Explore the vast range of titles available.

The number of HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplants continues to increase worldwide due to recent improvements in outcomes, allowing more patients with hematological malignancies and non-malignant disorders to benefit from this procedure and have a chance to cure their disease. Despite these encouraging results, questions remain as multiple donors are usually available for transplantation, and choosing the best HLA-haploidentical donor for transplantation remains a challenge. Several approaches to haploidentical transplantation have been developed over time and, based on the graft received, can be grouped as follows: T-cell depleted haploidentical transplants, either complete or partial, or with T-cell replete grafts, performed with post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, or G-CSF-primed bone marrow graft and enhanced GVHD prophylaxis. Carefully selecting the donor can help optimize transplant outcomes for recipients of haploidentical donor transplants. Variables usually considered in the donor selection include presence of donor-specific antibodies in the recipient, donor age, donor/recipient gender and ABO combinations, and immunogenic variables, such as natural killer cell alloreactivity or KIR haplotype. Here we provide a comprehensive review of available evidence for selecting haploidentical donors for transplantation, and summarize the recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) on donor selection for different transplant platforms.

Haploidentical related donor transplantation (haplo-HCT) is associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS). We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to analyze risk factors for CRS and outcomes after haplo-HCT. We included 451 patients from four academic centers receiving both peripheral blood and bone marrow grafts. Severe CRS was more common with PB vs. BM grafts (19.5% vs 4.9%, OR 2.9, p = 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified recipient CMV sero-positivity, prior transplant, HCT-CI score and donor–recipient sex mismatch as risk factors for severe CRS. Outcomes were analyzed with no CRS as the comparison group. Overall survival (OS) was superior with mild CRS (HR 0.64, p = 0.05) and worst with severe CRS (HR 2.12, p = 0.0038). Relapse risk was significantly decreased in both mild CRS (HR 0.38, p < 0.0001) and severe CRS (HR 0.17, p < 0.0001) groups. The risk of non-relapse mortality was notably higher in severe CRS group (HR 8.0, p < 0.0001), but not in mild CRS group. Acute GVHD was similar among groups. Chronic GVHD at 1 year was 18.5% for no CRS, 23% for mild CRS, and 4.3% for severe CRS (p = 0.0023), with the competing risk of early mortality and short follow up of surviving patients contributing to the low chronic GVHD rates in the severe CRS group.

Haploidentical donors are now increasingly considered for transplantation in the absence of HLA-matched donors or when an urgent transplant is needed. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) have been recently recognized as an important barrier against successful engraftment of donor cells, which can affect transplant survival. DSA appear more prevalent in this type of transplant due to higher likelihood of alloimmunization of multiparous females against offspring’s HLA antigens, and the degree of mismatch. Here we summarize the evidence for the role of DSA in the development of primary graft failure in haploidentical transplantation and provide consensus recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant Group on testing, monitoring, and treatment of patients with DSA receiving haploidentical hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.

