Explore the vast range of titles available.

In 2019 the Canadian Space Agency initiated development of a dedicated wildfire monitoring satellite (WildFireSat) mission. The intent of this mission is to support operational wildfire management, smoke and air quality forecasting, and wildfire carbon emissions reporting. In order to deliver the mission objectives, it was necessary to identify the technical and operational challenges which have prevented broad exploitation of Earth Observation (EO) in Canadian wildfire management and to address these challenges in the mission design. In this study we emphasize the first objective by documenting the results of wildfire management end-user engagement activities which were used to identify the key Fire Management Functionalities (FMFs) required for an Earth Observation wildfire monitoring system. These FMFs are then used to define the User Requirements for the Canadian Wildland Fire Monitoring System (CWFMS) which are refined here for the WildFireSat mission. The User Requirements are divided into Observational, Measurement, and Precision requirements and form the foundation for the design of the WildFireSat mission (currently in Phase-A, summer 2020).

FireWork is an on-line, one-way coupled meteorology–chemistry model based on near-real-time wildfire emissions. It was developed by Environment and Climate Change Canada to deliver operational real-time forecasts of biomass-burning pollutants, in particular fine particulate matter (PM2.5), over North America. Such forecasts provide guidance for early air quality alerts that could reduce air pollution exposure and protect human health. A multi-year (2013–2016) analysis of FireWork forecasts over a five-month period (May to September) was conducted. This work used an archive of FireWork outputs to quantify wildfire contributions to total PM2.5 surface concentrations across North America. Different concentration thresholds (0.2 to 28 µg/m3) and averaging periods (24 h to five months) were considered. Analysis suggested that, on average over the fire season, 76% of Canadians and 69% of Americans were affected by seasonal wildfire-related PM2.5 concentrations above 0.2 µg/m3. These effects were particularly pronounced in July and August. Futhermore, the analysis showed that fire emissions contributed more than 1 µg/m3 of daily average PM2.5 concentrations on more than 30% of days in the western USA and northwestern Canada during the fire season.

A previous intercomparison of atmospheric mercury models in North America has been extended to compare simulated and observed wet deposition of mercury. Three regional‐scale atmospheric mercury models were tested: the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, the Regional Modeling System for Aerosols and Deposition (REMSAD), and the Trace Element Analysis Model (TEAM). These models were each employed using three sets of lateral boundary conditions to test their sensitivity to intercontinental transport of mercury. The same meteorological and pollutant emission data were used in each simulation. Observations of wet deposition were obtained from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program's Mercury Deposition Network. The regional models can explain 50–70% of the site‐to‐site variance in annual mercury wet deposition. CMAQ was found to have slightly superior agreement with observations of annual mercury deposition flux in terms of the mean value for all monitoring sites, but REMSAD showed the best correlation when measured by the coefficient of determination (r2). With the exception of one CMAQ simulation, all of the models tended to simulate more wet deposition of mercury than was observed. TEAM exceeded the observed average annual wet deposition by 50% or more in all three of its simulations. CMAQ and REMSAD were better able to reproduce the observed seasonal distribution of mercury wet deposition than was TEAM, but TEAM showed the highest correlation for weekly wet deposition samples. An analysis of model accuracy at each observation site showed no obvious geographic patterns for correlation, bias, or error. Adjusting simulated mercury deposition on the basis of the difference between observed and simulated precipitation data improved the correlation and error scores for all of the models.