Explore the vast range of titles available.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) carry a high risk of fatal rupture, necessitating improved preoperative risk stratification. This study evaluates the predictive value of systemic risk scores—specifically the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)—for in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and one-year mortality in patients undergoing elective ascending aortic surgery. The study further compares MELD variants (MELD-Na and MELD-XI) for their prognostic performance in this context. This retrospective single-center study analyzed digital medical records of 500 patients undergoing elective surgery for ascending thoracic aortic disease between 2003 and 2023. MELD, MELD-Na (incorporating sodium), and MELD-XI (excluding INR for anticoagulated patients) were calculated from preoperative laboratory data. The CCI was derived from documented comorbidities. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (from admission to discharge), and one-year mortality assessed via outpatient follow-up. The study excluded patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. MELD-Na incorporates serum sodium, while MELD-XI is a variant that excludes INR for patients with anticoagulation. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was derived from patients’ medical histories prior to surgery. Length of stay was defined as total inpatient days between admission and discharge. One-year mortality was assessed via outpatient follow-up data. Loss to follow-up did not exceed 30%. Of 500 patients (median age 64 years, 72.8% male), the MELD-Na score showed the strongest ability to predict in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.698), outperforming both the standard MELD (AUC = 0.690) and the age-adjusted CCI (AUC = 0.631). For one-year mortality (N = 355), MELD-Na again performed best (AUC = 0.732), while the unadjusted CCI showed minimal predictive value (AUC = 0.509). Predictive power for hospital length of stay was limited across all scores; the age-adjusted CCI achieved the highest, though modest, discrimination (AUC = 0.627). 1-year mortality was assessed in 355 patients with available follow-up data (29.0% lost to follow-up). Among these, non-survivors had significantly higher MELD scores (p < 0.001). MELD-Na demonstrated the strongest predictive performance (AUC = 0.732). The MELD score, particularly MELD-Na, demonstrated strong predictive ability for in-hospital and 1-year mortality, but showed limited value in estimating hospital stay duration. MELD-Na and the age-adjusted CCI provide valuable preoperative prognostic information for patients undergoing elective ascending aortic surgery. While not intended to replace established risk models, their simplicity and reliance on routine clinical data make them attractive tools for early triage, especially in older or multimorbid patients. Their integration into preoperative planning may enhance individualized risk assessment and resource allocation.

IntroductionPostmortem multi-detector computed tomography (PMCT) has become an important part in forensic imaging. Modern reconstruction techniques such as iterative reconstruction (IR) are frequently used in postmortem CT angiography (PMCTA). The image quality of PMCTA depends on the strength of IR. For this purpose, we aimed to investigate the impact of different advanced IR levels on the objective and subjective PMCTA image quality.Material and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the coronary arteries of 27 human cadavers undergoing whole-body postmortem CT angiography between July 2017 and March 2018 in a single center. Iterative reconstructions of the coronary arteries were processed in five different level settings (0%; 30%; 50%; 70%; 100%) by using an adaptive statistical IR method. We evaluated the objective (contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) and subjective image quality in several anatomical locations.ResultsOur results demonstrate that the increasing levels of an IR technique have relevant impact on the image quality in PMCTA scans in forensic postmortem examinations. Higher levels of IR have led to a significant reduction of image noise and therefore to a significant improvement of objective image quality (+ 70%). However, subjective image quality is inferior at higher levels of IR due to plasticized image appearance.ConclusionObjective image quality in PMCTA progressively improves with increasing level of IR with the best CNR at the highest IR level. However, subjective image quality is best at low to medium levels of IR. To obtain a “classic” image appearance with optimal image quality, PMCTAs should be reconstructed at medium levels of IR.

Purpose Cardiac surgery patients require chest drains for postoperative fluid drainage. Innovations in this field include chemical drain coating and manual clot extraction systems, aiming to provide reduced clotting and improved patient comfort. This study compares outcomes using hydrogel-coated, active clearance and conventional chest drains. Methods Patients with cardiac surgery at our institution from January 2023 to September 2023 were included. Drain allocation was based on surgeon’s choice, with either a combination of hydrogel-coated and conventional, active clearance and conventional, or conventional drains alone. Drain data and clinical outcomes were recorded prospectively. Results One hundred seventy-eight patients (62.9 ± 11.7 years, 67.4% male) received a total of 512 chest drains intraoperatively. Hydrogel-coated and active clearance drains showed higher drainage volumes than conventional drains ( p  < 0.001, respectively). Patency was lowest in conventional drains (36.7% vs. 98.8% for hydrogel-coated, p  < 0.001, and vs. 96.6% for active clearance drains, p  < 0.001). Conventional drains showed 5.9 times the odds (95% CI 2.0–25.2) of large pleural effusions compared to hydrogel-coated and 12.0 times the odds (95% CI 1.9–504.1) compared to active clearance drains. Patients with hydrogel-coated drains had the shortest length of stay ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion Hydrogel-coated and active clearance drains show improved outcomes compared to conventional drains in cardiac surgery.

Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an established treatment for end-stage left ventricular heart failure. Parameters are needed to identify the most appropriate patients for LVADs. This study aimed to evaluate pectoral muscle mass and density as prognostic parameters. Methods This single-center study included all patients with LVAD implantation between January 2010 and October 2017 and a preoperative chest CT scan. Pectoral muscle mass was assessed using the Pectoralis Muscle Index (PMI, surface area indexed to height, cm 2 /m 2 ) and pectoral muscle density by Hounsfield Units (HU). Overall mortality was analyzed with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and 1-year and 3-year mortality with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox regression models. Results 57 patients (89.5% male, mean age 57.8 years) were included. 64.9% of patients had end-stage left ventricular failure due to ischemic heart disease and 35.1% due to dilated cardiomyopathy. 49.2% of patients had preoperative INTERMACS profile of 1 or 2 and 33.3% received mechanical circulatory support prior to LVAD implantation. Total mean PMI was 4.7 cm 2 /m 2 (± 1.6), overall HU of the major pectoral muscle was 39.0 (± 14.9) and of the minor pectoral muscle 37.1 (± 16.6). Mean follow-up was 2.8 years (± 0.2). Mortality rates were 37.5% at 1 year and 48.0% at 3 years. Neither PMI nor HU were significantly associated with overall mortality at 1-year or 3-year. Conclusions The results of our study do not confirm the association between higher pectoral muscle mass and better survival after LVAD implantation previously described in the literature.

Objectives: The need for concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during acute type A aortic dissection repair is common and associated with high mortality. This study aims to characterize the patient cohort, assess outcomes, and evaluate the role of preoperative diagnostics in these high-risk patients. Methods: Patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass and acute type A aortic dissection repair between March 2007 and June 2023 were included. In-hospital survivors and non-survivors were compared. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. Preoperative computed tomography scans were independently reviewed by a cardiovascular radiologist to assess potential coronary involvement. The agreement between computed tomography and intraoperative reports of coronary dissection was evaluated using Cohen’s κappa test. Results: The cohort consisted of ninety-eight patients. In-hospital mortality was 26.5% (n = 26). The right coronary artery was the most frequently grafted (57%, n = 56). Elevated preoperative creatine kinase was the only predictor of in-hospital mortality (p = 0.044). Of the 72 available preoperative CT scans, 76% (n = 55) indicated coronary involvement, whereas intraoperative coronary dissection requiring bypass grafting was documented in only 42% (n = 30)). The agreement between computer tomography and intraoperative dissection reports was poor (κappa 0.043 (95% CI, −0.155 to 0.241), p = 0.66). Conclusion: Simultaneous coronary artery bypass during acute type A aortic dissection repair remains associated with high mortality and morbidity. The right coronary artery is most often affected. Coronary bypass is not always linked to coronary dissection, making intraoperative detection challenging. This underscores the importance of preoperative diagnostics, especially computer tomography.

Aim: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is resource-intensive, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and requires careful patient selection. This study examined whether the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is a suitable predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively assessed patients with COVID-19 on ECMO at our institution from March 2020 to May 2021. MELD scoring was performed using laboratory values recorded prior to ECMO initiation. A multiple logistic regression model was established. Results: A total of 66 patients with COVID-19 on ECMO were included (median age of 58.5 years; 83.3% male). The in-hospital mortality was 74.2%. In relation to mortality, patients with MELD Na scores >13.8 showed 6.5-fold higher odds, patients aged >53.5 years showed 18.4-fold higher odds, and male patients showed 15.9-fold higher odds. The predictive power of a model combining the MELD Na with age and sex was significant (AUC = 0.883, p < 0.001). The findings in the COVID-19 patients were not generalizable to a group of non-COVID-19 patients on ECMO. Conclusions: A model combining the MELD Na, age, and sex has high predictive power for in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 on ECMO, and it may be clinically useful for guiding patient selection in critically ill COVID-19 patients both now and in the future, should the virus widely re-emerge.

