Explore the vast range of titles available.

Chemotherapy for patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma offers poor long-term survival prospects. We report the final analysis from our study of the immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3) at 90 hospitals and cancer centres in Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with unresectable advanced or recurrent oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, and who were refractory or intolerant to one previous fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy and had a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either nivolumab (240 mg for 30 min every 2 weeks) or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 for at least 60 min once per week for 6 weeks then 1 week off; or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for at least 60 min every 3 weeks), all given intravenously. Treatment continued until disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST version 1.1 or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was done using an interactive web response system with a block size of four and stratified according to geographical region (Japan vs rest of the world), number of organs with metastases, and PD-L1 expression. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation until death from any cause, in the intention-to-treat population that included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02569242, and follow-up for long-term outcomes is ongoing. Between Jan 7, 2016, and May 25, 2017, we assigned 419 patients to treatment: 210 to nivolumab and 209 to chemotherapy. At the time of data cutoff on Nov 12, 2018, median follow-up for overall survival was 10·5 months (IQR 4·5–19·0) in the nivolumab group and 8·0 months (4·6–15·2) in the chemotherapy group. At a minimum follow-up time (ie, time from random assignment of the last patient to data cutoff) of 17·6 months, overall survival was significantly improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group (median 10·9 months, 95% CI 9·2–13·3 vs 8·4 months, 7·2–9·9; hazard ratio for death 0·77, 95% CI 0·62–0·96; p=0·019). 38 (18%) of 209 patients in the nivolumab group had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events compared with 131 (63%) of 208 patients in the chemotherapy group. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (four [2%]) in the nivolumab group and decreased neutrophil count (59 [28%]) in the chemotherapy group. Five deaths were deemed treatment-related: two in the nivolumab group (one each of interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis) and three in the chemotherapy group (one each of pneumonia, spinal cord abscess, and interstitial lung disease). Nivolumab was associated with a significant improvement in overall survivaland a favourable safety profile compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and might represent a new standard second-line treatment option for these patients. ONO Pharmaceutical Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a public health concern with a high mortality and disease burden worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a predominant histological subtype of EC that has unique etiology, molecular profiles, and clinicopathological features. Although systemic chemotherapy, including cytotoxic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients, the clinical benefits are limited with poor prognosis. Personalized molecular-targeted therapies have been hampered due to the lack of robust treatment efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the molecular profiles of ESCC based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses, highlighting potent therapeutic targets for establishing future precision medicine for ESCC patients, with the most recent results of clinical trials.

BackgroundEndoscopic resection (ER) has been widely implemented for cT1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Additional therapy, including esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), is sometimes required after noncurative ER.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who received any additional treatment following noncurative ER (positive vertical margins, lymphovascular invasion, or invasion depth of submucosa or more), and compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the two treatment modalities.ResultsOf 108 patients, 56 underwent esophagectomy (E group), and 52 received CRT (CRT group). A positive vertical margin was observed in 17 (14.8%) patients and high risks of occult lymph node metastasis were observed in 91 (85.2%) patients, as well as lymphovascular invasion in 35 (32.4%) patients, invasion depth of the submucosa or more in 27 (25.0%) patients, and both in 29 (26.9%) patients. The E group patients were significantly younger (p = 0.046) and tended to present with larger tumors than those in the CRT group (p = 0.057). Lymphatic invasion was more frequent in the E group (p = 0.019), and, furthermore, one treatment-related death was observed in the E group. There were no significant differences between the groups in overall and disease-specific survival (p = 0.406 and 0.151, respectively), however, recurrence was only observed in the CRT group.ConclusionBoth esophagectomy and CRT are safe and effective as additional treatments after noncurative ER in patients with ESCC. Esophagectomy is oncologically safe, whereas a risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality remains. Although the adverse events are acceptable, CRT has a certain degree of risk of disease recurrence.

