Explore the vast range of titles available.

There is growing interest in the complex relationship between the nervous and immune systems and how its alteration can affect homeostasis and result in the development of inflammatory diseases. A key mediator in cross-talk between the two systems is nerve growth factor (NGF), which can influence both neuronal cell function and immune cell activity. The up-regulation of NGF described in inflamed tissues of many diseases can regulate innervation and neuronal activity of peripheral neurons, inducing the release of immune-active neuropeptides and neurotransmitters, but can also directly influence innate and adaptive immune responses. Expression of the NGF receptors tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) and p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) is dynamically regulated in immune cells, suggesting a varying requirement for NGF depending on their state of differentiation and functional activity. NGF has a variety of effects that can be either pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory. This apparent contradiction can be explained by considering NGF as part of an endogenous mechanism that, while activating immune responses, also activates pathways necessary to dampen the inflammatory response and limit tissue damage. Decreases in TrkA expression, such as that recently demonstrated in immune cells of arthritis patients, might prevent the activation by NGF of regulatory feed-back mechanisms, thus contributing to the development and maintenance of chronic inflammation.

In 1973, IL-6 was identified as a soluble factor that is secreted by T cells and is important for antibody production by B cells. Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, the IL-6 pathway has emerged as a pivotal pathway involved in immune regulation in health and dysregulation in many diseases. Targeting of the IL-6 pathway has led to innovative therapeutic approaches for various rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still’s disease, giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis, as well as other conditions such as Castleman disease and cytokine release syndrome. Targeting this pathway has also identified avenues for potential expansion into several other indications, such as uveitis, neuromyelitis optica and, most recently, COVID-19 pneumonia. To mark the tenth anniversary of anti-IL-6 receptor therapy worldwide, we discuss the history of research into IL-6 biology and the development of therapies that target IL-6 signalling, including the successes and challenges and with an emphasis on rheumatic diseases.In this Perspective article, the authors recount the earliest stages of translational research into IL-6 biology and the subsequent development of therapeutic IL-6 pathway inhibitors for the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases and potentially numerous other indications.

Interferon-γ (IFNγ) is a pleiotropic cytokine with multiple effects on the inflammatory response and on innate and adaptive immunity. Overproduction of IFNγ underlies several, potentially fatal, hyperinflammatory or immune-mediated diseases. Several data from animal models and/or from translational research in patients point to a role of IFNγ in hyperinflammatory diseases, such as primary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, various forms of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, including macrophage activation syndrome, and cytokine release syndrome, all of which are often managed by rheumatologists or in consultation with rheumatologists. Given the effects of IFNγ on B cells and T follicular helper cells, a role for IFNγ in systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis is emerging. To improve our understanding of the role of IFNγ in human disease, IFNγ-related biomarkers that are relevant for the management of hyperinflammatory diseases are progressively being identified and studied, especially because circulating levels of IFNγ do not always reflect its overproduction in tissue. These biomarkers include STAT1 (specifically the phosphorylated form), neopterin and the chemokine CXCL9. IFNγ-neutralizing agents have shown efficacy in the treatment of primary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in clinical trials and initial promising results have been obtained in various forms of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, including macrophage activation syndrome. In clinical practice, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the usefulness of circulating CXCL9 levels as a biomarker reflecting IFNγ production.Interferon-γ (IFNγ) is important in innate and adaptive immunity and its overproduction is also implicated in hyperinflammation. Here, De Benedetti and colleagues discuss the evidence for a pathogenetic role of IFNγ in hyperinflammatory diseases, the search for IFNγ biomarkers, and the results of clinical trials of IFNγ-neutralizing therapeutics.

