Explore the vast range of titles available.

Predicting invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is crucial in determining the precise indication for endoscopic resection because the rate of lymph node metastasis increases in proportion to the invasion depth of the carcinoma. Previous studies have shown a close relationship between microvascular patterns observed by Narrow Band Imaging magnifying endoscopy and invasion depth of the superficial carcinoma. Thus, the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) developed a simplified magnifying endoscopic classification for estimating invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the diagnostic values of type B vessels in the pretreatment estimation of invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas utilizing JES classification, the criteria of which are based on the degree of irregularity in the microvascular morphology. Type A microvessels corresponded to noncancerous lesions and lack severe irregularity; type B, to cancerous lesions, and exhibit severe irregularity. Type B vessels were subclassified into B1, B2, and B3, diagnostic criteria for T1a-EP or T1a-LPM, T1a-MM or T1b-SM1, and T1b-SM2 tumors, respectively. We enrolled 211 patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The overall accuracy of type B microvessels in estimating tumor invasion depth was 90.5 %. We propose that the newly developed JES magnifying endoscopic classification is useful in estimating the invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BackgroundWe aimed to elucidate the risk of metastatic recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER) without additional treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) with tumor invasion into the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (T1b-SM).MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM ESCC after ER at 21 institutions in Japan between 2006 and 2017. We compared metastatic recurrence between patients with and without additional treatment, stratified into category A (pT1a-MM with negative lymphovascular invasion [LVI] and vertical margin [VM]), B (tumor invasion into the submucosa ≤ 200 µm [pT1b-SM1] with negative LVI and VM), and C (others). Subsequently, using multivariate Cox analysis, we evaluated risk factors for metastatic recurrence after ER without additional treatment.ResultsWe enrolled 593 patients, and metastatic recurrence occurred in 38 patients. Metastatic recurrence after additional treatment was significantly lower than that after no additional treatment in category C (9.1% vs. 23.6% in 5 years, p = 0.001), whereas no significant difference was noted in categories A (0.0% vs. 2.6%) and B (0.0% vs. 4.3%). In patients without additional treatment after ER, risk factors for metastatic recurrence were lymphatic invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 5.61), positive VM (HR, 4.55), and tumor invasion into the submucosa > 200 μm (HR, 3.25), and, but near half of the patients with metastatic recurrence had no further recurrence after salvage treatment, resulting in excellent 5-year disease-specific survival in categories A (99.6%) and B (100.0%).ConclusionsClosed follow-up with no additional treatment may be an acceptable option after ER in pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM1 ESCC with negative LVI and VM.

Curative management after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which invades the muscularis mucosa (pMM-ESCC) or shallow submucosal layer (pSM1-ESCC), has been controversial. We identified patients with pMM-ESCC and pSM1-ESCC treated by ER. Outcomes were the predictive factors for regional lymph node and distant recurrence, and survival data were based on the depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and additional treatment immediately after ER. A total of 992 patients with pMM-ESCC (n = 749) and pSM1-ESCC (n = 243) were registered. According to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, pSM1-ESCC (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.07, P = 0.012) and LVI (hazard ratio = 6.92, 95% confidence interval 4.09-11.7, P < 0.0001) were associated with a risk of regional lymph node and distant recurrence. In the median follow-up period of 58.6 months (range 1-233), among patients with risk factors (pMM-ESCC with LVI or pSM1-ESCC), the 5-year overall survival rates, relapse-free survival rates, and cause-specific survival rates of patients with additional treatment were significantly better than those of patients without additional treatment; 85.4% vs 61.5% ( P < 0.0001), 80.5% vs 53.3% ( P < 0.0001), and 98.5% vs 93.1% ( P = 0.004), respectively. There was no difference in survival rate between the chemoradiotherapy and surgery groups. pSM1 and LVI were risk factors for metastasis after ER for ESCC. To improve the survival, additional treatment immediately after ER, such as chemoradiotherapy or surgery, is effective in patients with these risk factors.

