Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second most common cause of death in hospitalized patients with cancer, and cancer treatments may exacerbate VTE risk. Patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer usually receive adjuvant endocrine therapy for 5 years or longer. The aim of this study is to examine VTE risk following long-term use of aromatase inhibitor (AI) compared with tamoxifen use among breast cancer survivors. Methods A prospective cohort of 12,904 postmenopausal women who were diagnosed with a first primary hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer and free from previous cardiovascular disease or VTE from 1991 to 2010 were followed through December 2011. Data elements were captured from the comprehensive electronic health records of a large California health plan, Kaiser Permanente. Women who developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were identified as having VTE. We calculated person-year rates of VTE by endocrine therapy groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were applied to assess the association between time-dependent endocrine therapy and VTE risk. Results We identified 623 VTE events during a median follow-up of 5.4 years. The crude rates were 4.6 and 2.8 per 1000 person-years for DVT and PE, respectively. Compared with tamoxifen use, AI use was associated with at least 41% lower VTE risk (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43, 0.81). Greater risk reductions in AI users were seen in women who also underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions These findings supplement existing evidence to inform treatment decisions that balance cancer control and cardiovascular toxic outcomes.

Observational studies have suggested that metformin decreases the incidence of several common cancers. However, findings regarding breast cancer have been mixed. In order to explore this issue, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed with a focus on potential biases. We conducted a comprehensive literature search for all pertinent studies addressing metformin use and breast cancer risk by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus (which includes Embase, ISI Web of Science) using the Mesh terms: “metformin” or “biguanides” or “diabetes mellitus, type 2/therapy” and “cancer” or “neoplasms.” When multiple hazard ratios (HR) or odds ratio (OR) were reported, the most adjusted estimate was used in the base-case analysis. We pooled the adjusted HR and performed sensitivity analyses on duration of metformin use (> or ≤3 years use), study quality (assessed using the GRADE system), and initial observation year of the cohort (before vs after 1997). From a total of 443 citations, 18 full-text articles were considered, and seven independent studies were included. All were observational (four cohort and three case control). Our combined OR of all seven studies was 0.83 (0.71–0.97). Stronger associations were found when analyses were limited to studies estimating the impact of longer metformin use (OR = 0.75. 95 % CI 0.62, 0.91) or among studies that began observing their cohort before 1997 (OR = 0.68. 95 % CI 0.55–0.084). Stratification according to study quality did not affect the combined OR but higher quality studies had smaller CI and achieved statistical significance. Interpretation is limited by the observational nature of reports and different comparison groups. Our analyses support a protective effect of metformin on breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women with diabetes. Clinical trials are needed for definitive determination of the role of metformin in breast cancer risk reduction.

By contrast with many observational studies, women in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial who were randomly allocated to receive oestrogen alone had a lower incidence of invasive breast cancer than did those who received placebo. We aimed to assess the influence of oestrogen use on longer term breast cancer incidence and mortality in extended follow-up of this cohort. Between 1993 and 1998, the WHI enrolled 10 739 postmenopausal women from 40 US clinical centres into a randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Women aged 50–79 years who had undergone hysterectomy and had expected 3-year survival and mammography clearance were randomly allocated by a computerised, permuted block algorithm, stratified by age group and centre, to receive oral conjugated equine oestrogen (0·625 mg per day; n=5310) or matched placebo (n=5429). The trial intervention was terminated early on Feb 29, 2004, because of an adverse effect on stroke. Follow-up continued until planned termination (March 31, 2005). Consent was sought for extended surveillance from the 9786 living participants in active follow-up, of whom 7645 agreed. Using data from this extended follow-up (to Aug 14, 2009), we assessed long-term effects of oestrogen use on invasive breast cancer incidence, tumour characteristics, and mortality. We used Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00000611. After a median follow-up of 11·8 years (IQR 9·1–12·9), the use of oestrogen for a median of 5·9 years (2·5–7·3) was associated with lower incidence of invasive breast cancer (151 cases, 0·27% per year) compared with placebo (199 cases, 0·35% per year; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·62–0·95; p=0·02) with no difference (p=0·76) between intervention phase (0·79, 0·61–1·02) and post-intervention phase effects (0·75, 0·51–1·09). In subgroup analyses, we noted breast cancer risk reduction with oestrogen use was concentrated in women without benign breast disease (p=0·01) or a family history of breast cancer (p=0·02). In the oestrogen group, fewer women died from breast cancer (six deaths, 0·009% per year) compared with controls (16 deaths, 0·024% per year; HR 0·37, 95% CI 0·13–0·91; p=0·03). Fewer women in the oestrogen group died from any cause after a breast cancer diagnosis (30 deaths, 0·046% per year) than did controls (50 deaths, 0·076%; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·39–0·97; p=0·04). Our findings provide reassurance for women with hysterectomy seeking relief of climacteric symptoms in terms of the effects of oestrogen use for about 5 years on breast cancer incidence and mortality. However, our data do not support use of oestrogen for breast cancer risk reduction because any noted benefit probably does not apply to populations at increased risk of such cancer. US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Wyeth.