Given the availability and efficacy of the mobilizing agent plerixafor in augmenting hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), there is a strong case for comparing the cost-effectiveness of mobilization with G-CSF + cyclophosphamide versus G-CSF alone. This study investigated the cost and effectiveness (i.e., successful 4 million-CD34+ collection) of G-CSF alone versus high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) + G-CSF mobilization (± on-demand plerixafor) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eligible for autograft in Italy. A decision tree-supported cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) model in MM patients was developed from the societal perspective. The CEA model compared G-CSF alone with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 + G-CSF (± on-demand plerixafor) and was populated with demographic, healthcare and non-healthcare resource utilization data collected from a questionnaire administered to six Italian oncohematologists. Costs were expressed in Euro (€) 2019. The CEA model showed that G-CSF alone was strongly dominant versus cyclophosphamide + G-CSF ( ± on-demand plerixafor), with incremental savings of €1198.59 and an incremental probability of a successful 4 million-CD34+ apheresis (+0.052). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case results. In conclusion, chemotherapy-free mobilization (± on-demand plerixafor) is a “good value for money” option for MM patients eligible for autograft.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an efficient GVHD prophylaxis but has not been extensively evaluated in mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allo-HSCT, for which antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is still considered as a standard. Thus, we evaluated the outcome of MMUD allo-HSCT with PT-Cy (n = 22) and performed a historical comparison with a control group receiving ATG (n = 40) in a single center experience. Compared with the ATG group, the risk of grade 2–4 acute GVHD was significantly lower in the PT-Cy group (HR = 0.12, 95% CI = [0.03–0.48], p = 0.002). No difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. The risk of both NRM and relapse was significantly lower in the PT-Cy group (NRM: HR = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.00–0.63], p = 0.021; relapse: HR = 0.31; 95% CI = [0.09–1.10], p = 0.07). Thus, we observed significantly better PFS (HR = 0.22, 95% CI = (0.07–0.65); p = 0.006), OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = (0.07–0.84); p = 0.026), and GRFS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI = (0.17–0.80); p = 0.011) in the PT-Cy group. We conclude that PT-Cy is an effective GVHD prophylaxis in the setting of MMUD allo-HSCT, resulting in a better outcome compared with standard prophylaxis using ATG. This suggests that as it was shown in the setting of haploidentical allo-HSCT, the use of PT-Cy can overcome the impact of HLA disparity, leading to promising survivals that approach those observed after HLA matched allo-HSCT.

Background The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is highly effective in preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the haploidentical (Haplo) transplant setting and is being increasingly used in matched sibling (MSD) and matched unrelated (MUD) transplants. There is no information on the impact of donor types using homogeneous prophylaxis with PTCy. Methods We retrospectively compared outcomes of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) who received a first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis from MSD ( n = 215), MUD ( n = 235), and Haplo ( n = 789) donors registered in the EBMT database between 2010 and 2017. Results The median follow-up was 2 years. Haplo-SCT carried a significantly increased risk of acute grade II–IV GVHD (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1–2.4) and NRM (HR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5–4.5) but a lower risk of relapse (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5–0.9) that translated to no differences in LFS (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.8–1.4) or GVHD/relapse-free survival (HR 1; 95% CI 0.8–1.3). Interestingly, the use of peripheral blood was associated with an increased risk of acute (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4–2.6) and chronic GVHD (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2–2.4) but a lower risk of relapse (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5–0.9). Conclusions The use of PTCy in patients with AML in CR1 receiving SCT from MSD, MUD, and Haplo is safe and effective. Haplo-SCT had increased risk of acute GVHD and NRM and lower relapse incidence but no significant difference in survival.

Whether to choose Haploidentical (Haplo) or one-antigen mismatched unrelated donor (1Ag-MMUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) remains an unanswered question. We compared PTCy- Haplo-HCT to PTCy-1Ag-MMUD-HCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (three groups: 1Ag-MMUD using peripheral blood (1Ag-MMUD-PB; n = 155); Haplo using bone marrow (Haplo-BM; n = 647) or peripheral blood (Haplo-PB; n = 949)). Haplo-BM and Haplo-PB had a higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) compared to 1Ag-MMUD-PB (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.23–4.24, p < 0.01; HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.46–4.81, p < 0.01, respectively). Haplo groups experienced a lower leukemia-free survival (LFS) compared to 1Ag-MMUD-PB (Haplo-BM: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06–2.14, p = 0.02; Haplo-PB: 1.47, 95% CI 1.05–2.05, p = 0.02); overall survival (OS) was also lower in Haplo-HCT (Haplo-BM: HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02–2.21, p = 0.04; Haplo-PB: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.05–2.19, p = 0.03). No differences were observed for graft-versus-host/relapse-free survival (GRFS) and relapse incidence (RI). Haplo-BM was associated with a lower risk of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24–0.81; p < 0.01), while no statistical differences were observed between groups for grade II-IV aGVHD and for cGVHD. Use of PTCy in 1Ag-MMUD-HCT is a valid alternative to consider when using alternative donors. Larger analysis of 1Ag-MMUD versus Haplo-HCT are warranted.

