Explore the vast range of titles available.

Except for management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) in cystic fibrosis, there are no approved inhaled antibiotic treatments for any other diseases or for infections from other pathogenic microorganisms such as tuberculosis, non-tuberculous mycobacteria, fungal infections or potential inhaled biowarfare agents including Francisella tularensis, Yersinia pestis and Coxiella burnetii (which cause pneumonic tularemia, plague and Q fever, respectively). Delivery of an antibiotic formulation via the inhalation route has the potential to provide high concentrations at the site of infection with reduced systemic exposure to limit side effects. A liposomal formulation may improve tolerability, increase compliance by reducing the dosing frequency, and enhance penetration of biofilms and treatment of intracellular infections. Two liposomal ciprofloxacin formulations (Lipoquin® and Pulmaquin®) that are in development by Aradigm Corporation are described here.

Background Brensocatib is an oral, selective, reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-1 (DPP-1), responsible for activating neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) including neutrophil elastase (NE), proteinase 3 (PR3), and cathepsin G (CatG). In chronic inflammatory lung diseases such as non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE), neutrophils accumulate in the airways resulting in excess active NSPs that cause damaging inflammation and lung destruction. Methods The 24-week WILLOW trial (NCT03218917) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in patients with NCFBE conducted at 116 sites across 14 countries. In this trial, treatment with brensocatib was associated with improvements in clinical outcomes including time to first exacerbation, reduction in exacerbation frequency and a reduction in NE activity in sputum. An exploratory analysis of NE activity in white blood cell (WBC) extracts and NE, PR3 and CatG activity in sputum was conducted to further characterize brensocatib’s effect and identify potential correlated effects. Results NE, PR3 and CatG activities were reduced in sputum and NE activity was reduced in WBC extracts in a dose-dependent manner after four weeks of brensocatib treatment, with a return to baseline four weeks after the end of treatment. Brensocatib produced the greatest reduction in the sputum activity of CatG, followed by NE and then PR3. Positive correlations among the sputum NSPs were observed both at baseline and in response to treatment, with the strongest correlation among the sputum NSPs for NE and CatG. Conclusions These results suggest a broad anti-inflammatory effect of brensocatib underlying its clinical efficacy observed in NCFBE patients. Trial registration: The study was approved by the corresponding ethical review boards of all participating centers. The trial was approved by the Food and Drug Administration and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03218917) on July 17, 2017 and approved by the European Medicines Agency and registered at the European Union Clinical trials Register (EudraCT No. 2017-002533-32). An independent, external data and safety monitoring committee (comprising physicians with pulmonary expertise, a statistician experienced in the evaluation of clinical safety, and experts in periodontal disease and dermatology) reviewed all adverse events.

While the inhalation route has been used for millennia for pharmacologic effect, the biological barriers to treating lung disease created real challenges for the pharmaceutical industry until sophisticated device and formulation technologies emerged over the past fifty years. There are now several inhaled device technologies that enable delivery of therapeutics at high efficiency to the lung and avoid excessive deposition in the oropharyngeal region. Chemistry and formulation technologies have also emerged to prolong retention of drug at the active site by overcoming degradation and clearance mechanisms, or by reducing the rate of systemic absorption. These technologies have also been utilized to improve tolerability or to facilitate uptake within cells when there are intracellular targets. This paper describes the biological barriers and provides recent examples utilizing formulation technologies or drug chemistry modifications to overcome those barriers.

