Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abusive head trauma (AHT) in children is notoriously one of the most challenging diagnoses for the forensic pathologist. The pathological “triad”, a combination of intracranial subdural haematoma, cerebral oedema with hypoxic-ischaemic changes and retinal haemorrhages, is frequently argued to be insufficient to support a corroborated verdict of abuse. Data from all available English-language scientific literature involving radiological and neuropathological spinal cord examination is reviewed here in order to assess the contribution of spinal cord changes in differentiating abusive from accidental head trauma. In agreement with the statistically proven association between spinal subdural haemorrhage (SDH) and abuse (Choudhary et al. in Radiology 262:216–223, 2012), spinal blood collection proved to be the most indicative finding related to abusive aetiology. The incidence of spinal blood collection is as much as 44–48% when all the spinal cord levels are analysed as opposed to just 0–18% when the assessment is performed at cervical level only, in agreement with the evidence of the most frequent spinal SDH location at thoracolumbar rather than cervical level. In this review, the source of spinal cord blood collection and how the age of the child relates to the position of spinal cord lesions is also discussed. We concluded that the ante mortem MRI examination and post mortem examination of whole-length spinal cord is of fundamental interest for the assessment of abuse in the forensic setting.

The diagnosis of abusive head trauma (AbHT) in children is a challenging one that needs to be differentiated from natural disease and accidental head injury (AcHT). There is increasing evidence from the Neuroradiology field showing spinal cord injury in children subject to AbHT, which has, so far, been poorly investigated pathologically. In this study we retrospectively reviewed the forensic records of 110 paediatric head injury cases over an eight-year-period. The records included detailed circumstances of death and clinical history alongside neuropathology, ophthalmic pathology and osteo-articular pathology. Based on the final multidisciplinary agreement, the 110 case were grouped into AbHT ( n  = 40), AcHT ( n  = 9), not clearly accidental or abusive (“undetermined” (UHT) n  = 8) and non-traumatic brain injury (NTBI, n  = 53). The spinal cord pathology present within each group was compared. Spinal subdural haematoma (SDH) was present in 71% of AbHT and 50% of AcHT cases and were located predominantly at the thoracolumbar level. In AbHT cases without spinal SDH, the suspected mechanism of injury was that of head impact rather than shaking, whilst cases of AcHT with spinal SDH were associated with direct trauma to the spinal cord. Injury of spinal nerve roots in AbHT was almost three times that seen in the accidental head injury group (58% vs. 17%). The study shows that pathological examination of the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots is of high value in investigating AHT and may help in differentiating AbHT from AcHT.