Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
75 result(s) for "Chaitman, Bernard R"
Sort by:
Troponin and Cardiac Events in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Diabetes
Among patients with diabetes and stable heart disease, those with troponin T levels of 14 ng per liter or more had a 5-year rate of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke of 27%, versus 13% in those with lower levels, but received no benefit from prompt revascularization. Cardiac troponin concentration is the preferred marker of myocardial necrosis. 1 Elevated concentrations of cardiac troponin have a strong association with an adverse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes and are used to identify patients who are likely to benefit from an early invasive management strategy. 2 – 4 High-sensitivity assays that allow the measurement of very low cardiac troponin levels in patients with stable heart disease are now available for clinical and research use. These low, previously undetectable troponin concentrations have shown strong associations with myocardial infarction, stroke, and death in a variety of primary and secondary prevention populations, including in . . .
Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion in High-Risk Patients after Hip Surgery
This trial compared a restrictive hemoglobin threshold with a liberal threshold for blood transfusion among hip-surgery patients with risk factors for CVD. The liberal strategy resulted in more transfusions and did not reduce death or inability to walk independently. In the United States, more than 17 million red-cell units are collected annually, and 15 million units are transfused. 1 Blood transfusions are frequently given to surgical patients and to the elderly. 2 , 3 Yet, the indications for postoperative transfusion have not been adequately evaluated and remain controversial. Most clinical trials have been small. 4 One adequately powered trial involving adults in intensive care units showed a nonsignificant decrease in 30-day mortality with a restrictive transfusion strategy, as compared with a liberal strategy (18.7% vs. 23.3%). 5 However, the effect of a restrictive approach on functional recovery or risk of myocardial infarction in patients . . .
Liberal versus restrictive blood transfusion strategy: 3-year survival and cause of death results from the FOCUS randomised controlled trial
Blood transfusion might affect long-term mortality by changing immune function and thus potentially increasing the risk of subsequent infections and cancer recurrence. Compared with a restrictive transfusion strategy, a more liberal strategy could reduce cardiac complications by lowering myocardial damage, thereby reducing future deaths from cardiovascular disease. We aimed to establish the effect of a liberal transfusion strategy on long-term survival compared with a restrictive transfusion strategy. In the randomised controlled FOCUS trial, adult patients aged 50 years and older, with a history of or risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and with postoperative haemoglobin concentrations lower than 100 g/L within 3 days of surgery to repair a hip fracture, were eligible for enrolment. Patients were recruited from 47 participating hospitals in the USA and Canada, and eligible participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio by a central telephone system to either liberal transfusion in which they received blood transfusion to maintain haemoglobin level at 100 g/L or higher, or restrictive transfusion in which they received blood transfusion when haemoglobin level was lower than 80 g/L or if they had symptoms of anaemia. In this study, we analysed the long-term mortality of patients assigned to the two transfusion strategies, which was a secondary outcome of the FOCUS trial. Long-term mortality was established by linking the study participants to national death registries in the USA and Canada. Treatment assignment was not masked, but investigators who ascertained mortality and cause of death were masked to group assignment. Analyses were by intention to treat. The FOCUS trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00071032. Between July 19, 2004, and Feb 28, 2009, 2016 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups: 1007 to the liberal transfusion strategy and 1009 to the restrictive transfusion strategy. The median duration of follow-up was 3·1 years (IQR 2·4–4·1 years), during which 841 (42%) patients died. Long-term mortality did not differ significantly between the liberal transfusion strategy (432 deaths) and the restrictive transfusion strategy (409 deaths) (hazard ratio 1·09 [95% CI 0·95–1·25]; p=0·21). Liberal blood transfusion did not affect mortality compared with a restrictive transfusion strategy in a high-risk group of elderly patients with underlying cardiovascular disease or risk factors. The underlying causes of death did not differ between the trial groups. These findings do not support hypotheses that blood transfusion leads to long-term immunosuppression that is severe enough to affect long-term mortality rate by more than 20–25% or cause of death. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Cardiac ultrasomics for acute myocardial infarction risk stratification and prediction of all-cause mortality: a feasibility study
