Explore the vast range of titles available.

Both human health and the health systems we depend on are increasingly threatened by a range of environmental crises, including climate change. Paradoxically, health care provision is a significant driver of environmental pollution, with surgical and anesthetic services among the most resource-intensive components of the health system. This analysis aimed to summarize the state of life cycle assessment (LCA) practice as applied to surgical and anesthetic care via review of extant literature assessing environmental impacts of related services, procedures, equipment, and pharmaceuticals. A state-of-the-science review was undertaken following a registered protocol and a standardized, LCA-specific reporting framework. Three bibliographic databases (Scopus®, PubMed, and Embase®) and the gray literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were applied, eligible entries critically appraised, and key methodological data and results extracted. From 1,316 identified records, 44 studies were eligible for inclusion. The annual climate impact of operating surgical suites ranged between 3,200,000 and . The climate impact of individual surgical procedures varied considerably, with estimates ranging from . Anesthetic gases; single-use equipment; and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system operation were the main emissions hot spots identified among operating room- and procedure-specific analyses. Single-use equipment used in surgical settings was generally more harmful than equivalent reusable items across a range of environmental parameters. Life cycle inventories have been assembled and associated climate impacts calculated for three anesthetic gases ( ) and 20 injectable anesthetic drugs ( ). Despite the recent proliferation of surgical and anesthesiology-related LCAs, extant studies address a miniscule fraction of the numerous services, procedures, and products available today. Methodological heterogeneity, external validity, and a lack of background life cycle inventory data related to many essential surgical and anesthetic inputs are key limitations of the current evidence base. This review provides an indication of the spectrum of environmental impacts associated with surgical and anesthetic care at various scales. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8666.

To determine the influence of time from injury to surgery on neurological recovery and length of stay (LOS) in an observational cohort of individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI), we analyzed the baseline and follow-up motor scores of participants in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry to specifically assess the effect of an early (less than 24 h from injury) surgical procedure on motor recovery and on LOS. One thousand four hundred and ten patients who sustained acute tSCIs with baseline American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A, B, C, or D and were treated surgically were analyzed to determine the effect of the timing of surgery (24, 48, or 72 h from injury) on motor recovery and LOS. Depending on the distribution of data, we used different types of generalized linear models, including multiple linear regression, gamma regression, and negative binomial regression. Persons with incomplete AIS B, C, and D injuries from C2 to L2 demonstrated motor recovery improvement of an additional 6.3 motor points (SE=2.8 p<0.03) when they underwent surgical treatment within 24 h from the time of injury, compared with those who had surgery later than 24 h post-injury. This beneficial effect of early surgery on motor recovery was not seen in the patients with AIS A complete SCI. AIS A and B patients who received early surgery experienced shorter hospital LOS. While the issues of when to perform surgery and what specific operation to perform remain controversial, this work provides evidence that for an incomplete acute tSCI in the cervical, thoracic, or thoracolumbar spine, surgery performed within 24 h from injury improves motor neurological recovery. Early surgery also reduces LOS.

Study designA retrospective study.ObjectivesThis study assessed the clinical utility of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in relation to the surgical treatment of spinal epidural metastasis and factors important for surgical decision-making. These factors include epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC), patient prognosis and neurologic status.SettingQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada.MethodsWe identified 285 patients with spinal metastatic disease. Data were extracted through a retrospective review. SINS and ESCC were scored based on CT and MRI, respectively.ResultsPatients were grouped into stable (35%), potentially unstable (52%), and unstable (13%) groups. The overall incidence of metastatic spinal deformity was 9%. Surgical interventions were performed in 21% of patients, including decompression and instrumented fusion (70%), decompression alone (17%), percutaneous vertebral augmentation (9%), and instrumented vertebral augmentation (5%). The use of spinal instrumentation was significantly associated with unstable SINS (p = 0.005). Grade 3 ESCC was also significantly associated with unstable SINS (p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that SINS was not a predictor of survival (p = 0.98). In the radiotherapy-alone group, a significant proportion of patients with potentially unstable SINS (30%) progressed into unstable SINS category at an average 364 ± 244 days (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that more severe categories of SINS were associated with higher degrees of ESCC, and surgical interventions were more often utilized in this group with more frequent placement of spinal instrumentation. Although SINS did not predict patient prognosis, it correlates with the progression of metastatic instability in patients treated with radiotherapy.

