Explore the vast range of titles available.

Using a standardized instrument to evaluate patients' stress reactions has become more important in daily clinical routines. Different signs or symptoms of stress are often unilaterally explored: the physiological, psychological or social aspects of stress disorders are each viewed on a single dimension. However, all dimensions afflict patients who have persistent health problems due to chronic stress. Therefore, it is important to use a multidimensional approach to acquire data. The 'Psycho-Physiological-Stress-Test' (PPST) was established to achieve a comprehensive understanding of stress and was further developed at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin in collaboration with the Psychological Department of Freie Universität Berlin. The PPST includes a series of varying stress phases, embedded in two periods of rest. Physiological and psychological parameters are simultaneously measured throughout the test session. Specifically, the PPST activates the sympathetic stress axis, which is measured by heart rate, blood pressure, respiration depth and rate, electro dermal activation and muscle tension (frontalis, masseter, trapezius). Psychological data are simultaneously collected, and include performance, motivation, emotion and behavior. After conducting this diagnostic test, it is possible to identify individual stress patterns that can be discussed with the individual patient to develop and recommend (outpatient) treatment strategies. This paper introduces the PPST as a standardized way to evaluate stress reactions by presenting the results from a sample of psychosomatic inpatients (n = 139) who were treated in Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. We observed that the varying testing conditions provoked adjusted changes in the different physiological parameters and psychological levels.

Adjustment disorders are re-conceptualized in the DSM-5 as a stress-related disorder; however, besides the impact of an identifiable stressor, the specification of a stress concept, remains unclear. This study is the first to examine an existing stress-model from the general population, in patients diagnosed with adjustment disorders, using a longitudinal design. The study sample consisted of 108 patients consecutively admitted for adjustment disorders. Associations of stress perception, emotional distress, resources, and mental health were measured at three time points: the outpatients' presentation, admission for inpatient treatment, and discharge from the hospital. To evaluate a longitudinal stress model of ADs, we examined whether stress at admission predicted mental health at each of the three time points using multiple linear regressions and structural equation modeling. A series of repeated-measures one-way analyses of variance (rANOVAs) was performed to assess change over time. Significant within-participant changes from baseline were observed between hospital admission and discharge with regard to mental health, stress perception, and emotional distress (p<0.001). Stress perception explained nearly half of the total variance (44%) of mental health at baseline; the adjusted R2 increased (0.48), taking emotional distress (i.e., depressive symptoms) into account. The best predictor of mental health at discharge was the level of emotional distress (i.e., anxiety level) at baseline (β= -0.23, R2corr=0.56, p<0.001). With a CFI of 0.86 and an NFI of 0.86, the fit indices did not allow for acceptance of the stress-model (Cmin/df=15.26; RMSEA=0.21). Stress perception is an important predictor in adjustment disorders, and mental health-related treatment goals are dependent on and significantly impacted by stress perception and emotional distress.

In recent years, interest in digital technologies such as electronic health, mobile health, telemedicine, big data, and health apps has been increasing in the health care sector. Acceptance and sustainability of these technologies play a considerable role for innovative health care apps. This study aimed to identify the spread of and experience with new digital technologies in the medical sector in Germany. We analyzed the acceptance of new health care technologies by applying the Technology Acceptance Model to data obtained in the German ePatient Survey 2018. This survey used standardized questionnaires to gain insight into the prevalence, impact, and development of digital health applications in a study sample of 9621 patients with acute and chronic conditions and healthy users. We extracted sociodemographic data and details on the different health app types used in Germany and conducted an evaluation based on the Technology Acceptance Model. The average age of the respondents was 59.7 years, with a standard deviation of 16 years. Digital health care apps were generally accepted, but differences were observed among age groups and genders of the respondents. Men were more likely to accept digital technologies, while women preferred coaching and consultation apps. Analysis of the user typology revealed that most users were patients (n=4041, 42%), followed by patients with acute conditions (n=3175, 33%), and healthy users (n=2405, 25%). The majority (n=6542, 68%) discovered coaching or medication apps themselves on the internet, while more than half of the users faced initial difficulties operating such apps. The time of use of the same app or program ranged from a few days (n=1607, 37%) and several months (n=1694, 39%) to ≥1 year (n=1042, 24%). Most respondents (n=6927, 72%) stated that they would like to receive customized health care apps from their physician. The acceptance of digital technologies in the German health care sector varies depending on age and gender. The broad acceptance of medical digital apps could potentially improve individualized health care solutions and warrants governance.