OBJECTIVES Perioperative mortality and complications still remain high after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, especially in highly compromised patient cohorts. Here, we evaluate the effects of preoperative Levosimendan therapy on peri- and postoperative outcomes after LVAD implantation. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 224 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation for end-stage heart failure between November 2010 and December 2019 in our centre with regard to short- and longer-term mortality as well as incidence of postoperative right ventricular failure (RV-F). Out of these, 117 (52.2%) received preoperative i.v. Levosimendan therapy within 7 days before LVAD implantation (Levo group). RESULTS In-hospital, 30-day and 5-year mortality was comparable (in-hospital mortality: 18.8% vs 23.4%, P = 0.40; 30-day mortality: 12.0% vs 14.0%, P = 0.65; Levo vs control group). However, in the multivariate analysis, preoperative Levosimendan therapy significantly reduced postoperative RV-F but increased postoperative vasoactive inotropic score ([RV-F: odds ratio 2.153, confidence interval 1.146–4.047, P = 0.017; vasoactive inotropic score 24 h post-surgery: odds ratio 1.023, confidence interval 1.008–1.038, P = 0.002). These results were further confirmed by 1:1 propensity score matching of 74 patients in each group. Especially in the subgroup of patients with normal preoperative RV function, the prevalence of postoperative RV-F was significantly lower in the Levo- group as compared to the control group (17.6% vs 31.1%, P = 0.03; respectively). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative Levosimendan therapy reduces the risk of postoperative RV-F, especially in patients with normal preoperative RV function without effects on mortality up to 5 years after LVAD implantation. The introduction of the newest generation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has further increased survival in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) requiring long-term mechanical circulatory support either as bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy [1].

OBJECTIVES Heart transplantation after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains challenging. It is still unclear whether its support duration impacts the outcome after transplantation. METHODS All patients undergoing heart transplantation between 2010 and 2021 at a single department after previous left ventricular assistance were retrospectively reviewed and divided into 4 different study groups with regard to the duration of LVAD support to examine the impact on the postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS A total of n = 198 patients were included and assigned to the 4 study groups (group 1: <90 days, n = 14; group 2: 90 days to 1 year, n = 31; group 3: 1–2 years, n = 29; group 4: >2 years, n = 24). Although there were no differences between the 4 groups concerning relevant mismatch between the recipients and donors, the incidence of primary graft dysfunction was numerically increased in patients with the shortest support duration, and also those patients with >1 year of support (group 1: 35.7%, group 2: 25.8%, group 3: 41.4%, group 4: 37.5%, P = 0.63). The incidence of acute graft rejection was by trend increased in patients of group 1 (group 1: 28.6%, group 2: 3.3%, group 3: 7.1%, group 4: 12.5%, P = 0.06). Duration of LVAD support did not impact on perioperative adverse events (infections, P = 0.79; acute kidney injury, P = 0.85; neurological events, P = 0.74; thoracic bleeding, P = 0.61), neither on postoperative survival (1-year survival: group 1: 78.6%, group 2: 66.7%, group 3: 80.0%, group 4: 72.7%, P = 0.74). CONCLUSION We cannot identify a significant impact of the duration of pretransplant LVAD support on postoperative outcome; therefore, we cannot recommend a certain timeframe for transplantation of LVAD patients.

Acute type‐A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndromes represents challenging cases and should always be treated on an interdisciplinary basis, whereby interventional radiologic therapy can be a successful procedure, especially in patients who are not fit for surgery.

Objective Chronic totally occluded right coronary artery (CTO-RCA) often poses a problem in decision making for/against bypass grafting due to the lack of standardized indication criteria. The aim of the study was to investigate whether qualitative angiograms can be useful in decision making for/against surgical revascularization of CTO-RCA. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 69 patients who underwent elective CABG procedure, including single graft to the RCA. The distal run-off of the bypassed RCA was measured intraoperatively using the ultrasonic transit-time method. As a primary endpoint of the study, the flow values were analysed in regard to diameter of the recipient artery. As a secondary endpoint, the correlations between the regional and global LV function, Rentrop grading, type of collateral pathway, number of donor sources, comorbidity, and the graft flow and the diameter of the recipient artery were investigated using uni- and multi-variate regression analyses. Results In general, the flow values correlated significantly with the diameter of the recipient artery. Significantly lower flow ( p  < 0.0001) and diameter values ( p  < 0.05) were found in hypo/akinetic and infarcted area reflecting functionality of the CTO-RCA territory. Conclusions The qualitative angiograms combined with regional wall motion studies can be useful in decision making for revascularization of CTO-RCA. Revascularization of akinetic/infarcted CTO-RCA territory is associated with lower graft flows even in patients presented with high Rentrop class and high degree of collaterality, suggesting necessity of viability tests prior to bypass surgery.