Explore the vast range of titles available.

Energy metabolism is intrinsic to cell viability but surprisingly has been little studied in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). The current study aims to investigate the effect of environmental O2 tension on carbohydrate utilisation of hESCs. Highly pluripotent hESCs cultured at 5% O2 consumed significantly more glucose, less pyruvate and produced more lactate compared to those maintained at 20% O2. Moreover, hESCs cultured at atmospheric O2 levels expressed significantly less OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG than those maintained at 5% O2. To determine whether this difference in metabolism was a reflection of the pluripotent state, hESCs were cultured at 5% O2 in the absence of FGF2 for 16 hours leading to a significant reduction in the expression of SOX2. In addition, these cells consumed less glucose and produced significantly less lactate compared to those cultured in the presence of FGF2. hESCs maintained at 5% O2 were found to consume significantly less O2 than those cultured in the absence of FGF2, or at 20% O2. GLUT1 expression correlated with glucose consumption and using siRNA and chromatin immunoprecipitation was found to be directly regulated by hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2α at 5% O2. In conclusion, highly pluripotent cells associated with hypoxic culture consume low levels of O2, high levels of glucose and produce large amounts of lactate, while at atmospheric conditions glucose consumption and lactate production are reduced and there is an increase in oxidative metabolism. These data suggest that environmental O2 regulates energy metabolism and is intrinsic to the self-renewal of hESCs.

Background Deaths from alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) are rising in the UK, representing a significant public health crisis. Effective interventions are urgently needed to reduce alcohol consumption and improve outcomes for individuals with ARLD. While behaviour change interventions (BCIs) are effective, their scalability is limited. Digital therapeutics offer a promising avenue for delivering BCIs remotely and at scale. AlcoChange, a novel digital therapeutic combining a smartphone app and digital breathalyser, delivers personalised BCIs based on patient triggers. Preliminary data suggest its potential efficacy in reducing alcohol use. Methods This is a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial comparing usual care (review by a hospital Alcohol Care Team and brief intervention) with usual care plus AlcoChange in patients with ARLD. Population Adults aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of ARLD (including cirrhosis, fibrosis, steatohepatitis, or recent alcoholic hepatitis) who have been advised to abstain from alcohol and intend to do so, and who have access to a smartphone. Intervention Usual care plus AlcoChange, comprising a smartphone app and digital breathalyser delivering personalised behaviour change techniques. Comparison Usual care alone. Outcome The primary outcome is the proportion of patients abstinent or reporting low-risk alcohol consumption (< 14 units/week) at 180 days post-randomisation, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method. Secondary outcomes include self-reported alcohol use at various time points, liver disease severity, health-related quality of life, healthcare resource utilisation, and cost-effectiveness. Four hundred participants will be recruited from up to 18 NHS hospitals in England and randomised 1:1. A mixed-methods approach was used to develop the trial protocol, including a theory of change framework and bespoke training materials for the TLFB assessment. Discussion This trial will evaluate the real-world efficacy and cost-effectiveness of AlcoChange in reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm in individuals with ARLD. The study addresses the urgent need for scalable interventions to combat the rising burden of ARLD in the UK. The pragmatic design and mixed methods approach to implementation aim to enhance the generalizability and impact of the findings. The trial will provide valuable evidence to inform clinical practice and policy regarding the use of digital therapeutics for alcohol use disorder and liver disease.

IntroductionAcne is one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases worldwide and can have significant psychosocial impact and cause permanent scarring. Spironolactone, a potassium-sparing diuretic, has antiandrogenic properties, potentially reducing sebum production and hyperkeratinisation in acne-prone follicles. Dermatologists have prescribed spironolactone for acne in women for over 30 years, but robust clinical study data are lacking. This study seeks to evaluate whether spironolactone is clinically effective and cost-effective in treating acne in women.Methods and analysisWomen (≥18 years) with persistent facial acne requiring systemic therapy are randomised to receive one tablet per day of 50 mg spironolactone or a matched placebo until week 6, increasing to up to two tablets per day (total of 100 mg spironolactone or matched placebo) until week 24, along with usual topical therapy if desired. Study treatment stops at week 24; participants are informed of their treatment allocation and enter an unblinded observational follow-up period for up to 6 months (up to week 52 after baseline). Primary outcome is the Acne-specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) symptom subscale score at week 12. Secondary outcomes include Acne-QoL total and subscales; participant acne self-assessment recorded on a 6-point Likert scale at 6, 12, 24 weeks and up to 52 weeks; Investigator’s Global Assessment at weeks 6 and 12; cost and cost effectiveness are assessed over 24 weeks. Aiming to detect a group difference of 2 points on the Acne-QoL symptom subscale (SD 5.8, effect size 0.35), allowing for 20% loss to follow-up, gives a sample size of 398 participants.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol was approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee (18/WA/0420). Follow-up to be completed in early 2022. Findings will be disseminated to participants, peer-reviewed journals, networks and patient groups, on social media, on the study website and the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit website to maximise impact.Trial registration numberISRCTN12892056;Pre-results.