Background Current risk stratification tools for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have limitations, particularly in predicting mortality. This study utilizes cardiac ultrasound radiomics (i.e., ultrasomics) to risk stratify AMI patients when predicting all-cause mortality. Results The study included 197 patients: (a) retrospective internal cohort ( n  = 155) of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction ( n  = 63) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction ( n  = 92) patients, and (b) external cohort from the multicenter Door-To-Unload in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction [DTU-STEMI] Pilot Trial ( n  = 42). Echocardiography images of apical 2, 3, and 4-chamber were processed through an automated deep-learning pipeline to extract ultrasomic features. Unsupervised machine learning (topological data analysis) generated AMI clusters followed by a supervised classifier to generate individual predicted probabilities. Validation included assessing the incremental value of predicted probabilities over the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score 2.0 to predict 1-year all-cause mortality in the internal cohort and infarct size in the external cohort. Three phenogroups were identified: Cluster A (high-risk), Cluster B (intermediate-risk), and Cluster C (low-risk). Cluster A patients had decreased LV ejection fraction ( P  < 0.01) and global longitudinal strain ( P  = 0.03) and increased mortality at 1-year (log rank P  = 0.05). Ultrasomics features alone (C-Index: 0.74 vs. 0.70, P  = 0.04) and combined with global longitudinal strain (C-Index: 0.81 vs. 0.70, P  < 0.01) increased prediction of mortality beyond the GRACE 2.0 score. In the DTU-STEMI clinical trial, Cluster A was associated with larger infarct size (> 10% LV mass, P  < 0.01), compared to remaining clusters. Conclusions Ultrasomics-based phenogroup clustering, augmented by TDA and supervised machine learning, provides a novel approach for AMI risk stratification.
Prognostic Value of Adipokines in Predicting Cardiovascular Outcome: Explaining the Obesity Paradox
To evaluate the cardiovascular (CV) prognostic value of adipokines in a large prospective cohort of patients participating in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial. The effects of the adipokine levels at baseline and change from baseline on the composite outcome (CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) were analyzed using unadjusted and fully adjusted Cox models in 2330 patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease who had participated in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (from January 1, 2001, through December 1, 2008). In a fully adjusted model, baseline leptin and change from baseline leptin were protective for CV events, whereas baseline adiponectin, baseline tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), change from baseline TNF-α, baseline C-reactive protein (CRP), and change from baseline CRP were harmful. The effect of baseline leptin on CV events depended on the body mass index (BMI), such that the hazard ratios (HRs) varied between 0.6 and 1.4 across the BMI quintiles (interaction P=.03). The same was true for baseline adiponectin (HR varied from 0.7 to 1.7; interaction P=.01), change from baseline monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (HR varied from 0.8 to 1.8; interaction P=.03), change from baseline TNF-α (HR varied from 0.9 to 1.4; interaction P=.02), and change from baseline IL-6 (HR varied from 0.7 to 1.8; interaction P=.005). Adipokines are independent predictors of CV events in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. The association between the specific adipokines and CV outcome varies depending on BMI. This reflects the complex pathophysiology of CV disease in obesity and may help explain the “obesity paradox.” clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00006305.
Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy
In this clinical trial involving patients with established cardiovascular disease, the addition of niacin to intensive statin therapy provided no additional clinical benefit over a period of 3 years, despite favorable changes in lipid levels. More than 18 million North Americans have coronary heart disease, and despite profound advances in both pharmacologic and interventional management, both morbidity and mortality remain appreciable. 1 , 2 Elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are an established predictor of the risk of coronary heart disease. Multiple primary and secondary prevention trials have shown a significant reduction of 25 to 35% in the risk of cardiovascular events with statin therapy 3 ; however, residual risk persists despite the achievement of target LDL cholesterol levels. Epidemiologic studies have shown that, in addition to elevated LDL cholesterol levels, low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol . . .
Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome
Dalcetrapib, an inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein, raises HDL cholesterol levels. In this clinical trial involving patients with an acute coronary syndrome, dalcetrapib had no beneficial effect on clinical outcomes, despite raising HDL cholesterol levels. High-density lipoproteins (HDLs) participate in the process of cellular cholesterol efflux and may have additional protective effects against atherothrombosis. 1 An inverse association between levels of HDL cholesterol and incident events of coronary heart disease has been shown in observational studies 2 , 3 and persists in most post hoc analyses and meta-analyses of trials of statin therapy for patients with cardiovascular risk factors, chronic cardiovascular disease, or recent acute coronary syndrome. 4 – 10 However, it remains uncertain whether pharmacologic intervention that raises HDL cholesterol levels results in decreased cardiovascular risk. 11 – 16 Moreover, changes in HDL cholesterol levels may not reflect changes in the . . .
