Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
16 result(s) for "Creger, R J"
Sort by:
Prospective study of one- vs two-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation following reduced intensity conditioning in adults with hematological malignancies
As the threshold nucleated cell dose for one-unit umbilical cord blood (UCB) in adults has not to date been firmly established, we prospectively compared one- vs two-unit UCB transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in adult patients with hematological malignancies. Study design specified one-UCB unit if the cryopreserved total nucleated cell (TNC) dose was ⩾2.5 × 10 7 /kg recipient weight, otherwise two units matched at minima of 4/6 HLA loci to the patient and 3/6 to each other were infused. A total of 27 patients received one unit; 23 patients received two units. Median time to ANC >500/μL was 24 days (95% confidence interval 22–28 days), 25 days for one unit and 23 days for two units ( P =0.99). At day 100, ANC >500/μL was 88.4 and 91.3% in the one- and two-unit groups ( P =0.99), respectively. Three-year EFS was 28.6% and 39.1% in the one- and two-unit groups ( P =0.71), respectively. Infusion of two units was associated with a significantly lower relapse risk, 30.4% vs 59.3% ( P =0.045). Infused cell doses (TNC, CD3 + , CD34 + and CD56 + CD3 neg ) did not impact on engraftment, OS or EFS. Taken together, one-unit UCB transplantation with a threshold cell dose ⩾2.5 × 10 7 /kg recipient weight after RIC is a viable option for adults, although infusion of two units confers a lower relapse incidence.
Clostridium difficile-associated disease in human stem cell transplant recipients: coming epidemic or false alarm?
Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea in the United States and Europe, and is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. A newly identified epidemic strain has been associated with many hospital outbreaks of C. difficile -associated disease (CDAD), raising the concern of an escalating burden of CDAD among at-risk patients. Hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) recipients are known to be at increased risk for a wide variety of infectious complications, including CDAD as a result of prolonged hospitalizations, exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, altered integrity of the intestinal mucosa and GVHD. The incidence of CDAD in the HSCT population has been reported as high as 20% in some large series. The frequency and seriousness of CDAD in this defined group as compared with the general hospital population, however, are not clearly delineated. We discuss the epidemiology and diagnosis of CDAD and review recent studies examining the risk factors and characteristics of CDAD in HSCT recipients. Finally, we provide a management algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of CDAD at our institution.
Transfer of the hematopoietic stem cell transplant patient to the intensive care unit: does it really matter?
We critically reviewed published English language literature and concluded that from 1998 onward the survival of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) patients who experienced intensive care unit (ICU) transfer has improved. The factors associated with increased mortality during ICU stay included increased patient age, allogeneic transplant, intubation/mechanical ventilation, multiorgan system failure (MOSF), presumed/documented infection, graft-versus-host disease, and higher APACHE and O-PRISM score at ICU transfer. This encouraging outcome trend reflects evolving advances such as use of recombinant hematopoietic growth factors, use of mobilized blood cells rather than marrow, protective strategies for acute lung injury and early goal-directed therapy for sepsis syndrome. Patient selection bias (which patients were transferred and which were not sent to an ICU) also plays a role in ICU survival rates. New strategies to improve upon SCT patient outcome include use of a scoring system to predict mortality, better therapies for MOSF and integration of ICU components and multispecialist involvement earlier in the clinical course to prevent severe complications such as respiratory failure. SCT recipients comprise a heterogeneous group; to further advance this field, prospective multicenter trials involving larger populations from many centers are needed to reduce the biases of retrospective and single-center reports.
Pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34+ cell count predicts the likelihood of successful hematopoietic stem cell mobilization
We examined pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell count to predict ability to mobilize adequate peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in 106 cancer patients and 36 allogeneic donors. Mean pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34+ cell count was 3.1 cells x 10(6)/l (s.d. = 3.9, r = 0.3-37) and mean CD34+ cells collected were 5.3 x 10(6) cells/kg/leukapheresis procedure (s.d. = 7.0, r = 0.03-53). Yields correlated with pre-mobilization CD34+ cells x 10(6)/l (r = 0.37, P-value < 0.0001); correlation was stronger in allogeneic donors (r = 0.56, P-value = 0.0004) and males (r = 0.46, P-value < 0.0001). Based on classification and regression tree multivariate analysis, the predictive value of pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell count was confounded by other variables, including age, gender, mobilization regimen and malignancy type. We generated an algorithm to predict a minimum PBPC yield of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/leukapheresis procedure after mobilization. A threshold pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell count of 2.65 cells x 10(6)/l was the most important decision point in predicting successful mobilization. Only 2% of subjects with pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell counts > 2.65 cells x 10(6)/l did not achieve the minimum per apheresis, whereas 24% with pre-mobilization values below threshold had inadequate mobilization. Prospectively identifying individuals at risk for mobilization failure would allow for improved treatment planning, resource utilization and time saving.
Corynebacterium striatum: A Diphtheroid with Pathogenic Potential
Although nondiphtherial corynebacteria are ubiquitous in nature and commonly colonize the skin and mucous membranes of humans, they rarely account for clinical infection. Corynebacterium striatum has rarely been reported to be a pathogen, causing pleuropulmonary infections and bacteremia in only immunocompromised or anatomically altered patients. We noted C. striatum to be the infecting pathogen or copathogen in six patients. To our knowledge, this report describes the first cases of C. striatum causing infection of exit sites of central venous catheters, thrombophlebitis associated with central venous catheters, conjunctivitis, and chorioamnionitis as well as a possible pathogen contributing to peritonitis and pyogenic granuloma. Unlike Corynebacterium jeikeium, which is highly resistant to β-lactam agents, aminoglycosides, and quinolones, all strains of C. striatum isolated from the patients described in this report were susceptible to vancomycin and aminoglycosides, and all strains except one were susceptible to penicillin G, imipenem, and ciprofloxacin. C. striatum should be recognized as a potential pathogen in both immunocompromised and normal hosts in the appropriate circumstances, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy can quickly lead to resolution of infection.
