Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectiveThe European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1 hour algorithm has been primarily validated in Europe, America and Australasia with less knowledge of its performance outside of these settings. We aim to evaluate the performance of the ESC 0/1 hour algorithm across different contexts.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published between 1 January 2008 and 31 May 2019. The primary outcome was index myocardial infarction and the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac event or mortality. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was used to derive the pooled estimate of each outcome.ResultsA total of 11 014 patients from 10 cohorts were analysed for the primary outcome. The algorithm based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn)T (Roche), hs-cTnI (Abbott) and hs-cTnI (Siemens) had pooled sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI=95.1% to 99.5%), 98.1% (95% CI=94.6% to 99.3%) and 98.7% (95% CI=97.3% to 99.3%), respectively. The algorithm based on hs-cTnT (Roche) and hs-cTnI (Siemens) had pooled specificity of 91.2% (95% CI=86.0% to 94.6%) and 95.9% (95% CI=94.1% to 97.2%), respectively. Among patients in the rule-out category, the pooled mortality rate at 30 days and at 1 year was 0.1% (95% CI=0.0% to 0.4%) and 0.8% (95% CI=0.5% to 1.2%), respectively. Among patients in the observation zone, the pooled mortality rate was 0.7% (95% CI=0.3% to 1.2%) at 30 days but increased to 8.1% (95% CI=6.1% to 10.4%) at 1 year, comparable to the mortality rate in the rule-in group.ConclusionThe ESC 0/1 hour algorithm has high diagnostic accuracy but may not be sufficiently safe if the 1% miss-rate for myocardial infarction is desired.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019142280.

ObjectivesSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce heart failure (HF) in at-risk patients and may possess antitumour effects. We examined the effect of SGLT2i on HF and mortality among patients with cancer and diabetes.MethodsThis was a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study involving adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed with cancer between January 2010 and December 2021. The primary outcomes were hospitalisation for incident HF and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were serious adverse events associated with SGLT2i.ResultsFrom a total of 8640 patients, 878 SGLT2i recipients were matched to non-recipients. During a median follow-up of 18.8 months, SGLT2i recipients had a threefold lower rate of hospitalisation for incident HF compared with non-SGLT2i recipients (2.92 vs 8.95 per 1000 patient-years, p=0.018). In Cox regression and competing regression models, SGLT2i were associated with a 72% reduction in the risk of hospitalisation for HF (HR 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.77), p=0.013; subdistribution HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.84), p=0.021). The use of SGLT2i was also associated with a higher overall survival (85.3% vs 63.0% at 2 years, p<0.001). The risk of serious adverse events such as hypoglycaemia and sepsis was similar between the two groups.ConclusionsThe use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower rate of incident HF and prolonged overall survival in patients with cancer with diabetes mellitus.

Before the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus epidemic in Taiwan, only persons with open tuberculosis wore masks in public. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. COVID-19 and the risk to health care workers: a case report.

BackgroundPatients with cryptogenic stroke or embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) face a high risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke, but the optimal antithrombotic strategy remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) versus antiplatelets in these populations, with a focus on subgroup effects by key clinical characteristics.MethodsSix databases were searched through March 2024 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OACs and antiplatelets in patients with cryptogenic stroke or ESUS. The primary outcome was recurrent ischaemic stroke. Subgroup analyses evaluated treatment effects based on supracardiac atherosclerosis risk, presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and signs or risk factors for atrial cardiopathy. Meta-regression with interaction p values was employed to assess differences in treatment effects between subgroups.ResultsNine RCTs comprising 15 451 participants were included. In the overall population, there was no significant difference in recurrent ischaemic stroke risk between OACs and antiplatelets (relative risk (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02; I2=0%). Subgroup analyses showed that OACs reduced ischaemic stroke risk in patients with low-risk supracardiac atherosclerosis (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.80; I2=0%) compared with those with high-risk supracardiac atherosclerosis (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06; I2=0%) and evidence of supracardiac atherosclerosis (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.53; I2=0%) (p interaction=0.0002). Similarly, OACs were more effective in patients with signs or risk factors for atrial cardiopathy (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99; I2=0%) than in those without atrial cardiopathy (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.30; I2=0%) (p interaction=0.02). There was no significant interaction by PFO status (p interaction=0.28). While the risk of major bleeding risk was comparable between groups (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.44; I2=65%), a significantly higher risk of major bleeding other than intracerebral haemorrhage was observed in patients taking OACs compared with antiplatelets (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.43; I2=0%).ConclusionsOACs are more effective than antiplatelets for preventing ischaemic stroke in patients who had a cryptogenic stroke or ESUS with low-risk supracardiac atherosclerosis or atrial cardiopathy. The findings highlight the need for personalised treatment strategies and further trials in these subgroups.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42024518903.

ObjectivesRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated conflicting results regarding the effects of corticosteroids on the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different corticosteroids on patients who were hospitalised for severe CAP.MethodsWe performed a systematic search through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to May 2023. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model.ResultsA total of 10 RCTs comprising 1962 patients were included. Corticosteroids were associated with a lower rate of all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR), 0.70 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.90); I2=0.00%). When stratified into different corticosteroid types, hydrocortisone was associated with an approximately 50% lower mortality risk (RR, 0.48 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.72); I2=0.00%). However, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone or prednisolone were not associated with an improvement in mortality. Furthermore, hydrocortisone was associated with a reduction in the rate of mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, shock and duration of intensive care unit stay. These trends were not observed for dexamethasone, methylprednisolone or prednisolone. Corticosteroids were not associated with an increased risk of adverse events including gastrointestinal bleeding, secondary infection or hyperglycaemia.ConclusionsThe use of hydrocortisone, but not other types of corticosteroids, was associated with a reduction in mortality and improvement in pneumonia outcomes among patients hospitalised with severe CAP.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023431360.

Background Certain angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ (PPAR‐γ) activation property, which has been associated with improved programmed cell death ligand 1 blockade and cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐mediated antitumor activity. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of PPAR‐γ‐activating ARBs on patient survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across all types of cancers. Results A total of 167 patients receiving both angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were included. Compared with non‐PPAR‐γ‐ARB users (n = 102), PPAR‐γ‐ARB users (n = 65) had a longer median overall survival (not reached [IQR, 16.0—not reached] vs. 18.6 [IQR, 6.1–38.6] months) and progression‐free survival (17.3 [IQR, 5.1—not reached] vs. 8.2 [IQR, 2.4–18.6] months). In Cox regression analysis, the use of PPAR‐γ‐activating ARBs had an approximately 50% reduction in all‐cause mortality and disease progression. Patients who received PPAR‐γ‐activating ARBs also had higher clinical benefit rates than non‐PPAR‐γ‐ARB users (82% vs. 61%, p = 0.005). Conclusion The use of ARBs with PPAR‐γ‐activating property is linked with better survival among patients receiving ICIs.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival outcomes in melanoma. Studies exploring the correlations between body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and the outcomes of ICI treatment have yielded inconsistent results. In this study, we aim to investigate the effects of BMI and T2DM on survival outcomes of patients with melanoma receiving ICIs.MethodsA retrospective multicenter cohort of patients with melanoma treated with ICIs was analyzed. Overall survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariate Cox and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity-score matching (1:1) analysis between overweight and non-overweight groups was done and survival analyses and Cox analyses were performed again. Subgroup analyses and secondary analyses stratifying patients with different weights and T2DM statuses were also performed.ResultsA total of 2,078 patients were included, of whom 1,412 were overweight (BMI≥25 kg/m2) and 666 were non-overweight (BMI<25 kg/m2). Overweight patients had better overall survival compared with non-overweight (median 71.7 vs 36.7 months, p<0.001). Patients with T2DM had worse overall survival compared with patients without T2DM (median 28.5 vs 67.3 months, p<0.001). After propensity-score matching (666 overweight were matched to 666 non-overweight), overweight patients remained to have better overall survival compared with non-overweight (median 67.7 vs 36.7 months, p<0.001). Patients with T2DM had worse survival in univariate Cox (HR 1.71, (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.43)) and multivariate Cox (HR 1.58, (95% CI: 1.08 to 2.31)) analyses. Overweight patients without T2DM had the best survival outcomes compared with other weight and T2DM combinations.ConclusionIn patients with melanoma treated with ICIs, being overweight had better survival outcomes compared with non-overweight. Having T2DM was associated with worse survival compared with those without T2DM. Further studies are needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of these associations.