Analysis of data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries shows that the age-adjusted incidence of breast cancer in the United States fell sharply by 6.7% in 2003, as compared with the rate in 2002. The decrease began in mid-2002 and had begun to level off by mid-2003. The authors attribute the decline to a sharp drop in the use of postmenopausal hormone-replacement therapy. The age-adjusted incidence of breast cancer in the United States fell sharply by 6.7% in 2003. The authors attribute the decline to a sharp drop in the use of postmenopausal hormone-replacement therapy. Major changes in cancer incidence and death rates, as detected in cancer-registry data, provide unique opportunities to examine questions related to the cause, prevention, detection, and treatment of cancer. In a preliminary report, we suggested that such a major change in breast-cancer incidence occurred in 2003 in the United States. 1 In contrast, the 1990s saw an increase in the annual age-adjusted incidence of breast cancer by an average of about 0.5% per year, a rise that was particularly evident among women who were 50 years of age or older 2 (Figure 1). Changes in reproductive factors, in the use of menopausal . . .

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among older postmenopausal women. The impact of postmenopausal breast cancer on CVD for older women is uncertain. We hypothesized that older postmenopausal women with breast cancer would be at a higher risk of CVD than similar aged women without breast cancer and that CVD would be a major contributor to the subsequent morbidity and mortality. In a prospective Women's Health Initiative study, incident CVD events and total and cause-specific death rates were compared between postmenopausal women with (n = 4,340) and without (n = 97,576) incident invasive breast cancer over 10 years post-diagnosis, stratified by 3 age groups (50-59, 60-69, and 70-79). Postmenopausal women, regardless of breast cancer diagnosis, had similar and high levels of CVD risk factors (e.g., smoking and hypertension) at baseline prior to breast cancer, which were strong predictors of CVD and total mortality over time. CVD affected mostly women age 70-79 with localized breast cancer (79% of breast cancer cases in 70-79 age group): only 17% died from breast cancer and CVD was the leading cause of death (22%) over the average 10 years follow up. Compared to age-matched women without breast cancer, women age 70-79 at diagnosis of localized breast cancer had a similar multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.33) for coronary heart disease, a lower risk of composite CVD (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00), and a higher risk of total mortality (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39). CVD was a major contributor to mortality in women with localized breast cancer at age 70-79. Further studies are needed to evaluate both screening and treatment of localized breast cancer tailored to the specific health issues of older women.

Background: Diet modulates inflammation and inflammatory markers have been associated with cancer outcomes. In the Women’s Health Initiative, we investigated associations between a dietary inflammatory index (DII) and invasive breast cancer incidence and death. Methods: The DII was calculated from a baseline food frequency questionnaire in 122 788 postmenopausal women, enrolled from 1993 to 1998 with no prior cancer, and followed until 29 August 2014. With median follow-up of 16.02 years, there were 7495 breast cancer cases and 667 breast cancer deaths. We used Cox regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) by DII quintiles (Q) for incidence of overall breast cancer, breast cancer subtypes, and deaths from breast cancer. The lowest quintile (representing the most anti-inflammatory diet) was the reference. Results: The DII was not associated with incidence of overall breast cancer (HR Q5 vs Q1 , 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91–1.07; P trend =0.83 for overall breast cancer). In a full cohort analysis, a higher risk of death from breast cancer was associated with consumption of more pro-inflammatory diets at baseline, after controlling for multiple potential confounders (HR Q5 vs Q1 , 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01–1.76; P trend =0.03). Conclusions: Future studies are needed to examine the inflammatory potential of post-diagnosis diet given the suggestion from the current study that dietary inflammatory potential before diagnosis is related to breast cancer death.

Background: This study aims to investigate the association between statin use and all-cancer survival in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women, using data from the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) and Clinical Trial (WHI-CT). Methods: The WHI study enrolled women aged 50–79 years from 1993 to 1998 at 40 US clinical centres. Among 146 326 participants with median 14.6 follow-up years, 23 067 incident cancers and 3152 cancer deaths were observed. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between statin use and cancer survival. Results: Compared with never-users, current statin use was associated with significantly lower risk of cancer death (hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–0.86, P <0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74–0.88). Use of other lipid-lowering medications was also associated with increased cancer survival ( P -interaction (int)=0.57). The lower risk of cancer death was not dependent on statin potency ( P -int=0.22), lipophilicity/hydrophilicity ( P -int=0.43), type ( P -int=0.34) or duration ( P -int=0.33). However, past statin users were not at lower risk of cancer death compared with never-users (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85–1.33); in addition, statin use was not associated with a reduction of overall cancer incidence despite its effect on survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92–1.001). Conclusions: In a cohort of postmenopausal women, regular use of statins or other lipid-lowering medications was associated with decreased cancer death, regardless of the type, duration, or potency of statin medications used.

In vitro and animal data suggest that cadmium, a heavy metal that contaminates some foods and tobacco plants, is an estrogenic endocrine disruptor. Elevated estrogen exposure is associated with breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer risk. We examined the association between dietary cadmium intake and risk of these cancers in the large, well-characterized Women's Health Initiative (WHI). A total of 155,069 postmenopausal women, 50-79 years of age, who were enrolled in the WHI clinical trials or observational study, participated in this study. We estimated dietary cadmium consumption by combining baseline food frequency questionnaire responses with U.S. Food and Drug Administration data on food cadmium content. Participants reported incident invasive breast, endometrial, or ovarian cancer, and WHI centrally adjudicated all cases through August 2009. We applied Cox regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for each cancer, comparing quintiles of energy-adjusted dietary cadmium intake. Over an average of 10.5 years, 6,658 invasive breast cancers, 1,198 endometrial cancers, and 735 ovarian cancers were reported. We observed no statistically significant associations between dietary cadmium and risk of any of these cancers after adjustment for potential confounders including total dietary energy intake. Results did not differ in any subgroup of women examined. We found little evidence that dietary cadmium is a risk factor for breast, endometrial, or ovarian cancers in postmenopausal women. Misclassification in dietary cadmium assessment may have attenuated observed associations.

In the post-intervention period of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial, women assigned to treatment with oestrogen plus progestin had a higher risk of cancer than did those assigned to placebo. Results also suggested that the combined hormone therapy might increase mortality from lung cancer. To assess whether such an association exists, we undertook a post-hoc analysis of lung cancers diagnosed in the trial over the entire follow-up period. The WHI study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 40 centres in the USA. 16 608 postmenopausal women aged 50–79 years with an intact uterus were randomly assigned by a computerised, stratified, permuted block algorithm to receive a once-daily tablet of 0·625 mg conjugated equine oestrogen plus 2·5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (n=8506) or matching placebo (n=8102). We assessed incidence and mortality rates for all lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer by use of data from treatment and post-intervention follow-up periods. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00000611. After a mean of 5·6 years (SD 1·3) of treatment and 2·4 years (0·4) of additional follow-up, 109 women in the combined hormone therapy group had been diagnosed with lung cancer compared with 85 in the placebo group (incidence per year 0·16% vs 0·13%; hazard ratio [HR] 1·23, 95% CI 0·92–1·63, p=0·16). 96 women assigned to combined therapy had non-small-cell lung cancer compared with 72 assigned to placebo (0·14% vs 0·11%; HR 1·28, 0·94–1·73, p=0·12). More women died from lung cancer in the combined hormone therapy group than in the placebo group (73 vs 40 deaths; 0·11% vs 0·06%; HR 1·71, 1·16–2·52, p=0·01), mainly as a result of a higher number of deaths from non-small-cell lung cancer in the combined therapy group (62 vs 31 deaths; 0·09% vs 0·05%; HR 1·87, 1·22–2·88, p=0·004). Incidence and mortality rates of small-cell lung cancer were similar between groups. Although treatment with oestrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women did not increase incidence of lung cancer, it increased the number of deaths from lung cancer, in particular deaths from non-small-cell lung cancer. These findings should be incorporated into risk–benefit discussions with women considering combined hormone therapy, especially those with a high risk of lung cancer. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Background Constitutional BRCA1 epimutations (promoter hypermethylation) are associated with an elevated risk of triple-negative breast cancer and high-grade serous ovarian cancer. While MGMT epimutations are frequent in colon cancer, glioblastoma, and B-cell lymphoma, it remains unknown whether constitutional MGMT epimutations are associated with risk of any of these malignancies. Methods We designed a nested case–control study, assessing potential associations between MGMT epimutations in blood from healthy individuals and subsequent risk of incident cancer. The study cohort was drawn from postmenopausal women, participating in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, who had not been diagnosed with either colon cancer, glioblastoma, or B-cell lymphoma prior to study entry. The protocol included n  = 400 women developing incident left-sided and n  = 400 women developing right-sided colon cancer, n  = 400 women developing diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, all matched on a 1:2 basis with cancer-free controls, and n  = 195 women developing incident glioblastoma multiforme, matched on a 1:4 basis. All cancers were confirmed in centralized medical record review. Blood samples, collected at entry, were analyzed for MGMT epimutations by massive parallel sequencing. Associations between MGMT methylation and incident cancers were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Analyzing epimutations affecting the key regulatory area of the MGMT promoter, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.07 (95% CI 0.79–1.45) and 0.80 (0.59–1.08) for right- and left-sided colon cancer, respectively, 1.13 (0.78–1.64) for glioblastoma, and 1.11 (0.83–1.48) for diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Sensitivity analyses limited to subregions of the MGMT promoter and to individuals with different genotypes of a functional SNP in the MGMT promoter (rs16906252), revealed no significant effect on HR for any of the cancer forms. Neither did we observe any effect of rs16906252 status on HR for any of the cancer forms among individuals methylated or non-methylated at the MGMT promoter. Conclusions Constitutional MGMT promoter methylation in normal tissue is not associated with an increased risk of developing colon cancer, glioblastoma, or B-cell lymphoma.