 present the results of the HD17 trial, which is the first study to show that radiotherapy can be safely omitted in patients who achieve a complete metabolic response after an intensified chemotherapy regimen consisting of two cycles of escalated doses of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin, and regular doses of bleomycin, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) plus two cycles of ABVD (2 + 2), without impairing disease control. Baseline PET was not mandatory in the HD17 study, but in routine practice, pretreatment PET could be valuable for accurately implementing the reduced tumour volume radiotherapy approach by targeting involved nodes and limiting the risk of uncertainty in the target volume delineation, which could otherwise have led to interobserver inconsistencies, and in some cases, delivery of an increased dose to non-target organs.7 This study6 provides additional evidence supporting the prognostic effect of interim PET, and the pivotal role of PET in guiding the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, including those given upfront eBEACOPP.8 Interim PET interpretation criteria are important for optimising patient management. [...]omitting involved-node radiotherapy in patients with a Deauville score of 3 or higher after induction therapy should be tested further before extending this approach to these patients in routine clinical practice.

The last 3 decades have witnessed a major evolution in the treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The most prominent of these developments include the introduction of the international prognostic scoring (IPS) system; therapeutic decision-making based on both IPS and interim PET/CT data; the finding that a negative interim PET/CT result could be safely used for treatment de-escalation; the introduction of intensive combination chemotherapy like escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, oncovin (vincristine), procarbazine, and prednisone); and further modification of this protocol with the incorporation of a conjugated anti-CD30 antibody brentuximab vedotin (BV) into first-line regimens, like BV-AVD (BV+ adriamycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) and BrECADD (brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and dexamethasone). The accruing data about the toxicity of the escalated BEACOPP protocol have led to decreasing the number of therapeutic cycles, substitution of toxic agents like procarbazine with dacarbazine (e.g., BEACOPDac), and reduction/omission of radiation therapy. Lately, a significant advancement has been made by the integration of checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line treatment, with preliminary results demonstrating the superiority of anti-PD1 combined with chemotherapy (nivolumab-AVD) compared to the BV-AVD regimen. This review aims to analyze recently published studies whose findings could change the treatment practice in advanced-stage HL.