Background HTA Programme funding is governed by the need for evidence and scientific quality, reflecting funding of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) by the NHS. The need criterion incorporates covering the spectrum of diseases, but also taking account of research supported by other funders. This study compared the NIHR HTA Programme portfolio of research with the UK burden of disease as measured by Disability-adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study using a cohort of all funded primary research and evidence syntheses projects received by the HTA Programme from April 2011 to March 2016 ( n = 363); to determine the proportion of spend by disease compared with burden of disease in the UK calculated using 2015 UK DALY data. Results The programme costing just under £44 million broadly reflected UK DALY burden by disease. Spend was lower than disease burden for cancer, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal diseases, which may reflect the importance of other funders, notably medical charities, which concentrate on these diseases. Conclusion The HTA Programme spend, adjusted for other relevant funders, broadly matches disease burden in the UK; no diseases are being neglected.

Background: Over 13,000 new cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are diagnosed in the UK, with approximately 4,900 attributable deaths each year. Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common NHL comprising one third of adult NHL cases. R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) is accepted as the international standard first-line regimen, but improvement in first line treatment is needed. Dysregulated B-cell receptor (BCR) signalling has been identified as a feature of DLBCL. Inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk), downstream of the BCR has proven efficacious in other B-cell malignancies and in combination with R-CHOP. The second generation Btk inhibitor, acalabrutinib, may have improved target potency and specificity, and therefore better efficacy and tolerability. Methods: ACCEPT is an open-label non-randomised Phase Ib/II trial testing the addition of acalabrutinib to conventional R-CHOP therapy. ACCEPT incorporates an initial 6+6 modified Phase I design of up to 24 participants followed by 15 participant single arm Phase II expansion cohort in treatment naive patients with histologically confirmed DLBCL expressing CD20. Participants are recruited from UK secondary care sites. Phase I will establish the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D, primary endpoint) of acalabrutinib in combination with R-CHOP. Phase II will gain additional information on safety and efficacy on the RP2D. The primary endpoints of Phase II are overall response rate and toxicity profile. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (progression-free survival and overall survival OS) in relation to cell of origin. Analyses are not powered for formal statistical comparisons; descriptive statistics will describe rates of toxicity, efficacy and translational endpoints. Discussion: ACCEPT will provide evidence for whether acalabrutinib in combination with R-CHOP is safe and biologically effective prior to future Phase II/III trials in patients with previously untreated CD20 positive DLBCL. Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2015-003213-18 (issued 16 July 2015); ISRCTN 13626902 (registered 07 March 2017).

In Southampton Water the copepod Acartia bifilosa presents a diapause reproductive strategy, where there is a switch from subitaneous to diapause egg production around May, prior to the species' disappearance from the water column between June and October. The effect of temperature and photoperiod on the production of diapause eggs by A. bifilosa was studied in an attempt to determine the primary cues for its summer diapause. A parallel study on the effect of temperature on metabolic efficiency of A. bifilosa and the non-diapause species A. discaudata, defined by the species' 'scope for growth' (SfG). was examined as a potential, ultimate reason behind the diapause stage. Photoperiod was identified as the primary proximate cue that induced diapause in A. bifilosa, and this response was temperature-mediated. Diapause was triggered by a 13:11 h light:dark photoperiod (day length), corresponding to a late-April photoperiodic regime, and resting eggs were produced even at temperatures as low as 5 degree C. A very low number of diapause eggs were, however, also produced after 6 d at a 12: 12 h light:dark photoperiod at elevated temperatures between 14 and 20 degree C, but the mean percentage produced was significantly less (p < 0.05) than under the longer day lengths. The ultimate cause of the over-summering strategy of A. bifilosa is currently unknown, but the SfG assay indicated that at 10 degree C, SfG was twice that at 20 or 5 degree C, and so it may diapause to avoid the higher temperatures in summer. This pattern contrasted with the SfG of A. discaudata, which suggested a simple, positive relationship with temperature. In the field, competition is greatly reduced in the winter months, so A. bifilosa has a better chance of survival, even with its lower SfG.

