Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose Rates of both unilateral (UM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for unilateral early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) have been increasing since 2003. Recent studies suggest that this increase may be due to women choosing UM and CPM because of fear. We conducted an in-depth qualitative study to identify those factors influencing a woman’s choice for more extensive surgery. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with breast cancer patients to examine the experiences, decision making, and choice of UM ± CPM for the treatment of ESBC. Purposive sampling identified suitable candidates for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) who underwent UM ± CPM. Interviews were guided by grounded theory methodology, and constant comparative analysis identified key concepts and themes. Results Data saturation was achieved after 29 interviews. ‘Taking control of cancer’ was the dominant theme. Fear of breast cancer was expressed at diagnosis and remained throughout decision making. Personal experiences of family or friends ‘living with cancer’ were the most influential source of information during the decision-making process. Fear translated into an overestimated risk of recurrence, contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and death. Despite surgeons discussing equivalent survival with BCT, UM ± CPM patients believed that by choosing UM ± CPM they would eliminate recurrence, CBC and live longer. By choosing more extensive surgery, women were actively trying to control cancer outcomes as more surgery was believed to offer greater survival. Conclusions Women seek UM and CPM to take control of cancer and manage their fear. It is important for surgeons to understand how personal experiences shape women’s choice for UM ± CPM to facilitate informed decision making.

BackgroundRadiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is an aggressive malignancy affecting 1 in 1000 breast cancer patients. This study aimed to determine differences in treatments and outcomes for RAAS initially managed through a sarcoma multi-disciplinary team (SMDT) compared with an outside center (OC) and to describe outcomes after recurrence.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of breast RAAS between 2004 and 2019 were identified from our sarcoma database. Clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence patterns, and factors predictive of survival were assessed. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared using the log-rank test.ResultsSurgery was performed for 49 women with RAAS, who had a median age of 74 years (range 41–89 years). Primary management was performed by SMDT for 26 patients and by OC for 23 patients. Radical mastectomy and reconstruction were performed for 96% of the SMDT group versus 17% of the OC group (p = 0.00001). The proportion patients who received chemotherapy, radiation, or both was 42.3% in the SMDT group and 0% in the OC group. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, recurrence was experienced by 38% (10/26) of the SMDT cohort and 83% (19/23) of the OC cohort (p = 0.002). The 3-year LRFS was better in the SMDT cohort (59.3% vs 31.8%; p = 0.019). Of the 29 recurrences 16 received chemotherapy and 6 received radiation, surgery, or both. At the last follow-up visit, 20 patients were in first remission, 1 patient was in second remission, 8 patients were alive with disease, and 20 patients had died of disease.ConclusionInitial treatment by SMDT was associated with more extensive surgery, multimodal treatments, and a better 3-year LRFS. Patients with breast RAAS likely benefit from early referral and treatment by an SMDT.

Purpose Unilateral mastectomy (UM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) have been increasing. Numerous etiological factors for this rise have been suggested, including increasing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and reconstruction, surgeon’s preference, and patient’s choice. We conducted a qualitative study to explore what role the surgeon and their practice environment play in the increasing rates. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with general surgeons to explore their current approach to treating ESBC and their experience with women requesting mastectomy. Purposive sampling identified surgeons across Ontario, Canada, and the United States (US). Constant comparative analysis identified key concepts. Results Data saturation was achieved after 45 interviews. ‘The effect of external factors on rising mastectomy rates’ was the dominant theme. All surgeons described increasing mastectomy rates over the last 5 years, and all surgeons discussed breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and UM as equivalent options. However, US surgeons discussed reconstruction early in the consultation process, reflecting legislative requirements. In contrast, Ontario surgeons discussed reconstruction only when a patient was considering mastectomy. Ontario surgeons often recommended BCT, whereas US surgeons rarely made a direct recommendation regarding the extent of surgery. Neither US nor Canadian surgeons recommended the use of UM + CPM in average-risk ESBC, and all surgeons described women initiating this request. MRI use and access to immediate breast reconstruction also impacted the choice for mastectomy. Conclusions Use of MRI, access to reconstruction, and legislative requirements regarding information disclosure, appeared to influence the surgical consultation process and the patient’s request for CPM.