Objectives This study developed and tested a research model that examined the effects of working conditions and individual resources on work–family conflict (WFC) using data collected from physicians working at German clinics. Material and methods This is a cross-sectional study of 727 physicians working in German hospitals. The work environment, WFC and individual resources were measured by the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire, the WFC Scale, the Brief Resilient Coping Scale and the Questionnaire for Self-efficacy, Optimism and Pessimism. Descriptive, correlation and linear regression analyses were applied. Results Clinical doctors working in German hospitals perceived high levels of WFC (mean=76). Sociodemographic differences were found for age, marital status and presence of children with regard to WFC. No significant gender differences were found. WFCs were positively related to high workloads and quantitative job demands. Job resources (eg, influence at work, social support) and personal resources (eg, resilient coping behaviour and self-efficacy) were negatively associated with physicians’ WFCs. Interaction terms suggest that job and personal resources buffer the effects of job demands on WFC. Conclusions In this study, WFC was prevalent among German clinicians. Factors of work organisation as well as factors of interpersonal relations at work were identified as significant predictors for WFC. Our results give a strong indication that both individual and organisational factors are related to WFC. Results may play an important role in optimising clinical care. Practical implications for physicians’ career planning and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Acceptance of new medical technology may be influenced by social conditions and an individual’s background and particular situation. We studied this acceptance by hypothesizing that current and former COVID-19 patients would be more likely to accept an electrocardiogram (ECG) “patch” (attached to the chest) that allows continuous monitoring of the heart than individuals who did not have the disease and thus the respective experience. Currently infected COVID-19 patients, individuals who had recovered from COVID-19, and a control group were recruited online through Facebook (and Instagram) and through general practitioners (GPs). Demographic information and questions tailored to the problem were collected via an online questionnaire. An online survey was chosen in part because of the pandemic conditions, and Facebook was chosen because of the widespread discussions of health topics on that platform. The results confirmed the central hypothesis that people who had experienced a disease are more willing to accept new medical technologies and showed that curiosity about new technologies and willingness to use them were significantly higher in the two groups currently or previously affected by COVID-19, whereas fears of being “monitored” (in the sense of surveillance) were significantly higher among people who had not experienced the disease and threat. Experiencing a serious disease (“patient experience”) promotes acceptance of new medical technologies.

Using a standardized instrument to evaluate patients' stress reactions has become more important in daily clinical routines. Different signs or symptoms of stress are often unilaterally explored: the physiological, psychological or social aspects of stress disorders are each viewed on a single dimension. However, all dimensions afflict patients who have persistent health problems due to chronic stress. Therefore, it is important to use a multidimensional approach to acquire data. The 'Psycho-Physiological-Stress-Test' (PPST) was established to achieve a comprehensive understanding of stress and was further developed at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin in collaboration with the Psychological Department of Freie Universität Berlin. The PPST includes a series of varying stress phases, embedded in two periods of rest. Physiological and psychological parameters are simultaneously measured throughout the test session. Specifically, the PPST activates the sympathetic stress axis, which is measured by heart rate, blood pressure, respiration depth and rate, electro dermal activation and muscle tension (frontalis, masseter, trapezius). Psychological data are simultaneously collected, and include performance, motivation, emotion and behavior. After conducting this diagnostic test, it is possible to identify individual stress patterns that can be discussed with the individual patient to develop and recommend (outpatient) treatment strategies. This paper introduces the PPST as a standardized way to evaluate stress reactions by presenting the results from a sample of psychosomatic inpatients (n = 139) who were treated in Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. We observed that the varying testing conditions provoked adjusted changes in the different physiological parameters and psychological levels.

Within the BUSTER trial, we analyzed the surgeon’s amount of experience and other parameters associated with URS procedures regarding the stone-free rate, complication rate, and operative time. Patient characteristics and surgical details on 307 URS procedures were prospectively documented according to a standardized study protocol at 14 German centers 01–04/2015. Surgeon’s experience was correlated to clinical characteristics, and its impact on the stone-free rate, complication rate, and operative time subjected to multivariate analysis. 76 (25%), 66 (21%) and 165 (54%) of 307 URS procedures were carried out by residents, young specialists, and experienced specialists (> 5 years after board certification), respectively. Median stone size was 6 mm, median operative time 35 min. A ureteral stent was placed at the end of 82% of procedures. Stone-free rate and stone-free rate including minimal residual stone fragments (adequate for spontaneous clearance) following URS were 69 and 91%, respectively. No complications were documented during the hospital stays of 89% of patients (Clavien–Dindo grade 0). According to multivariate analysis, experienced specialists achieved a 2.2-fold higher stone-free rate compared to residents (p = 0.038), but used post-URS stenting 2.6-fold more frequently (p = 0.023). Surgeon’s experience had no significant impact on the complication rate. We observed no differences in this study’s main endpoints, namely the stone-free and complication rates, between residents and young specialists, but experienced specialists’ stone-free rate was significantly higher. During this cross-sectional study, 75% of URS procedures were performed by specialists. The experienced specialists’ more than two-fold higher stone-free rate compared to residents’ justifies ongoing efforts to establish structured URS training programs.