In prior analyses of the effectiveness of methylprednisolone for the treatment of patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCIs), the prognostic importance of patients' neurological levels of injury and their baseline severity of impairment has not been considered. Our objective was to determine whether methylprednisolone improved motor recovery among participants in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR). We identified RHSCIR participants who received methylprednisolone according to the Second National Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS-II) protocol and used propensity score matching to account for age, sex, time of neurological exam, varying neurological level of injury, and baseline severity of neurological impairment. We compared changes in total, upper extremity, and lower extremity motor scores using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and performed sensitivity analyses using negative binomial regression. Forty-six patients received methylprednisolone and 1555 received no steroid treatment. There were no significant differences between matched participants for each of total (13.7 vs. 14.1, respectively; p=0.43), upper extremity (7.3 vs. 6.4; p=0.38), and lower extremity (6.5 vs. 7.7; p=0.40) motor recovery. This result was confirmed using a multivariate model and, as predicted, only cervical (C1–T1) rather than thoracolumbar (T2–L3) injury levels (p<0.01) and reduced baseline injury severity (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale grades; p<0.01) were associated with greater motor score recovery. There was no in-hospital mortality in either group; however, the NASCIS-II methylprednisolone group had a significantly higher rate of total complications (61% vs. 36%; p=0.02) NASCIS-II methylprednisolone did not improve motor score recovery in RHSCIR patients with acute TSCIs in either the cervical or thoracic spine when the influence of anatomical level and severity of injury were included in the analysis. There was a significantly higher rate of total complications in the NASCIS-II methylprednisolone group. These findings support guideline recommendations against routine administration of methylprednisolone in acute TSCI.

This study aimed to estimate the effects of preoperative psychological health on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. This retrospective cohort study included data from patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for radiculopathy. Preoperative psychological health was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), and depression and severe psychological symptomology were measured with the Mental Component Score of the Short Form Survey-12 (MCS). Surgical outcomes comprised trajectory subgroups for neck pain and arm pain (numeric rating scales) and disability (neck disability index) measured preoperatively and 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. For each outcome, patients were dichotomized as following either a poor or a fair-to-excellent trajectory. Average treatment effects were estimated with doubly robust propensity score models using inverse probability of treatment weights accounting for multiple confounders. We included data from 352 patients (43.8% female). Approximately half (52.1%) of patients were identified as depressed based on the PHQ-8, while 61.8% and 33.1% were classified as experiencing depression or severe psychological symptomology, respectively, on the MCS. In fully adjusted models, patients with PHQ-8-measured depression were at increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes for disability (risk ratio[95% CI] = 6.73[1.85 to 24.45]) and neck pain (RR[95% CI] = 1.90[1.09 to 3.32]). Patients with MCS-measured depression were at elevated risk of a poor disability outcome (RR[95% CI] = 2.77[1.30 to 5.90]). Patients reporting severe psychological symptomatology had an increased likelihood of poor disability, neck pain, and arm pain outcomes (RR[95% CI] = 1.82 [1.17 to 2.82] to 2.84[1.58 to 5.09]). These findings highlight the high prevalence of negative psychological features and their impacts on neck surgery outcomes. Future research should prioritize the development and evaluation of preoperative interventions to optimize psychological well-being and improve surgical outcomes in this population.