HTA Programme funding is governed by the need for evidence and scientific quality, reflecting funding of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) by the NHS. The need criterion incorporates covering the spectrum of diseases, but also taking account of research supported by other funders. This study compared the NIHR HTA Programme portfolio of research with the UK burden of disease as measured by Disability-adjusted Life Years (DALYs). A retrospective cross-sectional study using a cohort of all funded primary research and evidence syntheses projects received by the HTA Programme from April 2011 to March 2016 (n = 363); to determine the proportion of spend by disease compared with burden of disease in the UK calculated using 2015 UK DALY data. The programme costing just under [pounds sterling]44 million broadly reflected UK DALY burden by disease. Spend was lower than disease burden for cancer, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal diseases, which may reflect the importance of other funders, notably medical charities, which concentrate on these diseases. The HTA Programme spend, adjusted for other relevant funders, broadly matches disease burden in the UK; no diseases are being neglected.

ObjectivesInnovations resulting from research have both national and global impact, so selecting the most promising research studies to fund is crucial. Peer review of research funding applications is part of the selection process, and requires considerable resources. This study aimed to elicit stakeholder opinions about which factors contribute to and influence effective peer review of funding applications to the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), and to identify possible minor improvements to current processes and any major changes or potential innovations to achieve a more efficient peer review process.DesignQualitative interviews with 30 stakeholders involved in the peer review process.ParticipantsParticipants were drawn from three NIHR coordinating centres and represented four types of stakeholders: board members with responsibility for making funding decisions, applicants, external peer reviewers and NIHR staff.MethodsAll interviews were conducted by telephone apart from three that were face to face with NIHR staff. Data were analysed using a thematic template method.ResultsThe responses from NIHR staff, board members and reviewers differed from those received from applicants. The first three groups focused on how well the process of peer review did or did not function. The applicants mentioned these points but in addition often reflected on how their personal application was assessed. Process improvements suggested included: developing a more proportionate review process; providing greater guidance, feedback, training, acknowledgement or incentives for peer reviewers; reducing the time commitment and amount of paperwork; and asking reviewers to comment on the importance, strengths and weaknesses of applications and flaws which are potentially ‘fixable’.ConclusionsOverall, participants were supportive of the need for peer review in evaluating applications for research funding. This study revealed which parts of the process are working well and are valued, and barriers, difficulties and potential areas for improvement and development.

INTRODUCTION:This study compared the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme portfolio of research with the united Kingdom (UK) burden of disease, as measured by Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs).METHODS:Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: The HTA Programme cohort included all funded applications (n = 363) received by the HTA Programme during the period 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2016. The sample contained primary research and evidence syntheses, all purely methodological studies were excluded since these are not comparable to the other study types.Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of spend for each of the twenty-one Health Research Classification System (HRCS) health categories were compared with burden of disease in the UK calculated using 2015 DALY data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx).RESULTS:The funded HTA Programme projects totalled about GBP397million research spend, which broadly reflected the UK DALY burden. Overall, there was less than 5 percent difference between the actual and predicted programme spend based on the burden of disease in the UK in most instances (seventeen out of the twenty-one HRCS Health Categories).The largest categories of apportioned spend were Cancer (accounting for 12.1 percent of portfolio), and Mental Health (11.8 percent of portfolio) which particularly reflected the 9.8 percent burden of disease to the UK. Most notable deviations from DALY, where spend was lower than disease burden, were in the Cancer, Cardiovascular and Musculoskeletal categories; which may reflect the importance of other, notably charity, funding.CONCLUSIONS:The HTA Programme spend broadly aligns with burden of disease as measured using DALYs. Discrepancies were expected owing to the programme remit and its approach to commissioning research to address market failure particularly in areas that are not already well supported by research charities or industry. Regular review of DALY data during research prioritisation and commissioning allows the HTA Programme to identify and address shortfalls in disease areas and to balance its portfolio.