We report about a 19-year-old female patient with diabetes mellitus type 1 and severe anorexia, who presented with life-threatening unstable metabolic imbalance. It is illustrated how these two illnesses interfere and influence each other and how they may be used to express two central conflicts, which are described in the Operationalizing Psychodynamic Diagnoses (OPD). This paper describes in particular the significant role of the psychotherapist who has to manage the conflicting emotions of the patient. Furthermore, the dilemma in the treatment is also discussed. On the one hand there is the attitude that treatment should be based on dialogue, care and understanding, yet on the other hand the treatment options should not be discussed with the patients. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501366

SummaryBackgroundDespite the high utilisation of ureterorenoscopy (URS) in interventional stone treatment, there is little evidence of any link between annual hospital volume and outcome.MethodsFrom January to April 2015, data from 307 URS patients were prospectively recorded in the multicentre observational BUSTER-Trial (Benchmarks of ureterorenoscopic stone treatment-results in terms of complications, quality of life, and stone-free rates). The best threshold value for annual hospital volume with an independent effect on the outcome (measured on stone-free and complication rates) of our study group was established with logistic regression.ResultsIn 38.4% of cases of renal and 61.6% of ureteral stones, median stone size was 6 mm with an interquartile range (IQR) of 4–8 mm. The annual URS rate in the 14 participating hospitals ranged from 77 to 333 (median 144; IQR 109–208). The binary endpoint as a combination of completely stone-free or residual fragments small enough to pass spontaneously and a maximum complication severity of Clavien–Dindo grade 1 was attained in 234/252 (92.9%) cases with a hospital volume of ≥ 99 URS compared with 43/55 (78.2%) in < 99 URS (p = 0.002). Adjusted for patient-, stone- and physician-related factors, an annual hospital URS volume of ≥ 99 increases the chance of an optimum outcome (OR = 3.92; 95% CI 1.46–10.51; p = 0.007).ConclusionsAn independent effect of URS hospital volume on outcome quality in the 14 participating hospitals was demonstrated. Threshold values for annual case numbers should be scientifically established irrespective of the considered procedure.

Background The introduction of efficiency-oriented provider payment systems in inpatient mental healthcare in various Western countries may lead to the use of less healthcare resources in the treatment of patients. To avoid unintended effects on quality of care that may result from reductions in resource utilization, it is essential for decision and policy makers to know whether there is a trade-off between costs and quality of care. Aim of the Study The aim of this study was to investigate and quantify the relationship between costs and outcomes in psychosomatic inpatients with somatoform pain disorder. Methods The inclusion criteria for patient selection ( n  = 101) were (i) a main diagnosis of somatoform pain disorder according to International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) [F45.4, F45.40, F45.41]; (ii) complete data on the mental component summary reflecting overall functioning of mental health (MCS-8) measured with the Short Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8) within 3 days of the admission and discharge dates; and (iii) treatment at Charité Universitaetsmedizin (Berlin, Germany) during the period January 2006–June 2010. The change in the MCS-8 score incurred over the treatment period was used as an indicator of quality of care. Treatment costs were calculated from the provider’s perspective, mainly using bottom-up micro-costing. The year of valuation for cost calculation was 2008 (with no inflation adjustment); for costs provided by the accounting department for services consumed by the patient, the valuation year was based on the year of service provision. We hypothesized that the outcome ‘change in MCS-8 score’ was a function of the independent variable costs, patient characteristics, socio-demographic variables, pain-related variables, co-morbidities and subjective illness attribution, i.e. whether patients attributed the origin of pain mainly to a somatic cause or not. An interaction term between costs and illness attribution was included to control for the hypothesized differing effects of resource input or costs on the outcome variable conditional on patients’ illness attribution. Hausman tests indicated that endogeneity was not present, thus, ordinary least squares regression (OLS) was conducted. We assessed whether the change in the MCS-8 score was clinically meaningful and perceptible by the patient, using the minimal clinical important difference (MCID). For Short Form Health Surveys, the MCID for changes in the mental component summary is typically around 3 points. Results We found a trade-off between costs and outcome for patients without or with only minor somatic illness attribution (77 % of the sample). This patient group improved 0.4 points in outcome after every 100 € increase in total costs per case ( F 1,77  = 13.836, t (77) = 3.72, p  = 0.0004). For patients with mainly somatic illness beliefs (23 % of the sample), we did not find a trade-off between costs and outcome. Conclusion For the majority of patients, we found a trade-off between costs and health outcome, thus, it seems advisable to carefully monitor outcome parameters when applying cost containment measures.