Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
19 result(s) for "Crabeck, Odile"
Sort by:
Pollution in the Arctic Ocean
The Arctic is undergoing unprecedented change. Observations and models demonstrate significant perturbations to the physical and biological systems. Arctic species and ecosystems, particularly in the marine environment, are subject to a wide range of pressures from human activities, including exposure to a complex mixture of pollutants, climate change and fishing activity. These pressures affect the ecosystem services that the Arctic provides. Current international policies are attempting to support sustainable exploitation of Arctic resources with a view to balancing human wellbeing and environmental protection. However, assessments of the potential combined impacts of human activities are limited by data, particularly related to pollutants, a limited understanding of physical and biological processes, and single policies that are limited to ecosystem-level actions. This manuscript considers how, when combined, a suite of existing tools can be used to assess the impacts of pollutants in combination with other anthropogenic pressures on Arctic ecosystems, and on the services that these ecosystems provide. Recommendations are made for the advancement of targeted Arctic research to inform environmental practices and regulatory decisions.
Polar primary aerosols across the ocean-sea ice-snow-atmosphere interface: From sources to impacts
Primary aerosols play a critical role in polar climate systems, influencing cloud formation, precipitation, radiative balance, and surface energy budgets. This paper provides a comprehensive synthesis of primary aerosol sources, transformation and removal processes, and broader atmospheric impacts in polar regions, emphasizing their links to ocean and sea ice biogeochemistry. These aerosols (including sea salt, primary organic aerosol, and primary biological aerosol particles) originate from marine and cryospheric environments and are emitted through physical processes, such as wave breaking, bubble bursting, and blowing snow. Emission sources include seawater, sea ice, snow, and freshwater from river discharge and glacial runoff. Once airborne, these particles can serve as a chemical reservoir, influencing atmospheric composition and reactivity, and as seeds for cloud droplet and ice crystal formation, influencing cloud microphysics and polar climate. Despite their importance, many of the processes governing primary aerosol emissions and transformations remain poorly constrained. The most pressing knowledge gaps pertain to emission processes, limited spatiotemporal observational coverage, instrumentation constraints, parameterization development, and the integration of interdisciplinary expertise. To improve our understanding of primary aerosol drivers and their response to climate, future research efforts should prioritize strategically coordinated and cross-disciplinary process studies, advancements in measurement technologies and coverage, and close collaboration between modelers and observational scientists to inform and refine model parameterizations. As polar regions continue to undergo profound changes marked by increased precipitation, reduced sea and land ice, freshening oceans, and shifting ecosystem dynamics, characterizing present-day primary aerosol populations is vital. Improved understanding will be essential for anticipating future changes in aerosol-radiation and aerosol-cloud interactions and their implications for polar and global climate systems.
Upward transport of bottom-ice dimethyl sulfide during advanced melting of arctic first-year sea ice
This paper presents the first empirical estimates of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) gas fluxes across permeable sea ice in the Arctic. DMS is known to act as a major potential source of aerosols that strongly influence the Earth’s radiative balance in remote marine regions during the ice-free season. Results from a sampling campaign, undertaken in 2015 between June 2 and June 28 in the ice-covered Western Baffin Bay, revealed the presence of high algal biomass in the bottom 0.1-m section of sea ice (21 to 380 µg Chl a L–1) combined with the presence of high DMS concentrations (212–840 nmol L–1). While ice algae acted as local sources of DMS in bottom sea ice, thermohaline changes within the brine network, from gravity drainage to vertical stabilization, exerted strong control on the distribution of DMS within the interior of the ice. We estimated both the mean DMS molecular diffusion coefficient in brine (5.2 × 10–5 cm2 s–1 ± 51% relative S.D., n = 10) and the mean bulk transport coefficient within sea ice (33 × 10–5 cm2 s–1 ± 41% relative S.D., n = 10). The estimated DMS fluxes ± S.D. from the bottom ice to the atmosphere ranged between 0.47 ± 0.08 µmol m–2 d–1 (n = 5, diffusion) and 0.40 ± 0.15 µmol m–2 d–1 (n = 5, bulk transport) during the vertically stable phase. These fluxes fall within the lower range of direct summer sea-to-air DMS fluxes reported in the Arctic. Our results indicate that upward transport of DMS, from the algal-rich bottom of first-year sea ice through the permeable sea ice, may represent an important pathway for this biogenic gas toward the atmosphere in ice-covered oceans in spring and summer.