Increased-dose bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPescalated) improves progression-free survival in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), but is associated with increased risks of haematological toxicity, secondary myelodysplasia or leukaemia, and infertility. We investigated whether PET monitoring during treatment could allow dose de-escalation by switching regimen (BEACOPPescalated to ABVD) in early responders without loss of disease control compared with standard treatment without PET monitoring. AHL2011 is a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 study done in 90 centres across Belgium and France. Eligible patients were aged 16–60 years and had newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma, excluding nodular lymphocyte predominant subtype, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score less than 3, a life expectancy of at least 3 months, an Ann Arbor disease stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum-to-thorax ratio of 0·33 or greater than or extranodal localisation, and had received no previous treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. Randomisation was unmasked and done centrally by the permuted block method. Patients were randomly assigned to standard treatment (BEACOPPescalated given every 21 days for six cycles) or PET-driven treatment. All patients received two cycles of upfront BEACOPPescalated, after which PET assessment was done (PET2). In the standard treatment group, PET2 patients completed two additional cycles of BEACOPPescalated induction therapy irrespective of PET2 findings. In the PET-driven treatment group, patients with positive PET2 scans received the further two cycles of BEACOPPescalated and those with a negative PET2 scan switched to two cycles of ABVD for the remaining induction therapy. In both treatment groups, PET at the end of induction therapy was used to decide whether to continue with consolidation therapy in those with negative scans or start salvage therapy in patients with positive scans (either two cycles of ABVD in PET2-negative patients in the PET-driven arm or two cycles of BEACOPPescalated). BEACOPPescalated consisted of bleomycin 10 mg/m2 and vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 intravenously on day 8, etoposide 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1–3, doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, 100 mg/m2 oral procarbazine on days 1–7, and 40 mg/m2 oral prednisone on days 1–14. ABVD was given every 28 days (doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, bleomycin 10 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 15). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Non-inferiority analyses were done by intention to treat and per protocol. The study had a non-inferiority margin of 10%, to show non-inferiority of PET-guided treatment versus standard care with 80% power and an alpha of 2·5% (one-sided). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01358747. From May 19, 2011, to April 29, 2014, 823 patients were enrolled—413 in the standard care group and 410 in the PET-driven group. 346 (84%) of 410 patients in the PET-driven treatment group were assigned to receive ABVD and 51 (12%) to continue receiving BEACOPPescalated after PET2. With a median follow-up of 50·4 months (IQR 42·9–59·3), 5-year progression-free survival by intention to treat was 86·2%, 95% CI 81·6–89·8 in the standard treatment group versus 85·7%, 81·4–89·1 in the PET-driven treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·084, 95% CI 0·737–1·596; p=0·65) and per protocol the values were 86·7%, 95% CI 81·9–90·3 and 85·4%, 80·7–89·0, respectively (HR 1·144, 0·758–1·726; p=0·74). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were leucopenia (381 [92%] in the standard treatment group and 387 [95%] in the PET-driven treatment group), neutropenia (359 [87%] and 366 [90%]), anaemia (286 [69%] vs 114 [28%]), thrombocytopenia (271 [66%] and 163 [40%]), febrile neutropenia (145 [35%] and 93 [23%]), infections (88 [22%] and 47 [11%]), and gastrointestinal disorders (49 [11%] and 48 [11%]). Serious adverse events related to treatment were reported in 192 (47%) patients in the standard treatment group and 114 (28%) in the PET-driven treatment group, including infections (84 [20%] of 412 vs 50 [12%] of 407) and febrile neutropenia (21 [5%] vs 23 [6%]). Six (1%) patients in the standard care group died from treatment-related causes (two from septic shock, two from pneumopathy, one from heart failure, and one from acute myeloblastic leukaemia), as did two (<1%) in the PET-driven treatment group (one from septic shock and one from acute myeloblastic leukaemia). PET after two cycles of induction BEACOPPescalated chemotherapy safely guided treatment in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma and allowed the use of ABVD in early responders without impairing disease control and reduced toxicities. PET staging allowed accurate monitoring of treatment in this trial and could be considered as a strategy for the routine management of patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique.

Purpose The presence of a bulky tumour at staging in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a predictor of a poor outcome. The total metabolic tumour volume at baseline (TMTV0) computed on PET may improve the evaluation of tumour burden. To explore the clinical usefulness of TMTV0, we compared the prognostic value of TMTV0, tumour bulk and interim PET response in a retrospective single-centre study. Methods From 2007 to 2010, 59 consecutive patients with a first diagnosis of HL were treated in our institution. PET was done at baseline (PET0) and after two cycles of chemotherapy (PET2), and treatment was not modified according to the PET2 result. TMTV0 was measured with a semiautomatic method using a 41 % SUVmax threshold. SUVmax reduction between PET0 and PET2 (ΔSUVmaxPET0-2) was also computed. Based on ROC analysis, patients with a ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 >71 % were considered good responders and a TMTV0 >225 ml was considered to represent hypermetabolic bulky disease. Results Median TMTV0 was 117 ml and 17 patients (29 %) had a TMTV0 >225 ml. TMTV0 (>225 ml vs. ≤225 ml) and tumour bulk (<10 cm vs. ≥10 cm) were predictive of 4-year PFS: 42 % vs. 85 % ( p  = 0.001) and 44 % vs. 79 % ( p  < 0.03), respectively. In multivariate analysis, using ΔSUVmaxPET0-2, TMTV0 and bulky tumour as covariates, only ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 ( p  = 0.0005, RR 6.3) and TMTV0 ( p  < 0.006, RR 4.4) remained independent predictors of PFS. Three prognosis groups were thus identified: ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 >71 % and TMTV0 ≤225 ml ( n  = 37, 63 %), ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 = <71 % or TMTV0 >225 ml ( n  = 17, 29 %), and ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 = <71 % and TMTV0 >225 ml ( n  = 5, 8 %). In these three groups the 4-year PFS rates were 92 %, 49 %, and 20 % ( p  < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion TMTV0 is more relevant than tumour bulk for predicting the outcome in patients with HL, and adds a significant prognostic insight to interim PET response assessment. The combination of TMTV0 and ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 made it possible to identify three subsets of HL patients with different outcomes. This may guide clinicians in their choice of therapeutic strategy.

