Explore the vast range of titles available.

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a formidable global health challenge, ranking among the top-five causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The majority of patients face advanced stages at diagnosis, with a mere 6% five-year survival rate. First-line treatment for metastatic GC typically involves a fluoropyrimidine and platinum agent combination; yet, predictive molecular markers have proven elusive. This review navigates the evolving landscape of GC biomarkers, with a specific focus on Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) as an emerging and promising target. Recent phase III trials have unveiled the efficacy of Zolbetuximab, a CLDN18.2-targeting antibody, in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for CLDN18.2-positive metastatic GC. As this novel therapeutic avenue unfolds, understanding the nuanced decision making regarding the selection of anti-CLDN18.2 therapies over other targeted agents in metastatic GC becomes crucial. This manuscript reviews the evolving role of CLDN18.2 as a biomarker in GC and explores the current status of CLDN18.2-targeting agents in clinical development. The aim is to provide concise insights into the potential of CLDN18.2 as a therapeutic target and guide future clinical decisions in the management of metastatic GC.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains an important cause of cancer-related mortality, and it is expected to play an even bigger part in cancer burden in the years to come. Despite concerted efforts from scientists and physicians, patients have experienced little improvement in survival over the past decades, possibly because of the non-specific nature of the tested treatment modalities. Recently, the discovery of potentially targetable molecular alterations has paved the way for the personalized treatment of PDAC. Indeed, the central piece in the molecular framework of PDAC is starting to be unveiled. KRAS mutations are seen in 90% of PDACs, and multiple studies have demonstrated their pivotal role in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Recent investigations have shed light on the differences in prognosis as well as therapeutic implications of the different KRAS mutations and disentangled the relationship between KRAS and effectors of downstream and parallel signaling pathways. Additionally, the recognition of other mechanisms involving KRAS-mediated pathogenesis, such as KRAS dosing and allelic imbalance, has contributed to broadening the current knowledge regarding this molecular alteration. Finally, KRAS G12C inhibitors have been recently tested in patients with pancreatic cancer with relative success, and inhibitors of KRAS harboring other mutations are under clinical development. These drugs currently represent a true hope for a meaningful leap forward in this dreadful disease.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are malignant mesenchymal tumors arising from the intestinal pacemaker cells of Cajal. They compose a heterogenous group of tumors due to a variety of molecular alterations. The most common gain-of-function mutations in GISTs are either in the KIT (60–70%) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) genes (10–15%), which are mutually exclusive. However, a smaller subset, lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations, is considered wild-type GISTs and presents distinct molecular findings with the activation of different proliferative pathways, structural chromosomal and epigenetic changes, such as inactivation of the NF1 gene, mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), BRAF, and RAS genes, and also NTRK fusions. Currently, a molecular evaluation of GISTs is imperative in many scenarios, aiding in treatment decisions from the (neo)adjuvant to the metastatic setting. Here, we review the most recent data on the molecular profile of GISTs and highlight therapeutic implications according to distinct GIST molecular subtypes.

5-fluorouracil (5-FU), a pyrimidine analogue with antimetabolite activity, is one of the most widely used drugs in Oncology and many different regimens have been described regarding its use. Nowadays, the modified de Gramont is the most popular schedule of 5-FU to treat gastrointestinal cancers and may be given either alone or combined with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and monoclonal antibodies. The true clinical value of bolus 5-FU right before infusional regimens remains to be determined since no randomized trials have addressed this issue. This manuscript aims to review the history of 5-FU, its mechanism of action and the data exploring the role of bolus 5-FU.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors remain a cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS and BRAF wild-type cancer. Yet, primary and acquired resistance limit their benefit for many patients. A growing body of evidence reveals that resistance is not random but rather driven by a complex network of molecular alterations that sustain tumor growth independent of EGFR signaling. These include amplification of ERBB2 (HER2) and MET, activation of the PI3K and AKT pathways, EGFR extracellular domain mutations, and rare kinase fusions. The concept of negative hyperselection has emerged as a powerful strategy to refine patient selection by excluding tumors with these resistance drivers. Multiple clinical trials have consistently shown that patients who are hyperselected based on comprehensive molecular profiling achieve significantly higher response rates and improved survival compared to those selected by RAS and BRAF status alone. Liquid biopsy through circulating tumor DNA has further transformed this landscape, offering a noninvasive tool to capture tumor heterogeneity, monitor clonal evolution in real time, and guide rechallenge strategies after resistance emerges. Together, negative hyperselection, ctDNA-guided monitoring, and emerging therapeutics define a precision-oncology framework for identifying, tracking, and overcoming resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in mCRC, moving the field toward more effective and individualized care. Looking ahead, the development of innovative therapeutics such as bispecific antibodies, antibody drug conjugates, and RNA-based therapies promises to further expand in this challenging clinical scenario. These advances move precision oncology in colorectal cancer from concept to clinical reality, reshaping the standard of care through molecular insights.