The biogenic sulfur cycle in the coupled ocean–sea ice–atmosphere system
Polar oceans and sea-ice regions are global hot spots for the production of biogenic volatile methylated sulfur (VMS) compounds: dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and methanethiol (MeSH). VMS compounds make important contributions to atmospheric particle formation and cloud property modulation, especially when polar atmospheres are pristine. As a result, the polar biogenic sulfur cycle may induce significant climate feedback in response to ongoing sea ice decline. However, polar VMS production, emission, and atmospheric oxidation processes remain poorly represented in current numerical models, hampering assessments of their radiative impacts and, in turn, implementation of targeted observations necessary for providing predictive understanding of changes in the ocean–sea ice–atmosphere (OIA) system. We synthesize current knowledge of the polar biogenic sulfur cycle and its representation in models. To untangle the existing gaps and provide a roadmap toward predictive understanding, we identify key features of sea ice habitats for biological VMS production, sea ice physical features that enhance or suppress VMS emissions, and atmospheric VMS oxidation at low temperatures that controls the contribution of oxidation products to particle formation or growth. These features are tightly coupled, emphasizing the need for coordinated efforts across disciplines that span the OIA interface, and among observational, experimental, and modeling communities. We recommend 4 priority research areas: (1) model representation of biological VMS production at the sea ice bottom and surface; (2) improved quantification of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) sensitivity to VMS emissions with updated gas phase and multiphase oxidation chemistry at low temperatures; (3) better spatial and seasonal quantification of MeSH abundance and its biological and chemical controls in sea-ice environments; and (4) assessment of the contribution of episodic extreme VMS emissions during sea ice breakup for the polar CCN budget.
Impact of air-ice CO2 fluxes on polar ocean carbon budgets from a bipolar data compilation
In ocean carbon budget assessments, sea ice is still treated as an impermeable barrier, rather than a dynamic interface mediating CO₂ exchange between ocean and atmosphere. We compiled more than 6000 chamber-based air-ice CO₂ flux measurements from the Arctic and Southern Oceans between 2003 and 2021, spanning diverse ice, snow, and seasonal conditions. These data show that sea ice releases CO₂ in winter and absorbs it in summer, with summer uptake offsetting winter emissions. On an annual basis, sea ice represents a small net CO₂ source of +4 Tg C yr⁻¹ in the Arctic and +2 Tg C yr⁻¹ in the Southern Ocean, challenging earlier views of a major sink. Although these fluxes are negligible at basin scales relative to open-ocean uptake, sea ice exchanges gases even in cold winter conditions, with implications for small-scale processes and other trace gases, underscoring the need for sustained, process-resolving observations.In ocean carbon budget assessments, sea ice is still treated as an impermeable barrier, rather than a dynamic interface mediating CO₂ exchange between ocean and atmosphere. We compiled more than 6000 chamber-based air-ice CO₂ flux measurements from the Arctic and Southern Oceans between 2003 and 2021, spanning diverse ice, snow, and seasonal conditions. These data show that sea ice releases CO₂ in winter and absorbs it in summer, with summer uptake offsetting winter emissions. On an annual basis, sea ice represents a small net CO₂ source of +4 Tg C yr⁻¹ in the Arctic and +2 Tg C yr⁻¹ in the Southern Ocean, challenging earlier views of a major sink. Although these fluxes are negligible at basin scales relative to open-ocean uptake, sea ice exchanges gases even in cold winter conditions, with implications for small-scale processes and other trace gases, underscoring the need for sustained, process-resolving observations.
Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season
Arctic sea ice has undergone significant changes over the past 50 years. Modern large-scale estimates of sea ice thickness and volume come from satellite observations. However, these estimates have limited accuracy, especially during the melt season, making it difficult to compare the Arctic sea ice state year to year. Uncertainties in sea ice density lead to high uncertainties in ice thickness retrieval from its freeboard. During the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of the Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition, we observed a first-year ice (FYI) freeboard increase of 0.02 m, while its thickness decreased by 0.5 m during the Arctic melt season in June–July 2020. Over the same period, the FYI density decreased from 910 to 880 kg m−3, and the sea ice air fraction increased from 1 % to 6 %, due to air void expansion controlled by internal melt. This increase in air volume substantially affected FYI density and freeboard. Due to differences in sea ice thermodynamic state (such as salinity and temperature), the air volume expansion is less pronounced in second-year ice (SYI) and has a smaller impact on the density evolution of SYI and ridges. We validated our discrete measurements of FYI density from coring using co-located ice topography observations from underwater sonar and an airborne laser scanner. Despite decreasing ice thickness, a similar counterintuitive increasing ice freeboard was observed for the entire 0.9 km2 MOSAiC ice floe, with a stronger freeboard increase for FYI than for less saline SYI. The surrounding 50 km2 area experienced a slightly lower 0.01 m ice freeboard increase in July 2020, despite comparable 0.5 m melt rates obtained from ice mass balance buoys. The increasing sea ice air volume defines the rapid decrease in FYI density, complicates the retrieval of ice thickness from satellite altimeters during the melt season, and underlines the importance of considering air volume and density changes in retrieval algorithms.
