Explore the vast range of titles available.

Aims/hypothesis Not all people with type 2 diabetes who undergo bariatric surgery achieve diabetes remission. Thus it is critical to develop methods for predicting outcomes that are applicable for clinical practice. The DiaRem score is relevant for predicting diabetes remission post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), but it is not accurate for all individuals across the entire spectrum of scores. We aimed to develop an improved scoring system for predicting diabetes remission following RYGB (the Advanced-DiaRem [Ad-DiaRem]). Methods We used a retrospective French cohort ( n  = 1866) that included 352 individuals with type 2 diabetes followed for 1 year post-RYGB. We developed the Ad-DiaRem in a test cohort ( n  = 213) and examined its accuracy in independent cohorts from France ( n  = 134) and Israel ( n  = 99). Results Adding two clinical variables (diabetes duration and number of glucose-lowering agents) to the original DiaRem and modifying the penalties for each category led to improved predictive performance for Ad-DiaRem. Ad-DiaRem displayed improved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and predictive accuracy compared with DiaRem (0.911 vs 0.856 and 0.841 vs 0.789, respectively; p =  0.03); thus correcting classification for 8% of those initially misclassified with DiaRem. With Ad-DiaRem, there were also fewer misclassifications of individuals with mid-range scores. This improved predictive performance was confirmed in independent cohorts. Conclusions/interpretation We propose the Ad-DiaRem, which includes two additional clinical variables, as an optimised tool with improved accuracy to predict diabetes remission 1 year post-RYGB. This tool might be helpful for personalised management of individuals with diabetes when considering bariatric surgery in routine care, ultimately contributing to precision medicine.

Background The aim of this study is to analyze mortality in patients treated with bevacizumab for wet AMD. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study between patients who received intravitreal injections of bevacizumab as the sole treatment for exudative AMD between September 2008 and October 2014 ( n  = 5385) and age and gender matched controls ( n  = 10,756). All individuals included in the study were reviewed for sociodemographic data and comorbidities. Survival analysis was performed using adjusted Cox regression, using relevant adjusted variables. Results During follow-up (maximum: 73 months), 1063 (19.7%) individuals after bevacizumab died compared with 1298 (12.1%) in the control group ( P  < .001). After adjusted Cox survival regression, mortality differed significantly between the groups, Odds ratio = 1.69, (95% C.I. 1.54–1.84), P  < .001. Conclusions We found an increased long-term mortality in individuals with wet AMD treated with bevacizumab compared to a same age and gender group without wet AMD.

Background Different bariatric surgeries have demonstrated different effectiveness for weight loss and glucose control in obese persons with diabetes, over a short follow-up time. The aim of this study was to compare weight loss, glucose control, and diabetes remission in individuals with type 2 diabetes, after three types of bariatric surgery: gastric banding (GB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), with 5 years follow-up. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on bariatric surgeries performed during 2002–2011 in a large nationwide healthcare organization. Results Of 2190 patients, 64.8 % were women. The operations performed were 1027 GB, 1023 SG, and 140 RYGB. Mean BMI ± SD at baseline, 1 year postoperatively, and 5 years postoperatively were 43.5 ± 6.18, 37.1 ± 6.35, and 35.5 ± 6.48 for GB; 43.6 ± 6.42, 34.4 ± 6.08, and 35.3 ± 6.7 for SG; and 42.8 ± 5.81, 32.8 ± 4.9, and 34.1 ± 5.09 for RYGB. Mean HbA1c ± SD at baseline, 1 year postoperatively, and 5 years postoperatively were 7.6 + 1.58, 6.5 + 1.22, and 6.8 + 1.48 for GB; 7.7 + 1.63, 6.4 + 1.18, and 6.7 + 1.57 for SG; and 8.0 + 1.78, 6.3 + 0.98, and 7.04 + 1.42 for RYGB. At 1 year follow-up, 53.2 % had achieved remission; at 5 years, 54.4 %. Remission rates at 5 years were similar for the three surgeries. Five-year remission was inversely associated with baseline HbA1c and with treatment with insulin at baseline and positively associated with BMI. Conclusions For all three surgeries, diabetes remission was higher than the baseline after 5 years; mean BMI and HbA1c decreased considerably during the first year postoperatively and remained lower than basal values throughout follow-up. Early improvements were greatest for RYGB, though the advantage over the other operations diminished with time.

