Explore the vast range of titles available.

The WHO 95-95-95 targets for 2030 do not imply that people living with HIV (PLHIV) achieve a good quality of life. The current 30-day dispensing interval for antiretroviral (ART) burdens the healthcare system. Lengthening dispensing intervals could alleviate this burden as well as enhance patient well-being. To capture perceptions on 90-day dispensing interval (90D) for ART from the perspective of PLHIV, people on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), doctors, and pharmacists. Multi-centre observational survey led in France from 16 to 20 October 2020, among doctors agreeing to participate via regional coordinated care organisations for HIV, all PLHIV or people on PrEP consulting these outpatient-clinic doctors, and pharmacists doing ART dispensing. The survey was completed by 220 doctors who saw 1087 people (999 PLHIV; 88 on PrEP) and 176 pharmacists from 55 centres. Among the PLHIV, 855 (85.6%, 95% CI: 83.2%-87.7%) and among the patients on PrEP, 70 (79.5%, 95% CI: 69.6%-87.4%) stated they would be interested in 90D. All in all, patients who were more likely to endorse 90D are those who opt exclusively for hospital dispensing (OR 3.22 [1.57-6.58]) and who rotate between hospital and community pharmacy dispensing (OR 3.29 [1.15-9.32]). Patients who were less likely to endorse 90-D were those who consult in a city located outside the 3 French high HIV prevalence regions (OR 0.66 [0.44-0.99]), receive 2 vs 1 pill QD regimens (OR 0.53 [0.31-0.91]), and anticipate at least one vs no limitation to 90D (OR 0.27 [0.17-0.42]). 90D was perceived as possible by 152 pharmacists (86.4%), including 8 (5%) without restriction, and 219 doctors (99.6%), including 42 (19.2%) regardless of PLHIV's immunovirologic status or social conditions (health insurance coverage, access to housing or accommodation, access to rights, resources). Comparison of the benefits and limitations of a 90-day ART dispensing interval as perceived by PLHIV and people on PrEP, doctors and pharmacists shows that doctors anticipate a higher number of benefits than people on ART and/or pharmacists, chiefly that 90D would be more convenient and create less risk of drug shortages and that patients would gain autonomy and a better quality of life. Pharmacists were found to clearly perceive the economic benefits (90D would be less expensive) but anticipate more drawbacks than doctors and the people on ART themselves: more administrative burdens, more non-dispensing if doses get lost, harder to track adherence and more drug-drug interaction issues, and more work as they shall have to warn the patient of potential risks of shortages due to the cost of the stock. A clear majority of PLHIV, people on PrEP, doctors, and pharmacists endorsed 90D of ART. Most patients thought that 90D would be a good option, whereas most pharmacists and doctors thought that eligibility for 90D dispensing should depend on immunovirologic factors and social condition criteria. Moreover, pharmacists thought it would be necessary to commit regulatory resources and a better follow-up on adherence and drug-drug interactions.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate people living with HIV (PLWH) and HIV specialist prescribers’ perception of discussing antiretroviral therapy (ART) price in PLWH’s care and the acceptability of choosing or switching to various types of less expensive ARTs.DesignCross-sectional surveys (one in a convenience sample of PLWH and one in a voluntary response sample of HIV specialist prescribers).Setting and participantsThe surveys were conducted among PLHW attending an HIV clinic in the North of Paris (cohort of 4922 PLWH in 2016), and HIV specialists working in French HIV clinics (210 across 12 districts/28), between January and June 2016.MethodSelf-administered questionnaires were constructed using data collected during focus groups with PLWH and prescribers. Pretests were carried out to select the questions and items. Descriptive analyses of the 129 complete questionnaires of PLWH and 79 of prescribers are presented.ResultsAmong PLWH, 128/129 were on ART and 54% (69/128) gave a fair estimation of the price of their current regimen. Among prescribers, 24% (19/79) thought that their patients knew this price. Taking into account the price of ART was not perceived as a negative step in the history of French response to HIV epidemic for 53% (68/129) of PLWH and 82% (65/79) of prescribers. Seventy-seven PLWH (60%) would agree to switch to less expensive antiretroviral regimens (as effective and with similar adverse events) if pills were bigger; 42 (33%) if there were more daily doses, and 37 (29%) if there were more pills per dose; prescribers were more circumspect.ConclusionA high proportion of PLWH gave a fair estimate of their ART price and this seemed unexpected by HIV specialists. Consideration of drug prices when choosing ART was perceived as conceivable by PLWH and prescribers if effectiveness and tolerance were also considered.

