Explore the vast range of titles available.

Recent studies have evaluated the potential of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as valuable biomarkers for characterizing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in males. The potential use of miRNAs as clinical indicators in females is unknown. The objective is to identify a set of miRNAs to be used as endogenous controls (ECs) in female patients with OSA. Then, to analyze differences in the miRNA expression profile between patients with and without OSA. This observational, longitudinal study included 85 females with suspected OSA who underwent a polysomnography. OSA was defined as an apnea hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h. The study population was stratified into 50 OSA patients and 38 non-OSA patients. Exploratory expression profiling of 188 miRNAs consistent and reliable in plasma was performed in a discovery cohort of 21 patients by TaqMan-Low-Density-Array (TLDA). The best ECs were identified by mean centre + standard deviation normalization and concordance correlation restricted normalization. Differentially expressed candidate miRNAs were selected for RT-qPCR validation in a validation cohort of 64 patients. Three circulating miRNAs (miR-30a-5p, miR-93-3p and miR-532-5p) were identified as most stable for use as ECs. Twenty-seven miRNA candidates were identified as potential biomarkers for OSA screening (p value < 0.025) in the TLDA cohort. However, validation cohort showed no differences in the circulating miRNA profile in female patients with and without OSA. We identified a set of ECs in females with OSA that may contribute to result homogeneity in determining circulating miRNAs. Exploratory analysis did not identify a significantly miRNA profile between female patients with and without OSA.

Background: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but treatment compliance is often unsatisfactory. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intelligent monitoring system for improving CPAP compliance. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, parallel, randomized controlled trial including 60 newly diagnosed patients with OSA requiring CPAP (Apnea–Hypopnea Index [AHI] >15) from Lleida, Spain. Participants were randomized (1:1) to standard management or the MiSAOS intelligent monitoring system, involving (1) early compliance detection, thus providing measures of patient’s CPAP compliance from the very first days of usage; (2) machine learning–based prediction of midterm future CPAP compliance; and (3) rule-based recommendations for the patient (app) and care team. Clinical and anthropometric variables, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life were recorded at baseline and after 6 months, together with patient’s compliance, satisfaction, and health care costs. Results: Randomized patients had a mean age of 57 (SD 11) years, mean AHI of 50 (SD 27), and 13% (8/60) were women. Patients in the intervention arm had a mean (95% CI) of 1.14 (0.04-2.23) hours/day higher adjusted CPAP compliance than controls (P=.047). Patients’ satisfaction was excellent in both arms, and up to 88% (15/17) of intervention patients reported willingness to keep using the MiSAOS app in the future. No significant differences were found in costs (control: mean €90.2 (SD 53.14) (US $105.76 [SD 62.31]); intervention: mean €96.2 (SD 62.13) (US $112.70 [SD 72.85]); P=.70; €1=US $1.17 was considered throughout). Overall costs combined with results on compliance demonstrated cost-effectiveness in a bootstrap-based simulation analysis. Conclusions: A machine learning–based intelligent monitoring system increased daily compliance, reported excellent patient satisfaction similar to that reported in usual care, and did not incur in a substantial increase in costs, thus proving cost-effectiveness. This study supports the implementation of intelligent eHealth frameworks for the management of patients with CPAP-treated OSA and confirms the value of patients’ empowerment in the management of chronic diseases. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03116958; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03116958