Neutrophils have been implicated in initiating and perpetuating systemic lupus erythematosus and the resultant kidney damage in lupus nephritis (LN) patients, in part through an excessive release of neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs). NSP zymogens are activated by dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1) during neutrophil maturation and released by mature neutrophils in response to inflammatory stimuli. Thus, a potential strategy to attenuate disease progression in LN would be to inhibit DPP1. We tested whether brensocatib, a highly selective and reversible DPP1 inhibitor, could mitigate LN progression in an interferon-alpha (IFNα)-accelerated NZB/W F1 mouse model. To confirm brensocatib’s pharmacodynamic effect on NSPs in this mouse strain, repeated dose studies were conducted for 7 and 14 days in naïve NZB/W F1 mice via oral gavage twice a day. Brensocatib at 2 and 20 mg/kg/day achieved a significant reduction in bone marrow NSP activities after 7 days of daily administration. To initiate LN disease progression, the mice were injected with an IFNα-expressing adenovirus. After 2 weeks, three brensocatib doses (or vehicle) were administered for 6 more weeks. Throughout the 8-week study, brensocatib treatment (20 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced the occurrence of severe proteinuria compared to the vehicle control. Brensocatib treatment also entailed a significant reduction in the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, indicating decreased kidney damage, as well as a significant reduction in blood urea nitrogen level, suggesting improved renal function. Based on kidney histopathology analysis, brensocatib treatment significantly lowered both the renal tubular protein score and the nephropathy score compared to the vehicle group. A trend towards reduced glomerulonephritis score with brensocatib treatment was also observed. Lastly, brensocatib significantly reduced LN mouse kidney infiltration by various inflammatory cells. In conclusion, these results suggest that brensocatib alters disease progression in LN mice and warrant further evaluation of DPP1 inhibition in LN.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a painful and incurable disease characterized by chronic joint inflammation and a progressive destruction of cartilage and bone. Although current treatments have improved clinical outcomes for some patients, the high relapse rates and sizeable proportion of non-responders emphasize the need for further research. Arthritic joints are massively infiltrated by neutrophils, which influence inflammatory and immune processes by releasing cytokines, chemokines, eicosanoids, and neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) – all of which are known to contribute to RA initiation and progression. Active NSPs are generated from zymogens at the promyelocytic stage of neutrophil differentiation under the action of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP-1) and DPP-1 knockout mice are resistant to the development of arthritis. Thus, DPP-1 inhibition represents a promising therapeutic approach in RA. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of a potent and highly selective DPP-1 inhibitor, brensocatib, in two well established RA models – rat collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and mouse collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA). In both models, brensocatib at 3 and 30 mg/kg/day significantly reduced bone marrow NSP levels, in keeping with prior pharmacodynamic studies in rodents. More importantly, brensocatib treatment significantly improved disease score at both dosages in both rodent models. In the mouse CAIA model, brensocatib even proved at least as potent as anti-TNF antibodies in diminishing both the histopathological score and neutrophil infiltration into arthritic joints. Together, these results show that brensocatib alters RA disease progression in rodents and supports the need for its further evaluation as a potential therapeutic option, or to complement existing RA treatments.

Brensocatib is a novel, oral, selective, reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1), which activates several neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs), including neutrophil elastase (NE), proteinase 3 (PR3), and cathepsin G (CatG) in the bone marrow during the early stage of neutrophil maturation. These NSPs are associated with pathogen destruction and inflammatory mediation; their dysregulated activation can result in excess secretion of active NSPs causing damaging inflammation and contributing to neutrophil-mediated inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Pharmacological inhibition of DPP1 in the bone marrow could therefore represent an attractive strategy for these neutrophil-driven diseases. A completed Phase 2 trial in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03218917; EudraCT number: 2017-002533-32) indeed demonstrated that administration of brensocatib attenuated the damaging effects of chronic inflammation by inhibiting the downstream activation of NSPs. To support a range of preclinical programs and further understand how rodent species and strains may affect brensocatib’s pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and its pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on NE, PR3, and CatG, an extensive naïve dosing study with brensocatib at different dosing levels, frequencies, and durations was undertaken. Dose-dependent PK exposure responses (AUC and Cmax) were observed regardless of the rodent species and strain. Overall, mice showed greater reduction in NSP activities compared to rats. Both mice and rats dosed once daily (QD) had equivalent NSP activity reduction compared to BID (twice a day) dosing when the QD dose was 1.5-times the BID daily dose. For both mouse strains, CatG activity was reduced the most, followed by NE, then PR3; whereas, for both rat strains, PR3 activity was reduced the most, followed by CatG, and then NE. Maximum reduction in NSP activities was observed after ∼7 days and recoveries were nearly symmetrical. These results may facilitate future in vivo brensocatib study dosing considerations, such as the timing of prophylactic or therapeutic administration, choice of species, dosage and dosing frequency.

Neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) are implicated in numerous inflammatory diseases. Thus, a robust methodology to monitor and quantify NSPs is important to study disease progression and evaluate the effect of pharmacological interventions. A comparison of the various methods used to extract NSPs from neutrophil granulocytes has not been published, providing the impetus to conduct this method optimization and comparison study. Two NSP recovery methodologies were evaluated on samples from five human donors: zymosan stimulation and cell pellet extraction. For the zymosan stimulation method, 1 mL donor blood was added to zymosan and samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 min while shaking. Samples were then centrifuged, and the plasma was collected for quantitation of NSP activity. For the cell pellet extraction procedure, 2 mL whole blood samples were centrifuged into white blood cell pellets following red blood cell lysis. To each pellet, three sequential lysis steps were performed using either 0.05% Nonidet P-40 Substitute (NP40) or 0.02% Triton X-100 lysis buffers under agitation followed by centrifugation. NSP activities were quantified using an exogenous peptide substrate specific to each of the three NSPs being analyzed: neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase 3. The zymosan stimulation method resulted in lower recovery of active NSPs and was unable to stimulate significant release of active cathepsin G. In contrast, the NP40 pellet extraction method showed consistent inter-donor NSP release with greater recoveries of active NSPs than the Triton method or the zymosan stimulation method. Overall, the pellet extraction procedure provided 13.3-fold greater recovery of active neutrophil elastase, 283-fold greater recovery of active cathepsin G, and 2.9-fold greater recovery of active proteinase 3 than the zymosan method. The NP40 cell pellet extraction method resulted in greater extraction of active NSPs compared to the other methods investigated here, which may allow for a more accurate and complete biomarker profile when evaluating human clinical samples.

