Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundSexual dysfunction (SD) is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), however, under-reported.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify barriers faced by patients with MS and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in discussing SD.MethodsThis was a two-part prospective study carried out at a tertiary care centre. Patients with MS were surveyed using a 29-item questionnaire and SD was assessed using the MSISQ and ASEX questionnaires; depression screened with PHQ-2. HCPs were surveyed using a 23-item questionnaire.ResultsSeventy four patients (mean age 42.4 ± 10.7, 54 females) and 98 HCPs (mean age 45.8 ± 8.9, 90 females) participated. SD was significant, with primary (36.4%), secondary (27%) and tertiary (29.8%) contributory factors. Commonest barriers reported by patients were dominance of neurological symptoms (N = 30, 40.5%), presence of family or friends (N = 28, 37.8%), and not being asked (N = 25, 33.8%), while HCPs reported presence of family or friends (N = 34, 34.7%), lack of knowledge about SD (N = 30, 30.6%), and inadequate time during the consultation (N = 27, 27.6%).ConclusionsBarriers to discussing SD are similar between patients and HCPs. The most common barriers are addressable through modifications in the clinic environment, raising awareness and providing training opportunities.

Background Performing cognitive–motor dual tasks (DTs) may result in reduced walking speed and cognitive performance. The effect in persons with progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPMS) having cognitive dysfunction is unknown. Objective To profile DT-performance during walking in cognitively impaired pwPMS and examine DT-performance by disability level. Methods Secondary analyses were conducted on baseline data from the CogEx-study. Participants, enrolled with Symbol Digit Modalities Test 1.282 standard deviations below normative value, performed a cognitive single task ([ST], alternating alphabet), motor ST (walking) and DT (both). Outcomes were number of correct answers on the alternating alphabet task, walking speed, and DT-cost (DTC: decline in performance relative to the ST). Outcomes were compared between EDSS subgroups (≤ 4, 4.5–5.5, ≥ 6). Spearman correlations were conducted between the DTC motor with clinical measures. Adjusted significance level was 0.01. Results Overall, participants (n = 307) walked slower and had fewer correct answers on the DT versus ST (both p  < 0.001), with a DTC motor of 15.8% and DTC cognitive of 2.7%. All three subgroups walked slower during the DT versus ST, with DTC motor different from zero ( p ’s < 0.001). Only the EDSS ≥ 6 group had fewer correct answers on the DT versus ST ( p  < 0.001), but the DTC cognitive did not differ from zero for any of the groups ( p  ≥ 0.039). Conclusion Dual tasking substantially affects walking performance in cognitively impaired pwPMS, to a similar degree for EDSS subgroups.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination showed a protein level of 0.74 g/L with a glucose of 3.2 mmol/L (serum 5.5 mmol/L), <1 white blood cell per millilitre and negative oligoclonal bands. A case study in 1999 coined the term 'lymphomatosis cerebri' to describe an exceedingly rare variant of PCNSL characterised by diffuse parenchymal infiltration of lymphomatous cells. 2 Previous presentations include gait disturbance (mainly ataxic), personality change, memory deficits and weight loss. 3 White matter abnormalities in LC have been described affecting all regions of the brain; however, serial MRI has rarely been performed.

BackgroundNeurofilament proteins have been extensively studied in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, where they are promising biomarkers of disease activity and treatment response. Their role in progressive multiple sclerosis, where there is a particularly urgent need for improved biomarkers, is less clear. The objectives of this systematic review are to summarise the literature on neurofilament light and heavy in progressive multiple sclerosis, addressing key questions.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus identified 355 potential sources. 76 relevant sources were qualitatively reviewed using QUADAS-2 criteria, and 17 were identified as at low risk of bias. We summarise the findings from all relevant sources, and separately from the 17 high-quality studies.ResultsDifferences in neurofilament light between relapsing–remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis appear to be explained by differences in covariates. Neurofilament light is consistently associated with current inflammatory activity and future brain atrophy in progressive multiple sclerosis, and is consistently shown to be a marker of treatment response with immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapies. Associations with current or future disability are inconsistent, and there is no evidence of NFL being a responsive marker of purportedly neuroprotective treatments. Evidence on neurofilament heavy is more limited and inconsistent.ConclusionsNeurofilament light has shown consistent utility as a biomarker of neuroinflammation, future brain atrophy and immunosuppressive treatment response at a group level. Neither neurofilament light or heavy has shown a consistent treatment response to neuroprotective disease-modifying therapies, which will require further data from successful randomised controlled trials.

On their behalf, we might wish to be more aggressive in current conventional treatments and be looking to enrol them early in trials of novel compounds, particularly when the transition is still occurring. [...]if the tide cannot be turned, the outpatient conversation can start slowly rather than hastily, to prepare and educate them for life with SPMS.

Sodium blockade with lamotrigine is neuroprotective in animal models of central nervous system demyelination. This study evaluated the effect of lamotrigine on magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR), a putative magnetic resonance imaging measure of intact brain tissue, in a group of subjects with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). In addition, the utility of MTR measures for detecting change in clinically relevant pathology was evaluated. One hundred seventeen people attending the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery or the Royal Free Hospital, London, UK, were recruited into a double-blind, parallel-group trial. Subjects were randomly assigned by minimisation to receive lamotrigine (target dose 400 mg/day) or placebo for 2 years. Treating and assessing physicians and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Results of the primary endpoint, central cerebral volume, have been published elsewhere. Significant differences between the verum and placebo arms were seen in only two measures [normal appearing grey matter (NAGM) p  = 0.036 and lesion peak height (PH) p  = 0.004], and in both cases there was a greater reduction in MTR in the verum arm. Significant correlations were found of change in MS functional composite with all MTR measures except lesion and normal appearing white matter (NAWM) PH. However, the change in MTR measures over 2 years were small, with only NAGM mean ( p  = 0.001), lesion peak location ( p  = 0.11) and mean ( p  < 0.0001) changing significantly from baseline. These data did not show that lamotrigine was neuroprotective. The clinical correlation of MTR measures was consistent, but the responsiveness to change was limited.