PurposeDiaRem is a clinical scoring system designed to predict diabetes remission (DR) 1-year post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We examined long-term (2- and 5-year) postoperative DR prediction by DiaRem and an advanced-DiaRem (Ad-DiaRem) score following RYGB, sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and gastric banding (GB).MethodsWe accessed data from a computerized database of persons with type 2 diabetes and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent RYGB, SG, or GB, and determined DR status 2- and 5-year postoperative according to preoperative DiaRem and the Ad-DiaRem calculated scores.ResultsAmong 1459 patients with 5-year postoperative diabetes status data, 53.6% exhibited DR. For RYGB, Ad-DiaRem trended to exhibit mildly improved predictive capacity 5-year postoperatively compared to DiaRem: Areas under receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] curves were 0.85 (0.76–0.93) and 0.78 (0.69–0.88), respectively. The positive predictive values (PPVs) detecting > 80% of those achieving DR (i.e., sensitivity ≥ 0.8) were 78.2% and 73.2%, respectively, and higher Ad-DiaRem scores more consistently associated with decreased DR rates. Following SG, both scores had an AUROC of 0.82, but Ad-DiaRem still had a higher PPV for predicting > 80% of those with 5-year postoperative DR (76.2% and 71.0%). Predictive capacity parameters were comparatively lower, for both scores, when considering DR 5-year post-GB (AUROC: 0.73 for both scores, PPV: 66.3% and 64.3%, respectively).ConclusionsAd-DiaRem provides modest improvement compared to DiaRem in predicting long-term DR 5-years post-RYGB. Both scores similarly provide fair predictive capacity for 5-year postoperative DR after SG.

BackgroundIntraocular injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are currently the main therapy in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The safety of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF compound frequently delivered off label, is debated, particularly for high-group risks. We aim to analyze the mortality associated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for AMD in patients previously diagnosed with acute myocardial infarct (MI).MethodsIn a national database, we identified bevacizumab-treated AMD patients with a diagnosis of MI prior to their first bevacizumab injection, delivered between September 2008 and October 2014 (n = 2100). We then generated sub-groups of patients treated within 3 months (n = 11), 6 months (n = 24), 12 months (n = 52), and 24 months (n = 124) after MI. Those patients were compared to age- and gender-matched members that had a MI at the same time and had never been exposed to anti-VEGF. Survival analysis was performed using propensity score-adjusted Cox regression.ResultsBevacizumab-treated patients were slightly and insignificantly older than controls (mean age 83.25 vs 83.19 year, P = .75). Gender distribution was similar. In a Cox regression adjusted with propensity score, the following differences in mortality were found: within 3 months between MI and initiation of bevacizumab treatment, OR = 6.22 (95% C.I 1.08–35.97, P < .05); within 6 months, OR = 2.37 (95% C.I 0.93–6.02, P = .071); within 12 months, OR = 3.00 (95% C.I 1.44–6.28, P < .01); within 24 months after MI, OR = 2.24 (95% C.I 1.35–3.70, P < .01); and MI any time prior to first bevacizumab injection, OR = 1.71 (95% C.I 1.53–1.92, P < .001).ConclusionsWe report increased mortality associated with the use of intravitreal bevacizumab in AMD patients after MI, compared to age- and gender-matched post-MI patients with no exposure to any anti-VEGF agent. Caution should be taken while offering bevacizumab to AMD patients after MI.

BackgroundIdentifying risk factors for conversion to diabetes among individuals with obesity and prediabetes is important for preventing diabetes.PurposeWe assessed conversion rates to diabetes 5 years after three types of metabolic surgery and examined predictors of diabetes development.MethodsWe accessed data of individuals with prediabetes, defined as fasting glucose (FG) 100–125 mg/dL (5.6–6.9 mmol/L) or HbA1c 5.7–6.4% at baseline (preoperatively), who underwent metabolic surgeries in Clalit Health Services during 2002–2011.ResultsOf 1,756 individuals with prediabetes, 819 underwent gastric banding (GB), 845 sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and 92 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Mean age was 41.6 years and 73.5% were women. Five years post-surgery, 177 (10.1%) had developed diabetes. Conversion rates by type of surgery were 14.4%, 6.3%, and 6.5% for GB, SG, and RYGB, respectively (p < 0.001). Conversion was more rapid following GB than SG or RYGB (χ2(2) = 29.67, p < 0.005). In a multiple-logistic-regression model, predictors of diabetes development 5 years postoperatively were (1) weight loss during the first postoperative year and (2) preoperative levels of both FG and HbA1c within the prediabetes range. Baseline weight, age, and sex, were not associated with conversion to diabetes. Conversion rates were lower (4.7%) five years postoperatively for patients who lost > 25% of their baseline weight, compared to those who lost less than 15% of their weight during the first postoperative year: (14.0% < 0.001).ConclusionsOur findings emphasize the importance of preoperative glycemic control and weight loss during the first year postoperatively, for the long-term prevention of diabetes in patients with prediabetes undergoing metabolic surgery.

Aims/hypothesisNot all people with type 2 diabetes who undergo bariatric surgery achieve diabetes remission. Thus it is critical to develop methods for predicting outcomes that are applicable for clinical practice. The DiaRem score is relevant for predicting diabetes remission post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), but it is not accurate for all individuals across the entire spectrum of scores. We aimed to develop an improved scoring system for predicting diabetes remission following RYGB (the Advanced-DiaRem [Ad-DiaRem]).MethodsWe used a retrospective French cohort (n = 1866) that included 352 individuals with type 2 diabetes followed for 1 year post-RYGB. We developed the Ad-DiaRem in a test cohort (n = 213) and examined its accuracy in independent cohorts from France (n = 134) and Israel (n = 99).ResultsAdding two clinical variables (diabetes duration and number of glucose-lowering agents) to the original DiaRem and modifying the penalties for each category led to improved predictive performance for Ad-DiaRem. Ad-DiaRem displayed improved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and predictive accuracy compared with DiaRem (0.911 vs 0.856 and 0.841 vs 0.789, respectively; p = 0.03); thus correcting classification for 8% of those initially misclassified with DiaRem. With Ad-DiaRem, there were also fewer misclassifications of individuals with mid-range scores. This improved predictive performance was confirmed in independent cohorts.Conclusions/interpretationWe propose the Ad-DiaRem, which includes two additional clinical variables, as an optimised tool with improved accuracy to predict diabetes remission 1 year post-RYGB. This tool might be helpful for personalised management of individuals with diabetes when considering bariatric surgery in routine care, ultimately contributing to precision medicine.

IntroductionGood medication adherence is associated with decreased healthcare expenditure; however, adherence is usually assessed for single medication. We aim to explore the associations of adherence levels to 23 chronic medications with emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations. The primary endpoints are ER visits and hospitalizations in internal medicine and surgical wards.MethodsIndividuals aged 50–74 years, with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or hypertension, treated with at least one antihypertensive or antidiabetic medication during 2017 were included. We determined personal adherence rates by calculating the mean adherence rates of the medications prescribed to each individual. Adherence rates were stratified into categories. We retrieved information about all the ER visits, and hospitalizations in internal medicine and surgical wards during 2016–2018.ResultsOf 268,792 persons included in the study, 50.6% were men. The mean age was 63.7 years. Hypertension was recorded for 217,953 (81.1%), diabetes for 160,082 (59.5%), and both diabetes and hypertension for 109,225 (40.6%). The mean number of antihypertensive and antidiabetic medications used was 2.2 ± 1.1. In total, 51,301 (19.1%) of the cohort visited the ER at least once during 2017, 21,740 (8.1%) were hospitalized in internal medicine wards, and 10,167 (3.8%) in surgical wards during 2017. Comparing the highest adherence category to the lowest, adjusted odds ratios were 0.64 (0.61, 0.67) for ER visits, 0.56 (0.52, 0.60) for hospitalization in internal wards, and 0.63 (0.57, 0.70) for hospitalization in surgical wards. Odds ratios were similar for the three consecutive years 2016–2018.ConclusionBetter medication adherence was associated with fewer ER visits and hospitalizations among persons with diabetes and hypertension. Investing in improving medication adherence may reduce health costs and improve patients’ health.

The coexistence of alopecia areata (AA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been described, but the association between these conditions is yet to be firmly established. We aimed to evaluate the association between AA and SLE using a large-scale real-life computerized database. A cross-sectional study was conducted comparing the prevalence of SLE among patients with AA and among age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects. Chi-square and t tests were used for univariate analysis, and a logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. The study was performed utilizing the computerized database of Clalit Health Services ensuring 4.4 million subjects. A total of 51,561 patients with AA and 51,410 controls were included in the study. The prevalence of SLE was increased in patients with AA as compared to the control group (0.3% vs. 0.1%, respectively; OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6–2.9; P < 0.001). The association increased consistently with age and was stronger among female and Jewish patients. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for sex, age, ethnicity, and other comorbidities, AA was still associated with SLE (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6–2.9; P < 0.001). To conclude, a significant positive association was observed between AA and SLE. Further longitudinal observational studies are necessary to establish these findings in other study populations. Physicians treating patients with AA may be aware of this possible association and may consider screening for SLE in patients with relevant symptoms.