Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. In case of metastatic or unresectable disease, the recommended first-line treatment is gemcitabine-based doublet, most commonly gemcitabine and cisplatin. There is no standard treatment for further lines. MET fusions are rare alterations described in many cancers. The efficacy of specific MET inhibitors is poorly studied. We present the case of a patient with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring a CAPZA-2-MET fusion along with MET amplification who dramatically responded to capmatinib, a specific MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The efficacy of specific MET inhibitors is poorly studied. This article presents the case of a patient with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring a CAPZA-2-MET fusion along with MET amplification who dramatically responded to capmatinib, a specific MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

The efficacy of ceritinib in patients with untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients. This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study in untreated patients with stage IIIB/IV ALK-rearranged non-squamous NSCLC was done in 134 centres across 28 countries. Eligible patients were assigned via interactive response technology to oral ceritinib 750 mg/day or platinum-based chemotherapy ([cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5–6 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2] every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed); randomisation was stratified by World Health Organization performance status (0 vs 1–2), previous neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and presence of brain metastases as per investigator's assessment at screening. Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was blinded independent review committee assessed progression-free survival, based on all randomly assigned patients (the full analysis set). Efficacy analyses were done based on the full analysis set. All safety analyses were done based on the safety set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01828099. Between Aug 19, 2013, and May 11, 2015, 376 patients were randomly assigned to ceritinib (n=189) or chemotherapy (n=187). Median progression-free survival (as assessed by blinded independent review committee) was 16·6 months (95% CI 12·6–27·2) in the ceritinib group and 8·1 months (5·8–11·1) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·42–0·73]; p<0·00001). The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (in 160 [85%] of 189 patients), nausea (130 [69%]), vomiting (125 [66%]), and an increase in alanine aminotransferase (114 [60%]) in the ceritinib group and nausea (in 97 [55%] of 175 patients), vomiting (63 [36%]), and anaemia (62 [35%]) in the chemotherapy group. First-line ceritinib showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Targeted therapies against receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are currently used with success on a small proportion of patients displaying clear oncogene activation. Lung cancers with a mutated EGFR provide a good illustration. The efficacy of targeted treatments relies on oncogene addiction, a situation in which the growth or survival of the cancer cells depends on a single deregulated oncogene. MET, a member of the RTK family, is a promising target because it displays many deregulations in a broad panel of cancers. Although clinical trials having evaluated MET inhibitors in large populations have yielded disappointing results, many recent case reports suggest that MET inhibition may be effective in a subset of patients with unambiguous MET activation and thus, most probably, oncogene addiction. Interestingly, preclinical studies have revealed a particularity of MET addiction: it can arise through several mechanisms, and the mechanism involved can differ according to the cancer type. The present review describes the different mechanisms of MET addiction and their consequences for diagnosis and therapeutic strategies. Although in each cancer type MET addiction affects a restricted number of patients, pooling of these patients across all cancer types yields a targetable population liable to benefit from addiction-targeting therapies.

In hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma (HPRCC), the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) mutations recorded to date are located in the kinase domain and lead to constitutive MET activation. This contrasts with MET mutations identified in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which lead to exon 14 skipping and deletion of a regulatory domain: In this latter case, the mutated receptor still requires ligand stimulation. Sequencing of MET in samples from 158 HPRCC and 2808 NSCLC patients revealed 10 uncharacterized mutations. Four of these, all found in HPRCC and leading to amino acid substitutions in the N‐lobe of the MET kinase, proved able to induce cell transformation, which was further enhanced by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) stimulation: His1086Leu, Ile1102Thr, Leu1130Ser, and Cis1125Gly. Similar to the variant resulting in MET exon 14 skipping, the two N‐lobe MET variants His1086Leu and Ile1102Thr were found to require stimulation by HGF in order to strongly activate downstream signaling pathways and epithelial cell motility. The Ile1102Thr mutation also displayed transforming potential, promoting tumor growth in a xenograft model. In addition, the N‐lobe‐mutated MET variants were found to trigger a common HGF‐stimulation‐dependent transcriptional program, consistent with an observed increase in cell motility and invasion. Altogether, this functional characterization revealed that N‐lobe variants still require ligand stimulation, in contrast to other RTK variants. This suggests that HGF expression in the tumor microenvironment is important for tumor growth. The sensitivity of these variants to MET inhibitors opens the way for use of targeted therapies for patients harboring the corresponding mutations. MET variants in the N‐lobe of the kinase domain, found in hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma, require ligand stimulation to promote cell transformation, in contrast to other RTK variants. This suggests that HGF expression in the microenvironment is important for tumor growth in such patients. Their sensitivity to MET inhibitors opens the way for use of targeted therapies in these patients.