MRI measures of tissue atrophy within the central nervous system may reflect the neurodegenerative process which underpins the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). There has been limited longitudinal investigation of MRI-detected atrophy in secondary progressive MS. This study includes 56 subjects with secondary progressive MS. Subjects were followed up for 2 years and MRI analysis was conducted at 12 month intervals using the following measures: (1) whole brain (WB) volume change; (2) grey and white matter (WM) volumes; (3) central brain volume; (4) upper cervical spinal cord (SC) area; (5) T2 lesion volumes. Clinical measures included the Expanded Disability Status Scale and the MS Functional Composite. All volumetric MRI measures were assessed for sensitivity, responsiveness, reliability and correlation with disability. The mean annual atrophy rate of WB was 0.59% per year and this was the most responsive atrophy measure assessed. Grey matter (GM) atrophy (−1.18% per year) was greater and more responsive than WM atrophy (0.12% per year). The SC demonstrated the highest atrophy rate at 1.63% per year. WB, GM and SC atrophy all correlated with change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite z score ( r  = 0.35, 0.42, 0.34), and GM atrophy was the only correlate of change in the 9 Hole Peg Test and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test performance. None of the MRI measures correlated with Expanded Disability Status Score progression. Measures of WB, GM and SC atrophy all have attributes for use as surrogate markers in secondary progressive MS trials and improvement in the reliability of the GM and SC volume measurements may enhance these further.

In the 24-month MS-STAT phase 2 trial, we showed that high-dose simvastatin significantly reduced the annualised rate of whole brain atrophy in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We now describe the results of the MS-STAT cognitive substudy, in which we investigated the treatment effect on cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcome measures. We did a secondary analysis of MS-STAT, a 24-month, double-blind, controlled trial of patients with SPMS done at three neuroscience centres in the UK between Jan 28, 2008, and Nov 4, 2011. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 80 mg simvastatin (n=70) or placebo (n=70). The cognitive assessments done were the National Adult Reading Test, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Graded Naming Test, Birt Memory and Information Processing Battery (BMIPB), Visual Object and Space Perception battery (cube analysis), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. Neuropsychiatric status was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. HRQoL was assessed using the self-reported 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) version 2. Assessments were done at study entry, 12 months, and 24 months. Patients, treating physicians, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Analyses were by intention to treat. MS-STAT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00647348. Baseline assessment revealed impairments in 60 (45%) of 133 patients on the test of frontal lobe function (FAB), and in between 13 (10%) and 43 (33%) of 130 patients in tests of non-verbal and verbal memory (BMIPB). Over the entire trial, we noted significant worsening on tests of verbal memory (T score decline of 5·7 points, 95% CI 3·6–7·8; p<0·0001) and non-verbal memory (decline of 6·8 points, 4·8–8·7; p<0·0001). At 24 months, the FAB score was 1·2 points higher in the simvastatin-treated group than in the placebo group (95% CI 0·2–2·3). The simvastatin group also had a 2·5 points better mean physical component score of the SF-36 (95% CI 0·3–4·8; p=0·028). A treatment effect was not noted for any other outcomes. To our knowledge, this SPMS cohort is the largest studied to date with comprehensive longitudinal cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and HRQoL assessments. We found evidence of a positive effect of simvastatin on frontal lobe function and a physical quality-of-life measure. Although we found no effect of simvastatin on the other outcome measures, these potential effects warrant confirmation and underline the importance of fully assessing cognition and quality of life in progressive multiple sclerosis treatment trials. The Moulton Foundation, the Berkeley Foundation, the Multiple Sclerosis Trials Collaboration, the Rosetrees Trust, a personal contribution from A W Pidgley CBE, and the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and University College London.

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, for which no satisfactory treatment presently exists, accounts for most of the disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Simvastatin, which is widely used for treatment of vascular disease, with its excellent safety profile, has immunomodulatory and neuroprotective properties that could make it an appealing candidate drug for patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We undertook a double-blind, controlled trial between Jan 28, 2008, and Nov 4, 2011, at three neuroscience centres in the UK. Patients aged 18–65 years with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned (1:1), by a centralised web-based service with a block size of eight, to receive either 80 mg of simvastatin or placebo. Patients, treating physicians, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the annualised rate of whole-brain atrophy measured from serial volumetric MRI. Analyses were by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00647348. 140 participants were randomly assigned to receive either simvastatin (n=70) or placebo (n=70). The mean annualised atrophy rate was significantly lower in patients in the simvastatin group (0·288% per year [SD 0·521]) than in those in the placebo group (0·584% per year [0·498]). The adjusted difference in atrophy rate between groups was −0·254% per year (95% CI −0·422 to −0·087; p=0·003); a 43% reduction in annualised rate. Simvastatin was well tolerated, with no differences between the placebo and simvastatin groups in proportions of participants who had serious adverse events (14 [20%] vs nine [13%]). High-dose simvastatin reduced the annualised rate of whole-brain atrophy compared with placebo, and was well tolerated and safe. These results support the advancement of this treatment to phase 3 testing. The Moulton Foundation [charity number 1109891], Berkeley Foundation [268369], the Multiple Sclerosis Trials Collaboration [1113598], the Rosetrees Trust [298582] and a personal contribution from A Pidgley, UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals/UCL Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme.