Explore the vast range of titles available.

The addition of nivolumab to chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced oesophagogastric (oesophageal, gastric, or gastro-oesophageal junction) adenocarcinoma; however, outcomes remain poor. We assessed the safety and activity of regorafenib in combination with nivolumab and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. This investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase 2 trial in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with previously untreated, HER2-negative, metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma was done at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY, USA). Eligible patients had measurable disease or non-measurable disease that was evaluable (defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] version 1.1) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received FOLFOX chemotherapy (fluorouracil [400 mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 over 48 h], leucovorin [400 mg/m2], and oxaliplatin [85 mg/m2]) and nivolumab (240 mg) intravenously on days 1 and 15, and oral regorafenib (80 mg) on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression (defined by RECIST version 1.1), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival in the per-protocol population (ie, all participants who received a dose of all study treatments). The regimen would be considered worthy of further investigation if at least 24 of 35 patients were progression free at 6 months. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04757363, and is now complete. Between Feb 11, 2021, and May 4, 2022, 39 patients were enrolled, received at least one dose of study drug, and were included in safety analyses. 35 patients were evaluable for 6-month progression-free survival. Median age was 57 years (IQR 52–66), nine (26%) patients were women, 26 (74%) were men, 28 (80%) were White, and seven (20%) were Asian. At data cutoff (March 3, 2023), median follow-up was 18·1 months (IQR 12·7–20·4). The primary endpoint was reached, with 25 (71%; 95% CI 54–85) of 35 patients progression free at 6 months. Nine (26%) of 35 patients had disease progression and one (3%) patient died; the death was unrelated to treatment. The most common adverse event of any grade was fatigue (36 [92%] of 39). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (18 [46%]), hypertension (six [15%]), dry skin, pruritus, or rash (five [13%]), and anaemia (four [10%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in ten (26%) patients, which were acute kidney injury (three [8%]), hepatotoxicity (two [5%]), sepsis (two [5%]), dry skin, pruritus, or rash (one [3%]), nausea (one [3%]), and gastric perforation (one [3%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. Regorafenib can be safely combined with nivolumab and chemotherapy and showed promising activity in HER2-negative metastatic oesophagogastric cancer. A randomised, phase 3 clinical trial is planned. Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer and National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute.

BackgroundGut microbiota composition can influence cancer immunotherapy response. Recent evidence suggests Helicobacter pylori infection may reduce immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in lung cancer and melanoma, but thorough characterization of this association in patients with gastric cancer is lacking. We aimed to determine the impact of H. pylori on survival in this population.MethodsThis single-center, retrospective study included all ICI-treated individuals with metastatic gastric cancer and documented H. pylori status at Memorial Sloan Kettering between July 2013 and October 2021. H. pylori-positive status was defined as history of infection obtained via breath test, stool antigen test, histopathology, and/or chart documentation. Negative status was defined as explicitly negative testing, histopathology, and/or chart documentation. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOf 215 included patients, 49 had documented history of H. pylori infection. Compared with H. pylori-negative patients, positive individuals tended to be younger, non-white, and Hispanic with non-cardia and intestinal-type gastric cancer. H. pylori-positive patients had significantly shorter median PFS (3.2 vs 6.8 months, HR 1.96, p<0.01) and OS (9.8 vs 17.9 months, HR 1.54, p=0.02). Multivariable analysis confirmed H. pylori infection as an independent predictor of PFS (HR 3.04, p<0.01) and OS (HR 2.24, p=0.01).ConclusionsIn this largest study of its kind, H. pylori infection was associated with inferior survival in ICI-treated patients with gastric cancer. This suggests H. pylori status may be a prognostic marker of immune responsiveness. Future studies are needed to elucidate immunoregulatory mechanisms and whether treatment of active infections would improve immunotherapy outcomes.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma, including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction, is uncommon in the United States, but is associated with a rising incidence in young adults, and has a traditionally poor prognosis. Despite the incremental benefits that have been made with multimodality approaches to locally advanced disease, most patients will go on to develop metastatic disease, and long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Over the last decade, PET-CT has emerged as a key tool in the management of this disease, with several prospective and retrospective studies evaluating its role in this disease. Herein, we review the key data pertaining to the use of PET-CT in the management of locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma, with a focus on staging, prognostication, PET-CT adapted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, and surveillance.

BackgroundSubgroup analyses of randomized trials suggest the superiority of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy over chemotherapy in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, these subgroups are small and studies examining prognostic features within dMMR/MSI-high patients are lacking.MethodsWe conducted an international cohort study at tertiary cancer centers and collected baseline clinicopathologic features of patients with dMMR/MSI-high metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer treated with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-based therapies. The adjusted HRs of variables significantly associated with overall survival (OS) were used to develop a prognostic score.ResultsOne hundred and thirty patients were included. At a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 30.3 months (95% CI: 20.4 to NA) and 2-year PFS rate was 56% (95% CI: 48% to 66%). Median OS was of 62.5 months (95% CI: 28.4 to NA) and 2-year OS rate was 63% (95% CI: 55% to 73%). Among the 103 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-evaluable patients, objective response rate was 66% and disease control rate 87% across lines of therapy. In the multivariable models, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or 2, non-resected primary tumor, presence of bone metastases and malignant ascites were independently associated with poorer PFS and OS. These four clinical variables were used to build a three-category (ie, good, intermediate, and poor risk) prognostic score. Compared with patients with good risk, patients with intermediate risk score had numerically inferior PFS and OS (2-year PFS rate: 54.3% versus 74.5%, HR 1.90, 95% CI: 0.99 to 3.66; 2-year OS rate: 66.8% versus 81.2%, HR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.87 to 3.98), whereas patients with poor risk score had significantly inferior PFS and OS (2-year PFS rate: 10.6%, HR 9.65, 95% CI: 4.67 to 19.92; 2-year OS rate: 13.3%, HR 11.93, 95% CI: 5.42 to 26.23).ConclusionsOverall outcomes with anti-PD-1-based therapies are favorable in MSI-high gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. However, within this overall favorable subgroup a more accurate prognostication using baseline clinical characteristics might identify patients at higher risk of rapid disease progression who may deserve intensified immunotherapy combination strategies.

BackgroundBiliary tract cancers (BTC) represent an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumors of bile duct and the patients (pts) have poor prognosis. The TOPAZ-1 study led the approval of front-line durvalumab (D) in combination (GCD) with cisplatin and gemcitabine (GC) in advanced BTC.1 2 Modest durable responses with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (ICI) have also been reported in a subgroup among refractory BTC.3 To date, traditional ICI biomarkers (high tumor mutational burden [TMB], and PD-L1) have not shown a strong association with the response or outcomes.4 A paucity of comprehensive datasets with clinically annotated biospecimens has limited our ability to understand the impact of heterogenous biology (e.g. different etiology, driver mutations, and anatomic location) BTC outcomes on ICI.5 Herein, we report the initial analysis of comprehensive clinical, pathologic, genomic, and spatial transcriptomic analyses from large real-world and clinical trial datasets to describe the immunogenic BTC subgroup (iBTC).MethodsPts with BTC treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) and Moffitt, who received an ICI (> 2 cycles), GCD, GC between July 2017 and June 2023, were identified (IRB 19–006). Progression Free Survival (PFS) comparison was analyzed by the Kaplan Meier method. We included genomics using targeted gene sequencing and pathologic analyses of available tissues. Further bulk and spatial transcriptomic and exome analyses are ongoing.ResultsN=208 pts with BTCs who received either GCD (N=35), GC (N=128) and ICI (N=45) were identified at MSK. Across the whole group (N=208), median age 63 years (32–81), female 95 (45%), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) 144 (69%), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) 40 (19%), GBC 24 (12%) (table 1). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains of N=45 samples were evaluated by a pathologist for tumor infiltrating (TI) and peritumoral (PT) lymphocytes (Lym), macrophages (Mac), and polymorphonuclear cells (PMN). No statistically significant differences were observed but numerically higher peritumoral infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages were observed in PT-Lym (p=0.13) and PT-Mac (p=0.16) when groups of PFS <6m and PFS>6m were compared. (figures 1 and 2) Deeper evaluation of the tumor immune contexture and their gene programming using spatial and bulk transcriptomic and genomic analyses (N=29 ICI, N=16 GCD) together with N=11 ICI from Moffitt are ongoing.ConclusionsDurable responses (PFS>6M) to immunotherapy were seen in a subgroup of BTC. Currently available biomarkers have not predicted the response, but ongoing deeper analysis of spatial immune, tumor, and stromal microenvironment analysis will be presented.AcknowledgementsFunded by Society of MSKReferencesOh D, He A, Qin S. Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer, NEJM Evid 2022;1(8)Kelley R, Ueno M, Yoo C. Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jun 3;401(10391):1853–1865.Kim R, Chuang V, Alese O. A Phase 2 Multi-institutional Study of Nivolumab for Patients With Advanced Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(6):888–894.Kim D, Kim Y, Kovari K. Biomarker analysis from a phase II multi-institutional study of nivolumab in patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2022 Nov;176:171–180Mody K, Jain P, El-Refai S. Clinical, Genomic, and Transcriptomic Data Profiling of Biliary Tract Cancer Reveals Subtype-Specific Immune Signatures. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Jun;6:e2100510Ethics ApprovalMSK IRB 19–006Abstract 115 Figure 1Abstract 115 Figure 2Two cases from GCD treatment group; (A) and (B) shoe a tumor with moderate to prominent immune response, whereas (C) and (D) show a tumor with only minimal/mild immune response. A tumor with relatively well-demarcated borders and prominent peritumoral immune response at the tumor-adjacent normal liver border (yellow lines). (A) Moderate tumor-infiltrating immune cells seen in higher magnification (B) whereas another tumor with prominent desmoplastic stroma and only minimal/mild immune response and its higher magnification (C,D).Abstract 115 Table 1

Cancers arising in the biliary tract are rare, with varied incidence depending on geographical location. As clinical presentation is typically vague with non-specific symptoms, a large proportion of patients present with unresectable or metastatic disease at diagnosis. When unresectable, the mainstay of treatment is cytotoxic chemotherapy; however, despite this, 5-year overall survival remains incredibly poor. Diagnostic molecular pathology, using next-generation sequencing, has identified a high prevalence of targetable alterations in bile duct cancers, which is transforming care. Substantial genomic heterogeneity has been identified depending on both the anatomical location and etiology of disease, with certain alterations enriched for subtypes. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in combination with chemotherapy are now poised to become the standard first-line treatment option in this disease. Here, we describe the established role of cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted precision treatments and immunotherapy in what is a rapidly evolving treatment paradigm for advanced biliary tract cancer.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma, including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction, is uncommon in the United States, but is associated with a rising incidence in young adults, and has a traditionally poor prognosis. Despite the incremental benefits that have been made with multimodality approaches to locally advanced disease, most patients will go on to develop metastatic disease, and long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Over the last decade, PET-CT has emerged as a key tool in the management of this disease, with several prospective and retrospective studies evaluating its role in this disease. Herein, we review the key data pertaining to the use of PET-CT in the management of locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma, with a focus on staging, prognostication, PET-CT adapted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, and surveillance.

Pancreatic cancer is mainly driven by mutations in the KRAS oncogene. While this cancer has shown remarkable therapy resistance, new approaches to inhibit mutated KRAS, KRAS activators and effectors show promise in breaking this therapeutic deadlock. Here, we review these innovations in therapies that target RAS signaling in pancreatic cancer from a clinical point of view. A number of promising approaches are currently in clinical trials or in clinical development. We focus on small-molecule drugs but also discuss immunotherapies and tumor vaccines.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma, including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction, is uncommon in the United States, but is associated with a rising incidence in young adults, and has a traditionally poor prognosis. Despite the incremental benefits that have been made with multimodality approaches to locally advanced disease, most patients will go on to develop metastatic disease, and long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Over the last decade, PET-CT has emerged as a key tool in the management of this disease, with several prospective and retrospective studies evaluating its role in this disease. Herein, we review the key data pertaining to the use of PET-CT in the management of locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma, with a focus on staging, prognostication, PET-CT adapted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, and surveillance.