Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Content Type
      Content Type
      Clear All
      Content Type
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
116 result(s) for "Cohen, H. Floris"
Sort by:
How Modern Science Came into the World
Once upon a time ‘The Scientific Revolution of the 17th century’ was an innovative concept that inspired a stimulating narrative of how modern science came into the world. Half a century later, what we now know as ‘the master narrative’ serves rather as a strait-jacket — so often events and contexts just fail to fit in. No attempt has been made so far to replace the master narrative. H. Floris Cohen now comes up with precisely such a replacement.
Two New Conceptions of the Scientific Revolution Compared
[...]there is an increasing awareness that, in addition to theoretical and conceptual up- heaval of a mostly mathematical nature, practice, notably experimental practice, should count, too. [...]both Stephen's book and mine cover far more than just the 17th century, even though we both take the conception of \"the Scien- tific Revolution of the 17th century\" very seriously and, hence, treat the period between Galileo and Newton as pivotal to our respective accounts. [...]when we seek specific reasons for the decline of science in such-or-such a civilization at such-and-such a time, we are unconsciously projecting backward the notion that under normal circumstances science is bound to display continuous growth. [...]a word on causation.