BackgroundThere is growing interest in the clinical significance of intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity. Its prognostic and predictive impacts on trastuzumab efficacy were demonstrated in breast cancer. However, its clinical significance in gastric cancer is still unclear.MethodsTwenty-eight HER2-positive gastric cancer patients who had gastrectomy prior to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy were consecutively enrolled. Intratumoral HER heterogeneity was evaluated using whole-tissue sections by immunohistochemistry. When all tumor cells overexpressed HER2 protein, the tumor was defined as homogeneously HER2 (Homo-HER2)-positive group. The others were defined as heterogeneously HER2 (Hetero-HER2)-positive group.ResultsThere was no significant difference in clinicopathological features between the two groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Homo-HER2-positive group were significantly longer than those in the Hetero-HER2-positive group (PFS; 20.0 months [95% CI 17.8–22.2] vs. 6.0 months [95% CI 2.3–9.7]; HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.03–0.41; p < 0.001, OS; not reached vs. 14.0 months [95% CI 11.9–16.1]; HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06–0.61; p = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, these associations remained significant both in PFS (HR 0.12; 95% CI 0.03–0.46, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06–0.72, p = 0.013). With respect to response rate, no statistical difference was found between two groups. However, deeper tumor shrinkage was obtained in the Homo-HER2-positive group compared with the Hetero-HER2-positive group (p = 0.046).ConclusionsIntratumoral HER2 heterogeneity may have robust clinical impact on trastuzumab efficacy in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. These findings should be validated by larger independent cohorts and further molecular correlative analyses are warranted.

S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin showed promising efficacy for treatment of advanced gastric cancer in a randomised phase 2 study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) and oxaliplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial in 62 centres across Japan and South Korea. Patients aged 20 years or older, with a histologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer with negative or unknown HER2 status, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, measurable or evaluable metastatic lesions, and no previous treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system using the minimisation method, stratified by performance status, presence of a measurable lesion, and country, to receive TAS-118 (S-1 40–60 mg and leucovorin 25 mg orally twice daily for 7 days) plus oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) every 2 weeks, or S-1 (40–60 mg orally twice daily) for 21 days plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 or 8) every 5 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival in patients who had advanced gastric cancer with measurable or evaluable metastatic lesions and who received the study drug. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the study drug. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02322593. Between Jan 28, 2015, and Dec 5, 2016, 711 patients were randomised to TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin (n=356) or S-1 plus cisplatin (n=355). 11 untreated patients and 19 ineligible patients were excluded from the primary analysis (TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin group n=347, S-1 plus cisplatin group n=334) following recommendation from the independent data monitoring committee. After median follow-up of 26·0 months (IQR 22·0–32·8), median overall survival was 16·0 months (95% CI 13·8–18·3) in the TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin group and 15·1 months (95% CI 13·6–16·4) in the S-1 plus cisplatin group (hazard ratio 0·83, 95% CI 0·69–0·99; p=0·039). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in the 352 patients in the TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin group and the 348 patients in the S-1 plus cisplatin group were anaemia (56 [16%] vs 64 [18%]), neutropenia (54 [15%] vs 88 [25%]), decreased appetite (53 [15%] vs 46 [13%]), diarrhoea (33 [9%] vs 15 [4%]), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (30 [9%] vs one [<1%]). Serious adverse events were observed in 155 (44%) of 352 patients in the TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin group and 159 (46%) of 348 patients in the S-1 plus cisplatin group. Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin group (pulmonary tuberculosis and viral pneumonia). TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin showed a clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy compared with S-1 plus cisplatin, and could be considered a new first-line treatment option for advanced gastric cancer in Asian patients. Taiho Pharmaceutical and Yakult Honsha.

BackgroundAdjuvant S-1 monotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with pathological stage II or III gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy. This therapeutic regimen is standard in Japan. Unfortunately, some patients who undergo this treatment suffer from recurrent disease. However, information regarding the timing and site-specific trends of recurrence is insufficient.MethodsAmong 396 patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy between 2008 and 2012, 122 experienced a recurrence. We retrospectively determined the timing and sites of recurrence.ResultsThe median RFS of the 122 patients was 19.5 months, and their 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 67.2%, 23.0% and 5.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in RFS among disease substages. Local recurrence, lymph node involvement and peritoneal and hematogenous metastases were found in 6, 25, 63 and 42 patients, respectively. Approximately 10% of patients presented with contemporaneous sites of recurrence. Local recurrence and lymph node metastasis plateaued 3 years after gastrectomy. Peritoneal and hematogenous metastasis increased within 5 years after surgery. In patients with hematogenous metastasis, the number of liver metastases plateaued but increased in others.ConclusionsIn patients with recurrent disease who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy, 80% of recurrences occur within 3 years after gastrectomy. The timing of recurrence is not significantly different among substages. Although the rates of local recurrence and lymph node and liver metastasis plateau after 3 years, peritoneal and the other hematogenous metastases increase within 5 years.

