Explore the vast range of titles available.

INTRODUCTION:The comparative effectiveness of upadacitinib and tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis (UC) is poorly understood.METHODS:In this retrospective cohort study, we compared steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) and endoscopic response/remission at 52 weeks among adults initiating upadacitinib or tofacitinib for UC.RESULTS:A total of 155 patients initiated upadacitinib (n = 81; 30% prior tofacitinib exposure) or tofacitinib (n = 74; 0% prior upadacitinib exposure). After inverse probability of treatment-weighted logistic regression, upadacitinib was associated with significantly higher odds of SFCR (odds ratio 3.01, 95% confidence interval 1.39-6.55) vs tofacitinib. There were no differences for endoscopic response/remission.DISCUSSION:Upadacitinib was more effective at achieving SFCR in UC at 52 weeks vs tofacitinib.

Lay Summary In this case series, 6 patients with chronic pouchitis (n = 3), cuffitis (n = 2), or Crohn’s-like disease of the pouch (n = 1) were treated with tofacitinib. One patient achieved clinical response; however, all patients ultimately discontinued therapy due to nonresponse or adverse events.

There exists a significant care gap in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in Latin America compared to the United States and Europe. This review aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of advanced therapies for patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) in Latin America. We conducted a targeted literature review of studies reporting clinical outcomes of advanced IBD therapies in Latin American countries. After applying pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 articles were included. Data were extracted regarding patient populations, therapeutic agents, clinical outcomes, and geographic distribution. The majority of studies focused on biologic therapies, including adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab. These therapies demonstrated favorable clinical remission and response rates in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Colombia for both UC and CD. Reported outcomes were largely consistent with observational data from North America and Europe, supporting the generalizability of therapeutic efficacy across regions. Advanced therapies for IBD appear to be effective in Latin American populations, with clinical outcomes comparable to those reported globally. Increasing access to these treatments may improve patient outcomes, reduce disease burden, and potentially decrease long-term healthcare costs in the region.

The disease activity of axSpA after initiating anti-TNF agents for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is poorly understood. We sought to examine the disease activity of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) after initiation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents among patients with IBD. This retrospective cohort study included adults with IBD and axSpA who initiated anti-TNF agents between 1/1/2012-10/1/2021 at a large academic center. The primary outcome was symptom resolution (SR) of axSpA at 12 months (“0/10 pain” or “no pain” or “controlled pain” with no morning stiffness and no use of daily NSAIDs). The secondary outcome was clinical remission (CR) of IBD at 12 months (simple clinical colitis activity index <3, Harvey-Bradshaw Index <5, or provider assessment with no use of oral/IV steroids for 30 days). Associations between baseline characteristics and SR of axSpA were examined using logistic regression. 82 patients with axSpA and IBD initiated anti-TNF agents. At 12 months, 52% and 74% achieved SR of axSpA and CR of IBD, respectively. IBD duration <5 years (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.5) and adalimumab use (reference: all other anti-TNFs; OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.002-7.1) were associated with SR of axSpA at 12 months. 52% of patients with axSpA and IBD achieved SR of axSpA at 12 months after initiating anti-TNF therapy. Shorter disease duration and adalimumab use may be associated with higher odds of SR. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings, examine additional clinical predictors of SR, and identify more effective therapeutics for this population.

Abstract Background Many patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who lose response to the standard ustekinumab dose interval of every 8 weeks (q8w) undergo dose intensification to q4w or q6w. However, baseline factors that predict success or failure after dose intensification are unknown. We sought to identify predictors of failure of ustekinumab after dose intensification for patients with CD. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adult CD patients undergoing ustekinumab dose intensification at a tertiary referral center between January 1, 2016, and January 31, 2019. Electronic health records were reviewed to obtain patient demographics, CD history, and laboratory data. The primary outcome was failure to achieve corticosteroid-free remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index <5) within 12 months after intensification. The secondary outcome assessed was time to new biologic therapy after dose intensification. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression to identify predictors of these outcomes. Results We included 123 patients who underwent ustekinumab dose intensification to q4w (n = 64), q5w (n = 1), q6w (n = 55), or q7w (n = 3). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that perianal disease, Harvey-Bradshaw Index, and opioid use at time of intensification were associated with failure to achieve remission. Cox regression demonstrated that perianal disease and corticosteroid use at time of intensification were associated with shorter time to a new biologic. Conclusion Perianal disease, Harvey-Bradshaw Index, current opioid use, and current corticosteroid use are associated with ustekinumab failure after dose intensification in CD. Larger, prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings and guide therapeutic strategies for patients who lose response to standard ustekinumab dosing.