Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeTo summarize contemporary and emerging strategies for the diagnosis and management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), focusing on diagnostic testing and therapeutics.MethodsLiterature review using PUBMED-Medline databases as well as clinicaltrials.gov to include reported or ongoing clinical trials on treatment for mHSPC. We prioritized the findings from phase III randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical practice guidelines.ResultsThere have been significant changes to the diagnosis and staging evaluation of mHSPC with the integration of increasingly accurate positron emission tomography (PET) imaging tracers that exceed the performance of conventional computerized tomography (CT) and bone scan. Germline multigene testing is recommended for the evaluation of patients newly diagnosed with mHSPC given the prevalence of actionable alterations that may create candidacy for specific therapies. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone of treatment for mHSPC, approaches to first-line treatment include the integration of multiple agents including androgen receptor synthesis inhibitors (ARSI; abiraterone) Androgen Receptor antagonists (enzalutamide, darolutamide, apalautamide), and docetaxel chemotherapy. The combination of ADT, ARSI, and docetaxel chemotherapy has recently been evaluated in a randomized trial and was associated with significantly improved overall survival including in patients with a high burden of disease. The role of local treatment to the prostate with radiation has been evaluated in randomized trials with additional studies underway evaluating the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy.ConclusionThe staging and initial management of patients with mHSPC has undergone significant advances in the last decade with advancements in the diagnosis, treatment and sequencing of therapies.

Purpose of Review Metastatic prostate cancer remains universally lethal. Although de-novo metastatic prostate cancer was historically managed with systemic therapy alone, local therapies are increasingly utilized in the early treatment of the disease, particularly in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). OMPC represents an intermediate stage between clinically localized and widespread metastatic disease. Diseases classified within this stage present an opportunity for localized targeting of the disease prior to progression to widespread metastases. The purpose of this review is to discuss the contemporary and emerging local therapies for the treatment of OMPC. Recent Findings To date, there are three utilized forms of local therapy for OMPC: cryoablation, radiation therapy, and cytoreductive prostatectomy. Cryoablation can be utilized for the total ablation of the prostate and has shown promising results in patients with OMPC either in combination with ADT or with ADT and systemic chemotherapy. Radiation therapy along with ADT has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival. The STAMPEDE Arm G, PEACE-1, and the HORRAD clinical trials have investigated radiation therapy for mPCa compared to standard of care versus systemic therapy with varying results. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) in conjunction with ADT has also been proposed in the management of OPMC with promising results from case–control and retrospective studies. Currently there are larger controlled trials investigating CRP for OPMC including the SIMCAP, LoMP, TRoMbone, SWOG 1802, IP2-ATLANTA, g-RAMPP, and FUSCC-OMPCa trials. Summary Given the novel nature of local treatments for OPMC, treatment selection is still controversial and requires long-term follow-up and randomized clinical trials to aid patient and clinician decision making.

Purpose of Review Prostate fusion biopsy, an innovative imaging modality for diagnosing prostate cancer, presents certain challenges for patients including discomfort and emotional distress, leading to nonadherence to treatment and follow-ups. To inform clinicians and offer pain relief alternatives to patients, this review delves into the risk factors for increased pain and modern management options to alleviate pain during prostate biopsy. Recent Findings Individual responses to pain vary, and the overall experience of pain during a prostate biopsy has been contributed to numerous factors such as patient age, prostate volume, previous biopsy experience, and more. As a result, several strategies aim to mitigate pain during in-office procedures. Notably, techniques including pharmacological analgesics, hand holding, heating pads, entertainment/virtual reality, and distraction have shown significant efficacy. Summary Existing studies explore risk factors influencing pain intensity during prostate biopsy and effective pain management strategies. This review consolidates available information to guide clinicians in enhancing patient comfort and thus, encourage surveillance adherence.

The combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) allows for better lesion targeting and diagnostic probability compared to random prostate biopsies. The Artemis Fusion Biopsy system and ExactVu micro-US technology capitalize on this advantage and provide higher-resolution imaging of the prostate during biopsy. Their accuracy in measuring prostate volume and resulting implications on prostate specific antigen (PSA) density and risk stratification, however, has not been evaluated. We hypothesized that PSA densities as measured by these modalities will demonstrate clinically insignificant differences compared to standard measurement. We retrospectively reviewed all prostate fusion biopsy cases performed at our health system with Artemis or ExactVu systems from April 2021 to July 2023 and compared the PSA density calculated from the volume obtained with these systems to standard measurement with ellipsoid calculation from MRI. Change in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) prostate cancer risk stratification was analyzed for each system. Artemis MRI segmentation (0.179 ng/ml, p = 0.04) and US (0.181 ng/ml, p = 0.067) underestimated and ExactVu micro-US (0.247 ng/ml, p <0.001) overestimated PSA density. Risk stratification changed in 1.2% of Artemis MRI segmentation cases, 1.6% of Artemis US cases, and 1.2% of ExactVu micro-US cases. Despite differences in PSA density, choice of fusion biopsy system has minimal clinical impact on risk stratification and any of these studied systems may be used without fear of misrepresenting a patient's disease state.

Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPCa) presents de novo or represents significant disease progression and requires systemic treatment. However, progression to castration resistance is inevitable. The treatment landscape has evolved with the introduction of intensified systemic therapy, including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with either androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) or cytotoxic chemotherapy (doublet therapy) or combined therapy with both agents (triplet therapy). Landmark trials such as CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, LATITUDE, ENZAMET, and TITAN have established combination therapies as the standard of care, demonstrating significant overall survival benefits. More recently, triplet therapy—integrating ADT, docetaxel, and an ARSI—has emerged as an effective approach, particularly in high-volume metastatic disease, as supported by ARASENS and PEACE-1. Advances in imaging, such as PSMA PET-CT, have improved disease detection, allowing earlier detection of metastasis and appropriate therapy. Similarly, genomic profiling has enabled biomarker-driven, personalized treatment strategies. The role of treatment of the primary tumor, by either radiation therapy or cytoreductive prostatectomy, in low-volume disease continues to be explored. As novel therapies, targeted agents, and immunotherapies undergo investigation, optimizing treatment selection based on disease burden, molecular characteristics, and patient factors will be essential. The future of mHSPCa management lies in multidisciplinary, precision-based approaches to improve patient outcomes while balancing treatment efficacy and tolerability.

Operando energy-dispersive x-ray diffraction (EDXRD) was carried out on a newly formed 8 Ah lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery with the goal of elucidating the origin of asynchronous phase transformation commonly seen with in situ x-ray diffraction studies. The high-energy photons at the NSLS X17B1 beamline allow for penetration into a fully assembled battery and therefore negate any need for a specially designed in situ cell which often uses modified current collectors to minimize x-ray attenuation. Spatially-and-temporally resolved phase-mapping was conducted with a semiquantitative reference intensity ratio (RIR) analysis to estimate the relative abundance of the delithiated phase. The data show an asynchronous response in the stoichiometry versus the electrochemical profile and suggest limited diffusion in the electrode toward the end of discharge. Our results confirm that the asynchronous electrode response is not just limited to specially designed cells but occurs in fully assembled cells alike. We attribute this behavior to be a consequence of performing a local measurement over a wide-area heterogeneous reaction.