Explore the vast range of titles available.

This paper is meant to analyze, and to critically evaluate the theoretical and practical foundations that are given by the IMF to justify the economic reforms that it imposed on countries such as Algeria, and that it still forces on underdeveloped countries which at one time or another, need its financial assistance, in their forced transition from a command system (in the form of a State Capitalism) to a free-market economic system, that is towards a capitalist economic system. These required reforms come under the form of a package of economic reforms, often called the \"Washington Consensus\" reforms, and which are of an eminently neoliberal inspiration. These reforms which Algeria has been implementing now and then, chugging along for more than three decades, are not at all appropriate for a satisfactory economic and social development for our country, or for any other developing country. The reason is that they can simply not be sustainable in the long term (ADLI & AKACEM, 2012), because they have not been designed in the interests of the countries such as Algeria but rather in the interest of multinationals companies (Western in particular). (STIGLIS, 2002, pp. 18-24) A better way to develop their economies, countries like Algeria, is to follow the economic development policies through a very strong protectionism, that the USA, starting 1816, has used to develop itself economically; actually, these are the policies that all the present-day developed countries have implemented at a time or another to precisely develop themselves. Unfortunately, for developing countries like Algeria, developed countries are doing everything possible to prevent developing countries from successfully following the economic development policies they have themselves used in the past. Nevertheless, it is still good to know that the history of the economic development of the United States has the greatest economic relevance to today's poor countries like Algeria, as a model of economic development to follow. (REINERT, 2008, pp. VIII- XXIX)

Algeria has more than 1.7 million diabetic patients on to whom a descriptive assessment particularly on the insulin usage behaviors has not yet been initiated, although is needed. This study aims to provide a descriptive analysis of how Algerian diabetic patients perceive and apply insulin injection techniques. using the \"patient\" questionnaire within the Injection Technique Questionnaire (ITQ) 2016 survey, this study assessed the insulin injection practices of 100 patients recruited over a seven-month period in western Algeria at the Tlemcen University Hospital Center. The results of this study are compared to those of the ITQ 2016 survey. pens are the instruments of injection for 98% of Algerians who continue to use mostly long needles of 6- and 8-mm, although 4mm needles are the recommended safer option. Insulin analogues (fast and basal) are plebiscite. Arms and thighs are the preferred injection sites; the abdomen (the preferred site elsewhere) is neglected for reasons to be investigated. The correct re-suspension technique for cloudy insulin is unknown. Extensive pen needle re-use (10+ times) for over half of the patients exposes them to both higher intramuscular (IM) injection risk and lipohypertrophy (LH). Injection training is performed in Algeria by the diabetologist. this study describes for the first time Algerian patients´ insulin injection technique. It highlights their skills and identifies many deficiencies which patients and professionals must correct given the issues in this area.