Explore the vast range of titles available.

A total of 2203 patients at 18 medical centers were randomly assigned to undergo on-pump or off-pump CABG. Mortality at 5 years was significantly lower with on-pump CABG than with off-pump CABG. No secondary outcomes indicated a benefit of off-pump surgery.

This comparative-effectiveness trial showed that clinical outcomes at 1 year were better with on-pump than with off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), and there was also better graft patency. There were no significant differences in neuropsychological outcomes. This comparative-effectiveness trial showed that clinical outcomes at 1 year were better with on-pump than with off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), and there was also better graft patency. During the past 30 years, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) primarily was performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (“on pump”) with cardioplegic arrest. Historically, on-pump CABG was shown to improve ischemic symptoms and, in selected patients, prolong survival. 1 – 3 In the mid-1990s, interest emerged in performing CABG without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (off pump), in order to reduce postoperative complications associated with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, 4 – 7 including generalized systemic inflammatory response, 8 , 9 cerebral dysfunction, 10 – 12 myocardial depression, and hemodynamic instability. 13 , 14 At the time this trial was being planned, initial enthusiasm for off-pump CABG became tempered by . . .

Status epilepticus is a life-threatening emergency that affects 65,000 1 to 150,000 2 people in the United States each year. Generalized convulsive status epilepticus is the most common and most dangerous type. Phenobarbital, 3 – 5 phenytoin, 6 – 14 diazepam plus phenytoin, 15 , 16 and lorazepam 17 – 28 have been advocated for the initial treatment of generalized convulsive status epilepticus, and each is used by a substantial number of physicians. 3 There are few data from controlled trials, however, to document the efficacy of these treatments, and they have not been directly compared. We therefore undertook this study to compare the efficacy of standard doses of these four . . .

Telemedicine has shown promise in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The objective of this study was to compare disease activity and quality of life (QoL) in a 1-year randomized trial of IBD patients receiving telemedicine vs. standard care. Patients with worsening symptoms in the prior 2 years were eligible for randomization to telemedicine (monitoring via texts EOW or weekly) or standard care. The primary outcomes were the differences in change in disease activity and QoL between the groups; change in healthcare utilization among groups was a secondary aim. 348 participants were enrolled (117 control group, 115 TELE-IBD EOW, and 116 TELE-IBD weekly). 259 (74.4%) completed the study. Age was 38.9 ± 12.3 years, 56.6% were women, 91.9% were Caucasian, 67.9% had Crohn's disease (CD) and 42.5% had active disease at baseline. In CD, all groups experienced a decrease in disease activity (control -5.2 ± 5.0 to 3.7 ± 3.6, TELE-IBD EOW 4.7 ± 4.1 to 4.2 ± 3.9, and TELE-IBD weekly 4.2 ± 4.2 to 3.2 ± 3.4, p < 0.0001 for each of the groups) In UC, only controls had a significant decrease in disease activity (control 2.9 ± 3.1 to 1.4 ± 1.4, p = 0.01, TELE-IBD EOW 2.7 ± 3.1 to 1.7 ± 1.9, p = 0.35, and TELE-IBD Weekly 2.5 ± 2.5 to 2.0 ± 1.8, p = 0.31). QoL increased in all groups; the increase was significant only in TELE-IBD EOW (control 168.1 ± 34.0 to 179.3 ± 28.2, p = 0.06, TELE-IBD EOW 172.3 ± 33.1 to 181.5 ± 28.2, p = 0.03, and TELE-IBD Weekly 172.3 ± 34.5 to 179.2 ± 32.8, p = 0.10). Unadjusted and adjusted changes in disease activity and QoL were not significantly different among groups. Healthcare utilization increased in all groups. TELE-IBD weekly were less likely to have IBD-related hospitalizations and more likely to have non-invasive diagnostic tests and electronic encounters compared to controls; both TELE-IBD groups had decreased non-IBD related hospitalizations and increased telephone calls compared to controls. Disease activity and QoL, although improved in all participants, were not improved further through use of the TELE-IBD system. TELE-IBD participants experienced a decrease in hospitalizations with an associated increase in non-invasive diagnostic tests, telephone calls and electronic encounters. Research is needed to determine if TELE-IBD can be improved through patient engagement and whether it can decrease healthcare utilization by replacing standard care.