The future of Arctic sea-ice biogeochemistry and ice-associated ecosystems
The Arctic sea-ice-scape is rapidly transforming. Increasing light penetration will initiate earlier seasonal primary production. This earlier growing season may be accompanied by an increase in ice algae and phytoplankton biomass, augmenting the emission of dimethylsulfide and capture of carbon dioxide. Secondary production may also increase on the shelves, although the loss of sea ice exacerbates the demise of sea-ice fauna, endemic fish and megafauna. Sea-ice loss may also deliver more methane to the atmosphere, but warmer ice may release fewer halogens, resulting in fewer ozone depletion events. The net changes in carbon drawdown are still highly uncertain. Despite large uncertainties in these assessments, we expect disruptive changes that warrant intensified long-term observations and modelling efforts.The Arctic is warming and undergoing rapid ice loss. This Perspective considers how changes in sea ice will impact the biogeochemistry and associated ecosystems of the region while calling for more observations to improve our understanding of this complex system.
Inorganic carbon dynamics of melt-pond-covered first-year sea ice in the Canadian Arctic
Melt pond formation is a common feature of spring and summer Arctic sea ice, but the role and impact of sea ice melt and pond formation on both the direction and size of CO2 fluxes between air and sea is still unknown. Here we report on the CO2–carbonate chemistry of melting sea ice, melt ponds and the underlying seawater as well as CO2 fluxes at the surface of first-year landfast sea ice in the Resolute Passage, Nunavut, in June 2012. Early in the melt season, the increase in ice temperature and the subsequent decrease in bulk ice salinity promote a strong decrease of the total alkalinity (TA), total dissolved inorganic carbon (TCO2) and partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) within the bulk sea ice and the brine. As sea ice melt progresses, melt ponds form, mainly from melted snow, leading to a low in situ melt pond pCO2 (36 μatm). The percolation of this low salinity and low pCO2 meltwater into the sea ice matrix decreased the brine salinity, TA and TCO2, and lowered the in situ brine pCO2 (to 20 μatm). This initial low in situ pCO2 observed in brine and melt ponds results in air–ice CO2 fluxes ranging between −0.04 and −5.4 mmol m−2 day−1 (negative sign for fluxes from the atmosphere into the ocean). As melt ponds strive to reach pCO2 equilibrium with the atmosphere, their in situ pCO2 increases (up to 380 μatm) with time and the percolation of this relatively high concentration pCO2 meltwater increases the in situ brine pCO2 within the sea ice matrix as the melt season progresses. As the melt pond pCO2 increases, the uptake of atmospheric CO2 becomes less significant. However, since melt ponds are continuously supplied by meltwater, their in situ pCO2 remains undersaturated with respect to the atmosphere, promoting a continuous but moderate uptake of CO2 (~ −1 mmol m−2 day−1) into the ocean. Considering the Arctic seasonal sea ice extent during the melt period (90 days), we estimate an uptake of atmospheric CO2 of −10.4 Tg of C yr−1. This represents an additional uptake of CO2 associated with Arctic sea ice that needs to be further explored and considered in the estimation of the Arctic Ocean's overall CO2 budget.
MARINE CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL FROM THE GLOBAL OCEAN ACIDIFICATION OBSERVING NETWORK
Along with other carbon monitoring groups, the ocean acidification (OA) community has been observing, modeling, and projecting the impacts of changing carbonate chemistry for over two decades. The Global Ocean Acidification Observing Network (GOA-ON) has three key goals related to these issues: (1) improve understanding of global OA conditions, (2) improve understanding of ecosystem responses to OA, and (3) acquire and exchange data necessary to optimize modeling for OA and its impacts. GOA-ON and associated networks have a wealth of knowledge, data, models, and best practice guides on how to monitor global carbonate chemistry, and GOA-ON regional hubs collaborate at local scales to inform policy and action for coastal communities. Here, the GOA-ON community shares lessons learned relevant for marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) research and development. Understanding whether, how, and where mCDR approaches should be deployed will require knowledge of the carbonate system, robust observations, sensor technology, and modeling capacities. Ongoing monitoring, reporting, and verification during field trials and any eventual implementation of mCDR will again require these resources. The GOA-ON community’s knowledge about environmental impacts, running laboratory and field experiments, and deriving biological indicators of change is of fundamental importance for assessing the environmental impacts of mCDR and of the potential for mitigating or exacerbating OA. Finally, we present recommendations for utilizing this OA experience toward mCDR research.
Impact of air-ice CO 2 fluxes on polar ocean carbon budgets from a bipolar data compilation
In ocean carbon budget assessments, sea ice is still treated as an impermeable barrier, rather than a dynamic interface mediating CO₂ exchange between ocean and atmosphere. We compiled more than 6000 chamber-based air-ice CO₂ flux measurements from the Arctic and Southern Oceans between 2003 and 2021, spanning diverse ice, snow, and seasonal conditions. These data show that sea ice releases CO₂ in winter and absorbs it in summer, with summer uptake offsetting winter emissions. On an annual basis, sea ice represents a small net CO₂ source of +4 Tg C yr⁻¹ in the Arctic and +2 Tg C yr⁻¹ in the Southern Ocean, challenging earlier views of a major sink. Although these fluxes are negligible at basin scales relative to open-ocean uptake, sea ice exchanges gases even in cold winter conditions, with implications for small-scale processes and other trace gases, underscoring the need for sustained, process-resolving observations.