Recent advances in biomarker-driven therapies have changed the landscape of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and brought not only access issues but also difficulties for the treating physician (especially generalist oncologists) in choosing the most suitable treatment for each individual patient. This manuscript proposes an algorithm developed by The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours with the aim of bringing easy-to-follow steps in the management of unresectable mCRC. The algorithm is based on evidence for fit patients to facilitate therapeutic decisions in the clinical practice and assumes that there are no access and resource limitations.

Due to differences in natural history and therapy, clinical trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have recently been subdivided into unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and metastatic disease. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors in LAPC patients who were treated with first‐line chemotherapy and describe patterns of disease progression. Patients with LAPC who initiated first‐line palliative chemotherapy, 2001–2011 at the BC Cancer Agency were included. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify clinicopathologic variables, treatment, and subsequent sites of metastasis. Kaplan–Meier and Cox‐regression survival analyses were performed. A total of 244 patients were included in this study. For the majority of patients (94.3%), first‐line therapy was single‐agent gemcitabine. About 144 (59%) patients developed distant metastatic disease and the most frequent metastatic sites included peritoneum/omentum (42.3%), liver (41%), lungs (13.9%), and distant lymph nodes (9%). Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 11.7 months (95% CI, 10.6–12.8). Development of distant metastases was associated with significantly inferior survival (HR 3.56, 95% CI 2.57–4.93), as was ECOG 2/3 versus 0/1 (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.28–2.23), CA 19.9 > 1000 versus ≤1000 (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.19–2.14) and female gender, (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.19–2.08). In this population‐based study, 41% of LAPC patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy died without evidence of distant metastases. Prognostic factors for LAPC were baseline performance status, elevated CA 19.9, gender, and development of distant metastasis. Results highlight the heterogeneity of LAPC and the importance of locoregional tumor control. Recently, patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have been subdivided into two groups: those with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and metastatic disease. This study identifies prognostic factors and the patterns of progression of LAPC which may influence the way that this disease is treated. This study demonstrates the heterogeneity of patients in this population and emphasizes the importance of locoregional tumor control.

Cancer during pregnancy is a rare but complex clinical scenario that affects approximately 0.1% of pregnant individuals and is associated with increased maternal morbidity. With the trend of delayed childbearing, the incidence of pregnancy-associated cancers is expected to rise. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), although rare in pregnancy, present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their hormonal activity, histological diversity, and limited data on management in the gestational context. Objectives: This manuscript reviews the current evidence on the diagnosis, staging, and management of NENs during pregnancy, focusing on maternal–fetal safety, therapeutic limitations, and multidisciplinary care strategies. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted using relevant case reports, retrospective studies, clinical guidelines, and expert consensus documents addressing cancer in pregnancy and NEN-specific management. Results: Pregnancy complicates the evaluation and treatment of NENs due to overlapping symptoms, contraindications to standard imaging and systemic therapies, and unreliable biomarkers such as chromogranin A and 5-HIAA. Most systemic therapies for NENs, including somatostatin analogs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, are contraindicated or lack safety data in pregnancy. Surgical interventions and supportive care require careful planning. Decisions regarding pregnancy continuation or termination must be individualized and supported by a multidisciplinary team. Conclusions: The management of NENs during pregnancy demands a highly individualized approach, coordinated among oncology, maternal–fetal medicine, and supportive care teams. Given the paucity of robust data, future research is essential to establish evidence-based guidelines and improve outcomes for both mother and fetus.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who are refractory to initial treatment lines exhibit a challenging clinical scenario characterised by a poor prognosis and constrained therapeutic options. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the integration of bevacizumab into trifluridine-tipiracil (TFD/TPI) therapy for mCRC, examining its benefits across patient subgroups and evaluating safety relative to TFD/TPI monotherapy. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statements, we conducted a thorough literature search from 15 October to 11 November 2023, covering MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane database. Data extraction and quality assessment followed Cochrane guidelines, and hazard or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled ( < 0.05 significance threshold). The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023484695). Analysing 770 database results, we included two randomised controlled trials and five observational studies covering over 4,000 patients. Combined therapy exhibited significant improvements in overall survival (OS) hazard ratios (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.49-0.72; < 0.01) and progression-free survival (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.40-0.59; < 0.01). Subgroups, including prior bevacizumab exposure (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.64-0.77; < 0.01) and mutated RAS gene (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.53-0.77; < 0.01), demonstrated improvements in OSwith bevacizumab. This meta-analysis underscores the heightened efficacy of TFD/TPI combined with bevacizumab for refractory mCRC compared to TFD/TPI monotherapy across diverse subgroups. Combined therapy has increased grade ≥3 neutropenia and hypertension, while monotherapy is associated with fatigue and anemia.

Recent advancements in biomarker-driven therapies have significantly transformed the treatment paradigm for unresectable metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). These innovations, however, have introduced not only issues related to accessibility but also complexities for treating physicians, particularly general oncologists, in selecting the most appropriate treatment for each patient and deciding on the best sequencing strategy. This manuscript presents an algorithm developed by the Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours, designed to provide straightforward guidance in the management of unresectable mGC. This algorithm, grounded in evidence for fit patients, aims to streamline therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice, assuming the absence of access and resource constraints.