Complete revascularization (CR) at the time of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery improves long-term cardiac outcomes. No studies have previously reported angiographically confirmed CR rates post-CABG. This study's aim was to assess the impact upon long-term outcomes of CR versus incomplete revascularization (IR), confirmed by coronary angiography 1 year after CABG. Randomized On/Off Bypass Study patients who returned for protocol-specified 1-year post-CABG coronary angiograms were included. Patients with a widely patent graft supplying the major diseased artery within each diseased coronary territory were considered to have CR. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) over the 4 years after angiography. Of the 1,276 patients, 756 (59%) had CR and 520 (41%) had IR. MACE was 13% CR versus 26% IR, p <0.001. This difference was driven by fewer repeat revascularizations (5% CR vs 18% IR; p <0.001). There were no differences in mortality (7.1% CR vs 8.1% IR, p = 0.13) or myocardial infarction (4% in both). Adjusted multivariable models confirmed CR was associated with reduced MACE (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.58, p <0.01), but had no impact on mortality. In conclusion, CR confirmed by post-CABG angiography was associated with improved MACE but not mortality. Repeat revascularization of patients with IR, driven by knowledge of the research angiography results, may have ameliorated potential mortality differences.

For advanced coronary disease, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery generally improves patients' symptoms and long-term survival. Unfortunately, some patients experience worse health-related quality of life (HRQL) after CABG. The objective of this study is to report the frequency and risk factors associated with 1-year post-CABG HRQL deterioration. From 2002 to 2007, 2203 “Randomized On/Off Bypass” (ROOBY) trial patients randomly received either off-pump or on-pump CABG at 18 VA medical centers. Subjects completed both baseline and 1-year Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Veterans Rand 36 (VR-36) questionnaires to assess HRQL. Using previously published criteria, the rates of clinically significant changes were determined for the SAQ [angina frequency (AF), physical limitation (PL), and quality of life (QoL)] and VR36 [mental component score (MCS) and physical component score (PCS)] subscales. Multivariate regression models were then used to identify pre-CABG patient characteristics associated with worsened 1-year HRQL status for each subscale. Over 80% of patients had an improvement or no change in SAQ and VR-36 subscale scores 1 year after CABG. The HRQL scale-specific deterioration rates were 4.5% SAQ-AF, 16.8% SAQ-PL, 4.9% SAQ-QoL, 19.4% VR36-MCS, and 13.5% VR36-PCS. Predictors of 1-year HRQL deterioration were diabetes and smoking for the SAQ-AF; diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) for SAQ-PL; COPD and depression for the SAQ-QoL; diabetes for VR36-PCS, and history of stroke and depression for VR36-MCS. The baseline score was an independent predictor for worsening in all the subscales studied. Among VA patients, less than 20% experienced worse HRQL 1 year after CABG. For patients with low symptom burden at baseline, diabetes, smoking, depression, PVD, COPD, and a prior stroke, clinicians should be more cautious in pre-CABG counseling as to their anticipated HRQL improvements.

The management of brain-dead organ donors is complex. The use of inotropic agents and replacement of depleted hormones (hormonal replacement therapy) is crucial for successful multiple organ procurement, yet the optimal hormonal replacement has not been identified, and the statistical adjustment to determine the best selection is not trivial. Traditional pair-wise comparisons between every pair of treatments, and multiple comparisons to all (MCA), are statistically conservative. Hsu's multiple comparisons with the best (MCB) - adapted from the Dunnett's multiple comparisons with control (MCC) - has been used for selecting the best treatment based on continuous variables. We selected the best hormonal replacement modality for successful multiple organ procurement using a two-step approach. First, we estimated the predicted margins by constructing generalized linear models (GLM) or generalized linear mixed models (GLMM), and then we applied the multiple comparison methods to identify the best hormonal replacement modality given that the testing of hormonal replacement modalities is independent. Based on 10-year data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), among 16 hormonal replacement modalities, and using the 95% simultaneous confidence intervals, we found that the combination of thyroid hormone, a corticosteroid, antidiuretic hormone, and insulin was the best modality for multiple organ procurement for transplantation.