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is among the least studied risk factors for erectile dysfunction (ED). We aimed to determine ED prevalence in newly-diagnosed OSA patients, describe their main characteristics and assess continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effects on ED. Cross-sectional study assessing ED prevalence in OSA patients and open-label, parallel, prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-month CPAP treatment effects on sexual function, satisfaction, and psychological, hormonal and biochemical profiles. Male patients newly diagnosed with moderate/severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index >20 events·h-1), aged 18-70 years, attending the sleep unit of a Spanish hospital during 2013-2016 were considered. A total of 150 patients were recruited (75 randomized ED patients). ED was defined as scores <25 on International Index Erectile Function 15 test. Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-ranks and rank-sum tests were used. ED prevalence was 51%. Patients with ED were older (p<0.001), had greater waist-to-hip ratios (p<0.001), were more frequently undergoing pharmacological treatment (p<0.001) and had higher glucose levels (p = 0.024) than non-ED patients. Although significant increases in erectile function (mean(SD) change: +4.6(7.9); p = 0.002), overall satisfaction (+1(2.2); p = 0.035), and sexual satisfaction (+2.1(4.3); p = 0.003) were found after CPAP treatment, only differences in sexual satisfaction (p = 0.027) and erectile function (p = 0.060) were found between study arms. CPAP treatment did not impact psychological, hormonal or biochemical profiles. This study confirmed the relationship between OSA and ED, suggesting the potential usefulness of ED screening in OSA patients, but could not determine conclusively whether CPAP is an effective stand-alone ED treatment, regardless of positive results on sexual satisfaction. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03086122.

Evaluation of microRNAs (miRNAs) could allow characterization of the obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and help diagnose it more accurately. We aimed to examine circulating miRNA profiles to establish the differences between non-OSA and OSA patients. Additionally, we aimed to analyse the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on the miRNA profile. This observational, longitudinal study included 230 subjects referred to the Sleep Unit due to suspected OSA. Expression profiling of 188 miRNAs in plasma was performed in 27 subjects by TaqMan-Low-Density-Array. OSA-related miRNAs were selected for validation by RT-qPCR in 203 patients. Prediction models were built to discriminate between non-OSA and OSA: 1) NoSAS-score, 2) differentially expressed miRNAs, and 3) combination of NoSAS-score plus miRNAs. The differentially expressed miRNAs were measured after 6 months of follow-up. From the 14 miRNAs selected for validation, 6 were confirmed to be differentially expressed. The areas under the curve were 0.73 for the NoSAS-score, 0.81 for the miRNAs and 0.86 for the combination. After 6 months of CPAP treatment, miRNA levels in the OSA group seem to approximate to non-OSA levels. A cluster of miRNAs was identified to differentiate between non-OSA and OSA patients. CPAP treatment was associated with changes in the circulating miRNA profile.

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary care (PC) and sleep unit (SU) models for the management of subjects with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).MethodsMulticentre, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. A total of 302 subjects with suspected OSA and/or resistant hypertension were consecutively enrolled, 149 were treated at 11 PC units and 153 patients at a SU. The primary outcomes were a 6-month change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score and Health Utilities Index (HUI). The non-inferiority margin for the ESS score was −2.0.ResultsA total of 80.2% and 70.6% of the PC and SU patients were diagnosed with OSA, respectively, and 59.3% and 60.4% of those were treated with CPAP in PC and SU units, respectively. The Apnoea–Hypopnoea Index was similar between the groups (PC vs SU (median (IQR); 23.1 (26.8) events/h vs 21.8 (35.2) events/h), and the baseline ESS score was higher in the PC than in the SU group (10.3 (6.6) vs 9 (7.2)). After 6 months, the ESS score of the PC group decreased from a mean of 10.1 to 7.6 (−2.49; 95% CI −3.3 to −1.69), and that of the SU group decreased from 8.85 to 5.73 (−3.11; 95% CI −3.94 to 2.28). The adjusted difference between groups for the mean change in the ESS score was −1.25 (one-sided 95% CI −1.88; p=0.025), supporting the non-inferiority of PC management. We did not observe differences in the HUI between groups. The cost analysis showed a median savings of €558.14/patient for the PC setting compared with the SU setting.ConclusionsAmong patients with suspected OSA, the PC model did not result in a worse ESS score or HUI than the specialist model and generated savings in terms of management cost. Therefore, the PC model was more cost-efficient than the SU model.Trial registrationResults; >>NCT02234765, Clinical Trials.gov.