Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundAverage percent excess weight loss data is commonly discussed preoperatively to guide patient expectations following surgery. However, there is a wide range and variation in weight loss following vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Unfortunately, most surgeons and even fewer patients have heard of using predictive models to help guide their decisions on procedure choice. We have developed a predictive model for SG to help patient choice prior to this major life-changing decision.ObjectivePredict weight loss results for SG patients at 1 year using preoperative data.SettingPrivate practice.MethodsThree hundred and seventy-one SG patients met the criteria for our study. These patients underwent surgery between October 2008 and June 2016. Non-linear regressions were performed to interpolate individual patient weights at 1 year. Multivariate analysis was used to find factors that affected weight loss. A model was constructed to predict weight loss performance.ResultsVariables that affect weight loss were found to be preoperative body mass index (BMI), age, hypertension, and diabetes. Diabetes and hypertension together were found to significantly affect weight loss.ConclusionPatient weight loss can be accurately predicted by simple preoperative factors. These findings should be used to help patients and surgeons decide if the SG is an appropriate surgery for each patient. Using this model, most patients can avoid failure by choosing an appropriate surgical approach for their personal circumstances.

The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most popular weight loss procedure in the USA. Despite its popularity, little is definitively known about the variables that correlate with weight loss. We performed a literature search to find studies that reported variables that correlated with weight loss following SG. Forty-eight articles were identified and included. These articles covered 36 different factors predictive of weight loss while only including five predictive models. Only 12.5% of multivariate analyses evaluated sufficiently reported their results. The factors that predict weight loss following SG cannot be concluded due to the inconsistency in reporting and the methodological flaws in analysis. Reporting factors that predict weight loss should be standardized, and methods should be changed to allow physicians to use the data presented.

BackgroundFor many years, the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) was considered a good balance of complications and weight loss. According to several short-term studies, single anastomosis duodenal switch or stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery (SIPS) offers similar weight loss to RYGB with fewer complications and better diabetes resolution. No one has substantiated mid-term complication and nutritional differences between these two procedures. This paper seeks to compare complication and nutritional outcomes between RYGB and SIPS.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 798 patients who either had SIPS or RYGB from 2010 to 2016. Complications were gathered for each patient. Nutritional outcomes were measured for each group at 1, 2, and 3 years. Regression analysis was applied to interpolate each patient’s weight at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. These were then compared with t tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and chi-squared tests.ResultsRYGB and SIPS have statistically similar weight loss at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 36 months. They statistically differ at 18 and 24 months. At 36 months, there is a trend for weight loss difference. There were only statistical differences in nutritional outcomes between the two procedures with calcium at 1 and 3 years and vitamin D at 1 year. There were statistically significantly more long-term class IIIb-V complications, class I-IIIa complications, reoperations, ulcers, small bowel obstructions, nausea, and vomiting with the RYGB than the SIPS.ConclusionWith comparable weight loss and nutritional outcomes, SIPS has fewer short- and long-term complications than RYGB and better type 2 diabetes resolution rates.

IntroductionSingle-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) surgery is a modification of the traditional duodenal switch (DS) surgery. SADI-S is relatively a new bariatric surgical procedure and has gone by many names depending on the length of the common channel. In this study, we report our initial experience with this novel technique in the Australian population.MethodsThe medical records of 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic primary SADI-S surgery by one surgeon at a single Australian center from January 2017 through May 2019 were retrospectively studied.ResultsNinety-one patients were identified for analysis. The mean age and preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 46.2 ± 9 years and 43.2 ± 5.7 kg/m2, respectively. The mean operative time and length of stay were 121.8+/- 25 minutes and 1.4 ± 0.8 days, respectively. At 12 and 24 months, the patients lost an average BMI of 15.2 ± 5.2 kg/m2 and 17.2 ± 5.9 kg/m2, respectively. The short-term and long-term complication rates were 4.3% and 0%, respectively. The mortality rate was 0%. Postoperatively, the obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux disease resolution rates were 94, 94, 75, 68, and 13%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between most of the preoperative and postoperative nutritional data.ConclusionsSADI-S appears to be a safe bariatric surgical procedure with favorable outcomes at 2 years in the Australian population.

Background In bariatric surgery, the procedure with the highest average weight loss is the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS). A new simplified duodenal switch called the stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery with less malabsorption and one fewer anastomosis claims to have similar outcomes when compared to the BPDDS. Methods A retrospective matched cohort analysis of SIPS versus BPDDS patients in a single private practice was obtained by matching every BPDDS to a SIPS patient of the same gender and BMI. Excess weight loss percentage (EWL), BMI, and percentage total weight loss (%TWL) were compared. Additionally, comorbidity resolution, nutritional data, and complications were also compared. Data was analyzed using both descriptive and comparative statistics. Results Over 2 years, there was no statistical difference in weight loss between BPDDS and SIPS. There also was no difference in nutritional data between the two procedures pre- and post-op. Complication rates were lower in SIPS however, due to the small sample sizes this is not statistically significant. Conclusion Weight loss and nutritional results between SIPS and BPDDS are similar at 2 years. However, there are fewer complications with SIPS.