Purpose We investigated the prognostic value of total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods TMTV was measured in 114 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT at baseline before immunochemotherapy. TMTV was computed by summing the volumes of all lymphomatous lesions after applying the local SUVmax threshold of 41 % using semiautomatic software. Prognostic value was assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Median follow-up was 39 months. Average pretherapy TMTV was 509 ± 568 cm 3 . The 3-year estimates of PFS were 77 % in the low metabolic burden group (TMTV ≤550 cm 3 ) and 60 % in the high metabolic burden group (TMTV >550 cm 3 , p  = 0.04), and prediction of OS was even better (87 % vs. 60 %, p  = 0.0003). Cox regression showed independence of TMTV for OS prediction ( p  = 0.002) compared with other pretherapy indices of tumour burden, such as tumour bulk and the International Prognostic Index. Conclusion Pretherapy TMTV is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with DLBCL.

Purpose The role of interim PET/CT in guiding therapeutic strategies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is debated, mainly because interpretation rules vary among centres. This study aimed to explore the reproducibility and confirm the prognostic value of early PET/CT using the Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. Methods This international confirmatory study retrospectively evaluated 114 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with a rituximab-containing regimen. All patients underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT at baseline (PET0) and after two cycles (PET2), with no therapy change based on the latter. Scans were interpreted by three observers using the Deauville five-point scale and ΔSUVmax between PET0 and PET2 was calculated. Interpretations were evaluated for interobserver agreement and for progression-free survival (PFS) prediction. Results Median follow-up was 39 months. Early PET/CT was predictive of outcome when interpreted with the Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. Using the five-point scale, the overall kappa value was 0.66 with the reference background set in the liver (score ≥4) and interobserver agreement was even better using a 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off (κ = 0.83). Moreover, the prognostic value of interim PET was slightly inferior when using a Deauville score ≥4 than when using a 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off: for the Deauville score the 3-year PFS estimate was 59 % (45–73 %) in PET2-positive patients vs. 81 % (71–91 %) in PET2-negative patients ( P  = 0.003); for the 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off the 3-year PFS estimate was 44 % (23–65 %) in PET2-positive patients vs. 79 % (70–88 %) in PET2-negative patients ( P  = 0.0002). Conclusion Although the Deauville criteria are valid for assessing the prognostic value of early PET/CT in DLBCL, computation of the ΔSUVmax leads to better performance and interobserver reproducibility, and should be preferred when a baseline scan is available.

Cytarabine-based immuno-chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation is standard of care for fit patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Aracytine, Melphalan) is among the most frequently used conditioning regimen. Studies comparing BEAM with Bendamustine-EAM (BeEAM) have suggested that patients treated with BeEAM have a better progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a cross-study analysis to better evaluate BeEAM. Thirty-five patients from a retrospective study who received R-DHAP/BeEAM were compared to 245 patients from the LyMa trial (NCT00921414) who all received R-DHAP followed by R-BEAM. PFS and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. At 2 years there was no difference between R-BEAM and BeEAM in either PFS (84.9% versus 87.9%; p = 0.95) or OS (91.8% versus 94.2%; p = 0.30). Analyses were repeated on a propensity score to reduce biases. Each patient from the BeEAM cohort (n = 30) was matched to three patients from the R-BEAM cohort (n = 90) for age, sex, MIPI score, pre-transplant status disease and rituximab maintenance (RM). PFS and OS at 2 years remained similar between R-BEAM and BeEAM with more renal toxicity in BeEAM group. MCL patients who received R-DHAP induction before ASCT have similar outcome after R-BEAM or BeEAM conditioning regimen.