Recently developed small-molecule inhibitors of the lysosomal protease dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1), also known as cathepsin C (CatC), can suppress suppurative inflammation in vivo by blocking the processing of zymogenic (pro-) forms of neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs), including neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3, and cathepsin G. DPP1 also plays an important role in activating granzyme serine proteases that are expressed by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and natural killer (NK) cells. Therefore, it is critical to determine whether DPP1 inhibition can also cause off-target suppression of CTL/NK-cell-mediated killing of virus-infected or malignant cells. Herein, we demonstrate that the processing of human granzymes A and B, transitioning from zymogen to active proteases, is not solely dependent on DPP1. Thus, the killing of target cells by primary human CD8 + T cells, NK cells, and gene-engineered anti-CD19 CAR T cells was not blocked in vitro even after prior exposure to high concentrations of the reversible DPP1 inhibitor brensocatib. Consistent with this observation, the turnover of model granzyme A/B peptide substrates in the human CTL/NK cell lysates was not significantly reduced by brensocatib. In contrast, preincubation with brensocatib almost entirely abolished (>90%) both the cytotoxic activity of mouse CD8 + T cells and granzyme substrate turnover. Overall, our finding that the effects of DPP1 inhibition on human cytotoxic lymphocytes are attenuated in comparison to those of mice indicates that granzyme processing/activation pathways differ between mice and humans. Moreover, the in vitro data suggest that human subjects treated with reversible DPP1 inhibitors, such as brensocatib, are unlikely to experience any appreciable deficits in CTL/NK-cell-mediated immunities.

Treprostinil palmitil (TP) is a prodrug of treprostinil (TRE), a pulmonary vasodilator that has been previously formulated for inhaled administration via a nebulizer. TP demonstrates a sustained presence in the lungs with reduced systemic exposure and prolonged inhibition of hypoxia-induced pulmonary vasoconstriction in vivo. Here, we report on re-formulation efforts to develop a more convenient solution-based metered-dose inhaler (MDI) formulation of TP, a treprostinil palmitil inhalation aerosol (TPIA) that matches the pharmacokinetic (PK) and efficacy profile of a nebulized TP formulation, treprostinil palmitil inhalation suspension (TPIS). MDI canisters were manufactured using a two-stage filling method. Aerosol performance, formulation solubility, and chemical stability assays were utilized for in vitro evaluation. For in vivo studies, TPIA formulations were delivered to rodents using an inhalation tower modified for MDI delivery. Using an iterative process involving evaluation of formulation performance in vitro (TP and excipient solubility, chemical stability, physical stability, and aerosol properties) and confirmatory testing in vivo (rat PK and efficacy, guinea pig cough), a promising formulation was identified. The optimized formulation, TPIA-W, demonstrates uniform in vitro drug delivery, a PK profile suitable for a once-daily administration, efficacy lasting at least 12 h in a hypoxic challenge model, and a significantly higher cough threshold than the parent drug treprostinil.

Treprostinil palmitil (TP), a prodrug of treprostinil, is being developed as an inhalation powder (TPIP) for the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). In ongoing human clinical trials, TPIP is administered via a commercially available high resistance (HR) RS01 capsule-based dry powder inhaler (DPI) device manufactured by Berry Global (formerly Plastiape), which utilizes the patient’s inspiratory flow to provide the required energy to deagglomerate and disperse the powder for delivery to their lungs. In this study, we characterized the aerosol performance of TPIP in response to changes in inhalation profiles to model more realistic use scenarios, i.e., for reduced inspiratory volumes and with inhalation acceleration rates that differ from those described in the compendia. The emitted dose of TP for all combinations of inhalation profiles and volumes ranged narrowly between 79 and 89% for the 16 and 32 mg TPIP capsules at the 60 LPM inspiratory flow rate but was reduced to 72–76% for the 16 mg TPIP capsule under the scenarios at the 30 LPM peak inspiratory flow rate. There were no meaningful differences in the fine particle dose (FPD) at all conditions at 60 LPM with the 4 L inhalation volume. The FPD values for the 16 mg TPIP capsule ranged narrowly between 60 and 65% of the loaded dose for all inhalation ramp rates with a 4 L volume and at both extremes of ramp rates for inhalation volumes down to 1 L, while the FPD values for the 32 mg TPIP capsule ranged between 53 and 65% of the loaded dose for all inhalation ramp rates with a 4 L volume and at both extremes of ramp rates for inhalation volumes down to 1 L for the 60 LPM flow rate. At the 30 LPM peak flow rate, the FPD values for the 16 mg TPIP capsule ranged narrowly between 54 and 58% of the loaded dose at both extremes of the ramp rates for inhalation volumes down to 1 L. Based on these in vitro findings, the TPIP delivery system appears not to be affected by the changes in inspiratory flow profiles or inspiratory volumes that might be expected to occur in patients with PAH or PH associated with underlying lung conditions such as ILD.