Multi-purpose silastic dual-lumen central venous catheters for both collection and transplantation of hematopoietic progenitor cells
Autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation frequently requires sequential placement and use of two separate central venous catheters: (1) a short-term, large-bore, stiff device inserted for leukapheresis, and after removal of that device, (2) a long-term, multi-lumen, flexible, Silastic catheter for administration of high-dose chemotherapy, re-infusion of hematopoietic cells, and intensive supportive care. We reviewed our recent experience with two dual-lumen, large-bore, Silastic multi-purpose ('hybrid') catheters, each of which can be used as a single device for both leukapheresis and long-term supportive care throughout the transplant process. Quinton-Raaf PermCath and Bard-Hickman hemodialysis/apheresis dual-lumen catheters were used as the sole venous access device in 112 consecutive patients who underwent autologous PBPC collection and transplantation. The catheter exit site was monitored three times a week, and lumen patency was assessed using clinical and radiologic techniques. Catheters were removed prematurely for persistent thrombus, positive blood cultures despite appropriate antibiotics, or mechanical dysfunction. There were no intra-operative or immediate post-operative complications relating to insertion. Thirty-two patients experienced catheter occlusion necessitating urokinase instillation. Persistent occlusive problems were noted in 16 patients, and in 10 patients the catheter had to be removed. Two exit site infections and 17 bacteremias occurred. Catheters had to be removed for persistent infection in two subjects and for mechanical problems in five others. Cost analysis comparing the hybrid catheters alone vs conventional devices revealed a charge of $4230 in patients with hybrid catheters vs. $7530 in those requiring a temporary non-Silastic dialysis catheter in addition to a flexible, long-term Silastic catheter. Hybrid, Silastic, dual-lumen, large-bore central venous catheters are safe, cost-effective and convenient multi-purpose venous access devices that may be used in the setting of autologous PBPC collection and transplantation. The rate of thrombotic, infectious and mechanical complications appears comparable to other central venous access devices.
Pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34 super(+) cell count predicts the likelihood of successful hematopoietic stem cell mobilization
We examined pre-mobilization blood CD34 super(+) cell count to predict ability to mobilize adequate peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in 106 cancer patients and 36 allogeneic donors. Mean pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34 super(+) cell count was 3.1 cells x 10 super(6)/l (s.d. = 3.9, r = 0.3-37) and mean CD34 super(+) cells collected were 5.3 x 10 super(6) cells/kg/leukapheresis procedure (s.d. = 7.0, r = 0.03-53). Yields correlated with pre-mobilization CD34 super(+) cells x 10 super(6)/l (r = 0.37, P-value < 0.0001); correlation was stronger in allogeneic donors (r = 0.56, P-value = 0.0004) and males (r = 0.46, P-value < 0.0001). Based on classification and regression free multivariate analysis, the predictive value of pre-mobilization blood CD34 super(+) cell count was confounded by other variables, including age, gender, mobilization regimen and malignancy type. We generated an algorithm to predict a minimum PBPC yield of 1 x 10 super(6) CD34 super(+) cells/kg/ leukapheresis procedure after mobilization. A threshold pre-mobilization blood CD34 super(+) cell count of 2.65 cells x 10 super(6)/l was the most important decision point in predicting successful mobilization. Only 2% of subjects with pre-mobilization blood CD34 super(+) cell counts >2.65 cells x 10 super(6)/l did not achieve the minimum per apheresis, whereas 24% with pre-mobilization values below threshold had inadequate mobilization. Prospectively identifying individuals at risk for mobilization failure would allow for improved treatment planning, resource utilization and time saving.
Pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34+ cell count predicts the likelihood of successful hematopoietic stem cell mobilization
We examined pre-mobilization blood CD34 + cell count to predict ability to mobilize adequate peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in 106 cancer patients and 36 allogeneic donors. Mean pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34 + cell count was 3.1 cells × 10 6 /l (s.d.=3.9, r =0.3–37) and mean CD34 + cells collected were 5.3 × 10 6  cells/kg/leukapheresis procedure (s.d.=7.0, r =0.03–53). Yields correlated with pre-mobilization CD34 + cells × 10 6 /l ( r =0.37, P -value<0.0001); correlation was stronger in allogeneic donors ( r =0.56, P -value=0.0004) and males ( r =0.46, P -value<0.0001). Based on c lassification a nd r egression t ree multivariate analysis, the predictive value of pre-mobilization blood CD34 + cell count was confounded by other variables, including age, gender, mobilization regimen and malignancy type. We generated an algorithm to predict a minimum PBPC yield of 1 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg/leukapheresis procedure after mobilization. A threshold pre-mobilization blood CD34 + cell count of 2.65 cells × 10 6 /l was the most important decision point in predicting successful mobilization. Only 2% of subjects with pre-mobilization blood CD34 + cell counts >2.65 cells × 10 6 /l did not achieve the minimum per apheresis, whereas 24% with pre-mobilization values below threshold had inadequate mobilization. Prospectively identifying individuals at risk for mobilization failure would allow for improved treatment planning, resource utilization and time saving.