The association of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia effect after stem-cell transplantation (SCT) is well established but with limited data in the setting of haploidentical SCT (haploSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We used a series of landmark analyses to investigate this association in 805 AML patients following haploSCT. On day +100, 707 patients were alive and leukemia-free, 500 had no prior acute GVHD, 137 had acute GVHD grade II and 70 had grade III–IV. Subsequent relapse rates were 20.3%, 23.2% and 15.0%, respectively (P = 0.52). Subsequent non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 8.6%, 17.8% and 38.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 71.0%, 59.0% and 46.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that acute GVHD grade II and grade III–IV were not associated with relapse (HR 1.21, P = 0.37 and HR 1.03, P = 0.94), but were associated with increased NRM (HR 2.09, P = 0.005 and HR 6.41, P < 0.0001) and lower LFS (HR 1.47, P = 0.02 and HR 2.59, P = < 0.0001). Chronic GVHD was not associated with subsequent relapse. Extensive chronic GVHD was associated with higher NRM (HR 6.72, P < 0.0001) and inferior LFS (HR 3.29, P = < 0.0001). GVHD of any type or grade is not associated with lower relapse after haploSCT with PTCy. Severe forms are associated with higher NRM and lower survival.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasia (BPDCN) is a rare myeloid malignancy with a generally poor prognosis. Although preliminary evidence suggests that hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) could improve outcome in patients with BPDCN, the individual contributions of conditioning and graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects to HCT success are undefined. We present a retrospective study of 162 adult patients who underwent a first HCT (allogeneic 146, autologous 16) between 2009 and 2017, and were registered with the EBMT. Median age was 57 (range 20–73) years, and disease status at HCT was first complete remission (CR1) in 78%. Among patients receiving allogeneic HCT (alloHCT), myeloablative conditioning (MAC), reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and in-vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) were used in 54%, 46%, and 59% respectively. Total body irradiation (TBI) was the conditioning backbone in 61% of MAC and 26% of RIC transplants. One-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were comparable after alloHCT and autologous HCT (autoHCT). Among alloHCT recipients, MAC with TBI significantly improved OS and PFS, independently of CR1, age, Karnofsky index and TCD. Accordingly, MAC (ideally based on TBI) should be preferred for alloHCT recipients with BPDCN. In patients who are not elegible for MAC alloHCT, autoHCT could be considered.

The use of haplo-HCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is a new standard in the treatment of hematological diseases. A paucity of data exists on risk factors for engraftment failure in haplo-HCT with PT-Cy. We analyzed 1939 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received a first haplo-HCT from 2010 to 2019. Status at haplo-HCT was first complete remission (CR1) in 72.5% of patients, secondary AML was reported in 9.9%. Median follow-up was 24.4 months and median age at haplo-HCT was 51 years. Stem cell source was bone marrow (BM) in 42% and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) in 58%, and 64% of patients received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen. Cumulative incidence of primary graft failure (GF) was 6%; GF was reported in 110 patients and 54 died before day +30 with no sign of cell recovery. Overall, 33 patients underwent a second HCT in a median time of 45 days and 13 were alive at last follow-up, the 2-year overall survival (OS) after second HCT being 32.4%. In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with the risk of nonengraftment were: secondary AML (HR 1.30, p = 0.003), use of RIC (HR 1.22, p < 0.001), and use of BM (HR 1.21, p < 0.001). At 2 years, leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS for the entire population was 55.2% (95% CI: 52.6–57.6) and 60.9% (95% CI: 58.4–63.3), respectively. Incidence of GF after haplo-HCT with PT-Cy is lower than reported T-cell-depleted haplo-HCT. Optimization of conditioning regimen and graft source should be considered for reducing the risk of GF in haplo-HCT recipients using PT-Cy.