Background Little is known about the specific risks of metastasis in esophageal adenocarcinoma in relation to invasion depth or other pathologic factors. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in 13 high-volume centers in Japan from January 2000 to October 2014 to elucidate the risk of metastasis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A total of 458 patients (217 surgically resected and 241 endoscopically resected) with esophageal adenocarcinoma or esophagogastric adenocarcinoma involving the esophagus were included. Metastasis was considered positive if there was histologically confirmed metastasis in the surgical specimen or clinically confirmed metastasis during follow-up. Metastasis was considered negative if no metastasis was identified in resected specimens and during follow-up in patients treated surgically or no metastasis during follow-up for >5 years in patients treated by endoscopic resection. Results Metastasis was identified in 72 patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed lymphovascular involvement [odds ratio (OR) 6.20; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.12–12.32; p  < 0.001], a poorly differentiated component (OR 3.69; 95 % CI 1.92–7.10; p  < 0.001), and lesion size >30 mm (OR 3.12; 95 % CI 1.63–5.97; p  = 0.001) as independent risk factors for metastasis. No metastasis was detected in patients with mucosal cancer without lymphovascular involvement and a poorly differentiated component (0/186 lesions) or in patients with cancer invading the submucosa (1–500 µm) without lymphovascular involvement, a poorly differentiated component, and ≤30 mm (0/32 lesions). Conclusions Mucosal and submucosal cancers (1–500 µm invasion) without risk factors have a low incidence of metastasis and may thus be good candidates for endoscopic resection.

Background Currently, no classification system using magnification endoscopy for the diagnosis of superficial Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia has been widely accepted. This nationwide multicenter study aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of the magnification endoscopy classification system, including the diagnostic flowchart developed by the Japan Esophageal Society—Barrett’s esophagus working group (JES-BE) for superficial Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasms. Methods The JES-BE acquired high-definition magnification narrow-band imaging (HM-NBI) images of non-dysplastic and dysplastic BE from 10 domestic institutions. A total of 186 high-quality HM-NBI images were selected. Thirty images were used for the training phase and 156 for the validation (test) phase. We invited five non-experts and five expert reviewers. In the training phase, the reviewers discussed how to correctly predict the histology based on the JES-BE criteria. In the validation phase, they evaluated whether the criteria accurately predicted the histology results according to the diagnostic flowchart. The validation phase was performed immediately after the training phase and at 6 weeks thereafter. Results The sensitivity and specificity for all reviewers were 87% and 97%, respectively. Overall accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91%, 98%, and 83%, respectively. The overall strength of inter-observer and intra-observer agreements for dysplastic histology prediction was κ  = 0.77 and κ  = 0.83, respectively. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility between experts and non-experts was found. Conclusion The JES-BE classification system, including the diagnostic flowchart for predicting dysplastic BE, is acceptable and reliable, regardless of the clinician’s experience level.

Aim and methods The Japan Esophageal Society created a working committee group consisting of 11 expert endoscopists and 2 pathologists with expertise in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The group developed a consensus-based classification for the diagnosis of superficial BE-related neoplasms using magnifying endoscopy. Results The classification has three characteristics: simplified, an easily understood classification by incorporating the diagnostic criteria for the early gastric cancer, including the white zone and demarcation line, and the presence of a modified flat pattern corresponding to non-dysplastic histology by adding novel diagnostic criteria. Magnifying endoscopic findings are composed of mucosal and vascular patterns, and are initially classified as “visible” or “invisible.” Morphologic features were evaluated for “visible” patterns, and were subsequently rated as “regular” or “irregular,” and the histology, non-dysplastic or dysplastic, was predicted. Conclusion We introduce the process and outline of the magnifying endoscopic classification.

BackgroundEndoscopic resection (ER) is a minimally invasive treatment for esophageal cancer that sometimes causes complications. To understand the real-world incidence and risk factors for these complications, a nationwide survey was conducted across Japan.MethodsThis retrospective multicenter study included patients who underwent ER for esophageal cancer from April 2017 to March 2018 (2017 complication analysis) and April 2021 to March 2022 (2021 complication analysis). The study assessed the complication rates and conducted risk factor analyses for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using data for these patients, with exclusions based on specific criteria to ensure data accuracy.ResultsIn the 2021 complication analysis, there were two mortalities highly likely attributable (0.03%) to ER and one mortality possibly attributable (0.01%) to ER. Intraoperative perforation, delayed bleeding, and pneumonia occurred in 137 cases (1.8%), 44 cases (0.6%), and 130 cases (1.7%), respectively. In the multivariate analysis for complications after ESD, low ER volume of the facility was an independent risk factor for perforation, while lesion location in the cervical or upper thoracic esophagus was an independent factor for reduced risk of perforation. Age ≥ 80 years was a risk factor for pneumonia, while use of traction techniques was a factor for reduced risk of pneumonia. Lesions located in the middle thoracic esophagus had a lower risk of stricture, and the risk of stricture increased as the circumferential extent of the lesion increased.ConclusionsThis large-scale study provided detailed insights into the complications associated with esophageal ER and identified significant risk factors.

