Explore the vast range of titles available.

Noninvasive brain stimulation methods are becoming increasingly common tools in the kit of the cognitive scientist. In particular, transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is showing great promise as a tool to causally manipulate the brain and understand how information is processed. The popularity of this method of brain stimulation is based on the fact that it is safe, inexpensive, its effects are long lasting, and you can increase the likelihood that neurons will fire near one electrode and decrease the likelihood that neurons will fire near another. However, this method of manipulating the brain to draw causal inferences is not without complication. Because tDCS methods continue to be refined and are not yet standardized, there are reports in the literature that show some striking inconsistencies. Primary among the complications of the technique is that the tDCS method uses two or more electrodes to pass current and all of these electrodes will have effects on the tissue underneath them. In this tutorial, we will share what we have learned about using tDCS to manipulate how the brain perceives, attends, remembers, and responds to information from our environment. Our goal is to provide a starting point for new users of tDCS and spur discussion of the standardization of methods to enhance replicability.

Background Digital health technologies show promise for improving the measurement of Parkinson’s disease in clinical research and trials. However, it is not clear whether digital measures demonstrate enhanced sensitivity to disease progression compared to traditional measurement approaches. Methods To this end, we develop a wearable sensor-based digital algorithm for deriving features of upper and lower-body bradykinesia and evaluate the sensitivity of digital measures to 1-year longitudinal progression using data from the WATCH-PD study, a multicenter, observational digital assessment study in participants with early, untreated Parkinson’s disease. In total, 82 early, untreated Parkinson’s disease participants and 50 age-matched controls were recruited and took part in a variety of motor tasks over the course of a 12-month period while wearing body-worn inertial sensors. We establish clinical validity of sensor-based digital measures by investigating convergent validity with appropriate clinical constructs, known groups validity by distinguishing patients from healthy volunteers, and test-retest reliability by comparing measurements between visits. Results We demonstrate clinical validity of the digital measures, and importantly, superior sensitivity of digital measures for distinguishing 1-year longitudinal change in early-stage PD relative to corresponding clinical constructs. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the potential of digital health technologies to enhance sensitivity to disease progression relative to existing measurement standards and may constitute the basis for use as drug development tools in clinical research. Plain language summary Parkinson’s disease can impact a person’s ability to move, which can result in slow or rigid movements. Wearable sensors can be used to measure these symptoms and could be particularly useful to detect changes early in the course of the disease when symptoms may be subtle. We developed a wearable sensor-based method to measure movement in people with early Parkinson’s disease that uses wrist and foot-worn sensors. Our results demonstrate that our sensor-based measurements can accurately quantify progressive changes in movement function. Such measurements may allow researchers to more accurately evaluate how well treatments designed to slow the course of Parkinson’s disease are working in the future. Czech et al. develop and clinically validate a sensor-based approach to measure upper and lower body bradykinesia in an early Parkinson’s disease population. Results demonstrate enhanced sensitivity of sensor-based digital measurements to disease progression over one year relative to current clinical measurement standards.