In France, antiretroviral (ARV) treatment can be dispensed by hospital and/or community pharmacies. Since January 2016, an online patient medication file can be used to optimize dispensing, but medication interviews have not yet been incorporated into this system. To understand both people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their pharmacists’ habits and expectations of patient medication file and interviews, two consecutive national surveys were organized. The first one, carried out in October 2016 in care centers, was an anonymous questionnaire for PLHIV. The second one was an online survey for community and hospital pharmacies conducted in February 2017. A total of 1137 PLHIV (68% men, of mean age 50.2 ± 11.5 years, CD4 count 671 ± 354, 90% with undetectable HIV viral load (VL) and 64.2% reporting comorbidities) and 246 pharmacies responded. While the existence of the online medication file is known by 58% of PLHIV, only 40% of pharmacists declare it to be systematically offered. It was offered to 120/694 (17%) PLHIV and 96 (80%) accepted it. Currently, 78 (7%) PLHIV feel well taken care of because they are offered medication interviews, 343/1078 (32%) would like to take advantage of this program, mainly those with a shorter ARV duration (OR ARV duration 0.97 [0.95‐0.99]), a VL less often undetectable (OR undetectable VL 0.55 [0.31‐0.98]), and those who feel anxious more often (OR anxious 2.38 [1.48‐3.84]). These results suggest that better implementation of medication files and interviews will strengthen current clinical pathways.

We compared use of a 3-class regimen (nevirapine [Nvp], stavudine [d4T], and indinavir [Idv; 1000 mg 3 times daily]) with use of a 2-class regimen (lamivudine [3TC], d4T, and Idv [800 mg 3 times daily]) for 145 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). At week 72, the plasma HIV-1 RNA level was undetectable in 52% of Nvp recipients versus 79% of 3TC recipients (P < .001). Idv trough levels were 81 ng/mL in the Nvp group and 99 ng/mL in the 3TC group (P = .012). In the Nvp group, 42.5% of patients discontinued the study regimen; in the 3TC group, 22.5% of patients discontinued therapy (P = .013). The rate of resistance to nonnucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors among patients in the Nvp group with virological failure was not different from the rate of resistance to 3TC among patients in the 3TC group with virological failure. These results do not support the use of a 3-class regimen that includes Nvp for patients with no or limited exposure to nucleoside analogues.

The tissular distribution of pentamidine mesylate (4 mg/kg as free base) after intravenous, intramuscular, and aerosol administration in healthy rats was examined. Pentamidine levels in the plasma, lungs, liver, kidneys, and other organs were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pentamidine was undetectable in the plasma after day 5. At day 1, the injected groups had high concentrations of the drug in the kidneys (32–34 μg/g) and spleen with much lower concentrations in the lungs and the liver (3.12–5.70 μg/g and 1.64–2.19 μg/g, respectively). Aerosol delivery of pentamidine produced negligible extrapulmonary drug levels (3.29 μg/g in kidneys at day 1)and high sustained pulmonary levels throughout the 60 d of the study (range 5.42–19.62 μg/g), The half-time of elimination was longer in the lungs and kidneys (29–45 d) than in the liver (1.4–7.0 d) regardless of the mode of administration.

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia has been the most frequent life-threatening opportunistic infection in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 1 , 2 but its incidence has fallen with the use of primary prophylaxis in persons with CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts below 200 per cubic millimeter (0.2 × 10 9 per liter.) 3 Oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 4 – 6 and aerosolized pentamidine 7 – 11 have demonstrated efficacy and are the regimens most frequently used to prevent both first episodes and relapses of P. carinii pneumonia. Two recent trials demonstrated better efficacy but poorer tolerance of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as compared with aerosolized pentamidine for primary 12 and secondary 13 prophylaxis. Dapsone is effective . . .