Background Accurate evaluation of tumor invasion depth is essential to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with superficial esophageal cancer. The pretreatment tumor depth diagnosis currently relies on the magnifying endoscopic classification established by the Japan Esophageal Society (JES). However, the diagnostic accuracy of tumors involving the muscularis mucosa (MM) or those invading the upper third of the submucosal layer (SM1), which correspond to Type B2 vessels in the JES classification, remains insufficient. Previous retrospective studies have reported improved accuracy by considering additional findings, such as the size and macroscopic type of the Type B2 vessel area, in evaluating tumor invasion depth. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether incorporating the size and/or macroscopic type of the Type B2 vessel area improves the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tumor invasion depth prediction based on the JES classification. Methods This multicenter prospective observational study will include patients diagnosed with MM/SM1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the Type B2 vessels of the JES classification. The tumor invasion depth will be evaluated using both the standard JES classification (standard-depth evaluation) and the JES classification with additional findings (hypothetical-depth evaluation) for the same set of patients. Data from both endoscopic depth evaluations will be electronically collected and stored in a cloud-based database before endoscopic resection or esophagectomy. This study’s primary endpoint is accuracy, defined as the proportion of cases in which the preoperative depth diagnosis matched the histological depth diagnosis after resection. Outcomes of standard- and hypothetical-depth evaluation will be compared. Discussion Collecting reliable prospective data on the JES classification, explicitly concerning the B2 vessel category, has the potential to provide valuable insights. Incorporating additional findings into the in-depth evaluation process may guide clinical decision-making and promote evidence-based medicine practices in managing superficial esophageal cancer. Trial registration This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN-CTR) under the identifier UMIN000051145, registered on 23/5/2023.

BackgroundWe previously developed a Japan Esophageal Society Barrett’s Esophagus (JES-BE) magnifying endoscopic classification for superficial BE-related neoplasms (BERN) and validated it in a nationwide multicenter study that followed a diagnostic flow chart based on mucosal and vascular patterns (MP, VP) with nine diagnostic criteria. Our present post hoc analysis aims to further simplify the diagnostic criteria for superficial BERN.MethodsWe used data from our previous study, including 10 reviewers’ assessments for 156 images of high-magnifying narrow-band imaging (HM-NBI) (67 dysplastic and 89 non-dysplastic histology). We statistically analyzed the diagnostic performance of each diagnostic criterion of MP (form, size, arrangement, density, and white zone), VP (form, caliber change, location, and greenish thick vessels [GTV]), and all their combinations to achieve a simpler diagnostic algorithm to detect superficial BERN.ResultsDiagnostic accuracy values based on the MP of each single criterion or combined criteria showed a marked trend of being higher than those based on VP. In reviewers’ assessments of visible MPs, the combination of irregularity for form, size, or white zone had the highest diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 91% for dysplastic histology; in the assessments of invisible MPs, GTV had the highest diagnostic performance among the VP of each single criterion and all combinations of two or more criteria (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 92%).ConclusionThe present post hoc analysis suggests the feasibility of further simplifying the diagnostic algorithm of the JES-BE classification. Further studies in a practical setting are required to validate these results.

BackgroundAlthough additional treatment is considered for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) invading into the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (pT1b-SM) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the actual benefits of this method remain to be elucidated.AimsWe aimed to evaluate the prognostic benefits of additional treatment in such patients.MethodsBetween 2006 and 2017, we enrolled patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM ESCC after ESD at 21 institutions in Japan. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between the additional treatment and follow-up groups after propensity score matching, to reduce the bias of baseline characteristics. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the pathological findings: category A, pT1a-MM but negative for lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and vertical margin (VM); category B, tumor invasion into the submucosa ≤ 200 μm but negative for LVI and VM; category C, others.ResultsOf 593 patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM ESCC after ESD, 101 matched pairs were extracted after propensity score matching. The OSs were similar between the additional treatment and follow-up groups (80.6% vs. 78.6% in 5 years; P = 0.972). In a subgroup analysis, the OS in the additional treatment group was significantly lower than that in the follow-up group (65.7% vs. 95.2% in 5 years; P = 0.037) in category A, whereas OS did not significantly differ in category C (76.8% vs. 69.5% in 5 years; P = 0.360).ConclusionsAdditional treatment after ESD in patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM ESCC was not associated with an improved prognosis.