Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
95 result(s) for "Chang, Jocelyn"
Sort by:
Longitudinal Effects of Mother-Child Sleep on Maternal Chronic Stress
Sleep is vital for well-being. During the COVID-19 pandemic, significant disturbances in family life impacted both stress and sleep, particularly in parents of young children. In the context of parent-child relations, both maternal sleep and child sleep are likely to have inordinate impacts on maternal physiological functioning. This study examines the longitudinal relationship between maternal and child sleep and maternal chronic stress, indexed by hair cortisol, during the early stages of the pandemic. Participants included 113 mothers ( Mage = 37.20 years, SD = 5.23) and their children (females = 49%; Mage = 72.88 months, SD = 10.94). Mothers completed surveys on sleep and provided hair samples for the analysis of cortisol. Regression analyses demonstrated that after controlling for initial levels of cortisol, child sleep disturbance, but not maternal sleep problems, at Time 1 predicted maternal hair cortisol at Time 2 (about 6 months later; b = .283, SE = .107, p = .008). Child's sleep and its implications for maternal physiological health are discussed.
Smartphone use on the toilet and the risk of hemorrhoids
Smartphones are ubiquitous in daily life, with many people now using them while sitting on the toilet. Despite anecdotal evidence that length of time spent on the toilet is a risk factor for hemorrhoids, a multivariate analysis of smartphone use has not been performed. This study examines the correlation between smartphone use on the toilet and prevalence of hemorrhoids. A cross-sectional study was conducted among adult patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Participants completed survey questions regarding their smartphone habits while using the toilet, Rome IV questionnaires, and additional behaviors including straining, fiber intake and levels of physical activity. Presence of hemorrhoids were evaluated endoscopically and independently rated by two blinded endoscopists. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests and linear variables with regression analysis. A total of 125 adult participants completed the survey and 43% had hemorrhoids visualized on colonoscopy. Participants who used smartphones on the toilet were younger than non-users (mean ages 55.4 vs. 62.1, p = 0.001). Of all respondents, 66% used smartphones while on the toilet. Participants who used smartphones on the toilet spent significantly more time there than those who did not, with 37.3% of smartphone users spending more than five minutes per visit on the toilet, compared to 7.1% of non-smartphone users (p = 0.006). Furthermore, in a multivariate logistic regression, smartphone use on the toilet was associated with a 46% increased risk of hemorrhoids (p = 0.044) after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, exercise activity, straining and fiber intake. The most common activity performed while on the toilet was reading “news” (54.3%), followed by “social media” (44.4%). The study suggests that prolonged engagement with smartphones while using the toilet may be associated with an increased prevalence of hemorrhoids.
Characterizing fermentable carbohydrate foods in the diets of children with abdominal pain-related disorders of gut-brain interaction and healthy children
Restricting dietary fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) can alleviate symptoms in children with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Due to the restrictions of a low FODMAP diet (LFD), a less restrictive FODMAP Gentle diet (FGD) has been suggested. However, the types and amounts of high FODMAP foods and carbohydrates commonly consumed by children have not been studied. We aimed to identify the high FODMAP foods and proportions of FODMAP carbohydrates consumed by children with DGBI and healthy children (HC) and to determine which usually ingested FODMAPs would be restricted on the FGD. Three-day diet records from both children with DGBI and HC were analyzed and compared to assess the type and amount of high FODMAP foods and carbohydrates ingested. Additionally, the ingested FODMAPs that would be restricted on the FGD were determined. Diet records from 77 children with DGBI and 64 HC were analyzed. The number of foods ingested daily was similar between children with DGBI and HC (12.3 ± 4.2 vs 12.9 ± 3.4, respectively); high FODMAP foods comprised most foods eaten in both groups. Children with DGBI (vs. HC) ate fewer high FODMAP foods per day (6.5 ± 2.3 vs 8.7 ± 2.4, P < 0.0001, respectively). Fructans were the most consumed FODMAP carbohydrate in both groups, and children with DGBI (vs. HC) consumed fewer fructans, lactose, fructose, and polyols (all P < 0.0001). The top 3 food categories consumed in both groups were wheat-containing foods, dairy, and fruits/ 100% fruit juices. In children with DGBI, 80.9% of the high FODMAP foods consumed would be limited on the FGD. Children with DGBI consume fewer high FODMAP foods and carbohydrates than HC, with the top consumed FODMAP carbohydrates being fructans, lactose, and fructose. A FGD would restrict most high FODMAP foods consumed by children with DGBI.
Smartphone use on the toilet and the risk of hemorrhoids
Smartphones are ubiquitous in daily life, with many people now using them while sitting on the toilet. Despite anecdotal evidence that length of time spent on the toilet is a risk factor for hemorrhoids, a multivariate analysis of smartphone use has not been performed. This study examines the correlation between smartphone use on the toilet and prevalence of hemorrhoids. A cross-sectional study was conducted among adult patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Participants completed survey questions regarding their smartphone habits while using the toilet, Rome IV questionnaires, and additional behaviors including straining, fiber intake and levels of physical activity. Presence of hemorrhoids were evaluated endoscopically and independently rated by two blinded endoscopists. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests and linear variables with regression analysis. A total of 125 adult participants completed the survey and 43% had hemorrhoids visualized on colonoscopy. Participants who used smartphones on the toilet were younger than non-users (mean ages 55.4 vs. 62.1, p = 0.001). Of all respondents, 66% used smartphones while on the toilet. Participants who used smartphones on the toilet spent significantly more time there than those who did not, with 37.3% of smartphone users spending more than five minutes per visit on the toilet, compared to 7.1% of non-smartphone users (p = 0.006). Furthermore, in a multivariate logistic regression, smartphone use on the toilet was associated with a 46% increased risk of hemorrhoids (p = 0.044) after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, exercise activity, straining and fiber intake. The most common activity performed while on the toilet was reading \"news\" (54.3%), followed by \"social media\" (44.4%). The study suggests that prolonged engagement with smartphones while using the toilet may be associated with an increased prevalence of hemorrhoids.
Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine if Biomarkers Predict Response to a Pediatric Chronic Pain Symptom Management Program
Background/Objectives: Disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI), characterized by chronic abdominal pain and significant disability, affect 15–20% of children and adults and continue into adulthood in ~60% of cases. Costs for adults reach USD 30 billion per year, yet effective management strategies are elusive. Studies support using cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), but abdominal pain only improves in ~40% of patients. Dietary management (low FODMAP diet; LFD) has also shown promise but it is effective in only a similar percentage of patients. Studies suggest that biologic factors (biomarkers) contribute to CBT response. Similarly, gut microbiome composition appears to influence abdominal pain response to the LFD. However, no previous CBT trials in children or adults have measured these biomarkers, and it is unclear which patients respond best to CBT vs. LFD. Methods: Children aged 7–12 years with DGBIs (n = 200) will be categorized as having/not having Autonomic Nervous System imbalance and/or abnormalities in gut physiology. We will randomize these children to either CBT or a LFD to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in those with/without abnormal physiologic biomarkers. We hypothesize that CBT will be more effective in those without abnormal physiology and LFD will be more effective in children with abnormal physiology. Primary outcome measures include the following: (1) Symptom improvement (abdominal pain frequency/severity) and (2) improvement in health-related quality of life. Conclusions: This innovative multidisciplinary study is the first to identify physiological characteristics that may moderate the response to two different management strategies. Identification of these characteristics may reduce the burden of these disorders through timely application of the intervention most likely to benefit an individual patient.