Explore the vast range of titles available.

The tumour suppressor p53 is mutated in cancer, including over 96% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Mutations cause loss of wild-type p53 function due to either gain of abnormal function of mutant p53 (mutp53), or absent to low mutp53. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) enables increased accuracy of detection of somatic variants in heterogeneous tumours. We used MPS and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to characterise HGSOCs for TP53 mutation and p53 expression. TP53 mutation was identified in 94% (68/72) of HGSOCs, 62% of which were missense. Missense mutations demonstrated high p53 by IHC, as did 35% (9/26) of non-missense mutations. Low p53 was seen by IHC in 62% of HGSOC associated with non-missense mutations. Most wild-type TP53 tumours (75%, 6/8) displayed intermediate p53 levels. The overall sensitivity of detecting a TP53 mutation based on classification as ‘Low’, ‘Intermediate’ or ‘High’ for p53 IHC was 99%, with a specificity of 75%. We suggest p53 IHC can be used as a surrogate marker of TP53 mutation in HGSOC; however, this will result in misclassification of a proportion of TP53 wild-type and mutant tumours. Therapeutic targeting of mutp53 will require knowledge of both TP53 mutations and mutp53 expression.

Although most mesotheliomas present with pleural effusions, it is controversial whether mesothelioma can be diagnosed with confidence in effusion cytology. Therefore, an ancillary marker of malignant mesothelial cells applicable in effusions would be clinically valuable. BRCA-1- associated protein ( BAP1 ) is a tumor suppressor gene, which shows biallelic inactivation in approximately half of all mesotheliomas. We investigated whether loss of BAP1 expression by immunohistochemistry can be used to support a diagnosis of mesothelioma in effusion cytology. Immunohistochemistry for BAP1 was performed on cell blocks and interpreted blinded. 43 of 75 (57%) effusions associated with confirmed mesothelioma showed negative staining with positive internal controls. Of 57 effusions considered to have atypical mesothelial cells in the absence of a definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma, 8 cases demonstrated negative staining for BAP1. On follow-up six of these patients received a definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma in the subsequent 14 months (two were lost to follow-up immediately, and mesothelioma could not be excluded). Only 5 of 100 consecutive benign effusions were interpreted as BAP1 negative. One of these patients died soon after and mesothelioma could not be excluded. On unblinded review the four other patients with apparently negative BAP1 staining but no malignancy lacked convincing positive staining in non-neoplastic cells suggesting that BAP1 immunohistochemistry may have initially been misinterpreted. 47 effusions with adenocarcinoma were BAP1 positive. We conclude that loss of BAP1 expression, while not definitive, can be used to support the diagnosis of mesothelioma in effusion cytology. We caution that interpretation of BAP1 immunohistochemistry on cell block may be difficult and that convincing positive staining in non-neoplastic cells is required before atypical cells are considered negative. We also note that BAP1 loss is not a sensitive test as it occurs in only half of all mesotheliomas and cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis.

Papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) are driven by a variety of molecular abnormalities including BRAF, RAS, ALK, RET, and NTRK alterations. PTCs driven by the BRAFV600E mutation, or tumours which demonstrate a similar gene expression profile to PTCs driven by this mutation, have been reported to demonstrate specific morphological features sometimes termed “BRAFV600E-like” atypia. BRAFV600E-like atypia is characterised by a well-developed papillary architecture, infiltrative growth, marked nuclear clearing, prominent intranuclear pseudoinclusions, abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, and scattered psammoma bodies. We sought to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of these morphological features for the presence of BRAFV600E mutation in PTCs as determined by mutation specific immunohistochemistry. An unselected cohort of 495 PTCs was reviewed by a single pathologist and categorised into three groups: typical BRAFV600E-like atypia (145 cases, 29%), possible BRAFV600E-like atypia (166 cases, 33%) and little/no BRAFV600E-like atypia (184 cases, 37%). The specificity and sensitivity of typical BRAFV600E-like atypia for the BRAFV600E mutation was 97.2% and 44.3%, respectively. When typical and possible BRAFV600E-like atypia were analysed together, the specificity was 70.6% and the sensitivity was 81.7%. In the morphologically little/no BRAFV600E-like atypia group, 58 cases (31.5%) had a BRAFV600E mutation. We conclude that typical BRAFV600E-like atypia is highly specific for the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation; however, the absence of BRAFV600E-like atypia does not exclude this mutation.

There is some uncertainty about pathological grading of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma, defined as colorectal cancer demonstrating at least 50% mucinous differentiation. Under the WHO 2000 classification mucinous colorectal cancer was considered high grade. However under the current WHO 2010 classification microsatellite unstable/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/MMRd) mucinous colorectal cancer is considered low grade, whereas microsatellite stable/mismatch repair proficient (MSS/MMRp) tumours are high grade. However there is little empirical evidence for this approach. We therefore compared the long term survival of patients with MSI/MMRd vs MSS/MMRp mucinous colorectal cancer in a large unselected cohort of patients undergoing surgery at our institution from 1998 to 2011. There were 2608 patients in the cohort, of which 264 (10.1%) were mucinous. 95 (36%) of the mucinous tumours were microsatellite unstable. The all-cause 5-year survival of mucinous MSI/MMRd colorectal cancer was similar to that of non-mucinous low-grade colorectal cancer (73 vs 67%, P =0.368), and significantly better than that of both non-mucinous high-grade (73 vs 53%, P <0.001) and mucinous MSS/MMRp colorectal cancer (73 vs 57%, P =0.023). The 5-year survival of mucinous MSS/MMRp colorectal cancer was slightly better than that of non-mucinous high-grade patients (57 vs 53%, P =0.027), but significantly worse than that of non-mucinous low-grade colorectal cancer (57 vs 67%, P =0.018). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, conventional histological grade based on glandular differentiation maintained prognostic significance ( P =0.003) whereas MSI/MMRd status just failed to be statistically significant ( P =0.062). Our findings support the WHO 2010 approach that as a group mucinous MSS/MMRp colorectal cancers are biologically aggressive. However, grading based exclusively on MSI/MMR status may be overly simplistic as conventional grading based on the degree of glandular differentiation still holds greater prognostic significance in multivariate analysis.

This letter indicates that immunohistochemical analysis to detect succinic dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) protein can screen renal tumors for underlying SDHB germline mutations at a fraction of the time and cost of formal genetic testing. To the Editor: The genes for the succinate dehydrogenase subunits A, B, C, and D ( SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD, respectively) encode proteins that form part of the mitochondrial complex II, which links the Krebs cycle and the electron-transport chain. Heterozygous germline mutations of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD cause the well-characterized familial pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndromes known respectively as PGL4, PGL3, and PGL1. 1 SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD mutations have also been linked to gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and SDHB and SDHD have been linked to renal-cell carcinoma. These kindreds are rarely recognized when they present with gastrointestinal stromal tumor and they are . . .

MYC over-expression as determined by molecular means has been reported as a favorable prognostic biomarker in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). However MYC expression analysis is not available in the routine clinical setting. We investigated whether immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the myc protein using a novel commercially available rabbit monoclonal antibody [clone Y69] which is currently in widespread clinical use for lymphoma diagnosis could be used to predict outcome in resected CRC. Myc IHC was performed on a tissue microarray (TMA) comprising a retrospective cohort of 1421 CRC patients and scored blinded as to all clinical and pathological data. IHC was also performed on a subcohort of whole section CRCs to assess staining characteristics and concordance with TMA expression. MYC over-expression was found in 980 (69%) of CRCs and was associated with tumor stage and DNA mismatch repair/BRAF status. There was substantial agreement between TMA and whole section myc IHC (kappa = 0.742, p<0.01). CRCs with MYC over-expression demonstrated improved 5-year survival (93.2% vs. 57.3%), with the effect significantly modulated by the dominant effect of tumor stage, age at diagnosis and lymphovascular space invasion status on survival. We conclude that myc status as determined by IHC alone can be used to predict overall survival in patients with CRC undergoing surgical resection.