Background In bariatric surgery, a significant question remains unanswered—What proportion of weight loss comes from each component and does this differ with time? Single anastomosis duodenal switch (LDS) combines a vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) with a loop attachment of the duodenal stump. There are two major variables the sleeve, and the intestine that processes ingested food. A comparison of patients that had a VSG with those that have had a LDS approximates the contribution of each component. Methods A retrospective matched cohort analysis of VSG and LDS patients was obtained by matching every LDS patient to a VSG patient of the same sex and BMI. Excess weight lost percentage (%EWL) and the total weight loss percentage (%TWL) was analyzed. The data was compared through descriptive statistics and non-linear regression analysis. Results Over 18 months, patients who received the LDS lost more %TWL and %EWL and the difference was statistically significant ( p  < 0.05). Additionally, with time, the difference became more profound. Weight loss stabilized at approximately 9–12 months and 15 to 18 for VSG and LDS patients’, respectively. At 6 months post op, there was approximately 13 % difference in weight loss. This increased to 29 % difference at 18 months. Conclusion LDS patients lose more weight than VSG. Preserving 3 m of intestinal length adds 30 % greater weight loss at 18 months. Early weight loss is similar between the two operations, while the intestinal component becomes more important with weight loss differentials increasing as time since surgery lengthens.

BackgroundSingle anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a modification of Roux-en-Y duodenal switch (RYDS). Long-term data on this operation is lacking in the literature. We reviewed our mid-term data of this RYDS modification.PurposeTo analyze the outcomes with SADI-S at 4 years.MethodsData from patients who underwent a primary SADI-S procedure performed by three surgeons at a single institution from June 2013 through February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All revision bariatric surgeries were excluded. Regression analyses were performed for all follow-up weight loss data.ResultsThere were 437 patients in our database. The pre-operative mean body mass index (BMI) was 49.8 ± 8.8 kg/m2. The 30-day complication rate was 7.7%. The 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates were 1.8, 1.3, and 0.2%, respectively. The long-term complication rate was 10.9%. Seventy-nine patients were 4 years post SADI-S surgery and follow-up was possible for 44 patients (55.7%). At 4 years, patients had an average change in BMI of 18.1 ± 6 units with an excess weight loss (EWL) of 85.7 ± 27.3%. At 4 years, 97.6% patients were able to maintain HbA1c < 6% with or without the use of diabetic medication. There was a statistically significant difference between most of the pre-operative and post-operative nutritional data.ConclusionsSADI-S is a safe and effective procedure in both short- and mid-term data points. Diabetes resolution and weight loss appear similar to traditional RYDS and better than RYGB.

Background The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been considered the gold standard for many years. The loop duodenal switch (LDS) is a relatively new procedure that simplifies the complexity of the duodenal switch (BPDDS) by making it a single anastomosis procedure while at the same time giving it more intestinal absorption to reduce the rates of malnutrition associated with traditional BPDDS. This paper seeks to compare the 18-month weight loss outcomes and complications of the more standard GBP with the newer LDS in a single US center. Methods A retrospective matched cohort was analyzed on 108 patients who had either GBP (54 patients) or LDS (54 patients). Regression analysis was used to compare weight loss outcomes as measured by BMI and weight loss percentages. Complications gathered included bleeds, reoperations, diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopy (EGD), ulcers and chronic nausea. Results GBP and LDS have statistically similar weight loss at 18 months (39.6 vs 41 % weight loss, respectively). However, there were significantly more nausea complaints (26 vs 5), diagnostic endoscopies (EGD) (21 vs 3) and ulcers (6 vs 0) with the GBP than the LDS. Conclusion LDS has comparable weight loss results to GBP. However, LDS has fewer 30-day and 18-month complications and patients suffer from less nausea postoperatively.

Background Although the duodenal switch (DS) has been the most effective weight loss surgical procedure, it is a small minority of the total bariatric surgical cases performed. Modifications that can make the operation technically simpler and reduce a long-term risk of short bowel syndrome would be of benefit. The aim of this study was to detail our initial experience with a modified DS called stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) procedure. Methods Data from patients who underwent a primary SIPS procedure performed by two surgeons at two centers from January 2013 to August 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All revisions of prior bariatric procedures were excluded. Regression analyses were performed for all follow-up weight loss data. Results One hundred twenty-three patients were available. One hundred two patients were beyond 1 year postoperative, with data available for 64 (62 % followed up). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 49.4 kg/m 2 . Two patients had diarrhea (1.6 %), four had abdominal hematoma (3.2 %), and one had a stricture (0.8 %) in the gastric sleeve. Two patients (1.6 %) were readmitted within 30 days. One patient (0.8 %) was reoperated due to an early postoperative ulcer. At 1 year, patients had an average change in BMI of 19 units (kg/m 2 ), which was compared to an average of 38 % of total weight loss or 72 % of excess weight loss. Conclusions Modification of the classic DS to one with a single anastomosis and a longer common channel had effective weight loss results. Morbidity seems comparable to other stapling reconstructive procedures. Future analyses are needed to determine whether a SIPS procedure reduces the risk of future small bowel obstructions and micronutrient deficiencies.

BackgroundSingle anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a modification of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) surgery. A concern with SADI-S is chronic diarrhea and hypoproteinemia. Common channel lengthening (CCL) is a surgical procedure to increase absorption in the small intestine to decrease diarrhea.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the occurrence and treatment of hypoproteinemia and chronic diarrhea with CCL following SADI-S surgery.SettingPrivate practice in the USA.MethodsPatients were included if they underwent SADI-S from September 2013 to March 2018 and following surgery underwent CCL.ResultsAverage operating time for laparoscopic CCL is 56.5 ± 4.6 min. The average bowel movements for the eight patients before laparoscopic CCL were 9.1 ± 4.7 a day. After the surgery, the bowel movements were reduced to 2.6 ± 0.4 a day. This difference was found to be statistically significantly different (p = .002). The two patients experiencing hypoproteinemia improved protein levels following CCL.ConclusionCCL is an effective way to treat symptomatic chronic diarrhea after SADI-S when conservative treatments have failed.