IntroductionDespite increasing proportions of underrepresented minority (URM) medical school graduates, their progression into surgical training and leadership remains disproportionately low. Barriers such as financial constraints, limited mentorship and implicit bias contribute to this disparity, creating a disconnect between the diversity of patient populations and those providing care. While interventions such as mentorship programmes and pipeline initiatives have been implemented, their overall effectiveness has not been systematically evaluated. The primary aim of this scoping review is to map the current landscape of interventions, programmes and policies designed to enhance access to surgical careers for URM learners.Methods and analysisSearches will be conducted on EMBASE, Web of Science and OVID MEDLINE. Three independent reviewers will screen references, extract data and perform analyses with disagreements adjudicated by a fourth reviewer. This review will include studies conducted across all levels of training: secondary (high school or secondary school), postsecondary (undergraduate, medical school) and postgraduate (residency, fellowship), with no geographical restrictions. The definition of URM will be accepted as reported within each individual study, allowing for variability in racial, ethnic, gender, socioeconomic or other criteria. The review will include any structured interventions, programmes or policies aimed at increasing URM representation in surgical education. Data on the nature, duration and target population of each intervention will be extracted. The primary outcome will be the reported impact of interventions on URM representation or participation in surgical education. Secondary outcomes will include characteristics of the study participants, definitions of URM status and any qualitative or quantitative evaluations of intervention effectiveness.Ethics and disseminationResearch ethics approval is not required under University of Toronto policy. Study results will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Results will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders at conference presentation(s) and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Background Persistent pain is a common yet debilitating complication after breast cancer surgery. Given the pervasive effects of this pain disorder on the patient and healthcare system, post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is becoming a larger population health problem, especially as the prognosis and survivorship of breast cancer increases. Interventions that prevent persistent pain after breast surgery are needed to improve the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. An intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion has emerged as a potential intervention to decrease the incidence of PMPS. We aim to determine the definitive effects of this intervention in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Methods PLAN will be a multicenter, parallel-group, blinded, 1:1 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 1,602 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Adult patients scheduled for a lumpectomy or mastectomy will be randomized to receive an intravenous 2% lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg with induction of anesthesia, followed by a 2.0 mg/kg/h infusion until the end of surgery, or placebo solution (normal saline) at the same volume. The primary outcome will be the incidence of persistent pain at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of pain and opioid consumption at 1 h, 1–3 days, and 12 months after surgery, as well as emotional, physical, and functional parameters, and cost-effectiveness. Discussion This trial aims to provide definitive evidence on an intervention that could potentially prevent persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. If this trial is successful, lidocaine infusion would be integrated as standard of care in breast cancer management. This inexpensive, widely available, and easily administered intervention has the potential to reduce pain and suffering in an already afflicted patient population, decrease the substantial costs of chronic pain management, potentially decrease opioid use, and improve the quality of life in patients. Trial registration This trial has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04874038, Dr. James Khan. Date of registration: May 5, 2021).

Introduction The purpose of this study was to identify effective individualized positive behavior support strategies and cognitive behavior therapy strategies for young adults who are deafblind. It discusses findings specific to four young adult students with CHARGE syndrome. Methods This collaborative action research study employed collective case study design and elements of grounded theory analysis. Principles of positive behavior support and modified cognitive behavior therapy supported the identification and implementation of individualized behavioral interventions that addressed environment arrangement, sensory needs and sensitivities, and how adults communicated with the students. Results Eight themes were identified as being important to each of the students, although to varying degrees. These were: provide structure, establish and maintain a positive climate, address students’ sensory needs and sensitivities, support on-task behavior, support transitions between activities and environments, support mature behavior, support students in coping with anxiety, and use adult language supports. Each theme included multiple strategies. Discussion Proactive and reactive strategies must be individualized even when children share an etiology. Educational team members must know each student's preferences, likes, dislikes, reinforcers, and unique communication needs in order to identify and effectively implement behavioral supports. Modified cognitive behavior therapy may be helpful in addressing the anxiety experienced by individuals with CHARGE syndrome. Teams require time to collaborate on behavioral assessment, the identification of individualized behavioral strategies, and the effectiveness of behavioral plans. Implications for practitioners Providing well-structured environments and teaching rules and routines can reduce anxiety because students know what to expect. Educational team members should prevent sensory overload, provide structured desensitization opportunities, and teach relaxation techniques to these students. Adult communication must be positive, clarify what will happen next, and redirect behaviors when needed.

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) on breast cancer outcomes. A retrospective analysis was performed of Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Hispanic patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in the SEER cancer registry between 2007 and 2016. A total of 382,975 patients were identified. On multivariate analysis, NHB (OR 1.18, 95%CI: 1.15–1.20) and Hispanic (OR 1.20, 95%CI: 1.17–1.22) patients were more likely to present with higher stage disease than NHW patients. There was an increased likelihood of not undergoing breast-reconstruction for NHB (OR 1.07, 95%CI: 1.03–1.11) and Hispanic patients (OR 1.60, 95%CI 1.54–1.66). NHB patients had increased hazard for all-cause mortality (HR: 1.13, 95%CI 1.10–1.16). All-cause mortality increased across SES categories (lower SES: HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.30–1.37, middle SES: HR 1.20, 95%CI 1.17–1.23). This population-based analysis confirms worse disease presentation, access to surgical therapy, and survival across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors. These disparities were compounded across worsening SES and insurance coverage. •Higher stage of breast cancer presentation is correlated with Black race, low socioeconomic status, and no insurance coverage.•This correlation with non-White race was compounded for worsening socioeconomic status and lack of insurance coverage.•Similar findings were found for survival in breast cancer and rates of breast reconstruction in the United States.