Pancreatic cancer is both common and highly lethal and therefore new biomarkers or potential targets for treatment are needed. Loss of BRCA associated protein-1 (BAP1) expression has been found in up to a quarter of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Given the close anatomical relationship between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, we therefore sought to investigate the frequency of loss of BAP1 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The records of the department of Anatomical Pathology Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia, were searched for cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1992 and 2014 with material available in archived formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks. Immunohistochemistry for BAP1 was performed on tissue microarray sections and if staining was equivocal or negative it was confirmed on whole sections. Negative staining for BAP1 was defined as loss of expression in all neoplastic nuclei, with preserved expression in non-neoplastic cells which acted as an internal positive control. Loss of BAP1 expression was found in only 1 of 306 (0.33%) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. This case was confirmed to demonstrate diffuse loss of expression throughout all neoplastic cells in multiple blocks, consistent with BAP1 loss being an early clonal event. All other cases demonstrated positive expression of BAP1. We conclude that, in contrast to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, loss of expression of BAP1 occurs very rarely in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Therefore BAP1 inactivation is unlikely to be a frequent driver abnormality in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Mutation specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a promising new technique to detect the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). When performed in conjunction with mismatch repair (MMR) IHC, BRAFV600E IHC can help to further triage genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome. In a cohort of 1426 patients undergoing surgery from 2004 to 2009 we recently demonstrated that the combination of MMR and BRAFV600E IHC holds promise as a prognostic marker in CRC, particularly because of its ability to identify the poor prognosis MMR proficient (MMRp) BRAFV600E mutant subgroup. We attempted to validate combined MMR and BRAFV600E IHC as a prognostic indicator in a separate cohort comprising consecutive CRC patients undergoing surgery from 1998 to 2003. IHC was performed on a tissue microarray containing tissue from 1109 patients with CRC. The 5 year survivals stratified by staining patterns were: MMRd/BRAFwt 64%, MMRd/BRAFV600E 64%, MMRp/BRAFwt 60% and MMRp/BRAFV600E 53%. Using the poor prognosis MMRp/BRAFV600E phenotype as baseline, univariate Cox regression modelling demonstrated the following hazard ratios for death: MMRd/BRAFwt HR = 0.71 (95%CI = 0.40-1.27), p = 0.31; MMRd/BRAFV600E HR = 0.74 (95%CI = 0.51-1.07), p = 0.11 and MMRp/BRAFwt HR = 0.79 (95%CI = 0.60-1.04), p = 0.09. Although the findings did not reach statistical significance, this study supports the potential role of combined MMR and BRAF IHC as prognostic markers in CRC.

NTRK gene rearrangements are important to identify as predictors of response to targeted therapy in many malignancies. Only 0.16–0.3% of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) harbor these fusions making universal screening difficult. We therefore investigated whether pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC), mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), and BRAFV600E mutation status could be used to triage molecular testing for NTRK gene rearrangements in CRC. CRCs from 4569 unselected patients underwent IHC in TMA format with two different anti-pan-Trk rabbit monoclonal antibodies. All positive cases were confirmed on whole sections and underwent RNA-sequencing. Pan-Trk IHC was positive in 0.2% of CRCs (9/4569). Both antibodies demonstrated similar staining characteristics with diffuse positive staining in all neoplastic cells. Of note 8/9 (89%) IHC positive cases were both MMRd (all showing MLH1/PMS2 loss) and lacked BRAFV600E mutation. That is, IHC was positive in 5.3% (8/152) MLH1/PMS2/ BRAFV600E triple negative CRCs, but only 0.02% (1/4417) not showing this phenotype. All nine IHC positive CRCs demonstrated gene rearrangements ( LMNA-NTRK1 in 5 CRCs, TPR - NTRK1 , STRM - NTRK1 , MUC2 - NTRK2 , and NTRK1 with an unknown partner in one each), suggesting close to 100% specificity for IHC in this sub-population. NTRK fusions were associated with right sided ( p  = 0.02), larger tumors ( p  = 0.029) with infiltrative growth ( p  = 0.021). As a part of universal Lynch syndrome screening many institutions routinely test all CRCs for MMRd, and then proceed to reflex BRAFV600E mutation testing in MLH1/PMS2 negative CRCs. We conclude that performing pan-Trk IHC on this preselected subgroup of MLH1/PMS2/ BRAFV600E triple negative CRCs (only 3.3% of all CRC patients) is a resource effective approach to identify the overwhelming majority of CRC patients with NTRK gene fusions.