Key Points A 'cytokine storm' is the final pathophysiological pathway in macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and blocking various cytokines could be an attractive therapeutic strategy Standard doses of anti-IL-1 and anti-IL-6 biologic therapies do not have a major effect on MAS rates even if the underlying disease responds well to the treatment Several case reports suggest that anakinra might be effective at least in some patients with systemic juvenile idiophatic arthritis (sJIA)-associated MAS, particularly when used in high doses Findings from several studies support IFN-γ blockade as a novel therapy for haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH); increasing evidence suggests the same approach could be beneficial in MAS presenting as a complication of rheumatic diseases The exact mechanism of predisposition to MAS in sIJA is yet to be defined, but might be independent of underlying sJIA activity and similar to infection-associated secondary HLH Whole-exome/genome sequencing approaches exploring hypomorphic mutations that affect the cytolytic pathway to support this theory might reveal promising therapeutic alternatives Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a potentially fatal complication of rheumatic disease, most notably systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Findings from studies in animal models and from clinical observations, particularly in relation to the effects of anticytokine biologic therapies, have led to new concepts of the pathophysiology of this phenomenon. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) refers to acute overwhelming inflammation caused by a 'cytokine storm'. Although increasingly recognized as a life-threatening complication of various rheumatic diseases, clinically, MAS is strikingly similar to primary and secondary forms of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Not surprisingly, many rheumatologists prefer the term secondary HLH rather than MAS to describe this condition, and efforts to change the nomenclature are in progress. The pathophysiology of MAS remains elusive, but observations in animal models, as well as data on the effects of new anticytokine therapies on rates and clinical presentations of MAS in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), provide clues to the understanding of this perplexing clinical phenomenon. In this Review, we explore the latest available evidence and discuss potential diagnostic challenges in the era of increasing use of biologic therapies.

Primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, a rare genetic immune disorder characterized by hyperinflammation, manifests in infancy and is associated with high mortality. In a study involving 34 children, an antibody to interferon-γ (emapalumab) produced responses in 65%; it served as a bridge to marrow transplantation in 70% of those who had received previous treatment.

ObjectiveTo report the first case of a patient with refractory childhood-onset SLE successfully treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy.MethodsA single infusion of fresh, autologous second-generation anti-CD19 CAR-T product (lentivirus) manufactured on the Prodigy device was administered (1x106 CAR-T cells/kg).ResultsA female patient with one-year history of childhood-onset SLE presented at our attention at the age of 15 years with persistent clinical (hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, malar rash, class II/V lupus nephritis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension (PAH) and pericardial effusion) and serological (hypocomplementemia and high ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies) active disease. She received multiple treatments, including high-dose glucocorticoids (GC), hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate (MMF), rituximab and IV cyclophosphamide (CYC) without reaching remission. She was started on sildenafil and bosentan for PAH. She developed osteoporosis and hypertension secondary to GC therapy, and 2 severe systemic infections, requiring prolonged hospitalization. Anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy was considered and performed after lymphodepletion with CYC (1500mg/m2) and fludarabine (90mg/m2). Immunosuppressants (GC, MMF and hydroxychloroquine) were withdrawn before CAR-T therapy. After the CAR-T cell infusion, the patient presented fever, rash and pleural effusion as part of mild cytokine release syndrome (G1) and transient anemia (G2) and neutropenia (G3). No infection or neurotoxicity were observed. The CAR-T cells expanded significantly (peak at day 12, 52 cells/uL). Circulating B cells at baseline were 111 cells/uL. Complete blood B-cell depletion was achieved on day 7. Bone marrow aspirates at week 2 and 4 showed complete B-cell depletion. Urinalysis normalized at week 3. Complement levels normalized at week 6. ANA and anti-dsDNA titers significantly decreased (from 1:5120 and 1:1280 at baseline to 1:640 and 1:160 at week 8, respectively). A normal right ventricular systolic pressure and NT-ProBNP levels were found at week 2 and 6, allowing bosentan discontinuation. At time of CAR-T infusion, the SLEDAI-2K score was 22, which rapidly improved reaching a score of 2 at week 6 and 10. Patient was on persistent drug-free remission at last follow-up (week 10).ConclusionsIn this SLE patient with severe refractory disease, B-cell depletion and drug-free remission were rapidly achieved after anti-CD19 CAR-T cells infusion. Long-term efficacy assessment is needed.