Prospective Surveillance for Cardiac Adverse Events in Healthy Adults Receiving Modified Vaccinia Ankara Vaccines: A Systematic Review
Vaccinia-associated myo/pericarditis was observed during the US smallpox vaccination (DryVax) campaign initiated in 2002. A highly-attenuated vaccinia strain, modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) has been evaluated in clinical trials as a safer alternative to DryVax and as a vector for recombinant vaccines. Due to the lack of prospectively collected cardiac safety data, the US Food and Drug Administration required cardiac screening and surveillance in all clinical trials of MVA since 2004. Here, we report cardiac safety surveillance from 6 phase I trials of MVA vaccines. Four clinical research organizations contributed cardiac safety data using common surveillance methods in trials administering MVA or recombinant MVA vaccines to healthy participants. 'Routine cardiac investigations' (ECGs and cardiac enzymes obtained 2 weeks after injections of MVA or MVA-HIV recombinants, or placebo-controls), and 'Symptom-driven cardiac investigations' are reported. The outcome measure is the number of participants who met the CDC-case definition for vaccinia-related myo/pericarditis or who experienced cardiac adverse events from an MVA vaccine. Four hundred twenty-five study participants had post-vaccination safety data analyzed, 382 received at least one MVA-containing vaccine and 43 received placebo; 717 routine ECGs and 930 cardiac troponin assays were performed. Forty-five MVA recipients (12%) had additional cardiac testing performed; 22 for cardiac symptoms, 19 for ECG/laboratory changes, and 4 for cardiac symptoms with an ECG/laboratory change. No participant had evidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic myo/pericarditis meeting the CDC-case definition and judged to be related to an MVA vaccine. Prospective surveillance of MVA recipients for myo/pericarditis did not detect cardiac adverse reactions in 382 study participants. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00082446 NCT003766090 NCT00252148 NCT00083603 NCT00301184 NCT00428337.
Effect of PCI on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
Patients in the COURAGE trial who gave permission for long-term survival tracking were followed for up to 15 years. There was no difference between the PCI and medical-therapy groups in all-cause mortality. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relieves angina and reduces the extent of myocardial ischemia in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, but trials have not shown a survival benefit. By contrast, among patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, PCI has been shown to increase survival rates, 1 , 2 and among patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, PCI has been shown to improve long-term survival, with a reduction in both early and late cardiac events. 3 , 4 Nevertheless, uncertainty persists about the effect of PCI on long-term survival among patients with stable ischemic heart disease. In the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive . . .
Prognostic importance of coronary anatomy and left ventricular ejection fraction despite optimal therapy: Assessment of residual risk in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation Trial
It is unknown if baseline angiographic findings can be used to estimate residual risk of patients with chronic stable angina treated with both optimal medical therapy (OMT) and protocol-assigned or symptom-driven percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalization for non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome were adjudicated in 2,275 COURAGE patients. The number of vessels diseased (VD) was defined as the number of major coronary arteries with ≥50% diameter stenosis. Proximal left anterior descending, either isolated or in combination with other disease, was also evaluated. Depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was defined as ≤50%. Cox regression analyses included these anatomical factors as well as interaction terms for initial treatment assignment (OMT or OMT + PCI). Percutaneous coronary intervention and proximal left anterior descending did not influence any outcome. Death was predicted by low LVEF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.86, CI 1.34-2.59, P < .001) and VD (HR 1.45, CI 1.20-1.75, P < .001). Myocardial infarction and non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome were predicted only by VD (HR 1.53, CI 1.30-1.81 and HR 1.24, CI 1.06-1.44, P = .007, respectively). In spite of OMT and irrespective of protocol-assigned or clinically driven PCI, LVEF and angiographic burden of disease at baseline retain prognostic power and reflect residual risk for secondary ischemic events.