Background Since the late 1960s, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures were traditionally performed using a heart-lung machine on an arrested heart (on-pump). Over the past decade, an increasing number CABG-only procedures were performed on a beating heart (off-pump). Advocates of the off-pump approach expect to reduce many of the adverse side effects related to using the heart-lung machine, while advocates for the on-pump procedure raise concerns related to graft patency rates and long-term event-free survival for the off-pump technique. Purpose The U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program funded a randomized, multicenter clinical trial comparing the clinical and resourcerelated outcomes following on-pump versus off-pump techniques for veterans undergoing a non-emergent CABG-only procedure. The planning committee was faced with several critically important challenges to assure feasibility of study costs and required sample size; generalizability to non-VA surgical practices; and comparability of clinically meaningful results. These challenges are discussed. Methods This study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, single blinded (patient) clinical trial that compares on-pump and off-pump techniques for veterans requiring non-emergent CABG-only procedures. There will be 2200 patients randomized at 17 VA Medical Centers when the five-year recruitment period ends on 15 April 2007. There are two primary objectives: a short-term objective to assess the immediate impact of the two techniques on 30-day mortality/morbidity and a long-term objective to assess one-year mortality/morbidity. Major secondary outcomes are one-year graft patency rates and change in neuropsychological assessments from baseline to one year. All patients are assessed at 30 days post-surgery or discharge from the hospital, whichever is latest, and at one-year post-surgery. Results During planning, several key issues had to be decided. These included 1) choosing primary objectives: a short-term (30-day) and a long-term (one-year) objective were chosen; 2) choosing primary outcome measures: composite measures were selected to ensure sufficient end-points; 3) standardization of surgical techniques: minimal standardization required but guidelines and continuing discussions on both techniques provided; 4) establishing criteria for surgeons and residents for participation: surgeons required to have completed 20 off-pump procedures prior to doing study procedures and residents, in presence of study surgeon, capable of doing either procedure; 5) identifying metrics of cognitive dysfunction sensitive to treatment: a neuropshychologist hired who centrally monitors cognitive functioning testing; and 6) blinding participants of surgical procedure: attempt to blind participants. Limitations Areas of concern are whether all surgeons sufficiently experienced on the off-pump procedure, should residents have been allowed to do study surgeries, should techniques have been standardized more and were the best neurocognitive tests selected. Conclusion The study design presented allows for a balanced and fair assessment of the on-pump and off-pump CABG procedures across a diversity of clinical outcomes and resource use metrics. Its results have the potential to influence clinical cardiac surgical practice in the future.

Aims. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an 8 mg/day sublingual dose of buprenorphine in the maintenance treatment of heroin addicts by comparison with a 1 mg/day dose over a 16‐week treatment period. As a secondary objective, outcomes were determined concurrently for patients treated with two other dose levels . Design. Patients were randomized to four dosage groups and treated double‐blind . Setting. Twelve outpatient opiate maintenance treatment centers throughout the United States . Participants. Two hundred and thirty‐nine women and 497 men who met the DSM‐III‐R criteria for opioid dependence and were seeking treatment . Intervention. Patients received either 1, 4, 8 or 16 mg/day of buprenorphine and were treated in the usual clinical context, including a 1‐hour weekly clinical counseling session . Measurement. Retention in treatment, illicit opioid use as determined by urine toxicology, opioid craving and global ratings by patient and staff. Safety outcome measures were provided by clinical monitoring and by analysis of the reported adverse events . Findings. Outcomes in the 8 mg group were significantly better than in the 1 mg group in all four efficacy domains. No deaths occurred in either group. The 8 mg group did not show an increase in the frequency of adverse events. Most reported adverse effects were those commonly seen in patients treated with opioids . Conclusions. The findings support the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine and suggest that an adequate dose of buprenorphine will be a useful addition to pharmacotherapy.