The anti–interleukin-1 antibody canakinumab was effective at controlling and preventing recurrence of flares in autoimmune inflammatory diseases: familial Mediterranean fever, mevalonate kinase deficiency, and the TNF receptor–associated periodic syndrome.

BackgroundDifferent diagnostic and classification criteria are available for hereditary recurrent fevers (HRF)—familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS)—and for the non-hereditary, periodic fever, aphthosis, pharyngitis and adenitis (PFAPA). We aimed to develop and validate new evidence-based classification criteria for HRF/PFAPA.MethodsStep 1: selection of clinical, laboratory and genetic candidate variables; step 2: classification of 360 random patients from the Eurofever Registry by a panel of 25 clinicians and 8 geneticists blinded to patients’ diagnosis (consensus ≥80%); step 3: statistical analysis for the selection of the best candidate classification criteria; step 4: nominal group technique consensus conference with 33 panellists for the discussion and selection of the final classification criteria; step 5: cross-sectional validation of the novel criteria.ResultsThe panellists achieved consensus to classify 281 of 360 (78%) patients (32 CAPS, 36 FMF, 56 MKD, 37 PFAPA, 39 TRAPS, 81 undefined recurrent fever). Consensus was reached for two sets of criteria for each HRF, one including genetic and clinical variables, the other with clinical variables only, plus new criteria for PFAPA. The four HRF criteria demonstrated sensitivity of 0.94–1 and specificity of 0.95–1; for PFAPA, criteria sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.93, respectively. Validation of these criteria in an independent data set of 1018 patients shows a high accuracy (from 0.81 to 0.98).ConclusionEurofever proposes a novel set of validated classification criteria for HRF and PFAPA with high sensitivity and specificity.

Recent therapeutic advances in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have made remission an achievable goal for most patients. Reaching this target leads to improved outcomes. The objective was to develop recommendations for treating JIA to target. A Steering Committee formulated a set of recommendations based on evidence derived from a systematic literature review. These were subsequently discussed, amended and voted on by an international Task Force of 30 paediatric rheumatologists in a consensus-based, Delphi-like procedure. Although the literature review did not reveal trials that compared a treat-to-target approach with another or no strategy, it provided indirect evidence regarding an optimised approach to therapy that facilitated development of recommendations. The group agreed on six overarching principles and eight recommendations. The main treatment target, which should be based on a shared decision with parents/patients, was defined as remission, with the alternative target of low disease activity. The frequency and timeline of follow-up evaluations to ensure achievement and maintenance of the target depend on JIA category and level of disease activity. Additional recommendations emphasise the importance of ensuring adequate growth and development and avoiding long-term systemic glucocorticoid administration to maintain the target. All items were agreed on by more than 80% of the members of the Task Force. A research agenda was formulated. The Task Force developed recommendations for treating JIA to target, being aware that the evidence is not strong and needs to be expanded by future research. These recommendations can inform various stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes for JIA.

In a randomized trial involving children with severe systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab was effective (response rate, 85% with tocilizumab vs. 24% with placebo). Adverse events included serious infections and neutropenia. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterized by chronic arthritis, systemic manifestations (spiking fever, rash, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and serositis), and substantially elevated inflammatory markers. 1 It is the most severe subtype of JIA; approximately half the patients have an unremitting course of chronic polyarthritis (with or without persistent systemic features). Substantial joint damage and disability often develop in these patients. 2 , 3 Treatment remains challenging because of the limited efficacy of methotrexate 4 and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors 5 , 6 and because of the major toxicity of high-dose glucocorticoids. Efficacy of the interleukin-1 inhibitor anakinra has been reported in a subset of patients. 7 – . . .