Background Patients with advanced lung cancer (LC) or malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) exhibit limitation of exercise capacities and alteration of quality of life (QoL) induced by cancer and its treatment. Few studies assessed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in these chemotherapy-treated patients, and none evaluated a home-based PR program. Methods In this prospective uncontrolled observational pilot study, patients treated by chemotherapy for LC or MPM were screened for a home-based PR program combining exercise training with global cares including therapeutic education and psychosocial management. Feasibility and safety were evaluated by attendance and adherence to PR program. Various exercise tolerance tests, including 6-min walk test (6MWT) and 6-min stepper test (6MST), were performed before and after PR associated with, QoL and psychological assessment (VSRQ and HAD, respectively). Results 243 patients were considered eligible but only 71 (60.6 ± 8.8 years) started a PR and 47 completed the program. Refusals to participate were mostly related to lack of motivation whereas withdrawals to PR were related to cancer-related medical issues. No adverse event related to PR was observed. Baseline 6MWT distance was associated with performance status ( r  = − 0.45, p  = 0.001) and mMRC dyspnea scale ( r  = − 0.49, p  < 0.001) but not with lung cancer stage. Post-PR reassessment showed 6MWT stability and 6MST improvement in patients who completed the program. Daily physical activity ( p  = 0.007) and anxiety ( p  = 0.02) scores were significantly improved. Conclusions Home-based PR was feasible and safe in patients with advanced LC or MPM. Exercise capacities stability in patients who completed the PR program suggests that PR might be beneficial. Further studies are warranted to confirm and to improve the potential value of PR in these patients.

Real-world data regarding patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations receiving mobocertinib are limited. This study describes these patients' characteristics and outcomes. A chart review was conducted across three countries (Canada, France, and Hong Kong), abstracting data from eligible patients (NCT05207423). The inclusion criteria were: ≥ 18 years old; diagnosis of stage IIIB-IV NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins between January 1, 2017 and November 30, 2021; received mobocertinib. Data on demographics, clinical parameters, treatment patterns, mobocertinib exposure, real-world outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Results are also reported by Asian/Non-Asian races. Overall, 105 patients were enrolled (median [IQR] age at initial diagnosis: 64.0 years [56, 71]; women: 62.9%). The most common first-line of therapy (LoT) was chemotherapy; the most common second LoT was EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Most patients received mobocertinib during LoT two and three (74.3%); the maximum dose was 160 mg/day for 67.6% of the cohort (mean [SD] daily dose: 130.6 mg [36.68]). The median real-world progression-free survival (PFS) on mobocertinib was 4.76 months (95% CI: 3.98, 6.21). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 20.0% and 48.6%, respectively (median duration of response: 8.34 months [95% CI: 3.61, 9.49]). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.28 months (95% CI: 20.21, 36.44). Asian patients had numerically superior PFS and OS compared with non-Asian patients. Regarding safety analysis, 73 patients (69.5%) experienced any AE. The most common AE was diarrhea (any grade) (52 patients; 49.5%). These data illustrate the real-world effectiveness of mobocertinib.

Although targeted therapies have increased the life expectancy of patients with druggable molecular alterations directly involved in tumor development, the efficacy of these therapies is limited by acquired resistances leading to treatment failure. Most targeted therapies, including ones exploiting therapeutic antibodies and kinase inhibitors, are directed against receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) or major signaling hubs. Resistances to these therapies arise when inhibition of these targets is bypassed through activation of alternative signaling pathways. In recent years, activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase MET has been shown to promote resistance to various targeted therapies. This casts MET as important actor in resistance. In this review, we describe how the MET receptor triggers resistance to targeted therapies against RTKs such as EGFR, VEGFR, and HER2 and against signaling hubs such as BRAF. We also describe how MET can be its own resistance factor, as illustrated by on-target resistance of lung tumors harboring activating mutations causing MET exon 14 skipping. Interestingly, investigation of all these situations reveals functional physiological relationships between MET and the target of the therapy to which the cancer becomes resistant, suggesting that resistance stems from preexisting mechanisms. Identification of MET as a resistance factor opens the way to co-treatment strategies that are being tested in current clinical trials.