PurposeIn the ATTRACTION-2 trial, nivolumab significantly improved the survival of advanced gastric cancer patients. The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is prognostic in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat various cancers. However, a few reports have explored the relationships between NLR changes during ICI treatment and patient survival. Here, we evaluated factors (including NLR changes in patients on nivolumab monotherapy) prognostic for gastric cancer patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 98 gastric cancer patients who received nivolumab (3 mg/kg or 240 mg/body bi-weekly) at our institution between December 2014 and September 2018. We evaluated pretreatment data, and those obtained 30 and 60 days after treatment commenced. We explored the prognostic utility of relative NLR changes in terms of the overall survival (OS) of patients on nivolumab monotherapy.ResultsOver a median of 4.9 months of follow-up, 98 gastric cancer patients received a median of four treatment courses. The overall response and disease-control rates were 25% and 52%, respectively. The median OS was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6–9.1). On multivariate analysis, factors poorly prognostic in terms of OS were an ECOG performance status of 0–1, a pretreatment NLR > 3, and an NLR difference ≧ 2 over the 60 days before and after nivolumab administration (∆NLR60). Patients with ∆NLR60 values < 2 survived significantly longer than did those with ∆NLR60 values ≧ 2 (median OS 9.2 months [95% CI 6.4–11.6] vs. 4.0 months [2.1–4.9]; P = 0.0002).ConclusionsNivolumab monotherapy was efficacious in gastric cancer patients. NLR changes during such therapy may be predictive of outcomes.

Background The standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using 5-FU plus cisplatin. However, complete response (CR) rates are low at 11–25%, resulting in 9–10 months of median overall survival (OS). An improved therapeutic efficacy by combining immunotherapy with radiation has been reported in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The results using ESCC cell lines suggest sequential treatment with anti-PD-L1 agents soon after completion of CRT is the most effective combination. Methods TENERGY trial is a multicenter, phase II, proof-of-concept study to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab following definitive CRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The main inclusion criteria are unresectable locally advanced ESCC without distant metastasis, completion of 60 Gy of radiation plus two concomitant cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 on day 1 and 5-FU 700 mg/m 2 on days 1–4, every 28 days), and adequate organ function. Within 6 weeks after CRT, participants will start taking 1200 mg of atezolizumab every three weeks and continue until 12 months or disease progression. The primary endpoint is the confirmed CR rate by the investigator’s assessment. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, adverse events, and confirmed CR rate by central assessment. We will enroll 50 patients (40 with primary locally advanced ESCC and 10 with postoperative locoregionally recurrent ESCC). We will obtain biopsies from the primary site and will collect blood at 3 time points (before CRT, after CRT, and four weeks after the start of atezolizumab) for an exploratory biomarker study. We will analyze the phenotype of immune-competent cells, neoantigens, tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 status, and Human Leukocyte Antigen haplotyping. Discussion The synergistic efficacies of the sequential combination of CRT and atezolizumab should improve the CR rate, resulting in survival improvement for patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC. Because CRT is a standard treatment option for patients with early stage to locally advanced ESCC, the sequential combination of CRT and atezolizumab has the potential to change the standard ESCC treatments. Trial registration UMIN000034373 , 10/04/2018 and EPOC1802 .

BackgroundWe recently reported the clinical significance of intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity on trastuzumab efficacy using surgical specimens; patients with homogeneously HER2 positive gastric cancer benefitted more from trastuzumab. However, the majority of patients are diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy, and surgical specimens are not available in these patients. The aim of this study is to verify clinical significance of HER2 heterogeneity on trastuzumab efficacy using biopsy specimens.MethodsEighty-seven patients, who received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy and whose endoscopic biopsy specimens were available for HER2 assessment, were consecutively enrolled. When all tumor cells in all biopsy specimens overexpressed HER2 protein, it was defined as homogeneously HER2 (homo-HER2) positive group, and the others were defined as heterogeneously HER2 (hetero-HER2) positive group. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated.ResultsThirty-four patients (39%) were diagnosed as the homo-HER2 group and 53 patients (61%) were the hetero-HER2 group. After the median follow-up period of 17.8 months, the median PFS and OS were 7.6 and 17.8 months, respectively. Significant survival differences were shown between the two groups; the homo-HER2 group showed significantly longer PFS (10.8 vs. 6.1 months, HR 0.469 95% CI 0.29–0.77, p = 0.003) and OS (29.3 vs. 14.4 months, HR 0.352 95% CI 0.20–0.61, p < 0.001). ORR was 68.6% in this cohort. Higher response rate (85.2% vs 58.1%, p = 0.020) and deeper response (− 49.0% vs − 40.0%, p = 0.018) were also found in the homo-HER2 group.ConclusionsSimilar to surgical specimens, we verified clinical significance of HER2 heterogeneity on trastuzumab efficacy using endoscopic biopsy specimens.