The hemodynamic management of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) aims to improve perfusion and mitigate ischemic secondary injury to the injured spinal cord, traditionally through the augmentation of mean arterial pressure (MAP). Recently, there has been interest in managing spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP)-the difference between MAP and intrathecal pressure (ITP) -after acute SCI. SCPP may be more physiologically relevant than MAP for neurologic recovery after traumatic SCI. Drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through a lumbar intrathecal catheter to reduce ITP and increase SCPP is commonly performed to reduce the risk of ischemic paralysis in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) surgery. We investigated a protocol for CSF drainage through intrathecal catheters to maintain SCPP ≥65 mmHg in participants with acute traumatic SCI. We sought to determine if managing SCPP was associated with better neurologic recovery compared to traditional MAP targets. Fifty-eight participants with acute SCI (51 ± 19 years, 46M/12F) were enrolled across eight North American sites between August 2019 and May 2024 into this prospective single-arm multi-center clinical trial of CSF drainage for SCPP management (NCT03911492). Data were compared to data from a historical cohort of 86 participants (44 ± 19 years, 72M/14F) who had intrathecal catheters inserted for SCPP measurement only; these participants were managed according to conventional MAP guidelines with a target MAP of 85-90 mmHg (NCT01279811). MAP, ITP, SCPP, intrathecal waveform morphology, vasopressor use, and CSF drainage volume were reported for up to 7 days following SCI. Fifteen participants in the intervention group were lost to follow-up. Neurological assessments at enrollment and 6-months post-SCI were compared. The investigator team ended the trial when it was clear that adherence to the protocol was inconsistent across study sites. Participants managed according to the SCPP management protocol had an intrathecal catheter in place 138 hours (95% CI [129,147]) and 495cc (95% CI [350,641]) of CSF drained. No CSF was drained from seven participants. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic measures such as ITP and SCPP between groups, indicating that the SCPP management protocol did not alter the hemodynamic management. Subsequently, there were no differences in measures of neurological recovery between participants managed according to SCPP management protocol and conventional MAP guidelines (p = 0.897). Participants managed according to an SCPP target had more ITP waveform recordings noted as dampened or fully pulsatile suggesting a patent subarachnoid space (p = 0.006) and were administered vasopressors on fewer hourly observations (p = 0.004). Six reported adverse events were probably related to the intervention. Adherence to a protocol for managing SCPP through CSF drainage across multiple sites was challenging. Ultimately, our protocol resulted in little CSF being drained, limited modification of ITP and SCPP, and no effect on neurological recovery. The relationship between CSF drainage volume and change in ITP was surprisingly unclear. This study revealed that draining CSF is more complex in traumatic SCI than in TAAA surgery patients. Future efforts to reduce ITP through CSF drainage likely need to address the occlusion of the subarachnoid space at the injury site through aggressive surgical decompression techniques.

Abstract BACKGROUND Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), particularly in mild DCM. OBJECTIVE To prospectively evaluate the impact of surgery on patient-reported outcomes in patients with mild (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] ≥ 15), moderate (mJOA 12-14), and severe (mJOA < 12) DCM. METHODS Prospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with DCM who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019 and completed 1-yr follow-up. Outcome measures (mJOA, Neck Disability Index [NDI], EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D], Short Form [SF-12] Physical Component Score [PCS]/Mental Component Score [MCS], numeric rating scale [NRS] neck, and arm pain) were assessed at 3 and 12 mo postoperatively and compared to baseline, stratified by DCM severity. Changes in outcome measures that were statistically significant (P < .05) and met their respective minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) were deemed clinically meaningful. Responder analysis was performed to compare the proportion of patients between DCM severity groups who met the MCID for each outcome measure. RESULTS The cohort comprised 391 patients: 110 mild, 163 moderate, and 118 severe. At 12 mo after surgery, severe DCM patients experienced significant improvements in all outcome measures; moderate DCM patients improved in mJOA, NDI, EQ-5D, and PCS; mild DCM patients improved in EQ-5D and PCS. There was no significant difference between severity groups in the proportion of patients reaching MCID at 12 mo after surgery for any outcome measure, except NDI. CONCLUSION At 12 mo after surgery, patients with mild, moderate, and severe DCM all demonstrated improved outcomes. Severe DCM patients experienced the greatest breadth of improvement, but the proportion of patients in each severity group achieving clinically meaningful changes did not differ significantly across most outcome measures. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

The impact of spine surgery on Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL) outcomes across common spinal degenerative diagnoses is not well characterised. A prospective observational study of patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry was performed. Baseline and 1-year post-operative Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were collated and compared to normative values from the Canadian General Population (CGP). The percentage of patients achieving the PCS Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was quantified. 5049 patients were included in the analysis. The mean pre-operative SF-12 PCS was 29.5 and MCS was 44.1. This improved to a mean PCS of 40.5 ( p  < 0.001) and MCS of 49.3 ( p  < 0.0001) at 1-year post-operatively. The mean pre-operative PCS was over 2 standard deviations (SD) lower than the normative mean of the CGP; this improved to being close to 1-SD from the normative CGP mean at 1-year post-operatively. Findings were similar across age- and sex-stratified subgroups. Across all conditions, 70–75% of patients achieved the PCS MCID. Fewer patients with cervical myelopathy achieved the PCS MCID (59%). In a surgical cohort, patients with degenerative spinal conditions demonstrate a profound reduction in PCS compared to their peers in the CGP. Spinal surgery was impactful in improving physical function HRQoL outcomes in the majority, but not typically to average population norms.