Introduction: Compared with docetaxel, the phase-III trial, ULTIMATE, showed a significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) with paclitaxel–bevacizumab combination (PB) as second- or third-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the increase of immunotherapy treatment in first-line settings, the optimal treatment after first-line failure must be redefined. Methods: This multicentric retrospective study identified all advanced NSCLC patients treated with PB as second-line therapy and beyond. The main efficacy outcomes assessed were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, and overall survival (OS). The adverse events were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results: From January 2010 to February 2020, 314 patients in 16 centers received the PB combination. Most patients were male (55%), with a median age of 60 years (19–82), 95% had adenocarcinoma, 27% had a performance status ⩾2, 45% had brain metastases at the time of inclusion. They mostly received the PB combination either in second (20%) or in third-line (39%), and 28% were treated just after ICI failure. ORR and DCR were 40% and 77%, respectively; median PFS and OS were 5.7 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.2–9.6] and 10.8 [IQR: 5.3–19.6] months, respectively. All grade adverse events concerned 82% of patients, including 53% asthenia and 39% neurotoxicity, and 25% of patients continued monotherapy (mostly with bevacizumab) alone due to toxicity. Median PFS for patients treated after ICI failure (ICI+) was significantly superior compared with those not previously treated with ICI (ICI−): 7.0 [IQR: 4.2–11.0] versus 5.2 [IQR: 2.9–8.8] months, p = 0.01, without statistically significant difference for OS between these two groups. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with superior PFS were previous ICI treatment and performance status of 0–1. Only a performance status of 0–1 was associated with superior OS. Conclusion: PB combination as second-line treatment or beyond for advanced non-squamous NSCLC had acceptable toxicity and a clinically relevant efficacy and is an option as salvage treatment for these patients, more particularly after ICI progression.

Antitumour drugs: novel EGFR inhibitors Non-small-cell lung tumours with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) often show a clinical response to receptor inhibitors, but tend to develop resistance due to the additional EGFR T790M mutations. Pasi Jänne and colleagues now have developed a new class of EGFR inhibitor that selectively inhibits the mutant receptor, rather that the wild type, and also inhibits the T790M mutant. These compounds reduce tumour growth in a mouse model and may prove more clinically effective and better tolerated than current EGFR kinase inhibitors in clinical use. Non-small-cell lung cancers with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) often show a clinical response to EGFR kinase inhibitors but tend to develop drug-resistance mutations, including the gatekeeper T790M mutation. Here, a new class of EGFR inhibitors is developed; these agents are 30- to 100-fold more potent against EGFR with the T790M mutation, and up to 100-fold less potent against wild-type EGFR, than current EGFR inhibitors. The clinical efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitors in EGFR -mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by the development of drug-resistance mutations, including the gatekeeper T790M mutation 1 , 2 , 3 . Strategies targeting EGFR T790M with irreversible inhibitors have had limited success and are associated with toxicity due to concurrent inhibition of wild-type EGFR 4 , 5 . All current EGFR inhibitors possess a structurally related quinazoline-based core scaffold and were identified as ATP-competitive inhibitors of wild-type EGFR. Here we identify a covalent pyrimidine EGFR inhibitor by screening an irreversible kinase inhibitor library specifically against EGFR T790M. These agents are 30- to 100-fold more potent against EGFR T790M, and up to 100-fold less potent against wild-type EGFR, than quinazoline-based EGFR inhibitors in vitro . They are also effective in murine models of lung cancer driven by EGFR T790M. Co-crystallization studies reveal a structural basis for the increased potency and mutant selectivity of these agents. These mutant-selective irreversible EGFR kinase inhibitors may be clinically more effective and better tolerated than quinazoline-based inhibitors. Our findings demonstrate that functional pharmacological screens against clinically important mutant kinases represent a powerful strategy to identify new classes of mutant-selective kinase inhibitors.

Abstract Introduction The emergence of diverse resistance mechanisms after osimertinib therapy, including on-target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and off-target alterations, warrants investigation of novel therapeutics to overcome these challenges and improve patient outcomes. Methods COMPOSIT was a French, retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of the effectiveness and tolerability of osimertinib in combination with other targeted therapies in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbored other oncogenic drivers as primary or acquired resistance mechanisms. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were the primary endpoints. Results The study included 61 patients (63.9% women; median age, 61 years). Chemotherapy was administered to 26 patients (42.6%) before the combinations. The most frequently targeted resistance mechanisms were MET amplification (n = 40) and BRAF alterations (n = 11). Sixteen combinations of osimertinib with other targeted therapies were reported. Overall (except for 10 patients in clinical trials), median rwPFS and OS were 3.9 (95% CI, 2.9-5.2) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.8-14.8). Best ORR (n = 54) was 50% (95% CI, 33.0-72.8). In patients with MET amplification (n = 29), median rwPFS and OS were 4.9 (95% CI, 2.9-7.2) and 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-21.6). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 15 patients (24.6%). No deaths were related to treatment. Conclusions Combinations of osimertinib with other targeted therapies appeared to be feasible and safe and may offer clinical benefit to overcome resistance to osimertinib in EGFRm NSCLC, especially in patients with MET amplification.